Lattice defect networks in 2d Yang-Mills

Elisa Iris Marieni; Itamar Yaakov; Luca Griguolo

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Lattice defect networks in 2d Yang-Mills

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An enriched lattice model realizes defect networks in 2d Yang-Mills as local insertions built from a single three-line junction.

desk verdict A solid, honest construction of 2dYM defect networks with two explicitly flagged generalization gaps; send it out. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12351 v2 pith:YODI6XOF submitted 2025-01-21 hep-th

Luca Griguolo , Elisa Iris Marieni , Itamar Yaakov This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords two-dimensionalYang-Millstheorylatticegaugedefectnetworksn-linejunctionssubdivisioninvariancefusionclosurediscretethetaanglesIRFcrossing

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two-dimensional Yang-Mills is exactly solvable on the lattice, but its standard lattice description makes defects such as Wilson points non-local. This paper enriches the lattice model by assigning corner variables $V_i$ in the universal cover $\tilde{G}$ and a center variable $B\in H$ to each plaquette, with the plaquette factor replaced by a sum over irreps of $\tilde{G}$ weighted by $\chi_{\hat h_{\hat\rho}}(B)$. The paper argues that subdivision invariance survives, so exact solvability is preserved, and that a large class of defect networks, including Wilson lines, Wilson points, $\theta$-angle interfaces, and their intersections, become local functionals of the enriched variables. The central structural claim is that all such networks are built from a single fundamental block, the 3-line junction $W_3$, and that fusing these blocks closes on the set of $n$-line junctions. A sympathetic reader would take this as a concrete lattice realization of the idea that a fully local theory should carry its defects in its local data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $n$-line junction $W_n$, an operator insertion obtained by contracting representation-matrix elements $R^{\hat\alpha_i}(U_i)$ and $R^{\hat\beta_i}(V_i)$ at triple intersections with invariant coupling tensors labeled by $\nu_i$. The 3-line junction $W_3$ is the fundamental block: lower junctions are produced by degeneration, i.e. by projecting a representation to the trivial one, and higher junctions are produced by fusion along a shared edge followed by squeezing the holonomy to the identity. The second piece of machinery is the enriched plaquette factor with corner ($V$) and center ($B$) degrees of freedom; its subdivision invariance is what guarantees that gluing plaquettes around the junctions leaves the exact solvability of the theory intact. The crossing computation additionally uses the back-coupling identity for 6j symbols, which is where the paper's proof is restricted to simply reducible groups.

