Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Exact path integrals on half-line in quantum cosmology with a fluid clock and aspects of operator ordering ambiguity

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that preserving general covariance and lapse-rescaling invariance in minisuperspace quantum cosmology fixes the operator-ordering ambiguity for D>2, making inner products, probability measures, and correlators…

desk verdict Solid exact half-line path integrals and a good canonical symmetry argument, but the path-integral conformal proof has a real gap in its delta-function identity. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11680 v2 pith:YPUOLASD submitted 2025-01-20 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

Vikramaditya Mondal , Harkirat Singh Sahota , Kinjalk Lochan This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thquant-ph
keywords quantumcosmologyminisuperspaceoperatororderingambiguityWheeler-DeWittequationpathintegralquantizationperfectfluidclocklapserescalinghalf-line
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the operator-ordering ambiguity of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation—the freedom to order momenta and coordinates when quantizing the Hamiltonian constraint—can be neutralized by symmetry in minisuperspace models whose dimension, excluding a clock fluid, is greater than two. The authors show that if the quantum Hamiltonian is Laplace-Beltrami ordered (respecting general covariance under point canonical transformations) and the potential-class term is fixed to a specific Ricci-scalar correction, then the theory becomes conformally invariant under arbitrary lapse rescalings. With a perfect fluid acting as an internal clock, this implies that wave-function inner products, probability measures, and correlators are independent of the ordering choice for a large class of Hamiltonians. In one-dimensional minisuperspace (flat FLRW with a fluid clock) the symmetry argument fails, and the ordering parameter leaves an imprint on physical predictions. Exact half-line path integrals, computed with all O(ℏ²) quantum corrections, reproduce the canonical stationary states and confirm the contrast between D=1 and D>2.

What carries the argument

The central object is the conformally invariant Wheeler-DeWitt Hamiltonian $\hat H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2}\Delta_{LB} + U + \hbar^2 \frac{D-2}{8(D-1)} R$, where $\Delta_{LB}$ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the minisuperspace metric, together with the fluid-clock deparametrization $i\hbar\partial_T\Psi = \hat H\Psi$. Under lapse rescaling $N \to \tilde N \Omega^{-2}$, the wave function and inner-product measure transform jointly, leaving $\langle\psi|\chi\rangle$ invariant. In the path integral, the same result is carried by the product-form discretization for curved manifolds, the $O(\hbar^2)$ quantum potentials $\Delta V_Q^{PF}$ and the Schwarzian correction from coordinate transformations, and a delta-function identity that reparametrizes the time coordinate and factors out the conformal factor from the kernel. This identity is what makes the conformal factor appear only in boundary factors, which then cancel from inner products and correlators.

