Analytic Model for Covariance Matrices of the 2-, 3-, and 4-Point Correlation Functions in the Gaussian Random Field Approximation

Alessandro Greco; Jessica Chellino; Simon May; Zachary Slepian

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 210 references

Analytic Model for Covariance Matrices of the 2-, 3-, and 4-Point Correlation Functions in the Gaussian Random Field Approximation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using the power spectrum model $P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n$, the paper derives closed-form expressions for the Gaussian-random-field covariance matrices of the 2-, 3-, and 4-point correlation functions and traces their sparsity to the triangle…

desk verdict The f-integral formulas are elegant but Eq. (5.43) drops the triangular-support Heavisides on the shot-noise term, so the paper's central analytic result is wrong as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21133 v2 pith:YMLREDEX submitted 2025-04-29 astro-ph.CO

Jessica Chellino , Alessandro Greco , Simon May , Zachary Slepian This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.CO

keywords covariancematricesN-pointcorrelationfunctionsGaussianrandomfieldsphericalBesself-integralstriangleinequalitysparsityshotnoisepower-lawpowerspectrum

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to replace the numerically integrated power-spectrum integrals in analytic covariance templates for galaxy clustering with fully closed forms. Using the model $P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n$, it derives an exact expression for the 2PCF covariance in terms of the geometric mean and ratio of pair separations, and closed forms for the f-integrals that are the building blocks of the 3PCF and 4PCF covariances. It reports single-digit-percent agreement with the Boltzmann-solver-based integrals across many multipole channels and separations. The structural payoff is an explanation of sparsity: each f-integral is only large when the two side lengths and the pair separation can form a closed triangle, so products of f-integrals inherit a smaller overlap region. If the model holds, future surveys can compute and invert covariance templates without expensive oscillatory integrals or many mock catalogs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the f-integral, a triple product of spherical Bessel functions weighted by the power spectrum, defined in equations (4.3) and (5.1). The paper evaluates it after substituting $P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n$, splitting into integrals $I^{[3,\mathrm{lin}]}$ and $I^{[3,\mathrm{quad}]}$ with powers $k$ and $k^2$. The $k^2$ piece collapses to a Dirac delta via the spherical Bessel closure relation; the $k$ piece is reduced, using an orthogonality identity to insert a free angular order, to finite sums over Wigner 3-j and 6-j symbols, binomial coefficients, and hypergeometric and Meijer G-functions. The mechanism that produces sparsity is the set of Heaviside functions $H(1-R_{+,ij})$ and $H(R_{-,ij}-1)$ in equation (5.43), which confine the dominant contribution to the region where the three lengths form a closed triangle. Multiplying f-integrals then shrinks the nonzero region to the overlap of their triangular supports.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate equation (5.1) directly for $P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n$ on a very fine $k$ grid for fixed $\{\ell,\ell',\ell''\}$, without dropping the $r=r'$, $s=u$, and $r_i=s$ points, and compare the binned result with equations (5.6) and (5.43); a mismatch at the few-percent level at small separations would indicate that the discarded pointwise terms survive binning.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the $1/k$ power-law plus shot-noise model makes every integral needed for the leading-order (Gaussian-random-field) covariance of the 2-, 3-, and 4-point correlation functions analytically tractable. For the 2PCF, the covariance reduces to equation (3.16), expressed through $g=\sqrt{rr'}$, $\chi=r/r'$, and the scale $\eta=1/(A\bar n)$ where cosmic variance balances shot noise. For the higher-order functions, the f-integral $f_{\ell,\ell',\ell''}(r_i,r'_j,s)=\int_0^\infty (k^2 dk/2\pi^2)P(k)j_\ell(kr_i)j_{\ell'}(kr'_j)j_{\ell''}(ks)$ is evaluated in closed form in two cases: one spherical Bessel function with zero order and argument (equation 5.6), and all arguments nonzero (equation 5.43), the latter expressed through finite sums over Wigner symbols, hypergeometric functions, and Meijer G-functions. The paper argues that these closed forms match integrals against the true power spectrum at the single-digit-percent level, and that the Heaviside functions in the closed form enforce the triangle inequalities $|r_i-r'_j|\le s\le r_i+r'_j$. This triangle constraint is the origin of the covariance sparsity: products of f-integrals are significant only where their triangular regions overlap.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the divergent contributions that occur when two spherical Bessel arguments coincide (and orders match) can be discarded because the covariance is binned in separation, so these points occupy measure zero; if binning or subsequent integration over $s$ gives those points finite weight, the closed-form f-integrals and the covariance built from them miss real pieces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The 2PCF covariance in equation (3.16) can be evaluated element-by-element from $g$, $\chi$, $\bar n$, and $V$ without numerical integration over $k$.
The closed-form f-integrals make the GRF covariance of the 3PCF and 4PCF computable by evaluating special functions at precomputed ratios $R_{\pm,ij}=|r_i\pm r'_j|/s$, with cost dominated by the $s$-grid rather than by a $k$-grid.
Covariance sparsity is explained geometrically: an element is appreciable only when the relevant side lengths and separations satisfy the triangle inequalities, and products of f-integrals are appreciable only in the overlap of their triangular regions.
Because the analytic model is invertible, the true covariance can be written as the analytic template plus a low-rank correction, enabling use of a matrix inversion lemma to obtain the precision matrix without inverting a huge mock covariance.
The same f-integral formulas extend to N-point correlation functions beyond the 4PCF, since higher-order GRF covariances are built from products of these same building blocks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the triangle-support picture is generic, sparsity patterns in high-order covariances could be predicted from pure geometry (side-length triangle inequalities) rather than from evaluating the full integrals, suggesting targeted compression schemes that only store overlapping-triangle blocks.
The $A/k$ model has no baryon acoustic oscillation wiggle; the residual errors at low $\{\ell,\ell'\}$ and the diagonal features in the half-inverse tests may be correctable by adding a small $k$-dependent correction to $A$ while preserving closed forms, for example a sum of power laws $P(k)=\sum_a A_a k^{-\alpha_a}$, since the same Bessel integral machinery applies term-by-term.
A direct testable extension is to compare the analytic precision matrix from the inversion lemma, with the correction estimated from a small number of mocks, against the precision matrix from thousands of mocks; the paper's sparsity argument predicts the correction is dominated by a few low-order multipole blocks.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The 2PCF covariance closed form and the general f-integral machinery are genuinely new, and the derivations are mostly careful. The structural insight that products of f-integrals suppress non-overlapping triangle regions is nice and likely correct in spirit. But the stress-test note is right, and it lands on the main equation.

The problem is in the sifting step from Eq. (5.24) to (5.25). The u-integral of δ(s−u) over [|ri−r′j|, ri+r′j] is only nonzero when s lies in that interval. That constraint has to appear as Heaviside factors in Eq. (5.25), and it must survive into Eq. (5.43). Instead, the 2π/(A nbar s) shot-noise term sits outside all the H(1−R+) and H(R±−1) factors, so it contributes for every s. For ℓ=ℓ′=ℓ″=0, ri=r′j=1, s=10, the defining integral vanishes by the Dirichlet integral, but Eq. (5.43) gives a nonzero value. So the claimed closed-form f-integral disagrees with its own definition outside the triangle region, and the sparsity story is contradicted by the shot-noise piece.

This is a fixable error, not a fatal one. But it means Eq. (5.43) cannot be used as published, and the validation tables do not currently test whether this term is correct away from the triangle region.

Other soft spots are proportionate: the equal-argument ultraviolet regularization is only sketched (footnote 5 and Section 5.1), and may deserve more care; the amplitude A is fitted to the same camb spectrum used for validation, so the percent-level metrics are partly in-sample; and no code or data are provided, which limits independent checking.

What the paper does well: the 2PCF covariance (3.16) is a clean closed form; the f-integral derivation is systematic and uses legitimate special-function identities; the comparison against camb covers many multipole channels and separations; and the triangle-overlap explanation of covariance sparsity is a useful contribution to the literature.

This is a paper for LSS methodologists working on analytic covariance templates. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should push for a corrected shot-noise term, a re-validation that checks the support behavior explicitly, and ideally a public implementation.