What would settle it

Repeat the crossing computation for SU(3), where coupling multiplicities can exceed 1, keeping all multiplicity labels in $\langle pW_4\rangle$ and comparing with the standard IRF expression $\langle W_+\rangle$. If no choice of phase factors makes the two sides equal, the general-compact-group claim fails; a single mismatch in a phase or a multiplicity sum would be enough. A second check is to fuse $W_3$ with $W_4$ explicitly and verify that the result lies in the span of known 5-line junctions, since the paper proves closure only for $W_3\circ W_3$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the lattice description of 2d Yang-Mills can be refined, without changing the theory in the absence of defects, into a model in which every known defect of dimension 0, 1, or 2 is a local insertion. The refined plaquette factor is $\Gamma(U,B;\epsilon_w)=\sum_{\hat\rho\in\hat{\tilde{G}}}\dim(\hat\rho)\,\chi_{\hat\rho}(V_1U_1V_2U_2V_3U_3)\,\chi_{\hat h_{\hat\rho}}(B)\,e^{-\epsilon_w c_2(\hat\rho)/2}$, and integrating out the internal variables reproduces the standard partition function and the discrete-$\theta$ partition function. The paper then defines $n$-line junctions $W_n$ built from representation matrices and invariant coupling tensors, shows that 2- and 1-line junctions are degenerations of the 3-line junction $W_3$, and proves by a direct expectation-value computation that fusing two $W_3$ blocks yields a combination of 4-line junctions already in the set. It further recovers the IRF crossing, the simplest intersection of two Wilson lines, as the expectation value of a 4-line junction with a weight. On the paper's own terms, the defect collection is complete with respect to fusion, with $W_3$ as the fundamental generator.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's most fragile assumption is that a technical identity connecting the fusion of representations, proved only for simply reducible groups (those whose tensor products decompose without multiplicity), also holds for every compact group; the advertised universality of the defect-network construction would collapse if that identity or its phase factors fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Known defects become strictly local lattice insertions: Wilson points are functionals of the $V$ variables, Wilson lines of the $U$ variables, and discrete theta angles of the $B$ variables, so mixed networks are assembled by standard gluing integrals.
The building blocks are closed under fusion, so composing networks cannot create genuinely new junction types: any network obtained from $W_3$ blocks is a linear combination of $n$-line junctions already in the set.
The refinement reproduces the known exact results of 2d Yang-Mills, including the partition function, theta-angle partition functions, and the IRF crossing, so the enrichment is invisible in the absence of defects.
Selection rules from representation-theoretic fusion numbers match the constraints of the center 1-form symmetry, for example forbidding a Wilson loop that separates two theta angles unless its N-ality equals the difference of their N-alities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An unstated consequence is a concrete lattice avatar of full locality: if $W_3$ generates all defect networks, the defect category of the theory is finitely generated in a way the continuum defect calculus does not make explicit.
If the back-coupling identity extends to arbitrary compact groups as the paper suspects, the same $W_3$ algebra should describe SU(N) defect networks with fusion multiplicities greater than one; one can test this directly by repeating the crossing computation for SU(3).
The same enrichment idea could be transplanted to lattice Chern-Simons theory or to 3d theories with mixed Wilson-vortex lines, where known defect correlation functions would serve as benchmarks for whether the corner and center variables are the right ones.
Because the setup controls the 1-form center symmetry gauging plaquette by plaquette, it can be viewed as a local realization of condensation or interface defects between gauged and ungauged theories; extending the weights to general higher-gauging procedures is a natural next step.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick summary: this is a genuine construction, not a re-coordinatization of earlier results. The enriched lattice (corner V, interior B) plus the W_n junction calculus is new, and the paper earns its claims by re-deriving the partition function, discrete theta angle, Wilson lines, Wilson points, and IRF crossing from the refined model. The sanity check in Appendix B.2—resolving the apparent N^2 issue—is a nice touch. The authors are explicit that V and B are variations on [25] and [39], so no overclaiming there.

The real soft spots are the two the authors flag in Section 4, and the stress-test note is right: the advertised generality outruns the proof. Fusion closure is demonstrated for W3∘U5 W3 as an expectation-value identity (3.12), with iteration to n,m left as a 'reasonable expectation.' The IRF crossing ⟨pW4⟩=⟨W+⟩ is proved only for simply reducible groups; for general compact G the Racah back-coupling rule is cited from Derome-Sharp/Butler, not proved, and the text says 'We believe the result still holds.' If either gap fails, the 'every defect network has a local realization' statement holds in a narrower regime. That said, these are honest, clearly marked limitations, not hidden assumptions. For simply reducible groups the construction stands.

One more caveat: fusion and IRF are verified only as expectation values, not operator equations. The authors themselves call this 'unusual and perhaps a sign that there is a more refined prescription.' That's the right hedged wording; it's a minor concern given the checks.

Who should read it: anyone working on lattice constructions of defects, generalized symmetries in exactly solvable gauge theories, or 2dYM-to-N=4 localization links. It provides a concrete, local toolkit, and the gaps are attackable.