What would settle it

Compute the exact half-line propagator for a D>2 minisuperspace with a fluid clock and a non-monotonic lapse-rescaling function $\Omega(q)$—for example a bouncing scale factor in Bianchi I—and check whether the kernel still satisfies the covariance law $K \to (\Omega(q_f)\Omega(q_i))^{(2-D)/2}K$; a violation would show that the ordering parameter can re-enter the physical predictions for histories outside the assumed uniqueness condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that demanding the quantum minisuperspace theory keep the two symmetries it has classically—general covariance under point canonical transformations and conformal invariance under lapse rescalings—selects a unique physical quantum Hamiltonian for D>2 and makes the conformal-class and factor-class operator orderings unobservable. Conformal invariance is achieved by adding a potential-class term $\hbar^2 \frac{D-2}{8(D-1)} R$ to the Laplace-Beltrami ordered Hamiltonian, where $R$ is the Ricci scalar of the minisuperspace metric. Under lapse rescaling, the wave function transforms as $\tilde\Psi = \Omega^{(2-D)/2}\Psi$, the integration measure transforms as $\sqrt{|G|}/\Omega^{2-D}$, and the inner product remains invariant. The paper proves the same covariance law for the path integral kernel, $K \to (\Omega(q_f)\Omega(q_i))^{(2-D)/2} K$, and verifies in exactly solvable models—flat FLRW (D=1) and Bianchi I with a massless scalar (D=4)—that the stationary states obtained from exact half-line path integrals satisfy the corresponding Wheeler-DeWitt equations with correct normalization. For D=4 the ordering parameter drops out of the probability distribution; for D=1 it survives in the Bessel-function index, making the ambiguity physically real.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the time reparametrization used to factor out the lapse rescaling has a unique solution for every history: if the scale factor approaches zero or the rescaling function is not monotonic, no argument is given that the delta-function trick performs the time change, and without it the propagator covariance law can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any minisuperspace model with D>2, a perfect-fluid clock, and the fixed Ricci potential term, inner products and n-point correlators are independent of the conformal-class ordering parameter, so infinitely many operator orderings give the same physics.
  • In a D=1 flat FLRW universe with a fluid clock the ordering parameter cannot be removed by any measure choice; the Bessel index of the stationary states depends on it, making the ambiguity physically real.
  • Exact half-line path integrals with Dirichlet boundary conditions at $a=0$ yield wave functions that vanish at the singularity, satisfying the DeWitt criterion, and these wave functions solve the corresponding Wheeler-DeWitt equation with the correct normalization.
  • The path integral proof establishes the propagator covariance law $K \to (\Omega(q_f)\Omega(q_i))^{(2-D)/2}K$, so correlators of coordinates and momenta are unchanged by lapse rescaling for D>2.
  • For D=2 the conformal term vanishes identically, so the symmetry argument gives no control over the conformal-class ambiguity; the paper treats this qualitatively and supplies explicit D=1 and D=4 examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same deparametrization argument should apply to any clock degree of freedom whose Hamiltonian is linear in a momentum—not only the Schutz fluid—so the conformal-invariance result may extend to dust clocks, harmonic clocks, or other relational-time constructions.
  • Inference: if BKL/Mixmaster dynamics near a generic spacelike singularity favours a three-dimensional Bianchi IX minisuperspace, the paper's D>2 result would predict an ambiguity-free quantum theory near the singularity, provided the same two symmetry requirements are imposed.
  • Inference: the uniqueness is fragile, since a small perturbation of the Ricci-potential coefficient away from $\frac{D-2}{8(D-1)}R$ destroys conformal invariance and revives ordering dependence; the scheme re-locates rather than eliminates the need for an empirical or deeper selection principle.
  • Inference: a direct testable extension is to compute the exact half-line propagator for a D=3 Bianchi IX model with a fluid clock and check that the ordering parameter cancels in transition amplitudes, not only in stationary-state inner products.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper addresses two issues in quantum cosmology with a perfect-fluid clock: exact half-line path integral quantization of flat FLRW and Bianchi I minisuperspace models, and the operator-ordering ambiguity of the quantum Hamiltonian. The authors argue that imposing two classical symmetries — general covariance under point canonical transformations and conformal invariance under lapse rescalings — fixes the potential-class ambiguity term to ξ=(D−2)/(8(D−1))R for D>2, rendering conformal-class ordering ambiguities immaterial for inner products and correlators. For D=1 the same symmetry argument fails and the ambiguity parameter p remains physically relevant. The paper provides canonical proofs, path-integral proofs, and explicit exactly solvable examples whose wave functions are checked against the Wheeler-DeWitt equation.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: it gives exact path integrals on the half-line for minisuperspace cosmologies with a fluid clock, carefully tracking O(ℏ²) corrections and Dirichlet boundary conditions, and it extends Halliwell's conformal-covariance resolution of ordering ambiguities to theories with a clock, where inner products are well-defined. The explicit D=1 and D=4 examples are concrete and the final wave functions are verified against the canonical equations, which is a genuine strength. The central ambiguity-free claim for D>2 is supported by the canonical computation and by the Bianchi I example, so the overall message is plausible. However, the advertised general path-integral proof of conformal covariance has a technical gap in the time-reparametrization identity, and the canonical derivation contains a sign inconsistency in the conformal rescaling. These issues are load-bearing for the claimed proofs, though they appear repairable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (43)] The delta-function identity used to impose the time reparametrization is not generally valid as written. For a path with F(u)=∫_0^u Ω²(q(u'))du', the correct endpoint Jacobian is F'(u_f)=Ω²(q_f), so the identity should be 1=∫_0^∞ du_f δ(N−F(u_f)) Ω²(q_f), not 1=(Ω(q_f)Ω(q_i))∫_0^∞ du_f δ(N−F(u_f)). The symmetric prefactor (Ω(q_f)Ω(q_i)) is not justified in the continuum limit and would introduce a spurious factor Ω(q_i)/Ω(q_f) into the covariance law Eq. (47). Furthermore, on the half-line with Ω(a)→0 as a→0 — as in the examples with Ω²=a^{3ω+2p−1} — the function F(u) can converge to a finite limit or be non-monotonic, so for a given lapse N there may be no root or multiple roots; the identity then fails. The paper's assumption of a unique u_f for every history, stated just before Eq. (42), is precisely what needs to be proven or restricted, and without it Eq. (47) is not established as a statement about the full path integral.