Recommendation: send to peer review, but expect major revision before acceptance.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops an analytic Gaussian-random-field covariance model for galaxy 2-, 3-, and 4-point correlation functions. The physical power spectrum is replaced by the model P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n; using standard spherical-Bessel integral identities, the authors obtain a closed form for the 2PCF covariance (Eq. 3.16), closed forms for the f-integrals that are the building blocks of the 3PCF and 4PCF covariances (Eqs. 5.6 and 5.43), and approximate sparsity of the resulting covariance matrices by the requirement that ri, r'j, and s form closed triangles. The model is validated against camb-based numerical integrals and against the full 3PCF and 4PCF covariance matrices, and the paper proposes a rank-one correction scheme for inversion together with a complexity discussion.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, this is a useful and potentially practical contribution: it provides an interpretable, fast, fully analytic template for covariance matrices that are otherwise too high-dimensional to estimate from mocks, and it gives a concrete structural explanation for their sparsity. The paper's strengths are the breadth of the derivations, the explicit closed forms, the extensive numerical comparisons against camb, and the clear discussion of triangular-region support. The weaknesses are that one of the two central closed forms, Eq. (5.43), is wrong as written outside the triangular region, and that the treatment of divergent equal-argument terms is asserted rather than rigorously derived; both issues affect the central claims of the paper, so they must be addressed before the results can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.1 and Section 5.1] The sifting step from Eq. (5.24) to Eq. (5.25) drops the integration bounds of the u-integral. Since the u-integral in Eq. (5.24) runs over u \in [|ri - r'j|, ri + r'j], the integral \int du \delta(s-u) (...) is nonzero only when |ri - r'j| \le s \le ri + r'j. The correct Eq. (5.25), and hence the shot-noise term 2\pi/(A \bar n s) in Eq. (5.43), must carry the factor H(s-|ri-r'j|)H(ri+r'j-s), equivalently H(R_+ - 1)H(1 - R_-). As printed, that term sits outside all three Heaviside factors and contributes for every s. For the simple case \ell=\ell'=\ell''=0, ri=r'j=1, s=10, Eq. (5.43) gives a nonzero shot-noise contribution proportional to 1/(8\pi \bar n s ri r'j), whereas the defining integral (5.1) vanishes because \int_0^\infty dk \, \sin^2 k \, \sin(10k)/k = 0 by the Dirichlet integral. Thus the closed-form f-integral disagrees with its definition outside the triangular region, and the sparsity mechanism derived from products of Eq. (5.43) is not supported as written.
[Section 3.1 and Section 5.1] The treatment of divergent equal-argument spherical-Bessel contributions is only sketched. Footnote 5 states that binning eliminates the ultraviolet divergence of I^{[2,lin]}_\ell(r,r') at r=r', and Section 5.1 drops the ri=s contribution to Eq. (5.6) because "the integral of a function at one point vanishes." This is not sufficient once products of f-integrals are integrated over s: a term supported at a single point can become a finite contribution after multiplication by a Dirac-delta shot-noise term (as in Eq. (5.6)) or after binning. The missing support constraint identified in Eq. (5.43) is an explicit example of a pointwise/support issue that is not measure zero in the final integration variable. The authors need to provide a rigorous regularization or an explicit binned derivation for these equal-argument terms before the f-integral results and the covariance comparisons built on them can be considered complete.
[Tables 2 and 3, Section 6.1.3] The accuracy summary is presented as the mean, standard deviation, and maximum of the absolute difference D between model and camb f-integrals, yet the text and table captions conclude "single-digit percent level accuracy" and quote the largest difference as "1.19%" or "2.22% away from a perfect match." As printed, the columns are dimensionful absolute differences, not relative percentages; for example, Table 2's Max(AbsVal)=1.19\times10^{-2} does not by itself establish 1.19% agreement. Please report relative errors with an explicit normalization (for example, relative to the typical or maximum |f| over the plotted region), or provide percent-error maps, so that the central accuracy claim is directly verifiable.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2.1] The amplitude A=277 h^{-2} Mpc^2 is hand-tuned to one power spectrum and one number density, and Appendix A notes that it should be re-tuned for other number densities. Please state explicitly how the quoted validation accuracy depends on this choice and whether the reported f-integral accuracy is partly in-sample.
[Section 6.1, Figures 7-13] It would be helpful to state explicitly whether the "model" f-integrals and covariance matrices in the figures are evaluated from the closed forms (5.6) and (5.43) or by direct numerical integration of Eq. (5.1) with P(k)=A/k+1/\bar n. This matters for assessing the implications of the support error in Eq. (5.43).
[Page 44, Table 2 caption] The phrase "the largest difference is 1.19% away from a perfect match" is inconsistent with the numerical column label Max(AbsVal). If these are absolute differences, the percentage wording should be removed or replaced with a properly normalized relative error.
[Section 5.2.1, Eq. (5.25)] After correcting the missing Heaviside factors, the statement that Eq. (5.25) matches equation 3.21 of [205] should be rechecked, since the cited result presumably includes the appropriate support constraint in its domain of validity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor in-sample normalization and methodological self-citations; core analytic derivation is independent.

fitted input called prediction [Section 2.1 (P(k) model, Eq. 2.1) and Section 6.1.3 (accuracy claims)]
"We have found that setting the amplitude to be A = 277h−2 Mpc2 gives good agreement between the model and true power spectra."

A is chosen by matching the model power spectrum of Eq. (2.1) to the same camb linear power spectrum that later serves as the 'true' spectrum in the f-integral and covariance comparisons of Section 6. The paper then reports in Section 6.1.3 that the f-integrals achieve single-digit percent accuracy, 'confirming that our power spectrum model provides a suitable alternative to the true power spectrum.' Since the f-integral in Eq. (5.2) is linear in A, the overall normalization of that agreement is fixed by construction rather than predicted. The residual shape comparison over many configurations is still nontrivial, so this is a mild in-sample validation issue rather than a complete reduction of the central claim.

full rationale

The derivation chain is largely self-contained: the analytic 2PCF covariance (Eq. 3.16) follows by substituting the model P(k) into the GRF covariance and using standard sBF integral identities (Eqs. 3.9, 3.14, 3.15), all derived in the text. The f-integrals are reduced algebraically to standard triple-sBF integrals using Mehrem et al. [205] and the sBF orthogonality relation displayed in Eq. (5.11); the cited prior work [206] by one of the present authors supplies a rewriting of that standard identity, not a uniqueness or target result, so it is methodological self-citation rather than load-bearing circularity. The covariance templates from [100], [176], and [177] are inputs from the authors' earlier framework, but the present paper's new closed forms are evaluated independently of those results. The main qualification is that the single amplitude A is fit to the same camb spectrum used for validation, making the reported percent-level agreement partly in-sample. The reviewer-flagged missing triangular-support Heavisides in the shot-noise term of Eq. (5.43) is a correctness concern about support and regularization, not a circularity of the derivation chain. Overall, no significant circularity; score 2 reflects the minor fitted-normalization issue and heavy methodological self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a hand-tuned power-law replacement for the true power spectrum, the GRF approximation, and a partially justified regularization of divergent equal-argument sBF integrals. The reuse of covariance frameworks from the same group's prior papers is transparent but means the new content is the analytic evaluation, not the covariance derivation.

free parameters (1)

A = 277 h^-2 Mpc^2
Hand-tuned amplitude of the physical 1/k power spectrum, chosen to minimize model-true deviation at nbar=3e-4 h^3 Mpc^-3; reused for all number densities in the validation, and Appendix A says it should be tuned per density.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The density field is treated as a Gaussian random field, so the connected parts beyond the power spectrum are neglected and the covariance reduces to products of P(k) (equations 4.1, 4.8, 4.12).
This is the leading-order GRF approximation; the paper states it is always the leading-order piece, but real galaxy density fields are non-Gaussian at the scales considered.
ad hoc to paper The true linear power spectrum can be represented by P(k)=A/k+1/nbar for the purposes of covariance integrals, with A set by hand.
Motivated by the 1/s^2 behavior of the 2PCF and by analytic tractability, not derived from the true transfer function; low-k and BAO features are not captured.
domain assumption The covariance skeleton equations from [100] and [176] are correct and can be reused without re-derivation.
The 3PCF and 4PCF covariances in equations (4.1), (4.8), and (4.12) are duplicated from prior work by the same group, and the paper does not independently prove them.
ad hoc to paper Ultraviolet-divergent equal-argument sBF contributions can be discarded as measure-zero under binning or integration over s.
Footnote 5 and Section 5.1 assert this cancellation with a sketch only; because shot-noise Dirac deltas are present, pointwise omission is not rigorously justified.
standard math Standard sBF orthogonality, closure, hypergeometric, and Meijer G integral identities from [202], [203], [205], and [206].
These identities are cited but not proved; they are standard mathematical results assumed throughout Section 5.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analytic Model for Covariance Matrices of the 2-, 3-, and 4-Point Correlation Functions in the Gaussian Random Field Approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YMLREDEX

