Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature

Elias Kiritsis; Francesco Nitti; Jani Kastikainen

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A holographic confining theory on a sphere has a curvature-driven phase transition: first-order above the Efimov bound, at least second-order below it.

desk verdict Solid, honest holography paper with a genuinely new branch classification and a plausible order-of-transition claim that still rests on an uncomputed matching matrix; worth refereeing, not fully settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04036 v1 pith:YKFYRJ6S submitted 2025-02-06 hep-th gr-qc

Jani Kastikainen , Elias Kiritsis , Francesco Nitti This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc

keywords holographicQFTquantumphasetransitionsconfinementEinstein-scalartheoryEfimovoscillationscurvature-driventransitionspherecompactificationrenormalizedfreeenergy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a holographic gauge theory which confines on flat space undergoes a genuine quantum phase transition when placed on a sphere of sufficiently large curvature. On the gravity side, two competing bulk geometries exist: at low curvature the scalar runs to infinity much as in flat space, while above a critical dimensionless curvature $R_c$ a regular interior endpoint dominates. The order of the transition is controlled by the exponent $b$ in the leading exponential falloff of the bulk potential. Above the Efimov bound $b_E$ the transition is first-order; below it the transition is at least second-order, and when the second derivative of the free energy is continuous the order is exactly $1+\lceil\delta\rceil$ with a computable exponent $\delta>1$. This gives a concrete, model-independent signature of how curvature competes with the scale that drives confinement.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order formulation of Einstein-scalar gravity in terms of $S(\phi)=\dot\phi$, $W(\phi)=-2(d-1)\dot A$ and $T(\phi)=d\kappa e^{-2A}$, which reduces the equations of motion to a single second-order equation for $S(\phi)$. IR boundary conditions divide solutions into three types: type III with a regular endpoint $\phi\to\phi_0$, type II with $\phi\to\infty$ that uplifts to a regular geometry in which the internal sphere shrinks, and type I, the critical interface solution where both spheres shrink. The Efimov bound $b_E$ appears in the exponents $\beta_\pm$ of linearized perturbations around the type I solution: for $b>b_E$ the exponents are complex and produce multi-valued Efimov spirals in the vev $C(R)$; for $b<b_E$ they are real and $C(R)$ can be single-valued. The renormalized free energy satisfies $F'(R)=N(2C(R)/R^3-1/(96R))$, which turns continuity of $C(R)$ into continuity of $F'(R)$ and yields the expansion (1.9) that fixes the order of the continuous transition.