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Eqs. (8)–(10)] There is a sign inconsistency in the conformal rescaling of the minisuperspace metric. Immediately after Eq. (8) the authors define \tilde G_{AB}=Ω^{-2}G_{AB}, while Eq. (9) and all subsequent conformal transformations (for example Eq. (37) and the tetrad scaling in Appendix B) use \tilde G_{AB}=Ω^2G_{AB}. Equation (10), which identifies Ω^{D−2} with the factor F_1, is only consistent with the latter convention. This is a load-bearing step in the derivation of the operator-ordering interpretation of lapse rescalings, and the contradiction needs to be fixed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (30) and (32)] The sign in front of the superpotential U inside the parentheses appears inconsistent with the definition H = 1/2 G^{AB}p_Ap_B + U(q) in Eq. (4). As written, the term −U(q) inside the exponent would give +U in the action, opposite to the classical Hamiltonian. Please check the sign convention and correct it, or clarify why U appears with the opposite sign in the path integral action.
  2. [Sec. III.B, after Eq. (43)] The statement that the symmetric combination (Ω(q_f)Ω(q_i)) in the delta identity is consistent with the product-form discretization needs elaboration. In the continuum limit the Jacobian for the endpoint u_f is Ω²(q_f), so the discrete prefactor must be shown to converge to that value rather than to (Ω(q_f)Ω(q_i)). A brief derivation from the lattice definition would remove the ambiguity.
  3. [Sec. V.A, Eq. (99)–(100)] The distributional identity used to evaluate the s_f and λ integrals relies on the integrand decaying in the lower half-plane. Please state explicitly the analyticity/decay assumptions on f(λ/ℏ), since the principal-value integral is not universally equal to f(0) without them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the unique potential-class coefficient is fixed by a symmetry condition, and the exact path-integral states are checked against the independent Wheeler-DeWitt equations; the only flagged item is a technical delta-function assumption in the path-integral covariance proof, which is a gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the canonical argument (Secs. II.B-II.C) starts from the general ambiguous Hamiltonian Eq. (5), imposes point-canonical covariance (Laplace-Beltrami ordering), and solves for the potential-class coefficient xi from the conformal-transformation identity Eq. (11). The value xi=(D-2)/(8(D-1)) is a consistency condition of the assumed conformal transformation, not an input fitted to the ambiguity-free conclusion. The inner-product invariance in Eqs. (16)-(17) follows from the Sturm-Liouville self-adjointness measure, and the paper explicitly emphasizes that this measure was not constructed by demanding conformal invariance. The D=4 example solves the p-dependent Wheeler-DeWitt equation and obtains a wave function whose p-dependence is canceled by the p-dependent self-adjointness measure in probabilities and observables (Appendix C); this is a derived cancellation, and the path-integral computation independently reproduces the same stationary states with correct normalization. The path-integral formal proof in Sec. III.B contains an assumption, stated in Eq. (42), that a unique u_f exists for every history, and the delta-normalization in Eq. (43) is asserted rather than rigorously derived for half-line histories with Omega -> 0; this is a technical limitation/gap, not a circular reduction: Eq. (47) is not used to define the identity, and the final wave functions are verified against the independent Wheeler-DeWitt equations. The self-citations [16,17,20] are used only to illustrate the known D=1 ambiguity, which the paper also re-derives through its own exact solution and the p-dependence of the Bessel index; they are not load-bearing. No equation is fitted to the conclusion or defined in terms of the conclusion, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters and no invented entities. The central computation depends on symmetry constraints that fix the coefficient xi, on the fluid-clock construction, on the half-line Dirichlet boundary condition, and on an unproved time-rescaling existence assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • Lapse-ordering parameter p
    Labels a one-parameter family of classically equivalent Hamiltonians obtained by lapse rescalings N -> N a^{-2p+1}; not fitted, but it is the ambiguity whose effect the paper studies.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Schutz perfect fluid clock admits a canonical transformation making its Hamiltonian linear in momentum.
    Needed to turn the Hamiltonian constraint into a Schrodinger equation with T as time; stated in Sec. II.A and Appendix A, with the caveat that it may break at high energies.
  • domain assumption Minisuperspace truncation is valid: homogeneous geometries and energies below the Planck scale justify ignoring inhomogeneous modes.
    Sec. II.A states the relevant energy scales are assumed to be much below the Planck scale so that metric fluctuations can be ignored or treated perturbatively.
  • ad hoc to paper For every path q(t(u)) there exists a unique u_f satisfying the time-rescaling boundary conditions in Eq. (42).
    Used to insert the delta function and perform the time reparametrization in the path integral; no proof or discussion of paths near a=0 is given.
  • domain assumption Dirichlet boundary condition on the half-line a>0 is the physical choice for the scale factor.
    Implemented in the path integral measure and radial path integral; motivated by the DeWitt criterion that the wave function vanishes at the singularity.
  • standard math The known radial path integral solution for inverse-square potentials remains valid in the pseudo-Riemannian setting with a negative kinetic term.
    Used in Sec. V to evaluate the propagators; the paper cites Grosche and Steiner for the radial path integral formulas.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact path integrals on half-line in quantum cosmology with a fluid clock and aspects of operator ordering ambiguity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPUOLASD

@misc{pith2026250111680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact path integrals on half-line in quantum cosmology with a fluid clock and aspects of operator ordering ambiguity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPUOLASD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11680}
}
abstract

We perform $\textit{exact}$ half-line path integral quantization of flat, homogeneous cosmological models containing a perfect fluid acting as an internal clock, in a $D+1$ dimensional minisuperspace setup. We also discuss certain classes of operator ordering ambiguity inherent in such quantization procedures and argue that a particular ordering prescription in the quantum theory can preserve two symmetries, namely arbitrary lapse rescalings and general covariance, which are already present at the classical level. As a result of this imposition, a large class of quantum Hamiltonians differing by operator ordering produces the same inner products between quantum states. This imposition of the two symmetries of the classical minisuperspace models leads to a unique prescription for writing the quantum Hamiltonian for minisuperspace dimension $D>2$. Interestingly, in the case of $D=1$, the lapse rescaling symmetry is lost in the quantum theory, leading to an essentially ambiguous description of the canonical theory. We provide general proof of this in the context of both canonical quantization and path integrals. We supply concrete examples to validate our findings further.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anisotropic quantum universe in Ho\v{r}ava-Lifshitz gravity

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the small-universe limit of Horava-Lifshitz gravity, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation separates and the anisotropy wave functions become normalizable harmonic-oscillator states, predicting small initial anisotropies set...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    20 The above action then evaluates to the following given the metric in Eq

    Classical action The Einstein-Hilbert action without a cosmological constant and GHY boundary term [ 86, 87] is SE-H = 1 16πG ∫ M d4x√−gR − 1 8πG ∫ ∂M d3y √ hK, (56) whereG is Newton’s universal gravitational constant, h is the determinant of the induced metric hij on the boundary 3-hypersurfaces∂M, and K is the trace of the extrinsic curvature tensor Kij...

  2. [2]

    Quantization For the case of one-dimensional minisuperspace, we expect the co nformal invariance to break down. Since by lapse rescaling, we can bring about arbitrary factors of a(t) in the kinetic term, lapse rescaling should be a source for the operator ordering ambiguity in the quantum Hamiltonian—the confor mal-class as discussed above. To quantify th...

  3. [3]

    (56) calculated for the metric Eq

    Classical action The Einstein-Hilbert gravity action Eq. (56) calculated for the metric Eq. (68) takes the form SE-H = 3V3 8πG ∫ dt [ − ˙a2a N + a3 4N ( ˙β2 1 + ˙β2 2 )] , (69) where again the boundary term coming from the integration by part s of the second-order time derivative of the isotropized scale factor is exactly canceled by the GHY boundary te r...

  4. [4]

    + ℏ 2 12 R

    Quantization For the Hamiltonian constraint − 2πG 3V3 p2 a a2p + 8πG 3V3 p2 β a2p+2 + p2 φ 2V3a2p+2 + pT a3ω+2p−1 ≈ 0, (75) 24 the Wheeler-DeWitt equation ( − ℏ2 2 1√ |G| ∂A √ |G|GAB∂B + ℏ2 D − 2 8(D − 1) R +Ea−3ω−2p+1 ) ψ = 0, (76) with ansatz ψ(a,φ, β,T ) = Ψ E(a,φ, β )eiET /ℏ , takes the form (4πGℏ2 6V3 a3ω−4−2p∂aa3+2p∂a −a3ω−3 ( ℏ2 2V3 ∂2 φ + 8πGℏ2 3V...

    2022

  5. [5]

    Republication of: The beginning of the wor ld from the point of view of quantum theory,

    G. Lemaitre, “Republication of: The beginning of the wor ld from the point of view of quantum theory,” Nature 127 (1931) 706

    1931

  6. [6]

    Quantum cosmology: a review,

    M. Bojowald, “Quantum cosmology: a review,” Reports on Progress in Physics 78 no. 2, (Jan., 2015) 023901 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/023901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/023901 2015

  7. [7]

    Quantum gravity: A Progress report,

    S. Carlip, “Quantum gravity: A Progress report,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 64 (2001) 885, arXiv:gr-qc/0108040

    arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Time and interpretations of quantum gravi ty,

    K. V. Kuchar, “Time and interpretations of quantum gravi ty,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20 (2011) 3–86

    2011

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    Canonical quantum gravity and the problem o f time,

    C. J. Isham, “Canonical quantum gravity and the problem o f time,” NATO Sci. Ser. C 409 (1993) 157–287, arXiv:gr-qc/9210011

    1993 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the universe,

    A. Vilenkin, “Quantum cosmology and the initial state of the universe,” Phys. Rev. D 37 (Feb, 1988) 888–897. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.888

    1988 doi

  3. [11]

    Derivation of the Wheeler-De Witt Equa tion from a Path Integral for Minisuperspace Models,

    J. J. Halliwell, “Derivation of the Wheeler-De Witt Equa tion from a Path Integral for Minisuperspace Models,” Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2468

    1988

  4. [12]

    Quantum Cosmology and the Selfobserving Unive rse,

    I. Moss, “Quantum Cosmology and the Selfobserving Unive rse,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. 49 (1988) 341–349

    1988

  5. [13]

    Operator ordering and consistency of the wave function of the universe,

    N. Kontoleon and D. L. Wiltshire, “Operator ordering and consistency of the wave function of the universe,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (Feb, 1999) 063513. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.063513