Verdict: deserves a serious referee. The core is sound, the new calculus is useful, and the flagged gaps are extensions, not contradictions. I'd accept with revisions, asking the authors to either extend the fusion computation to one more case or narrow the closure claim.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an enriched lattice model for 2d Yang-Mills theory with gauge group G = G~/H, adding corner degrees of freedom V in the universal cover G~ and center degrees of freedom B in H on each plaquette. The authors show that this refinement preserves subdivision invariance and recovers the partition function, the partition function with a discrete theta angle, Wilson lines, and Wilson points. They introduce n-line junction operators W_n built from representation matrices and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and argue that W_3 is the fundamental building block: degenerate projections give lower junctions, and fusion of two W_3 junctions yields 4-line junctions. The paper further attempts to recover the IRF crossing of intersecting Wilson lines. The central claim is that the enriched lattice provides an exact local realization of all 0-, 1-, and 2-dimensional defect networks in 2dYM, with the set of building blocks closed under fusion.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work provides a concrete, solvable lattice framework for defect networks in 2dYM, with potential implications for full locality, generalized symmetries, and higher-dimensional generalizations. The paper is carefully written and contains detailed Haar-measure and Clebsch-Gordan computations; the re-derivations of the known partition function, theta-angle partition function, Wilson line, and Wilson point are clean and serve as useful checks. However, the advertised universality rests on two explicitly deferred extensions: the IRF crossing identity beyond simply reducible groups, and the iteration of fusion beyond the W_3∘W_3 case. These gaps are acknowledged in the text but are load-bearing for the claimed scope, and they should be addressed or the claims should be correspondingly delimited.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.3, eq. (3.12)] The central claim of closure under fusion is demonstrated only for a single case: the expectation value ⟨W_3 ∘_{U_5} W_3⟩ is shown to equal a linear combination of ⟨W_4⟩. The text immediately follows with 'we can reasonably expect to be able to iterate the procedure to fuse an n- and an m-line junction into a linear combination of (n+m-2)-line junctions' (Section 3.3, final paragraph). This is a conjecture, not a proof. Since the abstract states that the authors 'explicitly demonstrate closure of the building blocks under fusion', the paper needs either a general proof of the fusion rule for arbitrary n and m, or an explicit statement that closure has been verified only for the W_3∘W_3 case and that the general case is conjectural.
[Section 3.4, eqs. (3.15), (3.20) and Appendix B.1] The recovery of the IRF crossing is derived only for simply reducible groups. The central identities used, in particular the Racah back-coupling rule (B.21) and the phase factor in the projection p (3.16), rely on Wigner phases that assume fusion numbers 0 or 1 and self-conjugate representations. For general compact groups, such as SU(N) with N≥3, the text only states: 'We believe that the result still holds, possibly with different phase factor in the weight' (Section 3.4, final paragraph). Since the construction is advertised for arbitrary simple connected compact G, this check is incomplete for the claimed scope. The authors should either supply a proof using the general Racah algebra cited from [44,45], or restrict the scope of the IRF-crossing claim.
[Section 4] The paper admits that 'we were only able to perform the fusion (section 3.3) and the IRF check (section 3.4) in terms of expectation values.' This is a significant limitation because the n-line junctions are defined as operators (Section 3.1), and the claimed locality property is about operators inserted into the lattice. The relation between an expectation-value computation and an operator identity is not established. The authors should clarify whether the locality and closure statements are meant at the level of correlation functions only, or whether an operator-level statement is intended and, if so, how it follows from the calculations presented.
[Section 3.1] The completeness of the defect set is assumed rather than proven. The text states: 'A generic defect is a weighted linear combination of these junctions, and any admissible choice of weight defines a gauge invariant operator in this set.' This makes the claim that 'any defect network can be built' from W_n a definition of the considered class of defects, not a demonstration that all defect networks of 2dYM are captured. The authors should separate the definition of their defect class from the stronger claim of completeness with respect to all possible defects in the theory.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2.1] Typo: 'lattic model' should be 'lattice model'.
[Introduction] Typo: 'Dijkgraff-Witten' should be 'Dijkgraaf-Witten'.
[Section 3.3] The section heading 'F usion' contains a spacing typo; it should be 'Fusion'.
[Section 3.4, eq. (3.16)] The phase factor (−1)^{β3+2ρ2−α1+α2} in the projection p is not explained; for simply reducible groups the conventions should be stated explicitly, and for general groups the reader is left without a definition of these phases.
[Appendix B.1] The footnote 'For a general compact group we get phase factor for both even and odd permutations' is too vague; the authors should either give the explicit phase or provide a precise reference to the relevant equations in [44,45].
[Appendix C] Typo: 'In or notation' should be 'In our notation'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the defect-network calculus is built from explicit Clebsch-Gordan and Haar-integral data, checked against independently known 2dYM results, and the two self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The enriched Migdal factor (2.3) is a direct construction from the standard Migdal factor plus new V in G-tilde corner and B in H interior degrees of freedom, and subdivision invariance is verified by explicit Haar integration with B1B2 = B recombination (Section 2.1). The recovery checks - partition function (2.6), discrete-theta partition function (2.8)-(2.9), Wilson line (3.7), Wilson point (3.8), and the IRF crossing <p W4> = <W+> (3.17) - are computed from Clebsch-Gordan and 6j data against independently established external results (Witten [8]; Santilli and Szabo [39]), not assumed. The fusion-closure result <W3 composed along U5 W3> = sum over alpha5 of N^{beta3}_{beta1 alpha5} <W4> (3.12) is a derived Racah-type identity: W4 is defined independently in (3.2), and the coefficient N is the group fusion number (B.5), not a fitted parameter, so the closure claim has independent content. No parameter is fitted anywhere, and no 'prediction' is an input renamed. The paper explicitly disclaims uniqueness ('We do not claim that this enrichment is unique, only that it does the job', Section 2.1) and labels the recoveries as checks of the refinement strategy (Section 1). The limitations are honestly flagged and are correctness/scope risks, not circular steps: the general-compact-group IRF identity is supported only by 'We believe that the result still holds, possibly with different phase factor in the weight' (Section 3.4, final paragraph); iteration of fusion beyond W3 composed with W3 is only a 'reasonable expectation' (Section 3.3); and both the fusion and IRF checks were performed 'only in terms of expectation values' (Section 4). These gaps weaken the advertised generality but do not smuggle the conclusion into the premises. The self-citations [22] (Griguolo et al. 2024) and [29] (Griguolo, Guerrini, Yaakov 2021) appear in the introduction as pointers to other 2dYM approaches and to higher-Casimir deformations alongside external refs [18, 27, 28]; neither is load-bearing, and the corner-degree input is credited to external [25] (Iraso and Mnev), the B-degree to external [39]. Accordingly the circularity score is 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The enriched Migdal factor (2.3) is a postulate whose justification is that it reproduces known results. The construction introduces two new lattice degrees of freedom, V and B, and a family of junction operators W_n. There are no fitted numerical constants, but the defect projection weight p is hand-chosen. The main conceptual burdens are the ad hoc fusion prescription (3.11), the conjectural extension to arbitrary compact groups, and the asserted completeness of the W_n defect set.