@misc{pith2026250421133,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analytic Model for Covariance Matrices of the 2-, 3-, and 4-Point Correlation Functions in the Gaussian Random Field Approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YMLREDEX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21133}
}

abstract

Analyses of the galaxy N-Point Correlation Functions (NPCFs) have a large number of degrees of freedom, meaning one cannot directly estimate an invertible covariance matrix purely from mock catalogs, as has been the standard approach for the 2PCF and power spectrum. Instead, templates are used based on assuming a Gaussian Random Field density with the true, Boltzmann-solver-computed power spectrum. The resulting covariance matrices are sparse but have notable internal structure. To understand this structure better, we seek a fully analytic, closed-form covariance matrix template, using a power law power spectrum $P(k) \propto 1/k$ and including shot noise. We obtain a simple closed-form solution for the covariance of the 2PCF, as well as closed-form solutions for the fundamental building blocks (termed ``$f$-integrals'') of the covariance matrices for the 3PCF, 4PCF, and beyond. We achieve single-digit percent level accuracy for the $f$-integrals, confirming that our power spectrum model is a suitable alternative to the true power spectrum. In the $f$-integrals, we find that the greatest contributions arise when closed triangles may be formed. When $f$-integrals are multiplied together, as needed for the covariance, the number of non-vanishing configurations reduces. We use these results to present a clearer picture of the covariance matrices' structure and sparsity, which correspond to triangular and non-triangular regions. This will be useful in guiding future NPCF analyses with spectroscopic galaxy surveys such as DESI, Euclid, Roman, and SPHEREx.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

210 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

[1]

Gil-Marín, J.E

H. Gil-Marín, J.E. Bautista, R. Paviot, M. Vargas-Magaña, S. de la Torre, S. Fromenteau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0, MNRAS 498 (2020) 2492 [2007.08994]

arXiv 2020
[2]

Gil-Marín, W.J

H. Gil-Marín, W.J. Percival, L. Verde, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies, MNRAS 465 (2017) 1757 [1606.00439]

arXiv 2017
[3]

Gil-Marín, L

H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Noreña, A.J. Cuesta, L. Samushia, W.J. Percival et al.,The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies - II. Cosmological interpretation, MNRAS 452 (2015) 1914 [1408.0027]

arXiv 2015
[4]

Beutler, S

F. Beutler, S. Saito, H.-J. Seo, J. Brinkmann, K.S. Dawson, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles, MNRAS 443 (2014) 1065 [1312.4611]

arXiv 2014
[5]

Philcox and M.M

O.H.E. Philcox and M.M. Ivanov,BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology:Λ CDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 043517 [2112.04515]. 9https://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/MeijerG/21/01/01/ – 64 –

arXiv 2022
[6]

B.A. Reid, L. Samushia, M. White, W.J. Percival, M. Manera, N. Padmanabhan et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z = 0.57 from anisotropic clustering, MNRAS 426 (2012) 2719 [1203.6641]

arXiv 2012
[7]

Massara, C

E. Massara, C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos et al.,SimBIG: Cosmological Constraints using Simulation-Based Inference of Galaxy Clustering with Marked Power Spectra, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.04228 [2404.04228]

arXiv 2024
[8]

Ivanov, O.H.E

M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, G. Cabass, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology with the galaxy bispectrum multipoles: Optimal estimation and application to BOSS data, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 083515 [2302.04414]

arXiv 2023

Show all 210 references

[9]

Estrada, B.R

N. Estrada, B.R. Granett and L. Guzzo,Cosmology behind the mask: constraining the parameters ofΛCDM with the unmasked galaxy density field from VIPERS, MNRAS 512 (2022) 2817 [2108.01926]

2022 arXiv
[10]

Veropalumbo, I

A. Veropalumbo, I. Sáez Casares, E. Branchini, B.R. Granett, L. Guzzo, F. Marulli et al.,A joint 2- and 3-point clustering analysis of the VIPERS PDR2 catalogue at z 1: breaking the degeneracy of cosmological parameters, MNRAS 507 (2021) 1184 [2106.12581]

2021 arXiv
[11]

Mohammad, B.R

F.G. Mohammad, B.R. Granett, L. Guzzo, J. Bel, E. Branchini, S. de la Torre et al.,The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). An unbiased estimate of the growth rate of structure at⟨z⟩ = 0.85 using the clustering of luminous blue galaxies, A&A 610 (2018) A59 [1708.00026]

2018 arXiv
[12]

Pezzotta, S

A. Pezzotta, S. de la Torre, J. Bel, B.R. Granett, L. Guzzo, J.A. Peacock et al.,The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). The growth of structure at0.5<z < 1.2 from redshift-space distortions in the clustering of the PDR-2 final sample, A&A 604 (2017) A33 [1612.05645]

2017 arXiv
[13]

Beutler, C

F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, G.B. Poole et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey:z≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate andσ8, MNRAS 423 (2012) 3430 [1204.4725]

2012 arXiv
[14]

Gagrani and L

P. Gagrani and L. Samushia,Information Content of the Angular Multipoles of Redshift-Space Galaxy Bispectrum, MNRAS 467 (2017) 928 [1610.03488]

2017 arXiv
[15]

Novell Masot, H

S. Novell Masot, H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey et al.,Full-Shape analysis of the power spectrum and bispectrum of DESI DR1 LRG and QSO samples, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2503.09714 [2503.09714]

2025 arXiv
[16]

F. Qin, C. Howlett and D. Parkinson,The Redshift-space Momentum Power Spectrum. III. Measuring the Growth Rate from the SDSSv Survey Using the Auto- and Cross-power Spectrum of the Galaxy Density and Momentum Fields, ApJ 978 (2025) 7 [2411.09571]

2025 arXiv
[17]

Brown, R

Z. Brown, R. Demina, A.G. Adame, S. Avila, E. Chaussidon, S. Yuan et al.,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity from the large scale structure two-point and three-point correlation functions, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2403.18789 [2403.18789]

2024
[18]

D’Amico, M

G. D’Amico, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,Limits on primordial non-Gaussianities from BOSS galaxy-clustering data, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 063514 [2201.11518]

2025 arXiv
[19]

Rezaie, A.J

M. Rezaie, A.J. Ross, H.-J. Seo, H. Kong, A. Porredon, L. Samushia et al.,Local primordial non-Gaussianity from the large-scale clustering of photometric DESI luminous red galaxies, MNRAS 532 (2024) 1902 [2307.01753]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Jeong and E

D. Jeong and E. Komatsu,Primordial Non-Gaussianity, Scale-dependent Bias, and the Bispectrum of Galaxies, ApJ 703 (2009) 1230 [0904.0497]. – 65 –

2009 arXiv
[21]

Ross, W.J

A.J. Ross, W.J. Percival, A. Carnero, G.-b. Zhao, M. Manera, A. Raccanelli et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III DR9 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, MNRAS 428 (2013) 1116 [1208.1491]

2013 arXiv
[22]

U. Giri, M. Münchmeyer and K.M. Smith,ConstrainingfNL using the Large-Scale Modulation of Small-Scale Statistics, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2305.03070 [2305.03070]

2023
[23]

Shirasaki, N.S

M. Shirasaki, N.S. Sugiyama, R. Takahashi and F.-S. Kitaura,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with postreconstructed galaxy bispectrum in redshift space, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 023506 [2010.04567]

2021 arXiv
[24]

Gualdi and L

D. Gualdi and L. Verde,Galaxy redshift-space bispectrum: the importance of being anisotropic, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020 (2020) 041 [2003.12075]

2020 arXiv
[25]

Goldstein, A

S. Goldstein, A. Esposito, O.H.E. Philcox, L. Hui, J.C. Hill, R. Scoccimarro et al.,Squeezing fNL out of the matter bispectrum with consistency relations, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 123525 [2209.06228]

2022 arXiv
[26]

Novell-Masot, D

S. Novell-Masot, D. Gualdi, H. Gil-Marín and L. Verde,GEO-FPT: a model of the galaxy bispectrum at mildly non-linear scales, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023 (2023) 044 [2303.15510]

2023 arXiv
[27]

Rossiter, S

S. Rossiter, S. Camera, C. Clarkson and R. Maartens,Decoupling Local Primordial non-Gaussianity from Relativistic Effects in the Galaxy Bispectrum, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2407.06301 [2407.06301]

2024 arXiv
[28]

X. Xu, N. Padmanabhan, D.J. Eisenstein, K.T. Mehta and A.J. Cuesta,A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - II. Fitting techniques, MNRAS 427 (2012) 2146 [1202.0091]

2012 arXiv
[29]

Slepian, D.J

Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Marín, S. Ho et al., Detection of baryon acoustic oscillation features in the large-scale three-point correlation function of SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS 469 (2017) 1738 [1607.06097]

2017 arXiv
[30]

Pearson and L

D.W. Pearson and L. Samushia,A Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation features in the SDSS BOSS DR12 Galaxy Bispectrum, MNRAS 478 (2018) 4500 [1712.04970]

2018 arXiv
[31]

Hansen, A

M.T. Hansen, A. Krolewski and Z. Slepian,Accelerating BAO scale fitting using Taylor series, MNRAS 519 (2023) 799 [2112.06438]

2023 arXiv
[32]

Percival, B.A

W.J. Percival, B.A. Reid, D.J. Eisenstein, N.A. Bahcall, T. Budavari, J.A. Frieman et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample, MNRAS 401 (2010) 2148 [0907.1660]

2010 arXiv
[33]

Anderson, E

L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A.S. Bolton et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample, MNRAS 427 (2012) 3435 [1203.6594]

2012 arXiv
[34]

A.J. Ross, F. Beutler, C.-H. Chuang, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, H.-J. Seo, M. Vargas-Magaña et al., The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: observational systematics and baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function, M...