What would settle it

Integrate the linearized perturbation equation around the numerical type I solution for a monotonic-regime potential (for example the $d=4$ potential with $b=0.47$) from $\phi\to\infty$ down to $\phi=0$ and extract the matrix $M$ in (4.19). If $M$ is singular, or if $\delta S(\phi)/S_I(\phi)$ fails to remain small in the intermediate region, then the free-energy expansion (1.9) and the finite-order bound (1.11) are wrong; a high-precision direct evaluation of $F''_{III}(R_c)-F''_{II}(R_c)$ would then decide whether the transition is second-order or higher.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for any confining Einstein-scalar holographic theory on a sphere there exists a critical dimensionless curvature $R_c$ separating two classes of bulk saddle points. For $R>R_c$ the Euclidean path integral is dominated by type III solutions with a regular endpoint at a finite scalar value $\phi_0$; for $R<R_c$ the dominant type II solutions have the same IR endpoint $\phi\to\infty$ as the flat-space confining solution, so the low-curvature phase inherits the discrete gapped spectrum of flat-space confinement. The order of the transition is set by $b$ in $V\sim V_\infty e^{2b\phi}$. For $b>b_E$, where $b_E=2/\sqrt{(d-1)(9-d)}$ is the Efimov bound, the branches of solutions oscillate around the critical type I solution and the transition is first-order. For $b_c<b<b_E$, the transition may be first-order or continuous; in the continuous case the paper proves that the free-energy difference obeys $(F'_{III}(R)-F'_{II}(R))/(2N)=F_1(R-R_c)/R^3+F_\delta(R-R_c)^\delta/R^3+\ldots$ with $\delta=((d-1)b+2\sqrt{1-(b/b_E)^2})/((d-1)b-2\sqrt{1-(b/b_E)^2})>1$, so the transition is at least second-order and, if $F_1=0$, has order $1+\lceil\delta\rceil$ rather than infinite order. Numerical solutions in $d=4$ with the potential $V=-d(d-1)/\ell^2+(\Delta_-(\Delta_--d)/(2\ell^2)-4V_\infty b^2)\phi^2+4V_\infty\sinh^2(b\phi)$ show a first-order transition for $b=0.65$ and a second-order transition for $b=0.47$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that small perturbations of the critical (type I) solution stay small all the way from the deep interior to the boundary, so that the unknown linear map connecting interior and boundary data is well defined and invertible; if that map is singular or the perturbations grow, the predicted exponent and the order of the transition do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Above the critical curvature the dominant geometry has a regular endpoint and the dual spectrum is continuous but gapped by the curvature, while below it the spectrum is discrete; the transition therefore changes the spectral character even when it is only second-order.
The existence and order of the transition are insensitive to subleading terms of the form $e^{2\gamma\phi}$ with $\gamma<b$, as long as the leading exponent lies in the confining range $b_c<b<b_G$.
In the Efimov regime $b>b_E$, the multi-valued spiral in $C(R)$ implies a range of curvatures with coexisting bulk geometries and a swallow-tail free energy, so the dominant phase jumps discontinuously at $R_c$.
In the monotonic regime with no peaks, the type I solution is the unique saddle at $R_c$ and is thermodynamically stable there, and the transition order is at most $1+\lceil\delta\rceil$, never infinite.
In the uplifted picture the transition is a change in which sphere of the warped product $S^d\times S^N$ shrinks to zero size, so it can be read as a conifold-type transition in the higher-dimensional geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension, not pursued in the paper, is to test whether the topological susceptibility (from a bulk axion profile) distinguishes the two phases as it does in thermal deconfinement; the paper raises this possibility but leaves it open.
Since the paper states that its IR expansion breaks down at $b=b_c$ and for power-law prefactors such as $\phi^{1/2}e^{2b_c\phi}$, adapting the analysis to potentials of that form could show whether the curvature transition survives in models closest to QCD and whether its order changes.
The numerical conclusion that the $b=0.47$ transition is second-order relies on fitting the ratios $m^-_C/m^-_R$; a direct high-precision computation of the linearized map $M$ in (4.19) would reveal whether all monotonic-regime potentials give second-order transitions or whether some realize the third-or-higher-order case.
For uplift dimensions with $d+N>9$, the Efimov regime is absent and the paper does not settle whether first-order transitions can occur there; a dedicated higher-dimensional scan would close this gap.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Good paper, worth engaging. The genuinely new thing is the classification of IR branches for confining Einstein-scalar theories on S^d: type I, II, III, the curvature-driven competition between them, and the claim that the order of the transition is controlled by the exponent b of the exponential potential. Earlier work covered special compactifications or negative curvature; this paper handles generic exponential potentials with a single scalar and gives a concrete formula for the higher-order exponent below the Efimov bound. The numerical examples for b=0.65 and b=0.47 support the two regimes, and the dimensional-reduction uplift gives a useful independent perspective on where the branches come from. The authors are candid about exclusions: IHQCD/V-QCD sit exactly at b=bc where the IR expansion breaks down, and the N=1 toroidal case is left open.

Where I agree with the conditional verdict: the order-of-transition result in the monotonic regime rests on the matrix M in (4.19), which is not computed. The paper says so. The coefficients n± are fitted to numerics, and consistency of a fit is not an independent derivation. If M were singular or the linearized flow from the intermediate IR region to the UV were not captured by the two IR modes, the expansion (4.32) and the exponent δ would not follow. I see no positive evidence that M is singular, and the numerics are consistent with the assumed forms, so this is a gap, not a demonstrated failure.