free parameters (1)

Projection weight p for IRF crossing recovery = Eq. (3.16): phase (-1)^(beta3+2rho2-alpha1+alpha2), dim(beta5), delta(beta1,e), delta(alpha1,alpha3)…
Chosen by hand so that <pW4> reproduces the known IRF crossing (3.15). The paper notes the phase is specific to simply reducible groups and would need modification for general compact groups.

assumptions (6)

standard math Peter-Weyl theorem and Haar orthogonality relations (A.5), plus the character delta function (A.7) for compact groups
Used to prove subdivision invariance in Section 2.1 and to perform all gluing integrals in Section 3, as collected in Appendix A.
domain assumption Standard Migdal factor (2.1) and subdivision invariance of the ordinary 2dYM lattice model
The enriched model is built on the standard Migdal factor and inherits its subdivision invariance as a background result from Witten [8].
standard math Clebsch-Gordan and 3j symbol identities (B.7), (B.8), (B.10), (B.12), including unitarity and delta relations
These identities underlie the definitions of W3 and W4 and the fusion and IRF computations in Sections 3.3 and 3.4.
ad hoc to paper Fusion on the lattice is identified with projecting the holonomy U5 to 1 and contracting Clebsch-Gordan indices, eq. (3.11)
This prescription defines the fusion operation used to prove closure; it is introduced in Section 3.3 without an independent derivation.
ad hoc to paper The IRF crossing identity extends to arbitrary compact groups via generalized Racah back-coupling and phase factors
Section 3.4 proves the identity only for simply reducible groups and states 'We believe that the result still holds, possibly with different phase factor in the weight'. The advertised generality for arbitrary structure group depends on this unproven extension.
ad hoc to paper Completeness of the defect set: any gauge-invariant network can be built by composing n-line junctions with arbitrary admissible weights
Section 3.1 asserts this construction principle but does not prove that it exhausts all continuum defects of 2dYM.