2017 arXiv
[35]

Abbott, M

T.M.C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S. Allam, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Asorey et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: A 2.7% measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 043512 [2107.04646]

2022 arXiv
[36]

J. Moon, D. Valcin, M. Rashkovetskyi, C. Saulder, J.N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,First detection of the BAO signal from early DESI data, MNRAS 525 (2023) 5406 [2304.08427]

2023 arXiv
[37]

Behera, M

J. Behera, M. Rezaie, L. Samushia and J. Ereza,Modelling the BAO feature in bispectrum, MNRAS 531 (2024) 3326 [2312.05942]. – 66 –

2024 arXiv
[38]

Cuesta, M

A.J. Cuesta, M. Vargas-Magaña, F. Beutler, A.S. Bolton, J.R. Brownstein, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function of LOWZ and CMASS galaxies in Data Relea...

2016 arXiv
[39]

Hou, A.G

J. Hou, A.G. Sánchez, A.J. Ross, A. Smith, R. Neveux, J. Bautista et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the quasar sample in configuration space between redshift 0.8 and 2...

2021 arXiv
[40]

Slepian, D.J

Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, J.A. Blazek, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, H. Gil-Marín et al., Constraining the baryon-dark matter relative velocity with the large-scale three-point correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS 474 (2018) 2109 [1607.06098]

2018 arXiv
[41]

Slepian, D.J

Z. Slepian, D.J. Eisenstein, F. Beutler, C.-H. Chuang, A.J. Cuesta, J. Ge et al.,The large-scale three-point correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies, MNRAS 468 (2017) 1070 [1512.02231]

2017 arXiv
[42]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,On the signature of the baryon-dark matter relative velocity in the two- and three-point galaxy correlation functions, MNRAS 448 (2015) 9 [1411.4052]

2015 arXiv
[43]

Moresco, A

M. Moresco, A. Veropalumbo, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini and A. Cimatti,C3: Cluster Clustering Cosmology. II. First Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Peak in the Three-point Correlation Function of Galaxy Clusters, ApJ 919 (2021) 144 [2011.04665]

2021 arXiv
[44]

Eisenstein, I

D.J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, D.W. Hogg, R. Scoccimarro, M.R. Blanton, R.C. Nichol et al., Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, ApJ 633 (2005) 560 [astro-ph/0501171]

2005 arXiv
[45]

Beutler, C

F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant, MNRAS 416 (2011) 3017 [1106.3366]

2011 arXiv
[46]

Child, M

H.L. Child, M. Takada, T. Nishimichi, T. Sunayama, Z. Slepian, S. Habib et al.,Bispectrum as baryon acoustic oscillation interferometer, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 123521 [1806.11147]

2018 arXiv
[47]

Zhang, L

H. Zhang, L. Samushia, D. Brooks, A. de la Macorra, P. Doel, E. Gaztañaga et al.,Constraining galaxy-halo connection with high-order statistics, MNRAS 515 (2022) 6133 [2203.17214]

2022 arXiv
[48]

Yuan, D.J

S. Yuan, D.J. Eisenstein and L.H. Garrison,Exploring the squeezed three-point galaxy correlation function with generalized halo occupation distribution models, MNRAS 478 (2018) 2019 [1802.10115]

2018 arXiv
[49]

Hikage,Constraining halo occupation distribution and cosmic growth rate using multipole power spectrum., MNRAS 441 (2014) L21 [1401.1246]

C. Hikage,Constraining halo occupation distribution and cosmic growth rate using multipole power spectrum., MNRAS 441 (2014) L21 [1401.1246]

2014 arXiv
[50]

Fosalba, J

P. Fosalba, J. Pan and I. Szapudi,Cosmological Three-Point Function: Testing the Halo Model against Simulations, ApJ 632 (2005) 29 [astro-ph/0504305]

2005 arXiv
[51]

Gao, Y.P

H. Gao, Y.P. Jing, S. Gui, K. Xu, Y. Zheng, D. Zhao et al.,The DESI One-Percent Survey: Constructing Galaxy-Halo Connections for ELGs and LRGs Using Auto and Cross Correlations, ApJ 954 (2023) 207 [2306.06317]

2023 arXiv
[52]

S. Yuan, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, D.J. Eisenstein and H. Guo,Evidence for galaxy assembly bias in BOSS CMASS redshift-space galaxy correlation function, MNRAS 502 (2021) 3582 [2010.04182]

2021 arXiv
[53]

Hadzhiyska, S

B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, D. Eisenstein and L. Hernquist,Extensions to models of the galaxy-halo connection, MNRAS 501 (2021) 1603 [2008.04913]

2021 arXiv
[54]

Scoccimarro, R.K

R. Scoccimarro, R.K. Sheth, L. Hui and B. Jain,How Many Galaxies Fit in a Halo? Constraints on Galaxy Formation Efficiency from Spatial Clustering, ApJ 546 (2001) 20 [astro-ph/0006319]. – 67 –

2001 arXiv
[55]

Neyrinck, I

M.C. Neyrinck, I. Szapudi and C.D. Rimes,Information content in the halo-model dark-matter power spectrum, MNRAS 370 (2006) L66 [astro-ph/0604282]

2006 arXiv
[56]

Neyrinck and I

M.C. Neyrinck and I. Szapudi,Information content in the halo-model dark-matter power spectrum - II. Multiple cosmological parameters, MNRAS 375 (2007) L51 [astro-ph/0610211]

2007 arXiv
[57]

H. Guo, Z. Zheng, I. Zehavi, P.S. Behroozi, C.-H. Chuang, J. Comparat et al.,Redshift-space clustering of SDSS galaxies - luminosity dependence, halo occupation distribution, and velocity bias, MNRAS 453 (2015) 4368 [1505.07861]

2015 arXiv
[58]

Y. Wang, X. Yang, H.J. Mo, F.C. van den Bosch and Y. Chu,The three-point correlation function of galaxies: comparing halo occupation models with observations, MNRAS 353 (2004) 287 [astro-ph/0404143]

2004 arXiv
[59]

Gao, Y.P

H. Gao, Y.P. Jing, Y. Zheng and K. Xu,Constructing the Emission-line Galaxy-Host Halo Connection through Auto and Cross Correlations, ApJ 928 (2022) 10 [2111.11657]

2022 arXiv
[60]

Eke, J.F

V.R. Eke, J.F. Navarro and M. Steinmetz,The Power Spectrum Dependence of Dark Matter Halo Concentrations, ApJ 554 (2001) 114 [astro-ph/0012337]

2001 arXiv
[61]

Kamalinejad and Z

F. Kamalinejad and Z. Slepian,A Non-Degenerate Neutrino Mass Signature in the Galaxy Bispectrum, arXiv e-prints (2020) arXiv:2011.00899 [2011.00899]

2020 arXiv
[62]

Bayer, F

A.E. Bayer, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Massara, J. Liu, D.N. Spergel, L. Verde et al.,Detecting Neutrino Mass by Combining Matter Clustering, Halos, and Voids, ApJ 919 (2021) 24 [2102.05049]

2021 arXiv
[63]

Garay, L

C.P. Garay, L. Verde and R. Jimenez,Neutrino footprint in large scale structure, Physics of the Dark Universe 15 (2017) 31 [1602.08430]

2017 arXiv
[64]

Cuesta, V

A.J. Cuesta, V. Niro and L. Verde,Neutrino mass limits: Robust information from the power spectrum of galaxy surveys, Physics of the Dark Universe13 (2016) 77 [1511.05983]

2016 arXiv
[65]

C. Hahn, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Castorina and R. Scoccimarro,Constraining Mν with the bispectrum. Part I. Breaking parameter degeneracies, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020 (2020) 040 [1909.11107]

2020 arXiv
[66]

