Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Nonlinear electrodynamics in Kerr-Newman-NUT-$\Lambda$ spacetime: exact solutions, horizons, and energy conditions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs two exact nonlinear-electrodynamic black-hole families that generalize the Kerr-Newman-NUT-Λ spacetime, with radial metric deformations solved exactly.

desk verdict Solid extension of the aligned-potential NLED construction to the NUT-Λ sector; the exact metrics are plausible and useful, but the rotating families are not shown to follow from a global L(F,G), so the 'NLED solution' label is one step stronger than what is demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22977 v1 pith:YASA2BIE submitted 2026-07-25 gr-qc

Oscar Galindo-Uriarte , Nora Breton , Claus Lämmerzahl , Alfredo Macías This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.20.Jb04.70.Bw
keywords nonlinearelectrodynamicsKerr-Newman-NUTspacetimeexactsolutionsalignedpotentialskeyequationhorizonsenergyconditionscosmologicalconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims to have found two new stationary, axisymmetric black-hole solutions to the Einstein–nonlinear-electrodynamics equations: the cubic and quartic NLED–Kerr–Newman–NUT–Λ families. Each family is characterized by seven parameters: mass, angular momentum, electric and magnetic charges, NUT parameter, cosmological constant, and one nonlinear parameter (β or ξ). The construction relies on aligning the electromagnetic field with the metric tetrad, which reduces the Maxwell–Faraday sector to a single integrability condition, the key equation. Solving the Einstein equations then reduces to a single radial ordinary differential equation for the deformation of the Kerr-like radial metric function, which is solved exactly. A sympathetic reader would care because these are among the few exact nonlinear-electrodynamic rotating black-hole solutions, and they provide a concrete setting to study how nonlinear electromagnetic sources alter horizons, energy conditions, and the structure of curvature singularities.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the aligned-potential method: the electromagnetic two-form is written in a tetrad aligned with the principal directions of the Kerr-like geometry, so that the Maxwell–Faraday sector reduces to two potentials constrained by a single integrability condition called the key equation. This key equation—together with the polynomial ansatz—selects the cubic and quartic families and guarantees that the on-shell Lagrangian exists locally. The Einstein equations then reduce to a single radial ordinary differential equation (the master equation) for the deformation f(r) of the radial metric function, which is solved exactly for both families.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to search for a fifth-degree polynomial solution of the key equation; finding one would disprove the claim that only cubic and quartic families arise within the polynomial aligned ansatz. Alternatively, proving that the map (r,θ) → (F,G) is not invertible in closed form for the rotating families would show the solutions lack an action-based NLED Lagrangian, undermining their status as nonlinear-electrodynamic solutions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, under a polynomial aligned ansatz for the electromagnetic potentials, the key equation admits exactly two admissible families: potentials that are cubic polynomials and quartic polynomials in the radial coordinate and in (a cos θ + n). For each family, the Einstein equations reduce to a single radial master equation, and the resulting deformation f(r) of the Kerr-Newman-NUT-Λ metric function is obtained in closed form: f_cubic = (Q_e² + Q_m²){[1 + β(n² − r²)]²(1 + β n²) − 1} and f_quartic = −ξ(Q_e² + Q_m²) r³. The corresponding metrics, electromagnetic fields, stress tensors, horizon structure, and energy conditions are derived. The paper also shows that the nonli