invented entities (3)

Corner degrees of freedom V in the universal cover G~
purpose: Realize Wilson points and point defects as local functionals of vertex data
Introduced ad hoc in Section 2.1; the Discussion admits the refinement was introduced ad hoc, with the BV formalism of [25] providing a guide at the algebra level. No independent observable is predicted.
Center degrees of freedom B in H on plaquette interiors
purpose: Realize discrete theta angles and space-filling defects as local weights
Analogs appeared in [39], but here B is auxiliary lattice data used to control gauging plaquette by plaquette; no falsifiable handle outside the paper is provided.
n-line junction operators W_n
purpose: Fundamental building blocks for defect networks; W3 is claimed to generate all junctions by degeneration and fusion
These operators are defined by construction from representation matrices and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and checked against known defects. No independent prediction or externally verified quantity is attached to them.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lattice defect networks in 2d Yang-Mills." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YODI6XOF

@misc{pith2026250112351,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lattice defect networks in 2d Yang-Mills},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YODI6XOF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12351}
}

read the original abstract

We construct defect networks in pure Yang-Mills theory in two dimensions using a refinement of the lattice approach. The refinement preserves the locality properties of individual defects, and is compatible with solvability of the theory via subdivision invariance. We explicitly demonstrate closure of the building blocks under fusion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[25]

Two-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory on Surfaces With Corners in Batalin-Vilkovisky Formalism

R. Iraso and P. Mnev, Two-Dimensional Yang–Mills Theory on Surfaces with Corners in Batalin–Vilkovisky Formalism, Commun. Math. Phys. 370 (2019) 637 [ 1806.04172]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[39]

Santilli and R.J

L. Santilli and R.J. Szabo, Higher form symmetries and orbifolds of two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, 2403.03119

arXiv
[1]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality , JHEP 04 (2014) 001 [1401.0740]. – 26 –

arXiv 2014
[2]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172 [ 1412.5148]

arXiv 2015
[3]

Bhardwaj, L.E

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D.S.W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al., Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rept. 1051 (2024) 1 [ 2307.07547]

arXiv 2024
[4]

Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Inst

M. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 68 (1989) 175

1989
[5]

Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , in Differential geometrical methods in theoretical physics, pp

G.B. Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , in Differential geometrical methods in theoretical physics, pp. 165–171, Springer (1988)

work page 1988
[6]

Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun

E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351

1989

Show all 69 references

[7]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology , Commun. Math. Phys. 129 (1990) 393

1990
[8]

Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two-dimensions , Commun

E. Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two-dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 141 (1991) 153

1991
[9]

Freed, Higher algebraic structures and quantization , Commun

D.S. Freed, Higher algebraic structures and quantization , Commun. Math. Phys. 159 (1994) 343 [hep-th/9212115]

1994 arXiv
[10]

Baez and J

J.C. Baez and J. Dolan, Higher dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory , J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6073 [ q-alg/9503002]

1995 arXiv
[11]

Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories , Current developments in mathematics 2008 (2008) 129

J. Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories , Current developments in mathematics 2008 (2008) 129

2008
[12]

Freed, Lectures on Field Theory and Topology , CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (2019)

D. Freed, Lectures on Field Theory and Topology , CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (2019)

2019
[13]

Grady and D

D. Grady and D. Pavlov, The geometric cobordism hypothesis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01095 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[14]