Where I push back on the stress-test note: the first-order claim above the Efimov bound does not really depend on M. The sine oscillations in (4.21)-(4.22) produce infinitely many turning points whenever the coefficients are nonzero, independent of the entries of M. So the first-order branch is robust; the conditional part is the specific higher-order behavior below b_E.

Minor points: no code is released, and the near-transition numerics have small overlap artifacts, though the authors identify them. The free-energy framework leans on the authors' earlier papers; that is legitimate because the machinery is established, and the differential relation (4.16) is a sensible check.

This paper deserves a serious referee. It is clear, honest, and advances the program. I would send it to review, with a request that the referee examine the matching assumption and ideally ask for a numerical construction of M or at least a third b value in the monotonic regime.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies holographic Einstein-scalar theories dual to confining QFTs on a sphere S^d. It classifies bulk solutions into three IR types, argues that the Euclidean path integral switches from the singular-but-acceptable type II branch to the regular type III branch at a critical curvature, and derives that, depending on the exponential potential exponent b relative to the Efimov bound b_E, the transition is first-order (b > b_E) or at least second-order (b < b_E), with a possible finite order 1+ceil(delta). The claims are supported by analytic IR expansions and by numerical solutions in d=4 for b=0.65 and b=0.47.

Significance. If correct, this is a generic curvature-driven quantum phase transition in holographic confining theories, with a sharp qualitative prediction for the order of the transition as a function of b and an explicit exponent delta. The paper's strengths are its combination of a higher-dimensional uplift, a clean IR classification, explicit free-energy expansions, and numerical verification of both regimes. The manuscript is also unusually candid about the points where its analytic control weakens, which is a genuine virtue.

major comments (3)