    1999 doi

  6. [14]

    Factor ordering in sta ndard quantum cosmology,

    R. Steigl and F. Hinterleitner, “Factor ordering in sta ndard quantum cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 3879–3894, arXiv:gr-qc/0511149

    2006 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Spontaneous creation of th e universe from nothing,

    D. He, D. Gao, and Q.-y. Cai, “Spontaneous creation of th e universe from nothing,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (Apr, 2014) 083510. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083510

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Inflation of small true vacuum bubbl e by quantization of Einstein-Hilbert action,

    D. He and Q.-y. Cai, “Inflation of small true vacuum bubbl e by quantization of Einstein-Hilbert action,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 58 no. 7, (2015) 079801 , arXiv:1409.2115 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Dynamical interpretation of the wavefunction of the universe,

    D. He, D. Gao, and Q.-y. Cai, “Dynamical interpretation of the wavefunction of the universe,” Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 361–365, arXiv:1507.06727 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Factor ordering and path integ ral measure for quantum gravity in (1+1) dimensions,

    J. Haga and R. L. Maitra, “Factor ordering and path integ ral measure for quantum gravity in (1+1) dimensions,” Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applica tions (June, 2017) . http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2017.039

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Elimination of cosmologic al singularities in quantum cosmology by suitable operator orderings,

    T. Demaerel and W. Struyve, “Elimination of cosmologic al singularities in quantum cosmology by suitable operator orderings,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (Aug, 2019) 046008. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.046008

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Infrared signatures of a qua ntum bounce in a minisuperspace analysis of Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi dust collapse,

    H. S. Sahota and K. Lochan, “Infrared signatures of a qua ntum bounce in a minisuperspace analysis of Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi dust collapse,”Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 12, (2021) 126027 , arXiv:2110.06247 [gr-qc] . 40

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Analyzing quantum gravity s pillover in the semiclassical regime,

    H. S. Sahota and K. Lochan, “Analyzing quantum gravity s pillover in the semiclassical regime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 12, (2023) 1162 , arXiv:2211.16426 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Operator ordering ambiguity in observables of quantum cos mology,

    H. S. Sahota and K. Lochan, “Operator ordering ambiguity in observables of quantum cos mology,” in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical an d Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories . 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Infrared signatures of quantum bounce in collapsing geome try,

    H. S. Sahota and K. Lochan, “Infrared signatures of quantum bounce in collapsing geome try,” in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical an d Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories . 1, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Imprints of the operator ordering ambigu ity on the dynamics of perfect fluid dominated quantum Universe,

    H. S. Sahota, “Imprints of the operator ordering ambigu ity on the dynamics of perfect fluid dominated quantum Universe,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41 no. 17, (2024) 175006 , arXiv:2310.09905 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Duality between operator ordering factor and massless scalar field,

    D. He and Q.-y. Cai, “Duality between operator ordering factor and massless scalar field,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 9, (2022) 791

    2022

  18. [26]

    Big bang singularity resolution in q uantum cosmology,

    K. P. Y. Thebault, “Big bang singularity resolution in q uantum cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40 no. 5, (2023) 055007 , arXiv:2209.05905 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Quantum Gravitatio n: Quantization of the Friedmann Model,

    V. G. Lapchinsky and V. A. Rubakov, “Quantum Gravitatio n: Quantization of the Friedmann Model,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 33 (1977) 364–376

    1977

  20. [28]

    Quantum cosmological perfect fluid models,

    F. G. Alvarenga, J. C. Fabris, N. A. Lemos, and G. A. Moner at, “Quantum cosmological perfect fluid models,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 34 (2002) 651–663, arXiv:gr-qc/0106051

    2002 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Time and a physical hamiltonian for quantum gravity,

    V. Husain and T. Paw/suppress lowski, “Time and a physical hamiltonian for quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (Apr, 2012) 141301. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.141301

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canonic al theory,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canonic al theory,” Phys. Rev. 160 (Aug, 1967) 1113–1148. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

    1967 doi

  23. [31]

    The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3 (1933) 64–72

    1933

  24. [32]

    Space-time approach to non-relativist ic quantum mechanics,

    R. P. Feynman, “Space-time approach to non-relativist ic quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 20 (Apr, 1948) 367–387. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.20.367

    1948 doi

  25. [33]

    Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitationa l Field,

    C. Teitelboim, “Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitationa l Field,” Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 3159

    1982

  26. [34]

    Causality Versus Gauge Invariance in Q uantum Gravity and Supergravity,

    C. Teitelboim, “Causality Versus Gauge Invariance in Q uantum Gravity and Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 705

    1983

  27. [35]

    Quantum mechanics of the gravitationa l field in asymptotically flat space,

    C. Teitelboim, “Quantum mechanics of the gravitationa l field in asymptotically flat space,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (Jul, 1983) 310–316. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.310

    1983 doi

  28. [36]

