Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Spectroscopic Supermassive Dark Star candidates

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that four spectroscopically confirmed high-redshift JADES objects are consistent with Supermassive Dark Stars, and that one shows a tentative He II absorption feature, the predicted dark-star signature.

desk verdict A careful consistency analysis that finds four JADES objects fit SMDS models, but without a galaxy baseline the title overpromises; still deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06101 v1 pith:Y5MQ34XH submitted 2025-05-09 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

Cosmin Ilie , Sayed Shafaat Mahmud , Jillian Paulin , Katherine Freese This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords darkstarssupermassivematterannihilationfirstJWSTNIRSpecspectroscopyJADESHeII1640absorptionhigh-redshiftgalaxies
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that four spectroscopically confirmed high-redshift JADES objects—JADES-GS-z11-0, JADES-GS-z13-0, JADES-GS-z14-0, and JADES-GS-z14-1—are consistent with being Supermassive Dark Stars: stars powered by dark matter annihilation rather than nuclear fusion. If correct, some of the brightest early-universe objects would not be ordinary galaxies, and dark matter's first visible signature would have been found. The most distant of them, JADES-GS-z14-0, also shows a tentative He II $\lambda1640$ absorption feature, the predicted dark-star smoking gun. The authors note that ALMA's probable [O III] detection in that same object makes the isolated-dark-star interpretation unlikely, leaving the possibility of a dark star inside a metal-enriched host.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Supermassive Dark Star model: a zero-metallicity hydrogen and helium star powered by annihilation of adiabatically contracted dark matter, built from polytropic equilibrium tracks for 100 GeV WIMPs. Synthetic stellar spectra are computed with TLUSTY, and for the three resolved objects CLOUDY adds emission from a surrounding photoionized hydrogen nebula. The model has only redshift and stellar mass as free parameters for point sources, plus hydrogen density for resolved ones, and it reproduces both the NIRSpec continua and the radial morphologies of the four candidates.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to obtain deeper NIRSpec spectroscopy of JADES-GS-z14-0 at the wavelength of He II 1640 and to confirm the ALMA [O III] line; if the [O III] emission is confirmed while the He II absorption does not strengthen, the dark-star interpretation for the most distant candidate fails, and if additional metal lines appear in the other three objects their zero-metallicity dark-star fits would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that four JADES sources with spectroscopic redshifts above ten—JADES-GS-z11-0 at z ≈ 11.38, JADES-GS-z13-0 at z ≈ 13.18, JADES-GS-z14-0 at z ≈ 14.43, and JADES-GS-z14-1 at z ≈ 13.90—are each well fit by Supermassive Dark Star models: zero-metallicity stars of mass of order $10^6$ solar masses, powered by annihilation of adiabatically contracted 100 GeV WIMPs, with the resolved sources surrounded by a photoionized primordial nebula. The best-fit models fall within 1 $\sigma$ of the NIRSpec continua and reproduce the observed F200W radial morphologies. For JADES-GS-z14-0 the authors identify a tentative (signal-to-noise ratio near 2.4) He II $\lambda1640$ absorption feature, which they call a smoking-gun signature of dark stars because no other known high-redshift source should show this line in absorption. They also report that an independent ALMA detection of a probable [O III] 88 μm emission line in that object makes the simple isolated-dark-star interpretation unlikely, so if both features survive, the dark star would have to be embedded in a metal-enriched environment.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes each object is a zero-metallicity source—an isolated dark star or one surrounded only by pristine hydrogen and helium—so if ordinary metal-enriched gas or a host galaxy contributes significant light, the dark-star fits are degenerate with ordinary early galaxies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the He II $\lambda1640$ absorption in JADES-GS-z14-0 is confirmed, it is the first direct evidence for dark stars, since no other known high-redshift source is expected to show this line in absorption.
  • Confirmed dark stars would make some of the over-luminous compact objects found by JWST understandable without invoking extreme efficiencies of star formation in early galaxies.
  • Dark stars that collapse after exhausting their dark matter fuel would leave roughly $10^6$ solar-mass black hole seeds, matching the masses needed to explain the earliest supermassive black holes.
  • If both the He II absorption and the ALMA [O III] emission survive, dark stars must be able to form or persist inside metal-enriched environments, a scenario the current isolated models do not cover.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If embedded dark stars are real, the most direct test is to search for He II $\lambda1640$ absorption in other z>10 objects with [O III] detections; finding the line only in metal-enriched systems would motivate new formation channels rather than the isolated pristine-cloud picture.
  • The four candidates are continuum fits, and continuum degeneracy means the discovery claim ultimately rests on line diagnostics; a null result for He II absorption across a larger sample would make the dark-star interpretation much less plausible even if individual fits remain good.
  • A population-level prediction implicit in the paper is that roughly $10^6$ solar-mass dark stars should be nearly point-like in JWST imaging; the angular-size fits presented here could be checked against higher-resolution ALMA or future 30-meter-class telescopes for compactness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a spectroscopic search for Supermassive Dark Star (SMDS) candidates in public JWST NIRSpec data from the JADES survey. Four objects (JADES-GS-z11-0, JADES-GS-z13-0, JADES-GS-z14-0, JADES-GS-z14-1) are modeled as zero-metallicity dark stars, three of them surrounded by a primordial H/He nebula treated with CLOUDY, and one as an unresolved point source. The authors conclude that all four objects are spectroscopically consistent with SMDS models, that JADES-GS-z14-0 shows a tentative He II 1640 Å absorption feature at S/N ~ 2.4, and that an ALMA detection of [O III] 88 μm in z14-0 makes the simple isolated-dark-star interpretation unlikely unless the system is metal-enriched. The paper is explicitly hedged and calls for follow-up observations.