Hahn and F

C. Hahn and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,Constraining Mν with the bispectrum. Part II. The information content of the galaxy bispectrum monopole, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021 (2021) 029 [2012.02200]

2021 arXiv
[67]

Ruggeri, E

R. Ruggeri, E. Castorina, C. Carbone and E. Sefusatti,DEMNUni: massive neutrinos and the bispectrum of large scale structures, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018 (2018) 003 [1712.02334]

2018 arXiv
[68]

de Belsunce and L

R. de Belsunce and L. Senatore,Tree-level bispectrum in the effective field theory of large-scale structure extended to massive neutrinos, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019 (2019) 038 [1804.06849]

2019 arXiv
[69]

Portillo, Z

S.K.N. Portillo, Z. Slepian, B. Burkhart, S. Kahraman and D.P. Finkbeiner,Developing the 3-point Correlation Function for the Turbulent Interstellar Medium, ApJ 862 (2018) 119 [1711.09907]

2018 arXiv
[70]

O’Brien, B

M.J. O’Brien, B. Burkhart and M.J. Shelley,Studying Interstellar Turbulence Driving Scales Using the Bispectrum, ApJ 930 (2022) 149 [2203.13334]

2022 arXiv
[71]

Burkhart,Diagnosing Turbulence in the Neutral and Molecular Interstellar Medium of Galaxies, PASP 133 (2021) 102001 [2106.02239]

B. Burkhart,Diagnosing Turbulence in the Neutral and Molecular Interstellar Medium of Galaxies, PASP 133 (2021) 102001 [2106.02239]

2021 arXiv
[72]

Williamson, J

V. Williamson, J. Sunseri, Z. Slepian, J. Hou and A. Greco,First Measurements of the 4-Point Correlation Function of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence as a Novel Probe of the Interstellar Medium, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2412.03967 [2412.03967]. – 68 –

2024 arXiv
[73]

Bartolo, E

N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Non-Gaussianity from inflation: theory and observations, Phys. Rep. 402 (2004) 103 [astro-ph/0406398]

2004 arXiv
[74]

Philcox, J

O.H.E. Philcox, J. Hou and Z. Slepian,A First Detection of the Connected 4-Point Correlation Function of Galaxies Using the BOSS CMASS Sample, arXiv e-prints (2021) arXiv:2108.01670 [2108.01670]

2021 arXiv
[75]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,Accelerating the two-point and three-point galaxy correlation functions using Fourier transforms, MNRAS 455 (2016) L31 [1506.04746]

2016 arXiv
[76]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,A new look at lines of sight: using Fourier methods for the wide-angle anisotropic 2-point correlation function, arXiv e-prints (2015) arXiv:1510.04809 [1510.04809]

2015 arXiv
[77]

Sunseri, Z

J. Sunseri, Z. Slepian, S. Portillo, J. Hou, S. Kahraman and D.P. Finkbeiner,SARABANDE: 3/4 point correlation functions with fast Fourier transforms, RAS Techniques and Instruments 2 (2023) 62 [2210.10206]

2023 arXiv
[78]

Philcox and Z

O.H.E. Philcox and Z. Slepian,Efficient computation of N-point correlation functions in D dimensions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science119 (2022) e2111366119 [2106.10278]

2022 arXiv
[79]

Brown, G

Z. Brown, G. Mishtaku and R. Demina,ConKer: An algorithm for evaluating correlations of arbitrary order, A&A 667 (2022) A129

2022
[80]

Grasshorn Gebhardt and D

H.S. Grasshorn Gebhardt and D. Jeong,Fast and accurate computation of projected two-point functions, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 023504 [1709.02401]

2018 arXiv
[81]

Guidi, A

M. Guidi, A. Veropalumbo, E. Branchini, A. Eggemeier and C. Carbone,Modelling the next-to-leading order matter three-point correlation function using FFTLog, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023 (2023) 066 [2212.07382]

2023 arXiv
[82]

Philcox and T

O.H.E. Philcox and T. Flöss,PolyBin3D: A Suite of Optimal and Efficient Power Spectrum and Bispectrum Estimators for Large-Scale Structure, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.07249 [2404.07249]

2024 arXiv
[83]

Lee and C

H. Lee and C. Dvorkin,Cosmological angular trispectra and non-Gaussian covariance, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020 (2020) 044 [2001.00584]

2020 arXiv
[84]

Benabou, A

J.N. Benabou, A. Testa, C. Heinrich, H.S.G. Gebhardt and O. Doré,Galaxy bispectrum in the spherical Fourier-Bessel basis, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 103507 [2312.15992]

2024 arXiv
[85]

Wen, H.S.G

R.Y. Wen, H.S.G. Gebhardt, C. Heinrich and O. Doré,Exact modeling of power spectrum multipole through spherical Fourier-Bessel basis, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 083525 [2404.04812]

2024 arXiv
[86]

Khek, H.G

B. Khek, H.G. Gebhardt and O. Doré,Fast theoretical predictions for spherical Fourier analysis of large-scale structures, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 063524 [2212.05760]

2024 arXiv
[87]

Grasshorn Gebhardt and O

H.S. Grasshorn Gebhardt and O. Doré,Validation of spherical Fourier-Bessel power spectrum analysis with log-normal simulations and eBOSS DR16 LRG EZmocks, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 083502 [2310.17677]

2024 arXiv
[88]

Semenzato, D

F. Semenzato, D. Bertacca and A. Raccanelli,Full-sky spherical Fourier-Bessel power spectrum in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 023522 [2406.09545]

2025 arXiv
[89]

Sabiu, B

C.G. Sabiu, B. Hoyle, J. Kim and X.-D. Li,Graph Database Solution for Higher-order Spatial Statistics in the Era of Big Data, ApJS 242 (2019) 29 [1901.00296]

2019 arXiv
[90]

Gramsci: GRAph Made Statistics for Cosmological Information

C. Sabiu, B. Hoyle, J. Kim and X.-D. Li, “Gramsci: GRAph Made Statistics for Cosmological Information.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1908.004, Aug., 2019

1908
[91]

Demina, S

R. Demina, S. Cheong, S. BenZvi and O. Hindrichs,A computationally efficient approach for calculating galaxytwo-point correlations, MNRAS 480 (2018) 49. – 69 –

2018
[92]

Philcox and D.J

O.H.E. Philcox and D.J. Eisenstein,Computing the small-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum in configuration space, MNRAS 492 (2020) 1214 [1912.01010]

2020 arXiv
[93]

Philcox,A faster Fourier transform? Computing small-scale power spectra and bispectra for cosmological simulations inO(N 2) time, MNRAS 501 (2021) 4004 [2005.01739]

O.H.E. Philcox,A faster Fourier transform? Computing small-scale power spectra and bispectra for cosmological simulations inO(N 2) time, MNRAS 501 (2021) 4004 [2005.01739]

2021 arXiv
[94]

Trusov, P

S. Trusov, P. Zarrouk and S. Cole,Neural network-based model of galaxy power spectrum: fast full-shape galaxy power spectrum analysis, MNRAS 538 (2025) 1789 [2403.20093]

2025 arXiv
[95]

Bai and J.-Q

J. Bai and J.-Q. Xia,FREmu: Power Spectrum Emulator for f(R) Gravity, ApJ 971 (2024) 11 [2405.05840]

2024 arXiv
[96]

Donald-McCann, F

J. Donald-McCann, F. Beutler, K. Koyama and M. Karamanis,MATRYOSHKA: halo model emulator for the galaxy power spectrum, MNRAS 511 (2022) 3768 [2109.15236]

2022 arXiv
[97]

Donald-McCann, K

J. Donald-McCann, K. Koyama and F. Beutler,matryoshka II: accelerating effective field theory analyses of the galaxy power spectrum, MNRAS 518 (2023) 3106 [2202.07557]

2023 arXiv
[98]

Agarwal, F.B

S. Agarwal, F.B. Abdalla, H.A. Feldman, O. Lahav and S.A. Thomas,PkANN - I. Non-linear matter power spectrum interpolation through artificial neural networks, MNRAS 424 (2012) 1409 [1203.1695]

2012 arXiv
[99]

Agarwal, F.B

S. Agarwal, F.B. Abdalla, H.A. Feldman, O. Lahav and S.A. Thomas,PkANN - II. A non-linear matter power spectrum interpolator developed using artificial neural networks, MNRAS 439 (2014) 2102 [1312.2101]

2014 arXiv
[100]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,Computing the three-point correlation function of galaxies in O(Nˆ2) time, MNRAS 454 (2015) 4142 [1506.02040]

2015 arXiv
[101]

Umeh,Optimal computation of anisotropic galaxy three point correlation function multipoles using 2DFFTLOG formalism, J