    Proper-time gauge in the quantum theor y of gravitation,

    C. Teitelboim, “Proper-time gauge in the quantum theor y of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (Jul, 1983) 297–309. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.297

    1983 doi

  29. [37]

    Path integrals in parametrized theories: Newtonian systems,

    J. B. Hartle and K. V. Kuchaˇ r, “Path integrals in parametrized theories: Newtonian systems,” Journal of mathematical physics 25 no. 1, (1984) 57–75

    1984

  30. [38]

    Path integrals in parametrized theories: The free relativistic particle,

    J. B. Hartle and K. V. Kuchaˇ r, “Path integrals in parametrized theories: The free relativistic particle,” Phys. Rev. D 34 (Oct, 1986) 2323–2331. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.2323

    1986 doi

  31. [39]

    Quantum Geometrod ynamics: The Path Integral and the Initial Value Problem for the Wave Function of the Universe,

    A. O. Barvinsky and V. N. Ponomarev, “Quantum Geometrod ynamics: The Path Integral and the Initial Value Problem for the Wave Function of the Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 289–294

    1986

  32. [40]

    Quantum Geometrodynamics: The Wheel er-de Witt Equations for the Wave Function of the Universe,

    A. O. Barvinsky, “Quantum Geometrodynamics: The Wheel er-de Witt Equations for the Wave Function of the Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 175 (1986) 401–404

    1986

  33. [41]

    Wave functions constr ucted from an invariant sum over histories satisfy constrai nts,

    J. J. Halliwell and J. B. Hartle, “Wave functions constr ucted from an invariant sum over histories satisfy constrai nts,” Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1170–1194

    1991

  34. [42]

    Steepest-descent contou rs in the path-integral approach to quantum cosmology. i. th e de sitter minisuperspace model,

    J. J. Halliwell and J. Louko, “Steepest-descent contou rs in the path-integral approach to quantum cosmology. i. th e de sitter minisuperspace model,” Phys. Rev. D 39 (Apr, 1989) 2206–2215. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2206

    1989 doi

  35. [43]

    Lorentzia n quantum cosmology,

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, “Lorentzia n quantum cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (May, 2017) 103508. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508. 41

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Space-time Transformations in Radial Pat h Integrals,

    F. Steiner, “Space-time Transformations in Radial Pat h Integrals,” Phys. Lett. A 106 (1984) 356

    1984

  37. [45]

    PATH INTEGRALS ON CURVED MAN IFOLDS,

    C. Grosche and F. Steiner, “PATH INTEGRALS ON CURVED MAN IFOLDS,” Z. Phys. C 36 (1987) 699

    1987

  38. [46]

    The Product Form for Path Integrals on Curv ed Manifolds,

    C. Grosche, “The Product Form for Path Integrals on Curv ed Manifolds,” Phys. Lett. A 128 (1988) 113–122

    1988

  39. [47]

    Grosche and F

    C. Grosche and F. Steiner, Handbook of Feynman Path Integrals , vol. 145. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998

    1998

  40. [48]

    Trinity of r elational quantum dynamics,

    P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, “Trinity of r elational quantum dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 6, (2021) 066001 , arXiv:1912.00033 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gaussian reference fluid and interpretation of quantum geometrodynamics,

    K. V. Kuchaˇ r and C. G. Torre, “Gaussian reference fluid and interpretation of quantum geometrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 419–441

    1991

  42. [50]

    The Harmonic gauge in canonical gravity,

    K. V. Kuchaˇ r and C. G. Torre, “The Harmonic gauge in canonical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 3116–3123

    1991

  43. [51]

    Extrinsic curvature as a reference fluidin canonical gravity,

    K. V. Kuchaˇ r, “Extrinsic curvature as a reference fluidin canonical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4443–4457

    1992

  44. [52]

    Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,

    J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchaˇ r, “Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 51 (May, 1995) 5600–5629. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5600

    1995 doi

  45. [53]

    Tensor perturba tions in quantum cosmological backgrounds,

    P. Peter, E. Pinho, and N. Pinto-Neto, “Tensor perturba tions in quantum cosmological backgrounds,” JCAP 07 (2005) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0509232

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A Non inflati onary model with scale invariant cosmological perturbations,

    P. Peter, E. J. C. Pinho, and N. Pinto-Neto, “A Non inflati onary model with scale invariant cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 023516, arXiv:hep-th/0610205

    2007 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Cosmology without inflatio n,

    P. Peter and N. Pinto-Neto, “Cosmology without inflatio n,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 063506, arXiv:0809.2022 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Primordial gravitational waves in a quantum model of big bounce,

    H. Bergeron, J. P. Gazeau, and P. Ma/suppress lkiewicz, “Primordial gravitational waves in a quantum model of big bounce,” JCAP 05 (2018) 057, arXiv:1709.05851 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Dynamics of primordial fields in quantum cosmological spacetimes,

