Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 35 references

Chiral restoration temperature at finite spin density in QCD

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At a spin potential of 0.310 GeV, the model restores chiral symmetry at all temperatures, and a critical endpoint at (0.142, 0.098) GeV marks the change from crossover to first order.

desk verdict A careful LSMq study that gives a lattice-calibrated phase diagram for spin-polarized QCD, but the headline CEP and T=0 endpoint are conditional on a one-parameter renormalization scheme that the authors do not stress-test. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20237 v2 pith:YBQ7S4YM submitted 2025-08-27 nucl-th hep-th

Pracheta Singha , Victor E. Ambrus , Sergiu Busuioc , Aritra Bandyopadhyay , Maxim N. Chernodub This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-th
keywords chiralphasetransitionspinpotentialdensitylinearsigmamodelwithquarksvacuumrenormalizationQCDdiagramcriticalendpoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts what happens to the chiral phase transition of strong-interaction matter when quarks carry a finite spin density, described by a spin potential $\mu_\Sigma$ conjugate to quark spin. Working in the two-flavour linear $\sigma$ model coupled to quarks (LSMq), it finds that $\mu_\Sigma$ enters the vacuum zero-point energy in a way that makes the renormalization procedure ambiguous: a one-parameter family of finite counterterms, labelled by $\ell$, all remove the divergences. The authors resolve the ambiguity by matching the model's small-$\mu_\Sigma$ transition curvature to lattice QCD results, then push the phase diagram into the region that lattice simulations cannot reach because of the sign problem. With the matched value $\ell = 2.61(8)$, the chiral crossover temperature falls as $\mu_\Sigma$ grows, the crossover becomes first order at a second-order critical endpoint $(T,\mu_\Sigma)_\mathrm{CEP} \simeq (0.142, 0.098)$ GeV, and the transition line ends at $T=0$ for $\mu_\Sigma \simeq 0.310$ GeV; above that spin potential the chirally broken phase no longer exists at any temperature. The result is a concrete, testable map of chiral symmetry restoration in strongly spin-polarized QCD matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-deformed quark dispersion relation, whose double-square-root form makes the vacuum energy depend on $\mu_\Sigma$ and creates an energy branch that is degenerate in momentum when $\mu_\Sigma/2 > g\sigma$. The second load-bearing object is the one-parameter renormalized meson potential, Eq. (46): $V^{\mathrm{ren}}_\sigma = \frac{\lambda}{4}[(\sigma^2-v^2)^2-(f_\pi^2-v^2)^2] - h(\sigma-f_\pi) + \frac{\ell N_f N_c g^2\mu_\Sigma^2}{32\pi^2 f_\pi^2}\left[\sigma^4-f_\pi^4+2f_\pi^2\sigma^2\ln\frac{f_\pi^2}{\sigma^2}\right]$. The $\ell$-term is the only place where the spin potential survives renormalization into the vacuum sector; its sign and magnitude set whether $\mu_\Sigma$ promotes or opposes chiral restoration, and matching $\ell$ to lattice data fixes the shape of the whole transition line.

What would settle it

Measure the fourth-order coefficient $\kappa^{(4)}_\Sigma$ of the chiral pseudocritical temperature as a function of imaginary spin potential on the lattice; the paper predicts $\kappa^{(4)}_\Sigma=0.0252(24)$ once $\ell=2.61$ is fixed by the quadratic curvature, so a lattice value outside this range would show that the one-parameter renormalization ansatz is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At mean-field level the spin potential deforms the quark dispersion relation to $E_p^{(s)} = \sqrt{p^2+g^2\sigma^2+s^2\mu_\Sigma^2-2s\mu_\Sigma\sqrt{p_z^2+g^2\sigma^2}}$ (for spin along the $z$-axis, $s=\pm 1/2$). This dispersion makes the one-loop vacuum free energy contain $\mu_\Sigma$-dependent ultraviolet divergences, which the paper removes with a bare meson potential whose residual freedom is a single parameter $\ell$. Comparing the resulting curvature of the chiral crossover line with the lattice value $\kappa^\psi_\Sigma \simeq 0.06$ fixes $\ell = 2.61(8)$; the same renormalized potential then determines the full phase diagram: $T_c$ decreases with $\mu_\Sigma$, a second-order critical endpoint appears at $(0.142, 0.098)$ GeV, and the first-order line terminates on the $T=0$ axis at $\mu_\Sigma=0.310$ GeV. For larger $\mu_\Sigma$ the chiral condensate vanishes at all temperatures. The paper also delivers a new quantitative prediction, the quartic curvature $\kappa^{(4)}_\Sigma = 0.0252(24)$, which lattice simulations have not yet measured.