Significance. If the dark-star interpretation survives further data, the claim would be transformative: it would identify the most distant luminous objects as dark-matter-powered stars and provide a new channel for seeding high-redshift supermassive black holes. The paper is also honest about its limitations: it repeatedly states that the objects are consistent with both dark stars and galaxies, that the He II feature has low signal-to-noise, and that the ALMA [O III] detection complicates the interpretation. The methodological strengths are the use of public NIRSpec data, the Monte Carlo propagation of spectral uncertainties into parameter posteriors, and the inclusion of CLOUDY nebular emission for resolved sources. These strengths do not, however, overcome the absence of any non-dark-star baseline fit, which is the main weakness identified in this report.

major comments (1)
  1. [Method and Results (spectral fitting)] The ALMA [O III] result for JADES-GS-z14-0 is handled inconsistently across the paper. In the Abstract and Discussion the authors state that the simple isolated-dark-star interpretation is unlikely and that a metal-enriched environment would require theoretical refinements, which is honest. However, the Results section still lists JADES-GS-z14-0 as one of 'four Supermassive Dark Star spectral candidates' and the discussion of the He II feature does not integrate the ALMA constraint into the candidate status. Since the ALMA detection is at S/N ~ 6 and is the only secure spectral line from any of the four objects, the paper should either exclude z14-0 from the set of clean dark-star candidates or present a concrete model of a dark star embedded in a metal-enriched nebula that reproduces both the He II absorption and the [O III] emission. As it stands, the most plausible interpretation of z14-0 is an ordinary highly magnified galaxy, and its inclusion as a dark-star candidate rests on the absence of alternatives rather than on positive evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'refinements of the formation of evolution of Dark Stars' should be 'refinements of the formation and evolution of Dark Stars'.
  2. [Introduction] The text contains a typo 'SDMS' where 'SMDS' is meant; also 'Nedler-Mead' appears twice and should be 'Nelder-Mead'.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption sentence 'The best fit redshift, with associated uncertainty, can be In the title of each plot...' is grammatically incomplete and should be rewritten.
  4. [Table 1] The table caption 'One can see' is informal and should be replaced by a more precise statement that all best-fit masses are of order 10^6 solar masses.
  5. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says 'Equivalent width of the potential He II absorption feature' but the quantity computed from the Voigt profile is an equivalent width in wavelength units; the text later quotes 3.26 Å, which is consistent, but the caption should state the units explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DS spectra are fitted to the data, not predicted from them, and the He II 1640 Å feature is a fixed theoretical prediction; the paper explicitly admits galaxy degeneracy.