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that an on-shell Lagrangian written in terms of field intensities (E,B,D,H), with no closed global expression in terms of the electromagnetic invariants F and G, still qualifies the rotating solutions as nonlinear electrodynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the solutions are exact, they provide new testbeds for studying strong-field gravitational lensing, black-hole shadows, and particle motion around charged rotating black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic sources.
  • The cubic family's ability to mimic an effective cosmological constant via β means the nonlinear parameter can be observationally constrained by cosmological and strong-field measurements, potentially tying NLED parameters to dark-energy-like behavior.
  • The horizon analysis reveals conditions under which the solutions possess inner, outer, and cosmological horizons, with explicit extremal and degenerate limits that could inform thermodynamic studies of these black holes.
  • The energy-condition analysis shows that the quartic family satisfies the weak and dominant energy conditions only under an angular bound 0 ≤ ξ(|n|+|a|)³ ≤ 1 and that the strong energy condition holds only in a finite radial interval, restricting the physically admissible parameter space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The absence of a closed global Lagrangian L(F,G) for the rotating families suggests that the solutions may belong to a broader class of 'aligned electrodynamic' configurations rather than standard action-based nonlinear electrodynamics; if no such global Lagrangian exists, the interpretation of these solutions as NLED black holes would need revision.
  • The claim that only two polynomial families solve the key equation is empirical within the ansatz; a formal proof of uniqueness or a search for higher-degree or non-polynomial solutions would settle whether the cubic and quartic families are truly the only aligned generalizations of this type.
  • The techniques here, if extended to potentials with higher multipole structure (e.g., denominators beyond the quadratic Σ), could generate a richer landscape of stationary NLED solutions with nontrivial electromagnetic multipoles, though the paper explicitly notes such an extension remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs two new stationary, axisymmetric, aligned electromagnetic solutions that generalize the Kerr–Newman–NUT–Λ spacetime to the nonlinear electrodynamic (NLED) setting. The authors impose an alignment condition between the electromagnetic principal directions and the metric tetrad, reduce the Maxwell–Faraday sector to two potentials, and derive a 'key equation' whose polynomial solutions are cubic and quartic in r and (a cosθ+n). For each family the Einstein equations reduce to a single radial ODE for the deformation f(r) of the Kerr-like radial function; explicit metrics, potentials, field strengths, horizon polynomials, and energy-condition analyses are presented. The static subsectors admit explicit Lagrangians L(F) in terms of invariants, while for the rotating families the paper explicitly states that a closed global L(F,G) is not obtained and that the on-shell Lagrangian is reconstructed from the trace of the stress tensor and the intensities E,B,D,H. The paper claims Maple verification of all componentwise equations, but no code or output is shipped.