    P. Ma/suppress lkiewicz and A. Miroszewski, “Dynamics of primordial fields in quantum cosmological spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 8, (2021) 083529 , arXiv:2011.03487 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Unitarily inequivalent quantum cosmological bouncing models,

    J. d. C. Martin, P. Ma/suppress lkiewicz, and P. Peter, “Unitarily inequivalent quantum cosmological bouncing models,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 2, (2022) 023522 , arXiv:2111.02963

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Wkb approac hes to restore time in quantum cosmology: Predictions and shortcomings,

    G. Maniccia, M. De Angelis, and G. Montani, “Wkb approac hes to restore time in quantum cosmology: Predictions and shortcomings,” Universe 8 no. 11, (Oct., 2022) 556 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/universe8110556

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    Ambiguous power spectrum from a quantum bounce,

    J. d. C. Martin, P. Ma/suppress lkiewicz, and P. Peter, “Ambiguous power spectrum from a quantum bounce,” Physical Review D 109 no. 6, (Mar., 2024) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.066009

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    Analyzing the i nfluence of graviton fluctuations on the inflationary spectru m with a kuchaˇ r-torre clock,

    G. Maniccia, G. Montani, and M. Tosoni, “Analyzing the i nfluence of graviton fluctuations on the inflationary spectru m with a kuchaˇ r-torre clock,”Physical Review D 110 no. 8, (Oct., 2024) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.086012

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    Singularity avoidance for co llapsing quantum dust in the lemaˆ ıtre-tolman-bondi model,

    C. Kiefer and T. Schmitz, “Singularity avoidance for co llapsing quantum dust in the lemaˆ ıtre-tolman-bondi model,” Physical Review D 99 no. 12, (June, 2019) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.126010

    2019 doi

  55. [63]

    Point Canonical Transfo rmations in Path Integral,

    J.-L. Gervais and A. Jevicki, “Point Canonical Transfo rmations in Path Integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 110 (1976) 93–112

    1976

  56. [64]

    Lorentzia n quantum cosmology,

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, “Lorentzia n quantum cosmology,” Physical Review D 95 no. 10, (2017) 103508

    2017

  57. [65]

    No smooth b eginning for spacetime,

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, “No smooth b eginning for spacetime,” Physical review letters 119 no. 17, (2017) 171301

    2017

  58. [66]

    Real no-boundary wave function in lorentzian quantum cosmology,

    J. D. Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T. Herto g, and O. Janssen, “Real no-boundary wave function in lorentzian quantum cosmology,” Physical Review D 96 no. 4, (2017) 043505

    2017

  59. [67]

    Damped perturbations in the no-boundary state,

    J. D. Dorronsoro, J. J. Halliwell, J. B. Hartle, T. Herto g, O. Janssen, and Y. Vreys, “Damped perturbations in the no-boundary state,” Physical review letters 121 no. 8, (2018) 081302

    2018

  60. [68]

    Tunneling wave function of t he universe,

    A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada, “Tunneling wave function of t he universe,” Physical Review D 98 no. 6, (2018) 066003

    2018

  61. [69]

    No rescue f or the no boundary proposal: Pointers to the future of quantu m cosmology,

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, “No rescue f or the no boundary proposal: Pointers to the future of quantu m cosmology,” Physical Review D 97 no. 2, (2018) 023509

    2018

  62. [70]

    Inconsist encies of the new no-boundary proposal,

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok, “Inconsist encies of the new no-boundary proposal,” Universe 4 no. 10, (2018) 100. 42

    2018

  63. [71]

    Tunneling wave function of t he universe. ii. the backreaction problem,

    A. Vilenkin and M. Yamada, “Tunneling wave function of t he universe. ii. the backreaction problem,” Physical Review D 99 no. 6, (2019) 066010

    2019

  64. [72]

    Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics

    P. Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics . Belfer Graduate School of Science, monograph series. Dove r Publications,

  65. [73]

    Path Integral Derivatio n of Black Hole Radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path Integral Derivatio n of Black Hole Radiance,” Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2188–2203

    1976

  66. [74]

    Point transformations in quantum mechan ics,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Point transformations in quantum mechan ics,” Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 653–661

    1952

  67. [75]

    Dynamical theory in curved spaces. i. a re view of the classical and quantum action principles,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Dynamical theory in curved spaces. i. a re view of the classical and quantum action principles,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (Jul, 1957) 377–397. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.377

    1957 doi

  68. [76]

    Path integrals in c urved spaces,

    D. W. Mclaughlin and L. S. Schulman, “Path integrals in c urved spaces,” J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 2520–2524

    1971

  69. [77]

    Quantization of a general dynamical syste m by feynman’s path integration formulation,

    K. S. Cheng, “Quantization of a general dynamical syste m by feynman’s path integration formulation,” J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 1723–1729

    1972

  70. [78]

    One-electron atom in curved space-time,

    L. Parker, “One-electron atom in curved space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (Jun, 1980) 1559–1562. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1559

    1980 doi

  71. [79]