full rationale

The paper's logic is a model-fitting exercise, not a derivation in which an output is defined by its input. The SMDS SEDs are computed with TLUSTY and CLOUDY from prior stellar-structure models (Refs. 12, 59) with fixed assumptions (100 GeV WIMPs, AC DM, zero metallicity), leaving only (M_DS, z, n_H) as free parameters. These are optimized against NIRSpec data, and the paper consistently describes the results as fits: 'we find optimal values in order to fit the JADES spectral data' and 'they are each consistent with a Dark Star interpretation.' It explicitly acknowledges the degeneracy: 'as of now those objects are consistent with both a Dark Star and a galaxy interpretation.' The one true prediction, He II λ1640 absorption, is a rest-frame feature of the DS atmosphere models, not a fitted constant; its inferred redshift (z≈14.52) lies about 2σ from the continuum fit (z=14.43±0.04), so it is not manufactured by the fit. The radial profile fits use the DS spectral flux as input and are presented as consistency checks, not independent confirmations. The ALMA [O III] detection (Ref. 18) is an external falsifier the authors incorporate as a caveat, weakening their own strongest claim. The absence of a fitted galaxy-template baseline is a real model-comparison weakness, but it is a correctness risk, not circularity: no equation or parameter in the paper reduces by construction to the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 17 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. It imports the established dark star framework (WIMP annihilation, adiabatic contraction, polytropic structure) from prior work by the same and other authors, then fits the imported SEDs to JWST data. The many free parameters are standard for SED fitting, but they mean the 'consistency' claim is a demonstration of fit quality rather than a unique identification.

free parameters (17)
  • M_DS (JADES-GS-z11-0) = 6.35e5 M_sun, +0.08/-0.04 (10^5)
    Stellar mass of DS model fit to NIRSpec spectrum.
  • M_DS (JADES-GS-z13-0) = 5.19e5 M_sun, +0.13/-0.13 (10^5)
    Stellar mass of DS model fit to NIRSpec spectrum.
  • M_DS (JADES-GS-z14-0) = 1.67e6 M_sun, +0.12/-0.08 (10^5)
    Stellar mass of DS model fit to NIRSpec spectrum; largest of the four.
  • M_DS (JADES-GS-z14-1) = 5.65e5 M_sun, +0.02/-0.02 (10^5)
    Stellar mass of pure DS fit for unresolved source.
  • z (JADES-GS-z11-0) = 11.38, +0.18/-0.04
    Redshift treated as free parameter in spectral fit rather than fixed to the reported spectroscopic value.
  • z (JADES-GS-z13-0) = 13.18, +0.24/-0.05
    Redshift fit to NIRSpec continuum.
  • z (JADES-GS-z14-0) = 14.43, +0.04/-0.04
    Redshift fit to NIRSpec continuum; He II feature analyzed at z=14.52.
  • z (JADES-GS-z14-1) = 13.90, +/-0.0003
    Redshift fit for unresolved object; error bar is extremely small relative to spectral resolution.
  • log10(n_H/cm^-3) (GS-z11-0) = 0.59, +0.18/-0.04
    Hydrogen density of spherical nebula around DS, fit with CLOUDY.
  • log10(n_H/cm^-3) (GS-z13-0) = 0.23, +0.03/-0.03
    Hydrogen density of nebula fit with CLOUDY.
  • log10(n_H/cm^-3) (GS-z14-0) = 0.03, +0.03/-0.03
    Hydrogen density of nebula fit with CLOUDY; low density.
  • Angular size a (GS-z11-0) = 0.10 arcsec, +0.04/-0.04
    Sersic radial fit parameter for morphology.
  • Sersic index n (GS-z11-0) = 4.00, +0.05/-0.05
    Fitted with prior centered at n=4, so the value is largely prior-driven.
  • Angular size a (GS-z13-0) = 0.066 arcsec, +0.0035/-0.0035
    Sersic radial fit parameter.
  • Sersic index n (GS-z13-0) = 4.00, +0.03/-0.03
    Fitted with prior centered at n=4.
  • Angular size a (GS-z14-0) = 0.27 arcsec, +0.01/-0.01
    Sersic radial fit parameter.
  • Sersic index n (GS-z14-0) = 3.99, +0.04/-0.04
    Fitted with prior centered at n=4.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dark matter annihilation heating formula Q = m_chi n_chi^2 <sigma v>; 100 GeV WIMPs with canonical <sigma v>=3e-26 cm3/s are assumed.
    Used to construct all DS SEDs; the paper states simpler assumptions are made for simplicity.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic contraction raises central DM densities to about 1e14 GeV/cm3 and replenishes them, so 1 M_sun seeds grow to about 1e6 M_sun DS.
    From Refs. 56 and 57; no re-derivation here.
  • domain assumption Polytropic equilibrium models from Ref. 12 give mass-radius-luminosity relations used to compute SEDs.
    The paper uses prior evolutionary tracks rather than recomputing stellar structure.
  • domain assumption TLUSTY non-LTE, zero-metallicity H/He atmospheres represent DS surface emission.
    Central to every spectral fit; assumes no metals in the photosphere or surrounding gas.
  • domain assumption CLOUDY models of a spherical primordial-composition nebula capture the emission and size of resolved DS candidates.
    Used for the three resolved objects; ALMA O III in z14-0 indicates this zero-metallicity assumption may fail.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopic Supermassive Dark Star candidates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y5MQ34XH