[§4.2, Eq. (4.19)] The central derivation of the order of the transition in the monotonic case (ii) relies on the linear map M between the IR perturbation amplitudes (S_-, S_+) and the UV data (δR, δC). The paper explicitly states that M is not computed analytically, and it assumes invertibility and a non-vanishing m^-_R entry. These assumptions enter directly in Eq. (4.32) and in the discontinuity formula Eq. (4.36); if det M = 0 or m^-_R = 0, the predicted order and even the existence of the δ-term do not follow. The numerical fits in Section 5.2 determine only ratios such as m^-_C/m^-_R and the coefficients n_R^±, n_C^±; they do not determine det M or independently test the invertibility assumption. I request a numerical construction of M (for example, by integrating the linearized perturbation equation around the type I solution) or a clear restatement of the order predictions as conditional on these assumptions.
[§3.3, Eq. (3.36), and §4.2 attractor assumption] The linearized solution (3.36) is obtained only in the IR region φ → ∞, where it diverges relative to S_I; the text therefore states that it is valid only in an intermediate range. The subsequent matching to the UV uses the assumption that the type I solution is an attractor, justified only by the numerical observation in footnote 15 that type II and III solutions remain close to type I in the UV. This observation concerns the nonlinear solutions, not the linearized flow that determines M. A quantitative check, such as integrating the linearized ODE for δS on top of the numerical type I solution and comparing the transfer matrix with the IR asymptotics, would directly test the attractor assumption and provide M. Without it, Eqs. (4.20)–(4.23) remain an ansatz with fitted coefficients.
[§4.3, Eqs. (4.36)–(4.38)] The finite-order formula 1+⌈δ⌉ is derived under the extra assumptions F1 = 0 and Fδ ≠ 0, with δ non-integer. The paper acknowledges this with 'assuming the transition is at least third-order' and 'generic situation', but Section 1.1 presents the formula as a definite prediction. Because F1 is built from the same fitted matrix elements, there is no argument that F1 vanishes; the numerical example b = 0.47 finds a non-zero F'' discontinuity, i.e. a second-order transition. I recommend separating the robust statement (at least second-order, under the M assumptions) from the conditional higher-order formula, and making explicit that the higher-order possibility is not realized in the numerical example.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and §1.1] The phrase 'depending on the leading asymptotic exponent' could be read as saying the order is fixed by b alone; Section 4.3 makes clear that below b_E the order also depends on the subleading shape of the potential and on F1. Please align the abstract with that qualification.
[§4.2, first paragraph] 'all they way to the UV' should be 'all the way to the UV'.
[Introduction, §1] 'one of they main interests' should be 'one of the main interests'.
[Eq. (4.10)] The coefficient B is used before it is introduced; please define it immediately before Eq. (4.10) or add a sentence after it.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.12)] The asymptotic values R_I^II and R_I^III differ by about 4×10^-4; although the quoted errors overlap, the overlap is marginal. A sentence explaining the fitting procedure and why the overlap is taken as evidence of equality would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central order-of-transition analysis is derived from the bulk equations; the unknown matrix M is an acknowledged limitation, not a fitted prediction, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is self-contained. The classification of type I, II and III solutions and the perturbation exponents β± are obtained by solving the linearized bulk equations in Section 3.3 and Appendix C, not imported from the paper's own summary. The free-energy formula (4.16) is derived from the on-shell action in Appendix F, with the holographic renormalization framework cited from the authors' earlier papers but also rederived in the appendix; the cited framework is an externally established, parameter-free result and does not encode the transition-order claim. The key potential concern is the unknown matrix M in Eq. (4.19), which relates IR perturbation amplitudes to UV data under the stated attractor assumption. The paper is explicit that M is not computed analytically: 'This we are not able to do however, because we do not know the type I solution SI(φ) except in the IR region φ → ∞'. This is an openly stated limitation and a correctness risk, not a circular step: the qualitative regimes (Efimov spiral vs monotonic approach) depend only on whether β± are complex or real, i.e. on the derived exponents, and not on the fitted coefficients. The exact order in the monotonic case is left conditional on F1, which depends on M; the paper does not claim to predict that coefficient from first principles. The numerical fits in Section 5.2 determine the constants in the analytically derived functional forms and are used to extract the order in the explicit example; this is calibration of undetermined coefficients to the same model, not the reduction of a prediction to its own input. The numerical construction of FII by matching FII(RI) = FIII(RI) does not by itself force the first derivative to be continuous; continuity of F′ follows from the separately fitted continuity of C(R). Therefore, although the analysis relies on earlier work by the same authors and on an unproven matching assumption, no load-bearing circularity—where the conclusion is equivalent to the input by construction—is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the holographic dictionary, the single-scalar truncation, the exponential-potential ansatz, and a global matching assumption whose coefficients are fitted numerically. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The numerical evidence uses one or two representative values of b and no code release, so the ledger is dominated by modeling assumptions and fitted matching constants rather than by invented entities.

free parameters (4)

matching matrix M_II, M_III and coefficients m_R^pm, m_C^pm, n_R^pm, n_C^pm = fitted numerically; values not tabulated
These encode the global linear relation between IR perturbation amplitudes and UV parameters (R,C) in Eq (4.19). They are not derived analytically and are extracted from numerical fits in Section 5.2.
type I reference values (R_I, C_I, F_I) = R_I about 2.1565 or 0.1664, C_I about -0.1740 or -0.1265 depending on b
Obtained by numerical shooting and used as the critical point around which expansions are made. They are numerical outputs used as reference values rather than fitted to an external dataset.
asymptotic fit values R_I^II, R_I^III, C_I^II, C_I^III = e.g., 2.15661 +/- 0.00017 for type III and 2.15699 +/- 0.00031 for type II in the Efimov example
The asymptotic limits for type II and III are fitted separately and are assumed to coincide with the type I value; small mismatches are attributed to numerical noise.
free energy expansion coefficients F_1 and F_delta = estimated F'' discontinuity about -7.1 for b=0.47
These coefficients determine whether the transition is second-order or higher. They are computed from fitted ratios m_C^-/m_R^- rather than from first principles.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence and the standard holographic dictionary
The on-shell action is identified with the QFT free energy and UV expansion coefficients with source and vev. Used throughout Sections 2 and 4.
domain assumption A single real scalar field coupled to Einstein gravity captures the confining dynamics
The model (1.1) is a toy model that the authors argue reproduces Wilson loop area law, gapped spectra, and thermal deconfinement. This truncation is assumed adequate.
domain assumption Confinement in flat space occurs for bc < b < bG with W ~ sqrt(-V) regular asymptotics
The criterion from [12,17] is imported from prior literature and used to select the class of potentials in Eq (1.3).
domain assumption The scalar potential has a single UV maximum and exponential large-field asymptotics V ~ V_inf e^{2b phi}
Most of the analysis is restricted to this class; the realistic IHQCD and V-QCD potentials at b=bc are explicitly excluded in Section 6.
ad hoc to paper The type I solution is an IR attractor and perturbations around it remain small all the way to the UV
Stated in Section 4.2 and only checked numerically for two values of b. It is required to connect S+ and S- to delta R and delta C through the unknown matrix M in Eq (4.19).
domain assumption Acceptability of singular IR endpoints is judged by whether they uplift to regular higher-dimensional geometries
Type II solutions are singular in the lower-dimensional theory but regular after uplift on S^N; this criterion is used to accept them and to define the type I solution as a limit.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YKFYRJ6S