Kapustin, Topological Field Theory, Higher Categories, and Their Applications , in International Congress of Mathematicians , 4, 2010 [ 1004.2307]

A. Kapustin, Topological Field Theory, Higher Categories, and Their Applications , in International Congress of Mathematicians , 4, 2010 [ 1004.2307]

2010 arXiv
[15]

Carqueville, M

N. Carqueville, M. Del Zotto and I. Runkel, Topological defects, 11, 2023 [ 2311.02449]

2023 arXiv
[16]

Migdal, Recursion Equations in Gauge Theories , Sov

A.A. Migdal, Recursion Equations in Gauge Theories , Sov. Phys. JETP 42 (1975) 413

1975
[17]

Rusakov, Loop averages and partition functions in U(N) gauge theory on two-dimensional manifolds , Mod

B.E. Rusakov, Loop averages and partition functions in U(N) gauge theory on two-dimensional manifolds , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 693

1990
[18]

Witten, Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited , J

E. Witten, Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited , J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992) 303 [hep-th/9204083]

1992 arXiv
[19]

Blau and G

M. Blau and G. Thompson, Lectures on 2-d gauge theories: Topological aspects and path integral techniques, in Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology (Includes Workshop on Strings, Gravity, and Related Topics 29-30 Jul 1993) , pp. 0175–244, 10, 1993 [hep-th/9310144]

1993 arXiv
[20]

Sharpe, Decomposition in diverse dimensions , Phys

E. Sharpe, Decomposition in diverse dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 025030 [1404.3986]

2014 arXiv
[21]

Blau and G

M. Blau and G. Thompson, Localization and diagonalization: A review of functional integral techniques for low dimensional gauge theories and topological field theories , J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 2192 [ hep-th/9501075]. – 27 –

1995 arXiv
[22]

Griguolo, R

L. Griguolo, R. Panerai, J. Papalini, D. Seminara and I. Yaakov, Localization and resummationof unstable instantons in 2d Yang-Mills , JHEP 06 (2024) 188 [ 2403.00053]

2024 arXiv
[23]

Cordes, G.W

S. Cordes, G.W. Moore and S. Ramgoolam, Lectures on 2-d Yang-Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 41 (1995) 184 [hep-th/9411210]

1995 arXiv
[24]

Runkel and L

I. Runkel and L. Szegedy, Area-dependent quantum field theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics 381 (2020) 83

2020
[26]

Blau and G

M. Blau and G. Thompson, Quantum Yang-Mills theory on arbitrary surfaces , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 (1992) 3781

1992
[27]

Ganor, J

O. Ganor, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz, The String theory approach to generalized 2-D Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B 434 (1995) 139 [ hep-th/9407114]

1995 arXiv
[28]

Rusakov and S

B. Rusakov and S. Yankielowicz, Large n phase transitions and multi-critical behaviour in generalized 2d qcd, Physics Letters B 339 (1994) 258

1994
[29]

Griguolo, L

L. Griguolo, L. Guerrini and I. Yaakov, Localization and duality for ABJM latitude Wilson loops, JHEP 08 (2021) 001 [ 2104.04533]

2021 arXiv
[30]

Chen, Instanton Density Operator in Lattice QCD from Higher Category Theory , 2406.06673

J.-Y. Chen, Instanton Density Operator in Lattice QCD from Higher Category Theory , 2406.06673
[31]

Pestun, Localization of the four-dimensional N=4 SYM to a two-sphere and 1/8 BPS Wilson loops, JHEP 12 (2012) 067 [ 0906.0638]

V. Pestun, Localization of the four-dimensional N=4 SYM to a two-sphere and 1/8 BPS Wilson loops, JHEP 12 (2012) 067 [ 0906.0638]

2012 arXiv
[32]

Drukker, S

N. Drukker, S. Giombi, R. Ricci and D. Trancanelli, Supersymmetric Wilson loops on S**3 , JHEP 05 (2008) 017 [ 0711.3226]

2008 arXiv
[33]