O. Umeh,Optimal computation of anisotropic galaxy three point correlation function multipoles using 2DFFTLOG formalism, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021 (2021) 035 [2011.05889]

2021 arXiv
[102]

Sugiyama, S

N.S. Sugiyama, S. Saito, F. Beutler and H.-J. Seo,A complete FFT-based decomposition formalism for the redshift-space bispectrum, MNRAS 484 (2019) 364 [1803.02132]

2019 arXiv
[103]

Sugiyama, S

N.S. Sugiyama, S. Saito, F. Beutler and H.-J. Seo,Towards a self-consistent analysis of the anisotropic galaxy two- and three-point correlation functions on large scales: application to mock galaxy catalogues, MNRAS 501 (2021) 2862 [2010.06179]

2021 arXiv
[104]

M. Wang, F. Beutler and N. Sugiyama,Triumvirate: A Python/C++ package for three-point clustering measurements, The Journal of Open Source Software8 (2023) 5571 [2304.03643]

2023 arXiv
[105]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,A practical computational method for the anisotropic redshift-space three-point correlation function, MNRAS 478 (2018) 1468 [1709.10150]

2018 arXiv
[106]

Philcox, Z

O.H.E. Philcox, Z. Slepian, J. Hou, C. Warner, R.N. Cahn and D.J. Eisenstein,ENCORE: an O (Ng 2) estimator for galaxy N-point correlation functions, MNRAS 509 (2022) 2457 [2105.08722]

2022 arXiv
[107]

Slepian and D.J

Z. Slepian and D.J. Eisenstein,Modelling the large-scale redshift-space 3-point correlation function of galaxies, MNRAS 469 (2017) 2059 [1607.03109]

2017 arXiv
[108]

Bertolini, K

D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M.P. Solon and K.M. Zurek,The trispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2016 (2016) 052 [1604.01770]

2016 arXiv
[109]

Ortolá Leonard, Z

W. Ortolá Leonard, Z. Slepian and J. Hou,A model for the redshift-space galaxy 4-point correlation function, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 090 [2402.15510]

2025 arXiv
[110]

Ivanov, O.H.E

M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović, M. Takada and M. Zaldarriaga, Precision analysis of the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 063512 [2110.10161]

2022 arXiv
[111]

Matsubara,Integrated perturbation theory and one-loop power spectra of biased tracers, Phys

T. Matsubara,Integrated perturbation theory and one-loop power spectra of biased tracers, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 043537 [1304.4226]. – 70 –

2014 arXiv
[112]

Hashimoto, Y

I. Hashimoto, Y. Rasera and A. Taruya,Precision cosmology with redshift-space bispectrum: A perturbation theory based model at one-loop order, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 043526 [1705.02574]

2017 arXiv
[113]

Z. Wang, D. Jeong, A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and K. Osato,Perturbation theory remixed: Improved nonlinearity modeling beyond standard perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 103534 [2209.00033]

2023 arXiv
[114]

Z. Wang, D. Jeong, A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and K. Osato,Perturbation theory remixed. II. Improved modeling of nonlinear bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 103548 [2408.06413]

2024 arXiv
[115]

Steele and T

T. Steele and T. Baldauf,Precise calibration of the one-loop trispectrum in the effective field theory of large scale structure, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 103518 [2101.10289]

2021 arXiv
[116]

Alkhanishvili, C

D. Alkhanishvili, C. Porciani, E. Sefusatti, M. Biagetti, A. Lazanu, A. Oddo et al.,The reach of next-to-leading-order perturbation theory for the matter bispectrum, MNRAS 512 (2022) 4961 [2107.08054]

2022 arXiv
[117]

Baldauf, L

T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, M. Mirbabayi and E. Pajer,The bispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2015 (2015) 007 [1406.4135]

2015 arXiv
[118]

D’Amico, Y

G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,The one-loop bispectrum of galaxies in redshift space from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024 (2024) 041 [2211.17130]

2024 arXiv
[119]

Steele and T

T. Steele and T. Baldauf,Precise calibration of the one-loop bispectrum in the effective field theory of large scale structure, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 023520 [2009.01200]

2021 arXiv
[120]

Bertolini and M.P

D. Bertolini and M.P. Solon,Principal shapes and squeezed limits in the effective field theory of large scale structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2016 (2016) 030 [1608.01310]

2016 arXiv
[121]

Baldauf, M

T. Baldauf, M. Garny, P. Taule and T. Steele,Two-loop bispectrum of large-scale structure, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 123551 [2110.13930]

2021 arXiv
[122]

Calderon, T

R. Calderon, T. Simon, A. Shafieloo and D.K. Hazra,Primordial Features in light of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2504.06183 [2504.06183]

2025 arXiv
[123]

Zhang, R

W. Zhang, R. Zhao, X. Mu, K. Koyama, R. Takahashi, Y. Wang et al.,A cosmological full-shape power spectra analysis using pre- and post-reconstructed density fields, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2503.20574 [2503.20574]

2025 arXiv
[124]

Garcia and Z

K. Garcia and Z. Slepian,Improving the line of sight for the anisotropic 3-point correlation function of galaxies: Centroid and Unit-Vector-Average methods scaling asO (N 2), MNRAS 515 (2022) 1199

2022
[125]

Philcox and Z

O.H.E. Philcox and Z. Slepian,Beyond the Yamamoto approximation: Anisotropic power spectra and correlation functions with pairwise lines of sight, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 123509 [2102.08384]

2021 arXiv
[126]

Padmanabhan, M

N. Padmanabhan, M. White, H.H. Zhou and R. O’Connell,Estimating sparse precision matrices, MNRAS 460 (2016) 1567 [1512.01241]

2016 arXiv
[127]

Friedrich and T

O. Friedrich and T. Eifler,Precision matrix expansion - efficient use of numerical simulations in estimating errors on cosmological parameters, MNRAS 473 (2018) 4150 [1703.07786]

2018 arXiv
[128]

Looijmans, M.S

M.J. Looijmans, M.S. Wang and F. Beutler,A comparison of shrinkage estimators of the cosmological precision matrix, MNRAS 537 (2025) 21 [2402.13783]

2025 arXiv
[129]

Escoffier, M.C

S. Escoffier, M.C. Cousinou, A. Tilquin, A. Pisani, A. Aguichine, S. de la Torre et al.,Jackknife resampling technique on mocks: an alternative method for covariance matrix estimation, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1606.00233 [1606.00233]. – 71 –

2016 arXiv
[130]

Grieb, A.G

J.N. Grieb, A.G. Sánchez, S. Salazar-Albornoz and C. Dalla Vecchia,Gaussian covariance matrices for anisotropic galaxy clustering measurements, MNRAS 457 (2016) 1577 [1509.04293]

2016 arXiv
[131]

Hartlap, P

J. Hartlap, P. Simon and P. Schneider,Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix, A&A 464 (2007) 399 [astro-ph/0608064]

2007 arXiv
[132]

Joachimi,Non-linear shrinkage estimation of large-scale structure covariance, MNRAS 466 (2017) L83 [1612.00752]

B. Joachimi,Non-linear shrinkage estimation of large-scale structure covariance, MNRAS 466 (2017) L83 [1612.00752]

2017 arXiv
[133]

Pope and I

A.C. Pope and I. Szapudi,Shrinkage estimation of the power spectrum covariance matrix, MNRAS 389 (2008) 766 [0711.2509]

2008 arXiv
[134]

Sellentin and A.F

E. Sellentin and A.F. Heavens,Parameter inference with estimated covariance matrices, MNRAS 456 (2016) L132 [1511.05969]

2016 arXiv
[135]

Taylor, B

A. Taylor, B. Joachimi and T. Kitching,Putting the precision in precision cosmology: How accurate should your data covariance matrix be?, MNRAS 432 (2013) 1928 [1212.4359]

2013 arXiv
[136]

Sellentin and A.F

E. Sellentin and A.F. Heavens,Quantifying lost information due to covariance matrix estimation in parameter inference, MNRAS 464 (2017) 4658 [1609.00504]

2017 arXiv
[137]

Dodelson and M.D

S. Dodelson and M.D. Schneider,The effect of covariance estimator error on cosmological parameter constraints, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 063537 [1304.2593]

2013 arXiv
[138]

Percival, A.J

W.J. Percival, A.J. Ross, A.G. Sánchez, L. Samushia, A. Burden, R. Crittenden et al.,The clustering of Galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: including covariance matrix errors, MNRAS 439 (2014) 2531 [1312.4841]

2014 arXiv
[139]

Taylor and B

A. Taylor and B. Joachimi,Estimating cosmological parameter covariance, MNRAS 442 (2014) 2728 [1402.6983]

2014 arXiv
[140]