Load-bearing premise

The whole phase diagram assumes that the only way the spin potential can alter the vacuum counterterms is through the single parameter $\ell$ in Eq. (46); if a second, independent finite counterterm, such as one proportional to $\sigma^2\mu_\Sigma^2$, also contributes, the predicted endpoint at 0.098 GeV and the zero-temperature endpoint at 0.310 GeV would both move.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\mu_\Sigma \gtrsim 0.310$ GeV, no chirally broken ground state survives at any temperature, so sufficiently spin-polarized QCD matter would be chiral-symmetric even in the cold limit.
  • At a spin potential of about 0.098 GeV, the transition changes character from smooth crossover to first order, meaning a jump in the chiral condensate and latent heat at that point.
  • The quartic coefficient $\kappa^{(4)}_\Sigma=0.0252(24)$ is a falsifiable prediction for lattice QCD continued from imaginary spin potentials.
  • In the restored phase the thermal quark contribution to the free energy becomes $\mu_\Sigma$-independent at leading order, so spin polarization at high temperature is carried by the vacuum-meson sector and saturates as the temperature grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same curvature-matching procedure can be applied to the Polyakov-loop-extended LSMq, which would predict whether deconfinement and chiral restoration split apart at finite spin density; the paper flags this as the natural next step.
  • The renormalization ambiguity identified here is generic to any modification of the quark dispersion relation, including chiral and isospin chemical potentials, so earlier phase diagrams in those settings may depend on an analogous one-parameter counterterm choice.
  • Because the spin-split dispersion relation also appears in Weyl and Dirac semimetals, the predicted first-order chiral transition may have a condensed-matter analogue that could be searched for in materials with a tunable effective spin potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the chiral phase transition in the linear sigma model coupled to quarks (LSMq) in the presence of a uniform spin potential μΣ, corresponding to a finite spin density. The authors derive the spin-deformed quark dispersion relation, compute the zero-point and thermal quark contributions to the free energy, and show that the μΣ-dependent zero-point energy contains UV divergences that require finite counterterms. They introduce a renormalization scheme with a single finite parameter ℓ, fixed by matching the quadratic curvature κΣ^(2) of the transition temperature versus spin potential to recent lattice results. With ℓ=2.61, the model yields a characteristic phase diagram in the (μΣ,T) plane: a crossover at small μΣ, a second-order critical endpoint at (T,μΣ)≈(0.142,0.098) GeV, and a first-order line ending at a T=0 critical point at μΣ=0.310 GeV. The paper also predicts the quartic curvature κΣ^(4)=0.0252(24). Detailed appendices present the dimensional regularization of the vacuum integrals, the treatment of infrared divergences in the thermal integrals, and the small-mass limit.