Significance. If the construction is accepted, the paper provides two explicit, seven-parameter, stationary axisymmetric charged black-hole solutions with NLED-type sources, extending the very small catalog of exact rotating NLED solutions. The aligned-potential method and the reduction of Einstein’s equations to a single radial ODE are useful technical contributions. The horizon and energy-condition analyses are detailed and the curvature singularities are honestly identified. The main limitation is that, for the rotating families, the solutions are not shown to follow from a global covariant Lagrangian L(F,G); the reconstructed on-shell Lagrangian is a local quantity. This reduces the force of the claim that these are exact solutions of the action-based Einstein–NLED system, although the aligned electromagnetic configuration is still an exact solution of dF=0, d⋆P=0, and the Einstein equations with the reconstructed stress tensor. The paper is transparent about this gap, but the abstract and conclusions overstate the result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.G Step 2; Appendix C; Conclusions] The central claim—that the metrics (67) and (96) with potentials (71)–(72) and (98)–(99) are exact solutions of the Einstein–NLED equations—is not established for the rotating families. The NLED field equations (9) presuppose a Lagrangian L(F,G) and require its derivatives L_F and L_G. For the rotating branches, no closed global L(F,G) is given; Appendix C states that inverting (r,θ) to (F,G) leads to algebraic equations of degree higher than four. The on-shell Lagrangian (78)/(C1) is reconstructed from the trace identity and the intensities E,B,D,H, and the key equation (57) is only a local integrability condition, as Sec. IV.G Step 2 itself concedes ('remains open'). Thus the paper demonstrates an aligned solution of the Maxwell–Faraday equations and the Einstein equations with the reconstructed stress tensor, but not a solution of the action-based NLED system. This is a load-bearing g
  2. [Sec. IV.G Step 4] The paper states that 'the complete componentwise checks were independently carried out in Maple' and that the alignment identities, key equation, and independent Einstein equations 'simplify identically to zero.' No Maple worksheet, output, or explicit residual expressions are provided. Because the exactness claim rests on this verification and the expressions are extremely long, the result is not independently checkable from the text. Please include a supplementary file with the Maple code and output, or display the explicit residual equations that vanish, so that the componentwise verification can be reproduced.
  3. [Sec. IV.E] The abstract and Sec. IV.E state that the key equation 'selects two admissible families.' Immediately afterward, however, the text notes that 'a formal proof of uniqueness is beyond the scope' and that only an exhaustive search did not yield higher-degree solutions. The existence of the two families is not in question, but the word 'selects' implies a proof of uniqueness that is not supplied. The claim should be softened to 'two admissible families were found within the polynomial aligned ansatz' unless a uniqueness proof is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract says that explicit Lagrangians in terms of invariants are obtained in selected static subsectors, but it does not state that for the rotating families no global L(F,G) is obtained. This limitation should be acknowledged in the abstract to match Sec. IV.G Step 2 and Appendix C.
  2. [Eq. (102)] In the quartic field component D, the term '−x ξx/2' appears to be a typo; it should likely be '−ξx^2/2'.
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C2)] The symbols X and Y in Eq. (C3) are used for the combinations Q_m H − Q_e E and Q_m B − Q_e D, but X(r) and Y(θ) were already used in Eqs. (41)–(42) for the separation functions. This notation clash should be removed by renaming the combinations in Appendix C.
  4. [Eq. (C10)] The expression '−3(D^2+B^2/2)(E/D−1)' is ambiguous. Clarify the intended parentheses, e.g., '−3(D^2+B^2/2)(E/D−1)' as written or correct to the intended factor.
  5. [Sec. IV.E, Eq. (58)] The summations in Eq. (58) are unbounded; the ranges (e.g., t=1..3 or t=1..4) should be specified to match the cubic and quartic cases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the construction is an explicit inverse problem; the missing global L(F,G) for the rotating families is a stated limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper does not fit a parameter to a target quantity and then rename it a prediction. The cubic and quartic deformations f(r) are obtained as explicit solutions of the radial Einstein equation (66), with the ODEs stated in (69) and (94) and solutions in (70) and (95). The potentials are fixed by the alignment ansatz and by the local integrability condition (57); the nonlinear parameters beta and xi are free couplings, not fitted constants. The linear limits beta=0 and xi=0 reproduce the known Kerr-Newman-NUT-Lambda solution, and the n=0 cubic case matches Ref. [9], providing independent checks. The only substantive caveat is the paper's own repeated admission that a closed global L(F,G) is not obtained for the rotating families (Sec. IV.G Step 2, Appendix C, Conclusions). That is a limitation on the action-based NLED interpretation, but it is not circularity: the paper never claims to derive the rotating solutions from a prescribed global L(F,G); instead it solves the aligned Maxwell-Faraday and Einstein equations directly and reconstructs an on-shell Lagrangian. Self-citations to Refs. [9] and [10] introduce the method, but the key equation and componentwise verification are rederived here, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation is therefore self-contained with respect to its stated constructive assumptions; the gap concerning global L(F,G) affects interpretive completeness, not the logical dependence of the results on their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All geometric parameters (m, a, Qe, Qm, n, Λ) are inherited from the Kerr–Newman–NUT–Λ baseline. The only new degrees of freedom are the couplings β and ξ; no new particle, field, dimension, or exotic matter entity is postulated. The method rests on the alignment condition and the polynomial ansatz, both stated as assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • β (cubic NLE coupling)
    Introduced as the nonlinearity parameter in the cubic vector potential coefficients (Eq. 60) and in the metric deformation (Eq. 68). It is not derived or fitted; its admissible range is later constrained by energy-condition and horizon analyses.
  • ξ (quartic NLE coupling)
    Introduced as the nonlinearity parameter in the quartic potential coefficients (Eq. 61) and metric deformation (Eq. 97). A free coupling constant, not fixed by the theory.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The mixed electromagnetic tensor can be diagonalized by choosing a tetrad aligned with the principal directions of the electromagnetic field (Eqs. 37-40).
    This is the central modeling assumption that reduces the Maxwell–Faraday sector to two potentials. It is motivated by stationarity and axisymmetry but is not forced by the NLED action.
  • ad hoc to paper The separation functions X(r), Y(θ), A(r), B(θ) are polynomials of degree at most 4 in r and (a cosθ + n) (Eq. 58 and coefficients in Eqs. 60-61).
    The paper states that exhaustive numerical and algebraic exploration found no higher-degree polynomial solutions, but a formal proof of uniqueness is explicitly said to be beyond its scope.
  • domain assumption The quadratic denominator Σ = r² + (a cosθ + n)² in the potential ansatz restricts the electromagnetic multipole structure to dipolar fields (Sec. IV.E, Eq. 62).
    The authors themselves note this restriction and suggest that freeing the denominator would be needed for higher multipoles.
  • standard math Standard quartic-root formulas and Cardano–Vieta relations are used for horizon analyses (Appendix D).
    Unproved background algebra accepted in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear electrodynamics in Kerr-Newman-NUT-$\Lambda$ spacetime: exact solutions, horizons, and energy conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YASA2BIE

