Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?

As of 12 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 32 of 32 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.09416.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2502.09416 v2

Coverage vector

measured 32 of 32 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.496516Z

measured 34 of 34 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T14:17:46.256665Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-07T11:18:18.929583Z

Reference resolution

32 of 32 outbound references displayed

verified exact1
verified fuzzy0
unresolved31
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 6e448a58-e5a5-434a-85e1-1b16262ec0a0 · outbound

This paper cites online" 'onlinestring :=.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? online" 'onlinestring :=

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.204352Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6b114e9c-90ac-41aa-aded-8b51c16de9ab · outbound

This paper cites write newline.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? write newline

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.214363Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 142eca42-5e3e-4ad3-a6c1-bc947ad31cba · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.221098Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a137969a-8346-4a06-bb39-337057429d36 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.231753Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 73d3dba7-bae9-474b-a879-a43e5b4439d5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.238281Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c1baa982-e629-429c-8311-d44cf421b67a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.246621Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ed7c341d-d2ec-4ea7-8e7f-bafb521fd756 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.255485Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation de1a8082-f4b0-4a69-891a-cbe9588ac87d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.264509Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ea63655f-62b7-4a7f-ae78-b19d1b7c1a6d · outbound

This paper cites gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.276104Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 46f921bb-4423-42f9-85b6-60ea45735c89 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.284105Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 329c7816-2d95-4b60-aaef-c55821d71a45 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.289701Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f5cb2043-daf8-4ab8-b8a8-8f019252ba0d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.307325Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a13fc7c6-cd3c-433f-883a-8518cde3bebc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.317189Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 618432fe-0bea-4294-b469-c50c607e3211 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.333767Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3dd537b4-3465-41fc-b791-005f77917758 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.343867Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 92bf4c58-0dcd-42ef-b5c2-8c799bc15a4f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.351135Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5bfe1d0c-bfb8-4196-850b-28f2d5d14257 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.357574Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 11ff3faf-2ddd-4554-8172-20484d3ccd85 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.363885Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 95f6fefb-ae8b-4074-bece-73b6c1fb299c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.371809Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7bc1f7bb-78fa-4a4a-9378-4daff4cebea0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.380794Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c6675e89-0815-4a4a-a6d9-400afc188691 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.387825Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5bb5bb4d-530b-4ad4-82f0-6d4145a6ad29 · outbound

This paper cites GLEU Without Tuning.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? GLEU Without Tuning

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.403761Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e657c586-1b2b-4485-b58f-72c4cc1b848f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.410654Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b8d56141-eb39-430a-a7f2-abe2f6a08617 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.416268Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8c69104a-eb5c-46d5-a006-bfd6ebfb64cf · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.426434Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5983da04-b8e3-45dd-87d8-0ade067c5a85 · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.433455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation bab1ad42-ea0d-4630-a6de-1931ec8722d5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.443291Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d0473703-fa93-441b-b01e-ff91120229a6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.453776Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1a7ee2cb-d0c0-4f07-9a9a-35e17acf1fc5 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.465520Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5b1241e3-2933-4b91-b03f-34a5106007af · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.615013Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 54e45577-f4c4-4ce4-aa3d-491435bde175 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.484542Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8ade268f-9eb6-45bc-a0b4-803c95c482d9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human? Unresolved cited work

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T21:38:59.496516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

Observation d766250f-7f69-414e-b771-ba95045112f3 · inbound

gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation cites this paper.

gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T14:17:46.256665Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6d8ded3f-5719-4145-919c-a0516fa7a1b5 · inbound

IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimator cites this paper.

IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimator Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T11:18:19.018776Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.