Significance. The technical core of the paper is careful and largely self-consistent: the dispersion relation, the zero-point regularization in Appendices A and C, the thermal-integral transformations in Appendix B, and the fit to the lattice curvature are all worked out in detail. The connection to lattice input is explicit and the predictions (quartic coefficient, CEP location, zero-temperature endpoint) are falsifiable by future lattice or model studies. If the renormalization-scheme ambiguity were fully controlled, this would be a valuable first extension of the spin-density phase diagram beyond the reach of current lattice simulations. The paper is also honest about the existence of a renormalization ambiguity; however, as argued below, it undercounts the scheme freedom, which limits the strength of the headline claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eqs. (42)-(46); Sec. IV C; Eqs. (79)-(80)] The renormalized potential in Eq. (46) is obtained by allowing a single finite deformation of the naive scheme, controlled by ℓ in Eq. (43). This is not the most general finite renormalization compatible with the symmetries and with the two conditions in Eq. (41). At order μΣ^2 there are at least two independent renormalizable finite counterterm structures, for example a local c2 μΣ^2 σ^2 term (which can be combined with a shift of the σ and constant terms so that Eq. (41) remains satisfied) in addition to the ℓ combination of σ^4 and σ^2 ln σ. The lattice curvature κΣ^(2) fixed in Sec. IV C constrains only one linear combination of these coefficients. Therefore the critical endpoint in Eq. (79) and the zero-temperature endpoint in Eq. (80) are not unique predictions; a different choice of the remaining counterterm that preserves the same κΣ^(2) would shift both endpoints. The statement in the abstract and Sec. VI that the regularization freedom is 'eliminated' by the fit is stronger than what the calculation establishes.
  2. [Sec. V, Fig. 10] The conclusion that 'for any ℓ>0, the phase diagram exhibits a critical point' rests on the zero-temperature first-order transition at μΣ√ℓ≃0.5 GeV derived from the specific potential (46). With the additional independent finite counterterm identified above, the zero-temperature potential changes at O(μΣ^2 σ^2) or O(μΣ^2 σ^4), and the order of the transition at T=0 can be altered. Thus even the qualitative universality of the CEP for all ℓ is a property of the one-parameter ansatz, not of the underlying LSMq with a spin potential.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV C] Please specify how κΣ^(2) is extracted from the model: whether it is the curvature at μΣ→0 or the quadratic coefficient of a polynomial fit over the stated interval μΣ∈[0,0.1] GeV. The quartic term is non-negligible at the upper end of this interval and can bias the extracted ℓ.
  2. [Fig. 6(a)] The curve labeled 'Lattice fit' is the quadratic truncation of Eq. (74); the text should clarify whether the model curves are compared with this truncation or with the lattice data points themselves, since that affects the interpretation of the fit quality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the parameter ℓ is calibrated against external lattice curvature, and the high-μΣ phase diagram is a genuine extrapolation rather than a restatement of the input.

full rationale

The paper introduces a free renormalization parameter ℓ in Eq. (43) and fixes it in Sec. IV C by matching the model curvature κΣ^(2) to the lattice value κψΣ ≃ 0.0595(27) of Ref. [17]. This is a standard calibration step: the lattice result is independent numerical data, not a prediction of the present model, and the fact that Ref. [17] shares an author does not make the calibration circular because the lattice numbers are externally computed. The headline outputs—the quartic curvature κΣ^(4) = 0.0252(24), the critical endpoint (T,μΣ)_CEP ≃ (0.142,0.098) GeV in Eq. (79), and the zero-temperature endpoint μΣ = 0.310 GeV in Eq. (80)—are obtained after ℓ is fixed, by solving the full saddle-point equations involving both the renormalized meson potential (46) and the thermal quark contribution (60). The fit constrains only one coefficient of the low-μΣ expansion; the endpoints are not equal by construction to the fitted curvature, nor do they reduce to the lattice input. The paper explicitly acknowledges the renormalization-scheme ambiguity and the fact that ℓ cannot be fixed from field theory alone, which is an honest statement of model dependence rather than a circular derivation. The possible existence of additional finite μΣ-dependent counterterms is a model-uncertainty or correctness concern, not a circularity, because the paper does not claim to derive those counterterms from the lattice input. No circular step is exhibited in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one fitted parameter ℓ, one ad hoc counterterm-family assumption, the canonical spin identification, the mean-field approximation, and analytic continuation. The model's meson parameters are standard inputs from vacuum meson physics, not free parameters fitted here.