@misc{pith2026250506101,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopic Supermassive Dark Star candidates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y5MQ34XH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06101}
}
abstract

Dark Stars, i.e. early stars composed almost entirely of hydrogen and helium but powered by Dark Matter, could form in zero metallicity clouds located close to the center of high redshift Dark Matter halos. In 2023 three of us identified (in a PNAS work) the first three photometric Dark Star candidates: JADES-GS-z11-0, JADES-GS-z12-0, and JADES-GS-z13-0. We report here our results of a followup analysis based on available NIRSpec JWST data. We find that JADES-GS-z11-0 and JADES-GS-z-13-0 are spectroscopically consistent with a Dark Star interpretation. Moreover, we find two additional spectroscopic Dark Star candidates: JADES-GS-z14-0 and JADES-GS-z-14-1, with the former being the most distant luminous object ever observed. We furthermore identify a feature in its spectrum indicative of the smoking gun signature of Dark Stars: the He II$\lambda$1640 absorption line. In view ALMA's recent identification of a probable OIII nebular emission line in the spectrum of JADES-GS-z14-0, the simple interpretation of this object as an isolated Dark Star is unlikely. If both spectral features survive follow-up observations it would imply a Dark Star embedded in a metal rich environment, requiring theoretical refinements of the formation of evolution of Dark Stars, which in previous studies were assumed to form in isolation, without any companions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstructing PTA measurements via early seeding of supermassive black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dark-star-seeded supermassive black holes with number density around 10^-3 per cubic megaparsec could dominate the PTA gravitational wave background, with PTA data capping the seed density near 0.1 per cubic megaparsec.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    T Abel, GL Bryan, ML Norman, The formation of the first star in the Universe.Science295, 93 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Rept.349, 125–238 (2001)

    R Barkana, A Loeb, In the beginning: The First sources of light and the reionization of the Universe.Phys. Rept.349, 125–238 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    V Bromm, RB Larson, The First stars.Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.42, 79–118 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    J.652, 6–25 (2006)

    N Y oshida, K Omukai, L Hernquist, T Abel, Formation of Primordial Stars in a lambda-CDM Universe.Astrophys. J.652, 6–25 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    BW O’Shea, ML Norman, Population III star formation in a lambda-CDM Universe. 1. The effect of formation redshift and environment on protostellar accretion rate.Astrophys. J.654, 66–92 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    N Y oshida, K Omukai, L Hernquist, Protostar Formation in the Early Universe.Science321, 669 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Nature459, 49–54 (2009)

    V Bromm, N Y oshida, L Hernquist, CF McKee, The formation of the first stars and galaxies. Nature459, 49–54 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    D Spolyar, K Freese, P Gondolo, Dark matter and the first stars: a new phase of stellar evolution.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 051101 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    J.685, L101–L112 (2008)

    K Freese, P Bodenheimer, D Spolyar, P Gondolo, Stellar Structure of Dark Stars: a first phase of Stellar Evolution due to Dark Matter Annihilation.Astrophys. J.685, L101–L112 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Notices Royal Astron

    F Iocco, et al., Dark matter annihilation effects on the first stars.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.390, 1655–1669 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    arXiv:2205.10904 (2022)

    Y Wu, S Baum, K Freese, L Visinelli, HB Yu, Dark Stars Powered by Self-Interacting Dark Matter.arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2205.10904 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J.716, 1397–1407 (2010)

    K Freese, C Ilie, D Spolyar, M Valluri, P Bodenheimer, Supermassive Dark Stars: Detectable in JWST.Astrophys. J.716, 1397–1407 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    The Astrophys

    E Zackrisson, et al., Finding High-redshift Dark Stars with the James Webb Space Telescope. The Astrophys. J.717, 257–267 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Notices Royal Astron