R.N. Cahn, Z. Slepian and J. Hou,Test for Cosmological Parity Violation Using the 3D Distribution of Galaxies, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 201002 [2110.12004]

2023 arXiv
[141]

J. Hou, Z. Slepian and R.N. Cahn,Measurement of parity-odd modes in the large-scale 4-point correlation function of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey twelfth data release CMASS and LOWZ galaxies, MNRAS 522 (2023) 5701 [2206.03625]

2023 arXiv
[142]

Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies, Phys

O.H.E. Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 063501 [2206.04227]

2022 arXiv
[143]

Krolewski, S

A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith and H. Hopkins,No evidence for parity violation in BOSS, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024 (2024) 044 [2407.03397]

2024 arXiv
[144]

Mohammad and W.J

F.G. Mohammad and W.J. Percival,Creating jackknife and bootstrap estimates of the covariance matrix for the two-point correlation function, MNRAS 514 (2022) 1289 [2109.07071]

2022 arXiv
[145]

O’Connell and D.J

R. O’Connell and D.J. Eisenstein,Large covariance matrices: accurate models without mocks, MNRAS 487 (2019) 2701 [1808.05978]

2019 arXiv
[146]

Philcox, D.J

O.H.E. Philcox, D.J. Eisenstein, R. O’Connell and A. Wiegand,RASCALC: a jackknife approach to estimating single- and multitracer galaxy covariance matrices, MNRAS 491 (2020) 3290 [1904.11070]

2020 arXiv
[147]

Trusov, P

S. Trusov, P. Zarrouk, S. Cole, P. Norberg, C. Zhao, J.N. Aguilar et al.,The two-point correlation function covariance with fewer mocks, MNRAS 527 (2024) 9048 [2306.16332]

2024 arXiv
[148]

Philcox and D.J

O.H.E. Philcox and D.J. Eisenstein,Estimating covariance matrices for two- and three-point correlation function moments in Arbitrary Survey Geometries, MNRAS 490 (2019) 5931 [1910.04764]. – 72 –

2019 arXiv
[149]

Barreira and F

A. Barreira and F. Schmidt,Response approach to the matter power spectrum covariance, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017 (2017) 051 [1705.01092]

2017 arXiv
[150]

Barreira, E

A. Barreira, E. Krause and F. Schmidt,Complete super-sample lensing covariance in the response approach, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018 (2018) 015 [1711.07467]

2018 arXiv
[151]

Barreira,The squeezed matter bispectrum covariance with responses, J

A. Barreira,The squeezed matter bispectrum covariance with responses, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2019 (2019) 008 [1901.01243]

2019 arXiv
[152]

Wadekar and R

D. Wadekar and R. Scoccimarro,Galaxy power spectrum multipoles covariance in perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 123517 [1910.02914]

2020 arXiv
[153]

Lacasa,Covariance of the galaxy angular power spectrum with the halo model, A&A 615 (2018) A1 [1711.07372]

F. Lacasa,Covariance of the galaxy angular power spectrum with the halo model, A&A 615 (2018) A1 [1711.07372]

2018 arXiv
[154]

Kobayashi,Fast computation of the non-Gaussian covariance of redshift-space galaxy power spectrum multipoles, Phys

Y. Kobayashi,Fast computation of the non-Gaussian covariance of redshift-space galaxy power spectrum multipoles, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 103512 [2308.08593]

2023 arXiv
[155]

Bertolini, K

D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M.P. Solon, J.R. Walsh and K.M. Zurek,Non-Gaussian covariance of the matter power spectrum in the effective field theory of large scale structure, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 123505 [1512.07630]

2016 arXiv
[156]

Mohammed, U

I. Mohammed, U. Seljak and Z. Vlah,Perturbative approach to covariance matrix of the matter power spectrum, MNRAS 466 (2017) 780 [1607.00043]

2017 arXiv
[157]

Hikage, R

C. Hikage, R. Takahashi and K. Koyama,Covariance of the redshift-space matter power spectrum after reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 083514 [2007.13998]

2020 arXiv
[158]

Sugiyama, S

N.S. Sugiyama, S. Saito, F. Beutler and H.-J. Seo,Perturbation theory approach to predict the covariance matrices of the galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum in redshift space, MNRAS 497 (2020) 1684 [1908.06234]

2020 arXiv
[159]

R. Zhao, K. Koyama, Y. Wang and G.-B. Zhao,Modeling the Covariance Matrix for the Power Spectra Before and After the BAO Reconstruction, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics24 (2024) 125015 [2410.18524]

2024 arXiv
[160]

X. Fang, T. Eifler and E. Krause,2D-FFTLog: efficient computation of real-space covariance matrices for galaxy clustering and weak lensing, MNRAS 497 (2020) 2699 [2004.04833]

2020 arXiv
[161]

Philcox, M.M

O.H.E. Philcox, M.M. Ivanov, M. Zaldarriaga, M. Simonović and M. Schmittfull,Fewer mocks and less noise: Reducing the dimensionality of cosmological observables with subspace projections, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 043508 [2009.03311]

2021 arXiv
[162]

Paz and A.G

D.J. Paz and A.G. Sánchez,Improving the precision matrix for precision cosmology, MNRAS 454 (2015) 4326 [1508.03162]

2015 arXiv
[163]

de Santi and L.R

N.S.M. de Santi and L.R. Abramo,Improving cosmological covariance matrices with machine learning, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022 (2022) 013 [2205.10881]

2022 arXiv
[164]

Adamo, H.-J

J. Adamo, H.-J. Huang and T. Eifler,Neural network based emulation of galaxy power spectrum covariances: A reanalysis of BOSS DR12 data, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 123517 [2405.00125]

2024 arXiv
[165]

Heavens, E

A.F. Heavens, E. Sellentin, D. de Mijolla and A. Vianello,Massive data compression for parameter-dependent covariance matrices, MNRAS 472 (2017) 4244 [1707.06529]

2017 arXiv
[166]

K.C. Chan, M. Crocce, A.J. Ross, S. Avila, J. Elvin-Poole, M. Manera et al.,BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics, MNRAS 480 (2018) 3031 [1801.04390]

2018 arXiv
[167]

O’Connell,Residual Smoothing: Using Mocks to Correct Model Covariance Matrices, arXiv e-prints (2019) arXiv:1911.04670 [1911.04670]

R. O’Connell,Residual Smoothing: Using Mocks to Correct Model Covariance Matrices, arXiv e-prints (2019) arXiv:1911.04670 [1911.04670]

2019 arXiv
[168]

O’Connell, D

R. O’Connell, D. Eisenstein, M. Vargas, S. Ho and N. Padmanabhan,Large covariance matrices: smooth models from the two-point correlation function, MNRAS 462 (2016) 2681 [1510.01740]. – 73 –

2016 arXiv
[169]

Fumagalli, M

A. Fumagalli, M. Biagetti, A. Saro, E. Sefusatti, A. Slosar, P. Monaco et al.,Fitting covariance matrix models to simulations, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022 (2022) 022 [2206.05191]

2022 arXiv
[170]

Pearson and L

D.W. Pearson and L. Samushia,Estimating the power spectrum covariance matrix with fewer mock samples, MNRAS 457 (2016) 993 [1509.00064]

2016 arXiv
[171]

Howlett and W.J

C. Howlett and W.J. Percival,Galaxy two-point covariance matrix estimation for next generation surveys, MNRAS 472 (2017) 4935 [1709.03057]

2017 arXiv
[172]

Hall and A

A. Hall and A. Taylor,A Bayesian method for combining theoretical and simulated covariance matrices for large-scale structure surveys, MNRAS 483 (2019) 189 [1807.06875]

2019 arXiv
[173]

Rashkovetskyi, D.J

M. Rashkovetskyi, D.J. Eisenstein, J.N. Aguilar, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole et al., Validation of semi-analytical, semi-empirical covariance matrices for two-point correlation function for early DESI data, MNRAS 524 (2023) 3894 [2306.06320]

2023 arXiv
[174]

Y. Li, S. Singh, B. Yu, Y. Feng and U. Seljak,Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019 (2019) 016 [1811.05714]

2019 arXiv
[175]

covdisc: Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure of the Universe

Y. Li, S. Singh, B. Yu, Y. Feng and U. Seljak, “covdisc: Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure of the Universe.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1904.028, Apr., 2019

1904
[176]

Hou, R.N

J. Hou, R.N. Cahn, O.H.E. Philcox and Z. Slepian,Analytic Gaussian covariance matrices for galaxy N -point correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 043515 [2108.01714]

2022 arXiv
[177]