free parameters (1)
  • ℓ (renormalization counterterm parameter) = 2.61(8)
    Controls the μΣ-dependent finite part of the renormalized meson potential (Eq. 43). Fixed by matching the LSMq curvature κ(2)_Σ to the lattice value κψΣ=0.0595(27) from Ref. [17] over μΣ∈[0,0.1] GeV.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The canonical spin tensor of Eq. (8) defines the physical spin density, so a finite spin potential μΣ is a meaningful thermodynamic parameter despite spin non-conservation.
    Invoked in Sec. II B and the Introduction; justified by Ref. [9] and by the same group's lattice study [17]. The entire ensemble with μΣ depends on this identification.
  • ad hoc to paper All μΣ-dependent UV divergences from the fermion zero-point energy can be absorbed by the one-parameter family of bare potentials in Eqs. (42)-(45), with no other independent finite μΣ counterterms.
    Sec. III C; this is the regularization freedom the paper acknowledges and resolves by fitting ℓ, but the functional form is a choice.
  • domain assumption Meson fluctuations can be neglected; the fermion determinant and renormalized meson tree potential determine the transition.
    Sec. II C and Conclusions; no bosonic fluctuations or Polyakov loop dynamics are included.
  • domain assumption The lattice curvature measured at imaginary spin potential [17] analytically continues to real μΣ and can be used to calibrate ℓ.
    Sec. IV C, Eqs. (72)-(74); the paper assumes the standard continuation despite the sign problem.
  • standard math Dimensional regularization, minimal subtraction, and Matsubara sums give the zero-point and thermal integrals in Appendices A-C.
    Routine background calculations; the paper supplies derivations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral restoration temperature at finite spin density in QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YBQ7S4YM

@misc{pith2026250820237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral restoration temperature at finite spin density in QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YBQ7S4YM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20237}
}
abstract

We investigate the impact of a uniform spin density on the critical temperature of the chiral phase transition in finite-temperature QCD in the scope of the linear sigma model. We demonstrate that at a finite spin potential $\mu_\Sigma$, corresponding to a finite spin density, the predictive power of the model is challenged by an ambiguity associated with a contribution of the vacuum renormalization term to the free energy. Eliminating the regularization freedom through comparison with recent low-$\mu_{\Sigma}$ lattice data, we extend the phase diagram of QCD at finite spin density to regions inaccessible to lattice simulations. We show that, as the spin potential increases, the temperature of the chiral crossover transition diminishes and the chiral crossover turns into a first-order transition at a second-order critical end-point $(T,\mu_\Sigma)_\mathrm{CEP}\simeq (0.142,0.098)$ GeV. With increasing spin potential, the critical temperature touches the zero-temperature axis at $\mu_{\Sigma} = 0.310$ GeV, implying that the chiral symmetry is restored at higher potentials at any temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The dependence of the vanishing-temperature ther [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Pressure and (b) spin density with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Thermodynamic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Normalized pressure and (b) Spin density as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Phase diagram of the chiral transition, in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Phase diagram in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a). The phase diagram contains a chirally bro- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Fermion energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Spin waves in spin hydrodynamics

    Victor E. Ambrus, Radoslaw Ryblewski, and Rajeev Singh, “Spin waves in spin hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 014018 (2022), arXiv:2202.03952 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    (B1) The above relation allows the integration variable to be changed from p to E(s) p in Eqs

    Energy branches Noting the relation (19) between the fermion energy E(s) p expressed with respect to the spherical coordinates (p,θ,φ ), and the momentum magnitude p, we derive dE(s) p dp = p E(s) p 1− sµΣ Epz cos2θ . (B1) The above relation allows the integration variable to be changed from p to E(s) p in Eqs. (57) and (59): Fq =−NcNfT π2 X s Z ΓE dEE ln...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Hence, Γ E in Eqs

    Case 1: gσ >sµΣ For case 1, the energy contour follows a monotonic in- crease from E1 0 = gσ−sµΣ to infinity. Hence, Γ E in Eqs. (B2) is replaced by the intervalE1 0 <E <∞. Simi- larly, the contour Γθ in the angular integrals in Eq. (B3) is simply−1≤ cosθ≤ 1. We now compute the angular integrals Is θ,E andδIs θ,E. Using the relations Es pz = p p2s cos2θ +...

    work page

  4. [3]

    p+ 1− 1 2|µΣ| ln 1 2|µΣ| +E +p+ 1 gσ # , (B26b) ∂Fc;− q ∂σ =−NcNfg2σ π2 1 2|µΣ|−gσZ 0 dE eβE + 1 ×

    Case 2: gσ <sµΣ As discussed in Sec. B 1, the fermion energy E(s) p be- comes degenerate when gσ < sµΣ. Separating Fq = F + q +F− q , with F± q corresponding to sµΣ =± 1 2|µΣ|, we note that the F− q contribution is compatible with case 1 discussed in Sec. B 2. We therefore focus for the remain- der of this section on F + q , which we split as follows: F +...