    C Ilie, K Freese, M Valluri, IT Iliev, PR Shapiro, Observing supermassive dark stars with James Webb Space Telescope.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.422, 2164–2186 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    S Zhang, C Ilie, K Freese, Detectabilty of Supermassive Dark Stars with the Roman Space Telescope.arXiv(2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    C Ilie, J Paulin, K Freese, Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.120, e2305762120 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    I Hubeny, T Lanz, Tlusty user’s guide iii: Operational manual.arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01937 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    & Astrophys.696, A87 (2025)

    S Carniani, et al., The eventful life of a luminous galaxy at z= 14: metal enrichment, feedback, and low gas fraction?Astron. & Astrophys.696, A87 (2025). 8| www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.XXXXXXXXXX Ilieet al. DRAFT

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    arXiv:2207.09434 (2022)

    RP Naidu, et al., Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates atz≈ 11 − 13Revealed by JWST.arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2207.09434 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    arXiv:2207.12474 (2022)

    SL Finkelstein, et al., A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z ~14 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging.arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2207.12474 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    arXiv:2207.12356 (2022)

    CT Donnan, et al., The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z ~8-15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging.arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2207.12356 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    arXiv:2208.02794 (2022)

    RP Naidu, et al., Schrodinger’s Galaxy Candidate: Puzzlingly Luminous at z≈ 17, or Dusty/Quenched atz≈5?arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2208.02794 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    arXiv e-printsp

    BE Robertson, et al., Discovery and properties of the earliest galaxies with confirmed distances. arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2212.04480 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    arXiv e-printsp

    E Curtis-Lake, et al., Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z=10.3-13.2. arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2212.04568 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    arXiv e-printsp

    I Labbe, et al., A population of red candidate massive galaxies ~600 Myr after the Big Bang. arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2207.12446 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    M Xiao, et al., Accelerated formation of ultra-massive galaxies in the first billion years.Nature 635, 311–315 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    SL Finkelstein, et al., Ceers key paper. i. an early look into the first 500 myr of galaxy formation with jwst.The Astrophys. J. Lett.946, L13 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Y Harikane, et al., Pure spectroscopic constraints on uv luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history from 25 galaxies atzspec = 8.61 − 13.20confirmed with jwst/nirspec (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Notices Royal Astron

    L YA Yung, RS Somerville, SL Finkelstein, SM Wilkins, JP Gardner, Are the ultra-high-redshift galaxies at z &gt; 10 surprising in the context of standard galaxy formation models?Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.527, 5929–5948 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    J Ziegler, J Lozano Mayo, G Montefalcone, K Freese, In preparation (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Notices Royal Astron

    A Dekel, KC Sarkar, Y Birnboim, N Mandelker, Z Li, Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.523, 3201–3218 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    I Juodžbalis, et al., A dormant overmassive black hole in the early universe.Nature636, 594–597 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Astron.8, 126–133 (2024)

    Á Bogdán, et al., Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈10 X-ray quasar.Nat. Astron.8, 126–133 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    F Wang, et al., Exploring Reionization-era Quasars. III. Discovery of 16 Quasars at 6.4 ≲ z ≲ 6.9 with DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys and the UKIRT Hemisphere Survey and Quasar Luminosity Function at z∼6.7.The Astrophys. J.884, 30 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    K Inayoshi, E Visbal, Z Haiman, The assembly of the first massive black holes.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.58, 27–97 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    A Lupi, Z Haiman, M Volonteri, Forming massive seed black holes in high-redshift quasar host progenitors.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.503, 5046–5060 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    C Ilie, K Freese, A Petric, J Paulin, Uhz1 and the other three most distant quasars observed: possible evidence for supermassive dark stars.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13837(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Astrophys

    A Loeb, FA Rasio, Collapse of primordial gas clouds and the formation of quasar black holes. Astrophys. J.432, 52 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    Notices Royal Astron

    MC Begelman, M Volonteri, MJ Rees, Formation of supermassive black holes by direct collapse in pre-galactic haloes.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.370, 289–298 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    G Lodato, P Natarajan, Supermassive black hole formation during the assembly of pre-galactic discs.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.371, 1813–1823 (2006)

    2006

  33. [41]

    P Natarajan, , et al., Mapping substructure in the HST Frontier Fields cluster lenses and in cosmological simulations.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.468, 1962–1980 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Astron.2, 987–994 (2018)