@misc{pith2026260722977,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear electrodynamics in Kerr-Newman-NUT-$\Lambda$ spacetime: exact solutions, horizons, and energy conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YASA2BIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22977}
}
abstract

We construct two exact nonlinear-electrodynamic generalizations of the Kerr-Newman-NUT-$\Lambda$ spacetime. Imposing alignment between the principal directions of the electromagnetic field and the metric tetrad reduces the Maxwell-Faraday sector to a pair of potentials constrained by a single integrability condition, the key equation. Within the polynomial aligned ansatz considered here, the key equation selects two admissible families, corresponding to electromagnetic potentials that are cubic and quartic polynomials. For each family the Einstein equations reduce to a single radial ordinary differential equation that gives a deformation of the Kerr-like radial metric function which is exactly solved. We derive the corresponding metrics, electromagnetic fields, stress tensors, horizon structure, and we analyze the associated energy conditions. The nonlinear sector breaks conformal invariance and, in the cubic family, can mimic an effective cosmological contribution. The explicit Lagrangians as functions of the electromagnetic invariants are obtained in selected static subsectors. The curvature invariants show that the nonlinear contribution does not remove the Kerr-like curvature singularity, while the solutions present the NUT axial conical singularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22977 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Comparison of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The Quartic NLED-RN metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The Quartic NLED-RN-NUT metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The Quartic NLED-KN-NUT metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The Quartic NLED-KN metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [9]

    Additionally, the energy density should not be exceeded by anypressure, such thatµ+pα≥0, α= 1,2,3

    Weak Energy Condition (WEC) If the energy momentum tensor is of type I, the Weak Energy Condition (WEC)[23] holds ifµ≥0. Additionally, the energy density should not be exceeded by anypressure, such thatµ+pα≥0, α= 1,2,3. For the case of the cubic vector potential NLE-KN-NUT-Λsolution, the Weak Energy Condition (WEC) amounts to the energy density µrestricte...

  2. [10]

    This leads to the following inequalities for the Cubic NLED-KN-NUT-Λ, 0≤(µ−p 1,2) =− Tµ µ 2 = (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4πΣ (1 +βn 2)(1 +βn 2−3r 2β)β

    Dominant Energy Condition (DEC) The Dominant Energy Condition (DEC)[23] holds ifµ≥0, andp α≤|µ|. This leads to the following inequalities for the Cubic NLED-KN-NUT-Λ, 0≤(µ−p 1,2) =− Tµ µ 2 = (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4πΣ (1 +βn 2)(1 +βn 2−3r 2β)β. (127) with the asymptotic behavior, lim r→0 (µ−p 1,2) = (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4π(acosθ+n) 2 (1 +βn 2)2β; lim r→∞ (µ−p 1,2) =−3 (Q...

  3. [1]

    If|Q|=mandβ >0, the non-linear effects ensure the existence of two distinct horizons bounded by0≤r−≤ r+≤2m

  4. [2]

    If|Q|=mandβ <0, the metric function has no real roots, indicating the presence of a naked singularity

  5. [3]

    For instance, ifβ= 9 50m2, the extremal charge is exactlyQext = 2 √ 5 3 m, which results in a single degenerate event horizon located atr+ = 5 3m

    For any given non-linear couplingβ >0, there exists a critical extremal chargeQ ext(β)> mthat yields a degenerate horizon. For instance, ifβ= 9 50m2, the extremal charge is exactlyQext = 2 √ 5 3 m, which results in a single degenerate event horizon located atr+ = 5 3m

  6. [4]

    If|Q|<Q ext(β)for a given positiveβ, the metric function always admits two distinct real roots, corresponding to an inner and an outer horizon

  7. [5]

    If|Q|>Q ext(β)for a given positiveβ, no horizons exist, and the geometry describes a naked singularity. 16 D. Effective cosmological contribution of the cubic nonlinear sector From Eq. (80) for∆r it is clear that the NLED parameterβcan be tuned to compensate the cosmological constant Λ. Equivalently, NLED leads to a dark energy contribution. In other word...

