Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 7 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2311.08576.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2311.08576 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 7 of 7 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 7 of 7 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T10:30:37.676788Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-22T18:44:28.863948Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 8b7a79d1-ea2a-4d6e-b455-5176afe3af84 · inbound

LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations cites this paper.

LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 21

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-22T18:44:28.866163Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-22T18:44:28.766639Z digest=sha256:fbdb7612592b5d77ecfa1bbc23eb12a34101e48f977a2d46db6416868968752f

Observation 35920143-623e-489d-81df-3c86fde6c33c · inbound

Does It Make Sense to Speak of Introspection in Large Language Models? cites this paper.

Does It Make Sense to Speak of Introspection in Large Language Models? Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 36

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T10:30:37.676788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T10:30:37.676788Z digest=sha256:80e03a4fa08f06efbb9318ed13615507ad17b0e8b04690fc1cb09515dcf11cde

Observation 7e3b42c4-18da-4fdb-a9ab-e60418513bf7 · inbound

Probing the Preferences of a Language Model: Integrating Verbal and Behavioral Tests of AI Welfare cites this paper.

Probing the Preferences of a Language Model: Integrating Verbal and Behavioral Tests of AI Welfare Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 11

Resolution
malformed identifier
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T21:29:55.547436Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T21:29:55.547436Z digest=sha256:331e5ed7a70b7445b79dc7c1f6ea14ba898a191e606dd74b459f62e8b6af0375

Observation 96cf9985-d195-4d6f-bc9b-b075195e9d19 · inbound

No Reliable Evidence of Self-Reported Sentience in Small Large Language Models cites this paper.

No Reliable Evidence of Self-Reported Sentience in Small Large Language Models Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T09:31:50.773039Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-03T09:31:50.773039Z digest=sha256:92444b1e30bc340873619f672aff444884696bb0c235134b58a8666927001b9d

Observation b2446327-b655-4f06-8c99-b0b92cead3a7 · inbound

The Consciousness Cluster: Emergent preferences of Models that Claim to be Conscious cites this paper.

The Consciousness Cluster: Emergent preferences of Models that Claim to be Conscious Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 7

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-15T10:15:27.288655Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-15T10:10:27.787424Z digest=sha256:031170fd9c99ecd44d5a8f99ea9de1810479618caeae59831c48a5e96477de45

Observation bc7fad5d-39f8-4389-af7d-68671c3301d2 · inbound

Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models cites this paper.

Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 23

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-13T23:23:26.959938Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-13T23:18:34.388467Z digest=sha256:17b90b72bb8982b77b6d8fcf80e757199664bfc669c8a3daa84ee8bb9b0aee09

Observation e9508304-7444-400f-81e3-62166b6affc6 · inbound

The Two-Process Theory of Machine Self-Report cites this paper.

The Two-Process Theory of Machine Self-Report Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T10:54:06.301593Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-01T10:54:06.301593Z digest=sha256:486037c09a141b67a115eeac20b906f93278dee7af207b18eaaac07b790b6fc3