Cahn and Z

R.N. Cahn and Z. Slepian,Isotropic N-point basis functions and their properties, Journal of Physics A 56 (2023) 325204 [2010.14418]

2023 arXiv
[178]

Slepian, J

Z. Slepian, J. Chellino, J. Hou and A. Greco,On a generating function for the isotropic basis functions and other connected results, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General57 (2024) 505203 [2406.15385]

2024 arXiv
[179]

McEwen, X

J.E. McEwen, X. Fang, C.M. Hirata and J.A. Blazek,FAST-PT: a novel algorithm to calculate convolution integrals in cosmological perturbation theory, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2016 (2016) 015 [1603.04826]

2016 arXiv
[180]

Fang, J.A

X. Fang, J.A. Blazek, J.E. McEwen and C.M. Hirata,FAST-PT II: an algorithm to calculate convolution integrals of general tensor quantities in cosmological perturbation theory, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017 (2017) 030 [1609.05978]

2017 arXiv
[181]

X. Fang, E. Krause, T. Eifler and N. MacCrann,Beyond Limber: efficient computation of angular power spectra for galaxy clustering and weak lensing, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020 (2020) 010 [1911.11947]

2020 arXiv
[182]

Simonović, T

M. Simonović, T. Baldauf, M. Zaldarriaga, J.J. Carrasco and J.A. Kollmeier,Cosmological perturbation theory using the FFTLog: formalism and connection to QFT loop integrals, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018 (2018) 030 [1708.08130]

2018 arXiv
[183]

Assassi, M

V. Assassi, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga,Efficient evaluation of angular power spectra and bispectra, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017 (2017) 054 [1705.05022]

2017 arXiv
[184]

Schmittfull, Z

M. Schmittfull, Z. Vlah and P. McDonald,Fast large scale structure perturbation theory using one-dimensional fast Fourier transforms, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 103528 [1603.04405]

2016 arXiv
[185]

S.-F. Chen, H. Lee and C. Dvorkin,Precise and accurate cosmology with CMB×LSS power spectra and bispectra, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021 (2021) 030 [2103.01229]

2021 arXiv
[186]

N. Hand, Y. Li, Z. Slepian and U. Seljak,An optimal FFT-based anisotropic power spectrum estimator, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017 (2017) 002 [1704.02357]

2017 arXiv
[187]

Schöneberg, M

N. Schöneberg, M. Simonović, J. Lesgourgues and M. Zaldarriaga,Beyond the traditional line-of-sight approach of cosmological angular statistics, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018 (2018) 047 [1807.09540]. – 74 –

2018 arXiv
[188]

Scoccimarro, Fast estimators for redshift-space clustering, Phys

R. Scoccimarro, Fast estimators for redshift-space clustering, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 083532 [1506.02729]

2015 arXiv
[189]

Mohammed and U

I. Mohammed and U. Seljak,Analytic model for the matter power spectrum, its covariance matrix and baryonic effects, MNRAS 445 (2014) 3382 [1407.0060]

2014 arXiv
[190]

Cohn,Power spectrum and correlation function errors: Poisson vs

J.D. Cohn,Power spectrum and correlation function errors: Poisson vs. Gaussian shot noise, New Astronomy 11 (2006) 226 [astro-ph/0503285]

2006 arXiv
[191]

Slepian,On decoupling the integrals of cosmological perturbation theory, MNRAS 507 (2021) 1337

Z. Slepian,On decoupling the integrals of cosmological perturbation theory, MNRAS 507 (2021) 1337

2021
[192]

Taule and M

P. Taule and M. Garny,The two-loop power spectrum in redshift space, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2023 (2023) 078 [2308.07379]

2023 arXiv
[193]

CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background

A. Lewis and A. Challinor, “CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.026, Feb., 2011

2011
[194]

CMBFAST: A microwave anisotropy code

U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, “CMBFAST: A microwave anisotropy code.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:9909.004, Sept., 1999

1999
[195]

Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv e-prints (2011) arXiv:1104.2932 [1104.2932]

J. Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv e-prints (2011) arXiv:1104.2932 [1104.2932]

2011 arXiv
[196]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

2020 arXiv
[197]

Dawson, D.J

K.S. Dawson, D.J. Schlegel, C.P. Ahn, S.F. Anderson, É. Aubourg, S. Bailey et al.,The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III, AJ 145 (2013) 10 [1208.0022]

2013 arXiv
[198]

Ntelis, J.-C

P. Ntelis, J.-C. Hamilton, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Burtin, P. Laurent, J. Rich et al.,Exploring cosmic homogeneity with the BOSS DR12 galaxy sample, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017 (2017) 019 [1702.02159]

2017 arXiv
[199]

Ereza, F

J. Ereza, F. Prada, A. Klypin, T. Ishiyama, A. Smith, C.M. Baugh et al.,The UCHUU-GLAM BOSS and eBOSS LRG lightcones: exploring clustering and covariance errors, MNRAS 532 (2024) 1659 [2311.14456]

2024 arXiv
[200]

Gil-Marín, W.J

H. Gil-Marín, W.J. Percival, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, J.N. Grieb, S. Ho et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the LOS-dependent power spectrum of DR12 BOSS galaxies, MNRAS 460 (2016) 4188 [1509.06386]

2016 arXiv
[201]

Higham and L

N.J. Higham and L. Lin,A schur–padé algorithm for fractional powers of a matrix, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications32 (2011) 1056

2011
[202]

Gradshteyn, I.M

I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Elsevier Academic Press, Boston (2007)

2007
[203]

NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

“NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.” https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.0 of 2024-03-15

2024
[204]

Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS 227 (1987) 1

N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS 227 (1987) 1

1987
[205]

Mehrem, J.T

R. Mehrem, J.T. Londergan and M.H. Macfarlane,Analytic expressions for integrals of products of spherical Bessel functions, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General24 (1991) 1435

1991
[206]

Meigs and Z

K. Meigs and Z. Slepian,On a General Method for Resolving Integrals of Multiple Spherical Bessel Functions Against Power Laws into Distributions, arXiv e-prints (2021) arXiv:2112.07809 [2112.07809]

2021 arXiv
[207]

Miller,On the inverse of the sum of matrices, Mathematics Magazine 54 (1981) 67 [https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1981.11976898]

K.S. Miller,On the inverse of the sum of matrices, Mathematics Magazine 54 (1981) 67 [https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1981.11976898]. – 75 –

1981
[208]

Virtanen, R

P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods 17 (2020) 261

2020
[209]

Meurer, C.P

A. Meurer, C.P. Smith, M. Paprocki, O. Čertík, S.B. Kirpichev, M. Rocklin et al.,Sympy: symbolic computing in python, PeerJ Computer Science3 (2017) e103

2017
[210]

The mpmath development team,mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic (version 1.3.0), 2023. – 76 –

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Gil-Marín, J.E

H. Gil-Marín, J.E. Bautista, R. Paviot, M. Vargas-Magaña, S. de la Torre, S. Fromenteau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0, MNRAS 498 (2020) 2492 [2007.08994]

arXiv 2020

[2] [2]

Gil-Marín, W.J

H. Gil-Marín, W.J. Percival, L. Verde, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies, MNRAS 465 (2017) 1757 [1606.00439]

arXiv 2017

[3] [3]

Gil-Marín, L

H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Noreña, A.J. Cuesta, L. Samushia, W.J. Percival et al.,The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies - II. Cosmological interpretation, MNRAS 452 (2015) 1914 [1408.0027]

arXiv 2015

[4] [4]

Beutler, S

F. Beutler, S. Saito, H.-J. Seo, J. Brinkmann, K.S. Dawson, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles, MNRAS 443 (2014) 1065 [1312.4611]

arXiv 2014

[5] [5]

Philcox and M.M

O.H.E. Philcox and M.M. Ivanov,BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology:Λ CDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 043517 [2112.04515]. 9https://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/MeijerG/21/01/01/ – 64 –

arXiv 2022

[6] [6]

B.A. Reid, L. Samushia, M. White, W.J. Percival, M. Manera, N. Padmanabhan et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z = 0.57 from anisotropic clustering, MNRAS 426 (2012) 2719 [1203.6641]

arXiv 2012

[7] [7]

Massara, C

E. Massara, C. Hahn, M. Eickenberg, S. Ho, J. Hou, P. Lemos et al.,SimBIG: Cosmological Constraints using Simulation-Based Inference of Galaxy Clustering with Marked Power Spectra, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.04228 [2404.04228]

arXiv 2024

[8] [8]

Ivanov, O.H.E

M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, G. Cabass, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology with the galaxy bispectrum multipoles: Optimal estimation and application to BOSS data, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 083515 [2302.04414]

arXiv 2023