  8. [6]

    NLED-RN-NUT:a= 0,n= 0.3m The quartic nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the NLED-RN-NUT solution is a static one with a NUT parametern̸= 0. In Figs. 3 the metric function∆ r/Σof the NLED-RN-NUT solution is shown, first by fixing ξ= 0.11/m 3 and increasingQ e from0to0.9m, witha= 0andn= 0.3m, it is observed that the event horizon decreases. However...

Show all 40 references
  1. [7]

    ξ=0 ξ=0.05/m3 ξ=0.1/m3 ξ=0.16/m3 0 2 4 6 8 10 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 r/m Δr Σ 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 (b)a= 0, n= 0.3mandQ e = 0.5m

    The horizons are then given by r0 = 0, r± m = 1± √ 1−8mQ 2ξ 2mQ2ξ ,(112) 20 Qe=0 Qe=0.3m Qe=0.5m Qe=0.9m 0 2 4 6 8 10 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 r/m Δr Σ 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 (a)a= 0, n= 0.3mandξ= 0.11/m 3. ξ=0 ξ=0.05/m3 ξ=0.1/m3 ξ=0.16...

  2. [8]

    Similarly, forQe = 0.5mandξ∈[0,0.16], the horizon grows withξ, and is larger than in the non-rotating case

    Case Quartic NLED-Kerr-Newman:a= 0.5m,n= 0 The metric function∆r/Σfor the Quartic NLED-Kerr-Newman solution, witha= 0.5m,n= 0, is displayed in Fig.5, withξ= 0.11/m 3 and varyingQe from0to0.9m; the radius of the event horizon decreases more significantly than in the non-rotatin...

  3. [11]

    In terms of theOTab components, SEC amounts toµ+p 1 +p 2 +p 3≥0

    Strong Energy Condition (SEC) The SEC guarantees that matter is attractive, causing geodesics to converge. In terms of theOTab components, SEC amounts toµ+p 1 +p 2 +p 3≥0. For the cubic vector potential NLE-KN solution this reduces to 0≤ (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4πΣ2 (1 +βn 2) { 1 + 2β [...

  4. [12]

    Weak Energy Condition In the case of the NLE-KN-NUT-Λsolution, with a quartic vector potential and characterized by the NLE parameter ξ, WEC amounts to the following conditions, 0≤µ= (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 8πΣ2 ( 1 + 2ξr3) , µ+p 3 = 0. (132) With the asymptotic behavior, lim r→∞ µ= 0; ...

  5. [13]

    Dominant Energy Condition (DEC) The Dominant Energy Condition (DEC)[23] holds ifµ≥0, andp α≤|µ|. This leads to the following inequalities for the NLE-KN-NUT-Λsolution −(µ+p 1,2)≤0≤µ−p 1,2 =− Tµ µ 2 −(Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4πΣ2 { 1 +ξr 2 [ r2−3(acosθ+n) 2]} ≤0≤ 3(Q2 e +Q 2 m) 8πΣ ξr, (1...

  6. [14]

    Quantum Frontiers

    Strong Energy Condition (SEC) SEC guarantees that matter is attractive, causing geodesics to converge. In terms of theOTab components SEC amounts to(µ+p 1 +p 2 +p 3)≥0. For the quartic vector potential NLE-KN-NUT-Λsolution this reduces to 0≤(µ+p 1 +p 2 +p 3) = (Q2 e +Q 2 m) 4π...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Equivalently, one may attempt to reconstruct L(E,B)from the constitutive relationsD= ∂L ∂E andH=− ∂L ∂B by solving the corresponding differential equation for L(E,B)

    Nonlinear electromagnetic cubic Lagrangian For the cubic family, the Lagrangian can be written compactly as L= ED−BH 2 + β 2    [ (1 +βn 2)X−Y+ β(1+βn 2)Q2 2 ]2 −β(1 +βn 2)Q2Y+ 3 4β2(1 +βn 2)2Q4 (1 +βn 2)X−Y    ,(C2) where X=Q mH−Q eE,Y=Q mB−Q eD, Q 2 =Q 2 e +Q 2 m.(...