@misc{pith2026250204036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic confining theories on space-times with constant positive curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YKFYRJ6S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04036}
}

read the original abstract

Varying the curvature, quantum phase transitions are investigated in holographic confining QFTs defined on a fixed constant positive curvature background. We find a competition between two branches of solutions and a phase transition as one varies the space-time curvature. The low-curvature phase has the same kind of IR geometry as the flat-space solution, while the high-curvature phase has a regular interior. We argue that, depending on the leading asymptotic exponent of the scalar potential, the transition may be first-order or higher-order.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

On the spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds
hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

For holographic QFTs on constant-curvature manifolds, the spectrum is always discrete for negative curvature and always has a continuous component starting at m^2 = (9/4)α^{-2} for positive curvature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv

E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 505–532, [ hep-th/9803131]

arXiv 1998
[2]

J. M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large N field theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862, [hep-th/9803002]

arXiv 1998
[3]

Rey and J.-T

S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379–394, [ hep-th/9803001]

arXiv 2001
[4]

D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 363–417, [hep-th/9904017]

arXiv 1999
[5]

Bianchi, D

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, How to go with an RG flow , JHEP 08 (2001) 041, [hep-th/0105276]. 29Note that the Uct in [44] differs from ours by a factor of d/2. – 80 –

arXiv 2001
[6]

Ryu and T

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, [ hep-th/0603001]

arXiv 2006
[7]

Ryu and T

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

arXiv 2006
[8]

V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062, [ 0705.0016]

arXiv 2007

Show all 53 references

[9]

N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, The Quantum gravitational back reaction on inflation , Annals Phys. 253 (1997) 1–54, [ hep-ph/9602316]

1997 arXiv
[10]

Sakai and S

T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD , Prog. Theor. Phys. 113 (2005) 843–882, [ hep-th/0412141]

2005 arXiv
[11]

Girardello, M

L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni, The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 569 (2000) 451–469, [ hep-th/9909047]

2000 arXiv
[12]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II, JHEP 02 (2008) 019, [ 0707.1349]

2008 arXiv
[13]

Gursoy and E

U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I , JHEP 02 (2008) 032, [ 0707.1324]

2008 arXiv
[14]

Jarvinen and E

M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis, Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit , JHEP 03 (2012) 002, [ 1112.1261]

2012 arXiv
[15]

S. S. Gubser, Curvature singularities: The good, the bad, and the naked , Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 4 (May, 2000) 679–745

2000
[16]

Charmousis, B

C. Charmousis, B. Gouteraux, B. S. Kim, E. Kiritsis and R. Meyer, Effective Holographic Theories for low-temperature condensed matter systems , JHEP 11 (2010) 151, [ 1005.4690]

2010 arXiv
[17]