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Spin and polarization: a new direc- tion in relativistic heavy ion physics,

    Francesco Becattini, “Spin and polarization: a new direc- tion in relativistic heavy ion physics,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 85, 122301 (2022), arXiv:2204.01144 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vor- tical fluid,

    L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), “Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vor- tical fluid,” Nature 548, 62–65 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [6]

    Vorticity and Spin Polarization in Heavy Ion Collisions: Transport Models,

    Xu-Guang Huang, Jinfeng Liao, Qun Wang, and Xiao- Liang Xia, “Vorticity and Spin Polarization in Heavy Ion Collisions: Transport Models,” Lect. Notes Phys. 987, 281–308 (2021), arXiv:2010.08937 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Extreme matter in electromagnetic fields and rotation,

    Kenji Fukushima, “Extreme matter in electromagnetic fields and rotation,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 167– 199 (2019), arXiv:1812.08886 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 35 references
  1. [8]

    Spin polar- ization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,

    Francesco Becattini, Matteo Buzzegoli, Takafumi Niida, Shi Pu, Ai-Hong Tang, and Qun Wang, “Spin polar- ization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430006 (2024), arXiv:2402.04540 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics,

    F. Becattini, Wojciech Florkowski, and Enrico Sper- anza, “Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B 789, 419–425 (2019), arXiv:1807.10994 [hep-th]. 22

    2019 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Spin ten- sor and pseudo-gauges: from nuclear collisions to grav- itational physics,

    Enrico Speranza and Nora Weickgenannt, “Spin ten- sor and pseudo-gauges: from nuclear collisions to grav- itational physics,” Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 155 (2021), arXiv:2007.00138 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Spin hydrodynamics and symmetric energy-momentum tensors – A current in- duced by the spin vorticity –,

    Kenji Fukushima and Shi Pu, “Spin hydrodynamics and symmetric energy-momentum tensors – A current in- duced by the spin vorticity –,” Phys. Lett. B817, 136346 (2021), arXiv:2010.01608 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Emergent Canonical Spin Tensor in the Chiral-Symmetric Hot QCD,

    Matteo Buzzegoli and Andrea Palermo, “Emergent Canonical Spin Tensor in the Chiral-Symmetric Hot QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 262301 (2024), arXiv:2407.14345 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    The axial vector current in beta decay,

    M. Gell-Mann and M. L´ evy, “The axial vector current in beta decay,” Il Nuovo Cimento 16, 705–726 (1960)

    1960

  7. [14]

    Ideal relativistic fluid limit for a medium with polar- ization,

    David Montenegro, Leonardo Tinti, and Giorgio Torri- eri, “Ideal relativistic fluid limit for a medium with polar- ization,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 056012 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 079901 (2017)], arXiv:1701.08263 [hep- th]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Spin Potential for Relativistic Particles with Spin 1/2,

    Wojciech Florkowski, Avdhesh Kumar, and Radoslaw Ryblewski, “Spin Potential for Relativistic Particles with Spin 1/2,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 51, 945–959 (2020), arXiv:1907.09835 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Hydrodynamics of spin currents,

    Angel Domingo Gallegos, Umut G¨ ursoy, and Amos Yarom, “Hydrodynamics of spin currents,” SciPost Physics 11 (2021), 10.21468/scipostphys.11.2.041

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    The perfect spinfluid,

    Nick Abboud, Lorenzo Gavassino, Rajeev Singh, and Enrico Speranza, “The perfect spinfluid,” (2025), arXiv:2506.19786 [nucl-th]

    2025

  11. [19]

    On the local thermodynamic relations in relativistic spin hydrody- namics,

    Francesco Becattini and Rajeev Singh, “On the local thermodynamic relations in relativistic spin hydrody- namics,” (2025), arXiv:2506.20681 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Chiral and deconfinement thermal transitions at finite quark spin polarization in lattice QCD simulations,

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, and A. A. Roenko, “Chiral and deconfinement thermal transitions at finite quark spin polarization in lattice QCD simulations,” Phys. Rev. D111, 114508 (2025), arXiv:2503.18636 [hep- lat]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Phase diagram of helically imbalanced QCD matter,

    M. N. Chernodub and Victor E. Ambrus, “Phase diagram of helically imbalanced QCD matter,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 094015 (2021), arXiv:2005.03575 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Pryce, Proc

    M.H.L. Pryce, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 195, 62–81 (1948)

    1948

  15. [23]

    What is the relativistic spin operator?