Giombi and V

S. Giombi and V. Pestun, Correlators of local operators and 1/8 BPS Wilson loops on S**2 from 2d YM and matrix models , JHEP 10 (2010) 033 [ 0906.1572]

2010 arXiv
[34]

Giombi and V

S. Giombi and V. Pestun, The 1/2 BPS ’t Hooft loops in N=4 SYM as instantons in 2d Yang-Mills, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 095402 [ 0909.4272]

2013 arXiv
[35]

Bassetto and L

A. Bassetto and L. Griguolo, Two-dimensional QCD, instanton contributions and the perturbative Wu-Mandelstam-Leibbrandt prescription, Phys. Lett. B 443 (1998) 325 [hep-th/9806037]

1998 arXiv
[36]

Wang, Taming defects in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills , JHEP 08 (2020) 021 [ 2003.11016]

Y. Wang, Taming defects in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills , JHEP 08 (2020) 021 [ 2003.11016]

2020 arXiv
[37]

Gaiotto and E

D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, J. Statist. Phys. 135 (2009) 789 [ 0804.2902]

2009 arXiv
[38]

Beasley, Localization for Wilson Loops in Chern-Simons Theory , Adv

C. Beasley, Localization for Wilson Loops in Chern-Simons Theory , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013) 1 [ 0911.2687]

2013 arXiv
[40]

Lin, D.G

L. Lin, D.G. Robbins and E. Sharpe, Decomposition, Condensation Defects, and Fusion , Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022) 2200130 [ 2208.05982]

2022 arXiv
[41]

Sharpe, An introduction to decomposition, (2024), DOI [ 2204.09117]

E. Sharpe, An introduction to decomposition, (2024), DOI [ 2204.09117]. – 28 –

2024 arXiv
[42]

Nguyen, Y

M. Nguyen, Y. Tanizaki and M. ¨Unsal, Noninvertible 1-form symmetry and Casimir scaling in 2D Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 065003 [ 2104.01824]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Gaiotto and E

D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Janus Configurations, Chern-Simons Couplings, And The theta-Angle in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory , JHEP 06 (2010) 097 [ 0804.2907]

2010 arXiv
[44]

Derome and W.T

J. Derome and W.T. Sharp, Racah Algebra for an Arbitrary Group , Journal of Mathematical Physics 6 (1965) 1584 [https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/6/10/1584/19142342/1584 1 online.pdf]

1965
[45]

Butler, Coupling coefficients and tensor operators for chains of groups , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

P.H. Butler, Coupling coefficients and tensor operators for chains of groups , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 277 (1975) 545

1975
[46]

C. Choi, J. Gomis and R.I. Garc ´ ıa,Surface operators and exact holography , JHEP 12 (2024) 195 [2406.08541]

2024 arXiv
[47]

Gukov and E

S. Gukov and E. Witten, Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program, hep-th/0612073

arXiv
[48]

Gukov and E

S. Gukov and E. Witten, Rigid Surface Operators, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14 (2010) 87 [0804.1561]

2010 arXiv
[49]

Moore and N

G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Taming the Conformal Zoo , Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 422

1989
[50]

Okuda, Mirror symmetry and the flavor vortex operator in two dimensions , JHEP 10 (2015) 174 [ 1508.07179]

T. Okuda, Mirror symmetry and the flavor vortex operator in two dimensions , JHEP 10 (2015) 174 [ 1508.07179]

2015 arXiv
[51]

Hosomichi, S

K. Hosomichi, S. Lee and T. Okuda, Supersymmetric vortex defects in two dimensions , JHEP 01 (2018) 033 [ 1705.10623]

2018 arXiv
[52]

Hosomichi, Orbifolds, Defects and Sphere Partition Function , JHEP 02 (2016) 155 [1507.07650]

K. Hosomichi, Orbifolds, Defects and Sphere Partition Function , JHEP 02 (2016) 155 [1507.07650]

2016 arXiv
[53]

Drukker, T

N. Drukker, T. Okuda and F. Passerini, Exact results for vortex loop operators in 3d supersymmetric theories, JHEP 07 (2014) 137 [ 1211.3409]