Kiritsis, F

E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. Silva Pimenta, Exotic RG Flows from Holography , Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1600120, [ 1611.05493]

2017 arXiv
[18]

Gouteraux and E

B. Gouteraux and E. Kiritsis, Generalized Holographic Quantum Criticality at Finite Density, JHEP 12 (2011) 036, [ 1107.2116]

2011 arXiv
[19]

Gouteraux, J

B. Gouteraux, J. Smolic, M. Smolic, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, Holography for Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories from generalized dimensional reduction , JHEP 01 (2012) 089, [1110.2320]

2012 arXiv
[20]

Marolf, M

D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and M. Van Raamsdonk, Holographic models of de Sitter QFTs , Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 105015, [ 1007.3996]

2011 arXiv
[21]

Blackman, M

J. Blackman, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, Acceleration-Induced Deconfinement Transitions in de Sitter Spacetime , JHEP 08 (2011) 064, [ 1105.0440]

2011 arXiv
[22]

Gursoy, Continuous Hawking-Page transitions in Einstein-scalar gravity , JHEP 01 (2011) 086, [1007.0500]

U. Gursoy, Continuous Hawking-Page transitions in Einstein-scalar gravity , JHEP 01 (2011) 086, [1007.0500]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Betzios, U

P. Betzios, U. G¨ ursoy, M. J¨ arvinen and G. Policastro,Fluctuations in a nonconformal holographic plasma at criticality , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 086026, [ 1807.01718]

2020 arXiv
[24]

Betzios, U

P. Betzios, U. G¨ ursoy, M. J¨ arvinen and G. Policastro,Quasinormal modes of a strongly coupled nonconformal plasma and approach to criticality , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 081901, [1708.02252]

2018 arXiv
[25]

Kiritsis, F

E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and J.-L. Raymond to appear
[26]

J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and quantum phase transitions , JHEP 05 (2018) 034, [ 1711.08462]. – 81 –

2018 arXiv
[27]

Ghodsi, J

A. Ghodsi, J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and V. Nourry, Holographic QFTs on AdS d, wormholes and holographic interfaces , JHEP 01 (2023) 121, [ 2209.12094]

2023 arXiv
[28]

J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, Revisiting Coleman-de Luccia transitions in the AdS regime using holography , JHEP 09 (2021) 065, [ 2102.11881]

2021 arXiv
[29]

Ghodsi, E

A. Ghodsi, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, On holographic confining QFTs on AdS , 2409.02879

arXiv
[30]

Ghodsi, E

A. Ghodsi, E. Kiritsis, P. Mashayeki and F. Nitti, Mass spectra of holographic QFTs on constant curvature manifolds , to appear
[31]

Buchel, Quantum phase transitions in cascading gauge theory , Nucl

A. Buchel, Quantum phase transitions in cascading gauge theory , Nucl. Phys. B 856 (2012) 278–327, [1108.6070]

2012 arXiv
[32]

Aharony, E

O. Aharony, E. Y. Urbach and M. Weiss, Generalized Hawking-Page transitions, JHEP 08 (2019) 018, [ 1904.07502]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Kiritsis, F

E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau, Holographic QFTs on S 2×S2, spontaneous symmetry breaking and Efimov saddle points , JHEP 08 (2020) 138, [ 2005.09054]

2020 arXiv
[34]

B¨ ohm,Inhomogeneous einstein metrics on low-dimensional spheres and other low-dimensional spaces, Inventiones mathematicae 134 (1998) 145–176

C. B¨ ohm,Inhomogeneous einstein metrics on low-dimensional spheres and other low-dimensional spaces, Inventiones mathematicae 134 (1998) 145–176

1998
[35]

B¨ ohm,Non-compact cohomogeneity one einstein manifolds , Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France127 (1999) 135–177

C. B¨ ohm,Non-compact cohomogeneity one einstein manifolds , Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France127 (1999) 135–177

1999
[36]

Kol, Topology change in general relativity, and the black hole black string transition , JHEP 10 (2005) 049, [ hep-th/0206220]