    KSS Barrow, A Aykutalp, JH Wise, Observational signatures of massive black hole formation in the early universe.Nat. Astron.2, 987–994 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    DJ Whalen, et al., Finding direct-collapse black holes at birth.The Astrophys. J. Lett.897, L16 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    N Banik, JC Tan, P Monaco, The formation of supermassive black holes from Population III.1 seeds. I. Cosmic formation histories and clustering properties.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.483, 3592–3606 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    J Singh, P Monaco, JC Tan, The formation of supermassive black holes from population iii.1 seeds. ii. evolution to the local universe.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.525, 969–982 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    V Cammelli, et al., The formation of supermassive black holes from population iii.1 seeds. iii. galaxy evolution and black hole growth from semi-analytic modelling (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    A Loeb,How did the first stars and galaxies form?(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    V Bromm, N Y oshida, The first galaxies.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.49, 373–407 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    The Astrophys

    NY Gnedin, Cosmic reionization on computers: the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. The Astrophys. J. Lett.825, L17 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Reports780, 1–64 (2018)

    P Dayal, A Ferrara, Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects.Phys. Reports780, 1–64 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    uv luminosity functions at z= 4–10.Mon

    LA Yung, RS Somerville, SL Finkelstein, G Popping, R Davé, Semi-analytic forecasts for jwst–i. uv luminosity functions at z= 4–10.Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.483, 2983–3006 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    P Behroozi, et al., The universe at z> 10: predictions for jwst from the universemachine dr1. Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.499, 5702–5718 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    J.781, 60 (2014)

    S Hirano, et al., ONE HUNDRED FIRST STARS: PROTOSTELLAR EVOLUTION AND THE FINAL MASSES.The Astrophys. J.781, 60 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    J.705, 1031–1042 (2009)

    D Spolyar, P Bodenheimer, K Freese, P Gondolo, Dark Stars: a new look at the First Stars in the Universe.Astrophys. J.705, 1031–1042 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    K Freese, T Rindler-Daller, D Spolyar, M Valluri, Dark stars: a review.Reports on Prog. Phys. 79, 066902 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    J.301, 27–34 (1986)

    GR Blumenthal, S Faber, R Flores, JR Primack, Contraction of dark matter galactic halos due to baryonic infall.The Astrophys. J.301, 27–34 (1986)

    1986

  49. [57]

    J.693, 1563–1569 (2009)

    K Freese, P Gondolo, J Sellwood, D Spolyar, Dark Matter Densities during the Formation of the First Stars and in Dark Stars.Astrophys. J.693, 1563–1569 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    Journals192, 3 (2011)

    B Paxton, et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA).The Astrophys. Journals192, 3 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    J.799, 210 (2015)

    T Rindler-Daller, MH Montgomery, K Freese, DE Winget, B Paxton, Dark Stars: Improved Models and First Pulsation Results.The Astrophys. J.799, 210 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    M Chatzikos, et al., The 2023 release of cloudy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06396(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    arXiv:1101.2895 (2011)

    E Zackrisson, The observational signatures of high-redshift dark stars.arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:1101.2895 (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  54. [62]

    & Astrophys

    F d’Eugenio, et al., Jades: Carbon enrichment 350 myr after the big bang.Astron. & Astrophys. 689, A152 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    J.976, 160 (2024)

    KN Hainline, et al., Searching for emission lines at z> 11: The role of damped lyα and hints about the escape of ionizing photons.The Astrophys. J.976, 160 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Nature633, 318–322 (2024)

    S Carniani, et al., Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14. Nature633, 318–322 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    I Hubeny, A computer program for calculating non-LTE model stellar atmospheres.Comput. Phys. Commun.52, 103–132 (1988)

    1988

  58. [66]

    AB Peck, CR Benn, RL Seaman

    TE Pickering, et al., Pandeia: a multi-mission exposure time calculator for jwst and wfirst in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VI, eds. AB Peck, CR Benn, RL Seaman. (SPIE), (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    JL Sersic,Atlas de Galaxias Australes. (1968)

    1968

  60. [68]

    J.142, 1633–1636 (1965)

    JE Gunn, BA Peterson, On the Density of Neutral Hydrogen in Intergalactic Space.The Astrophys. J.142, 1633–1636 (1965). Ilieet al. PNAS |September 5, 2025| vol. XXX | no. XX |9

    1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.