    H. Bauke, S. Ahrens, Ch. H. Keitel, and R. Grobe, “What is the relativistic spin operator?” New J. Phys. 16, 043012 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    The role of Pryce’s spin and coordinate operators in the theory of massive Dirac fermions,

    Ion I. Cotaescu, “The role of Pryce’s spin and coordinate operators in the theory of massive Dirac fermions,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1073 (2022), arXiv:2206.13911 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    General treatment of the breaking of chiral symmetry and scale invariance in the SU(3) sigma model,

    J. Schechter and Y. Ueda, “General treatment of the breaking of chiral symmetry and scale invariance in the SU(3) sigma model,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 2874–2893 (1971), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 8, 987 (1973)]

    1971

  18. [26]

    Topo- logical nodal semimetals,

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and Leon Balents, “Topo- logical nodal semimetals,” Physical Review B 84 (2011), 10.1103/physrevb.84.235126

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    Chi- ral pumping effect induced by rotating electric fields,

    Shu Ebihara, Kenji Fukushima, and Takashi Oka, “Chi- ral pumping effect induced by rotating electric fields,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 155107 (2016), arXiv:1509.03673 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Thermodynamics of quark mat- ter with a chiral imbalance,

    R. L. S. Farias, Dyana C. Duarte, Gast˜ ao Krein, and Rudnei O. Ramos, “Thermodynamics of quark mat- ter with a chiral imbalance,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 074011 (2016), arXiv:1604.04518 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Decon- finement and chiral phase transitions in quark matter with chiral imbalance,

    Francisco X. Azeredo, Dyana C. Duarte, Ricardo L. S. Farias, Gast˜ ao Krein, and Rudnei O. Ramos, “Decon- finement and chiral phase transitions in quark matter with chiral imbalance,” Phys. Rev. D110, 076007 (2024), arXiv:2406.04900 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cold QCD at fi- nite isospin density: confronting effective models with recent lattice data,

    Sidney S. Avancini, Aritra Bandyopadhyay, Dyana C. Duarte, and Ricardo L. S. Farias, “Cold QCD at fi- nite isospin density: confronting effective models with recent lattice data,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 116002 (2019), arXiv:1907.09880 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hot QCD at finite isospin density: Confronting the SU(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with recent lattice data,

    Bruno. S. Lopes, Sidney S. Avancini, Aritra Bandyopad- hyay, Dyana C. Duarte, and Ricardo L. S. Farias, “Hot QCD at finite isospin density: Confronting the SU(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with recent lattice data,” Phys. Rev. D103, 076023 (2021), arXiv:2102.02844 [hep- ph]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    QCD equation of state at finite isospin density from the linear sigma model with quarks: The cold case,

    Alejandro Ayala, Aritra Bandyopadhyay, Ricardo L. S. Farias, Luis A. Hern´ andez, and Jos´ e Luis Hern´ andez, “QCD equation of state at finite isospin density from the linear sigma model with quarks: The cold case,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 074027 (2023), arXiv:2301.13633 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynam- ics of chiral models,

    V. Skokov, B. Friman, E. Nakano, K. Redlich, and B. J. Schaefer, “Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynam- ics of chiral models,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 034029 (2010), arXiv:1005.3166 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kapusta and Charles Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications , 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2006)

    Joseph I. Kapusta and Charles Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications , 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Chiral and Deconfinement Transitions in Spin-Polarized Quark Matter,

    Ricardo L. S. Farias and William R. Tavares, “Chiral and Deconfinement Transitions in Spin-Polarized Quark Matter,” (2025), arXiv:2507.08130 [hep-ph]

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.