B. Kol, Topology change in general relativity, and the black hole black string transition , JHEP 10 (2005) 049, [ hep-th/0206220]

2005 arXiv
[37]

Asnin, B

V. Asnin, B. Kol and M. Smolkin, Analytic evidence for continuous self similarity of the critical merger solution , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 6805–6827, [ hep-th/0607129]

2006 arXiv
[38]

Kalisch, S

M. Kalisch, S. M¨ ockel and M. Ammon,Critical behavior of the black hole/black string transition, JHEP 08 (2017) 049, [ 1706.02323]

2017 arXiv
[39]

S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 086007, [ 0804.0434]

2008 arXiv
[40]

S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu and F. D. Rocha, Thermodynamics and bulk viscosity of approximate black hole duals to finite temperature quantum chromodynamics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 131601, [ 0804.1950]

2008 arXiv
[41]

G¨ ursoy, A

U. G¨ ursoy, A. Jansen and W. van der Schee, New dynamical instability in asymptotically anti–de Sitter spacetime , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 061901, [ 1603.07724]

2016 arXiv
[42]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti, Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity, JHEP 05 (2009) 033, [ 0812.0792]

2009 arXiv
[43]

Karch, A

A. Karch, A. O’Bannon and L. G. Yaffe, Critical Exponents from AdS/CFT with Flavor , JHEP 09 (2009) 042, [ 0906.4959]

2009 arXiv
[44]

J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, Back-reaction in massless de Sitter QFTs: holography, gravitational DBI action and f(R) gravity , JCAP 07 (2020) 040, [2003.09435]

2020 arXiv
[45]

J. K. Ghosh, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, Holographic RG flows on curved manifolds and the F -theorem, JHEP 02 (2019) 055, [ 1810.12318]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Balasubramanian and P

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413–428, [ hep-th/9902121]

1999 arXiv
[47]

Henningson and K

M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The Holographic Weyl anomaly , JHEP 07 (1998) 023, [hep-th/9806087]. – 82 –

1998 arXiv
[48]

Papadimitriou, Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity , JHEP 08 (2011) 119, [ 1106.4826]

I. Papadimitriou, Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity , JHEP 08 (2011) 119, [ 1106.4826]

2011 arXiv
[49]

Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ hep-th/0703152]

I. Papadimitriou, Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT , JHEP 05 (2007) 075, [ hep-th/0703152]

2007 arXiv
[50]

Kiritsis, W

E. Kiritsis, W. Li and F. Nitti, Holographic RG flow and the Quantum Effective Action , Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 389–454, [ 1401.0888]

2014 arXiv
[51]

Jarvinen, Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit , JHEP 07 (2015) 033, [1501.07272]

M. Jarvinen, Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit , JHEP 07 (2015) 033, [1501.07272]

2015 arXiv
[52]

Vicari and H

E. Vicari and H. Panagopoulos, Theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories in the presence of a topological term, Phys. Rept. 470 (2009) 93–150, [ 0803.1593]

2009 arXiv
[53]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti, Improved Holographic Yang-Mills at Finite Temperature: Comparison with Data , Nucl. Phys. B 820 (2009) 148–177, [ 0903.2859]. – 83 –

2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv

E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 505–532, [ hep-th/9803131]

arXiv 1998

[2] [2]

J. M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large N field theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862, [hep-th/9803002]

arXiv 1998

[3] [3]

Rey and J.-T

S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379–394, [ hep-th/9803001]

arXiv 2001

[4] [4]

D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 363–417, [hep-th/9904017]

arXiv 1999

[5] [5]

Bianchi, D

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, How to go with an RG flow , JHEP 08 (2001) 041, [hep-th/0105276]. 29Note that the Uct in [44] differs from ours by a factor of d/2. – 80 –

arXiv 2001

[6] [6]

Ryu and T

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, [ hep-th/0603001]

arXiv 2006

[7] [7]

Ryu and T

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

arXiv 2006

[8] [8]

V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062, [ 0705.0016]

arXiv 2007