  8. [16]

    Nonlinear electromagnetic quartic Lagrangian For the quartic family, the on-shell Lagrangian is L= ED−BH 2 + 3 4ξ2(Q2 e +Q 2 m)2 ( Ψ1 Ψ2 1 + Ψ2 2 ) ,(C9a) where the auxiliary functionsΨ1 andΨ 2 are defined in terms of the field intensities as Ψ1 =n 3ξ(QeH+Q mE)−2Q e(D−E) + 2Q ...

  9. [17]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Tests of general relativity with GW150914.Physical Review Letters, 116:221101, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, D. Agarwal, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, L. Aiello, A. Ain, P. Ajith, S. Akcay, T. Akutsu, et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed...

    2023

  11. [19]

    A. M. Ghez et al. Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits.Astrophys. J., 689:1044–1062, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    Sean A. Hayward. Formation and evaporation of nonsingular black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96(031103), 2006

    2006

  13. [21]

    Brizuela A

    D. Brizuela A. Alonso-Bardaji and R. Vera. An effective model for the quantum schwarzschild black hole.Phys. Lett. B, 829(137075), 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Francisco S. N. Lobo, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, Alex Simpson, and Matt Visser. Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure.Phys. Rev. D, 103(8):084052, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    M. E. Rodrigues G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov and D. Sáez-Chillón Gómez. On black bounce space-time in non-linear electrodymanics.Eur. Phys. J. C., 84(745), 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Alencar, Albert Duran-Cabacés, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, and Diego Sáez-Chillón Gómez

    G. Alencar, Albert Duran-Cabacés, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, and Diego Sáez-Chillón Gómez. General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):104020, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Garcia-Diaz

    A. Garcia-Diaz. AdS-dS stationary rotating black hole exact solution within Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics.Ann. Phys., 441:168880, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Galindo-Uriarte and N

    O. Galindo-Uriarte and N. Breton. Nonlinear electromagnetic generalization of the Kerr-Newman solution with a cosmo- logical constant.Phys. Rev. D, 110(6):064021, 2024. Also available as arXiv:2406.17077 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. F. Plebański.Lectures on Non Linear Electrodynamics. Nordita, 1968

    1968

  20. [28]

    Kubizňák and P

    D. Kubizňák and P. Krtouš. Conformal killing-yano tensors for the plebański - demiański family of solutions.Phys. Rev. D, 76(084036), 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    Breton and C

    N. Breton and C. E. Ramírez-Codiz. On the NUT–Born–Infeld-Λspacetime.Ann. Phys., 353:252–270, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    Salazar, A

    H. Salazar, A. Garcia-Diaz, and J. F. Plebański. Duality rotations and type D solutions to Einstein equations with nonlinear electromagnetic sources.J. Math. Phys., 28(9):2171–2181, 1987

    1987

  23. [31]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler.Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

    1973

  24. [32]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky. A new look at the Plebański-Demiański family of solutions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15(03):335–369, 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    J. F. Plebański. A class of Solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations.Ann. Phys., 90:196–255, 1975

    1975

  26. [34]

    García, H

    A. García, H. Salazar, and J. F. Plebański. Type-D solutions of the Einstein and Born-Infeld nonlinear-electrodynamics equations.Il Nuovo Cimento B, 84(1):65–90, 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Unveilingtheelectrodynamicsofthefirstnonlinearlychargedrotatingblackhole.Annals Phys., 469:169771,

    E.Ayón-Beato. Unveilingtheelectrodynamicsofthefirstnonlinearlychargedrotatingblackhole.Annals Phys., 469:169771,

  28. [37]

    Grenzebach, V

    A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl. Photon regions and shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT black holes with a cosmological constant.Phys. Rev. D, 89:124004, 2014

    2014

  29. [38]

    V. S. Manko and E. Ruiz. Physical interpretation of NUT solution.Class. Quantum Grav., 22:3555–3560, 2005

    2005

  30. [39]

    Hackmann and C

    E. Hackmann and C. Lämmerzahl. Observables for bound orbital motion in axially symmetric space-times.Phys. Rev. D, 85:044049, 2012

    2012

  31. [40]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis.The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, 1973

    1973

  32. [2024]

    Also available as arXiv:2203.12809 [gr-qc]. 31

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.