REVIEW 2 cited by
Vector and scalar charmonium resonances with lattice QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We perform an exploratory lattice QCD simulation of $D \bar D$ scattering, aimed at determining the masses as well as the decay widths of charmonium resonances above open charm threshold. Neglecting coupling to other channels, the resulting phase shift for $D \bar D$ scattering in p-wave yields the well-known vector resonance $\psi(3770)$. For $m_\pi = 156$ MeV, the extracted resonance mass and the decay width agree with experiment within large statistical uncertainty. The scalar charmonium resonances present a puzzle, since only the ground state $\chi_{c0}(1P)$ is well understood, while there is no commonly accepted candidate for its first excitation. We simulate $D \bar D$ scattering in s-wave in order to shed light on this puzzle. The resulting phase shift supports the existence of a yet-unobserved narrow resonance with a mass slightly below 4 GeV. A scenario with this narrow resonance and a pole at $\chi_{c0}(1P)$ agrees with the energy-dependence of our phase shift. Further lattice QCD simulations and experimental efforts are needed to resolve the puzzle of the excited scalar charmonia.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The hadronic decay of vector charmonium
The authors extract the psi(3770) to D Dbar hadronic mixing and a decay width compatible with experiment using a narrow-width ratio method on two CLS ensembles.
-
Hadronic decay of vector charmonium from the lattice
The ratio method, tuned with twisted boundary conditions, extracts a psi(3770) -> D D mixing amplitude from two N_f=2 ensembles and gives Gamma = 24.2(6.4) MeV, but with unquantified systematic errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.