2014 arXiv
[54]

Kapustin, B

A. Kapustin, B. Willett and I. Yaakov, Exact results for supersymmetric abelian vortex loops in 2+1 dimensions , JHEP 06 (2013) 099 [ 1211.2861]

2013 arXiv
[55]

Hosomichi and K

K. Hosomichi and K. Suzuki, Supersymmetric vortex loops in 3D gauge theories , JHEP 04 (2022) 027 [ 2111.04249]

2022 arXiv
[56]

Drukker and O

N. Drukker and O. Shahpo, Vortex loop operators and quantum M2-branes , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 016 [ 2312.17091]

2024 arXiv
[57]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic, Canonical quantization of lattice Chern-Simons theory , JHEP 11 (2024) 087 [ 2401.09597]

2024 arXiv
[58]

Gross and W

D.J. Gross and W. Taylor, Two-dimensional QCD is a string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 400 (1993) 181 [ hep-th/9301068]

1993 arXiv
[59]

Gross and W

D.J. Gross and W. Taylor, Twists and Wilson loops in the string theory of two-dimensional QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 403 (1993) 395 [ hep-th/9303046]

1993 arXiv
[60]

Horava, Topological rigid string theory and two-dimensional QCD , Nucl

P. Horava, Topological rigid string theory and two-dimensional QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 463 (1996) 238 [ hep-th/9507060]

1996 arXiv
[61]

Pantev and E

T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, Decomposition and the Gross–Taylor string theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38 (2023) 2350156 [ 2307.08729]. – 29 –

2023 arXiv
[62]

Roumpedakis, S

K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects, Commun. Math. Phys. 401 (2023) 3043 [ 2204.02407]

2023 arXiv
[63]

Gaiotto and T

D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, Condensations in higher categories , 1905.09566

1905 arXiv
[64]

Vilenkin, Special functions and the theory of group representations , 1968, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122254133

N.Y. Vilenkin, Special functions and the theory of group representations , 1968, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122254133

1968
[65]

Sepanski, Compact lie groups , 2006, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117022255

M.R. Sepanski, Compact lie groups , 2006, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117022255

2006
[66]

Nist digital library for mathematical functions , https://dlmf.nist.gov/
[67]

Wigner, On the matrices which reduce the kronecker products of representations of s

E.P. Wigner, On the matrices which reduce the kronecker products of representations of s. r. groups, in The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner: Part A: The Scientific Papers , A.S. Wightman, ed., (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 608–654, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1993), DOI

1993
[68]

Messiah, Quantum mechanics, v.2 , 1961, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125322572

A.M.L. Messiah, Quantum mechanics, v.2 , 1961, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125322572

1961
[69]

A. Alex, M. Kalus, A. Huckleberry and J. von Delft, A Numerical algorithm for the explicit calculation of SU(N) and SL(N,C) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients , J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 023507 [1009.0437]. – 30 –

2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Two-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory on Surfaces With Corners in Batalin-Vilkovisky Formalism

R. Iraso and P. Mnev, Two-Dimensional Yang–Mills Theory on Surfaces with Corners in Batalin–Vilkovisky Formalism, Commun. Math. Phys. 370 (2019) 637 [ 1806.04172]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[2] [39]

Santilli and R.J

L. Santilli and R.J. Szabo, Higher form symmetries and orbifolds of two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, 2403.03119

arXiv

[3] [1]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality , JHEP 04 (2014) 001 [1401.0740]. – 26 –

arXiv 2014

[4] [2]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172 [ 1412.5148]

arXiv 2015

[5] [3]

Bhardwaj, L.E

L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D.S.W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al., Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rept. 1051 (2024) 1 [ 2307.07547]

arXiv 2024

[6] [4]

Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Inst

M. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 68 (1989) 175

1989

[7] [5]

Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , in Differential geometrical methods in theoretical physics, pp

G.B. Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , in Differential geometrical methods in theoretical physics, pp. 165–171, Springer (1988)

work page 1988

[8] [6]

Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun

E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351

1989