    Path integrals for a particle in curved spac e,

    L. Parker, “Path integrals for a particle in curved spac e,” Phys. Rev. D 19 (Jan, 1979) 438–441. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.19.438

    1979 doi

  72. [80]

    Quantum mechanics of a nonlinear s ystem,

    M. Omote and H. Sato, “Quantum mechanics of a nonlinear s ystem,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 47 (1972) 1367–1377

    1972

  73. [81]

    Quantum mechanics of electromagnetically bounded spin-1/2 particles in an expandi ng universe: I. influence of the expansion,

    J. Audretsch and G. Sch¨ afer, “Quantum mechanics of electromagnetically bounded spin-1/2 particles in an expandi ng universe: I. influence of the expansion,” General Relativity and Gravitation 9 (1978) 243–255

    1978

  74. [82]

    One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime cu rvature,

    L. Parker, “One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime cu rvature,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (Oct, 1980) 1922–1934. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1922

    1980 doi

  75. [83]

    Measure for measure: Covariant skeletonizations of phase space path integrals for systems moving on Riemannian manifolds,

    K. Kuchaˇ r, “Measure for measure: Covariant skeletonizations of phase space path integrals for systems moving on Riemannian manifolds,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 24 no. 8, (08, 1983) 2122–2141 , https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/24/8/2122/19238602/2122 1 online.p...

    1983 doi

  76. [84]

    Singularity avoidance in Bianchi I quantum cosmology,

    C. Kiefer, N. Kwidzinski, and D. Piontek, “Singularity avoidance in Bianchi I quantum cosmology,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 8, (2019) 686 , arXiv:1903.04391 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Wavefun ction of the universe: Reparametrization invariance and fie ld redefinitions of the minisuperspace path integral,

    H. Partouche, N. Toumbas, and B. de Vaulchier, “Wavefun ction of the universe: Reparametrization invariance and fie ld redefinitions of the minisuperspace path integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 973 (2021) 115600, arXiv:2103.15168 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A formalism for the ambiguit ies of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation,

    E. Kaimakkamis and K. Sil, “A formalism for the ambiguit ies of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation,” PoS CORFU2023 (2024) 227, arXiv:2407.03077 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    T he exact Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the scale-factor minisuperspace model,

    E. Kaimakkamis, H. Partouche, K. Sil, and N. Toumbas, “T he exact Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the scale-factor minisuperspace model,” arXiv:2412.18532 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    Bouncing wit h shear: implications from quantum cosmology,

    K. Rajeev, V. Mondal, and S. Chakraborty, “Bouncing wit h shear: implications from quantum cosmology,” JCAP 01 no. 01, (2022) 008 , arXiv:2109.08696 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Hamiltonian operators via feynman path inte grals,

    L. Cohen, “Hamiltonian operators via feynman path inte grals,” J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970) 3296–3297

    1970

  82. [90]

    Unique hamiltonian ope rators via feynman path integrals,

    E. H. Kerner and W. G. Sutcliffe, “Unique hamiltonian ope rators via feynman path integrals,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 11 no. 2, (1970) 391–393

    1970

  83. [91]

    Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,

    J. W. York, Jr., “Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 1082–1085

    1972

  84. [92]

    Action Integrals and Pa rtition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Pa rtition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752–2756

    1977

  85. [93]

    On the path integral for the potential V = ar− 2 + br2,

    I. Duru, “On the path integral for the potential V = ar− 2 + br2,” Physics Letters A 112 no. 9, (1985) 421–423

    1985

  86. [94]

    Theory of cosm ological perturbations in an anisotropic universe,

    T. S. Pereira, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan, “Theory of cosm ological perturbations in an anisotropic universe,” JCAP 09 (2007) 006, arXiv:0707.0736 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Unavoidable shear from quantum fluctuations in contracting cosmologies,

    J. Grain and V. Vennin, “Unavoidable shear from quantum fluctuations in contracting cosmologies,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 2, (2021) 132 , arXiv:2005.04222 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Feynman Path Integra ls: Some Exact Results and Applications,

    D. C. Khandekar and S. V. Lawande, “Feynman Path Integra ls: Some Exact Results and Applications,” Phys. Rept. 137 (1986) 115–229. 43

    1986

  89. [97]

    Summation over feynman histories in polar coordinates,

    A. Inomata, “Summation over feynman histories in polar coordinates,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 10 no. 8, (1969) 1422–1428

    1969

  90. [98]

    Quantum field theory on a cosmological, quantum space-time,

    A. Ashtekar, W. Kaminski, and J. Lewandowski, “Quantum field theory on a cosmological, quantum space-time,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064030, arXiv:0901.0933 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  91. [99]

    A new derivation of the feynm an propagator for the inverse square potential,

    K. Bhagwat and S. Lawande, “A new derivation of the feynm an propagator for the inverse square potential,” Physics Letters A 141 no. 7, (1989) 321–325

    1989

  92. [100]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions .” https://dlmf.nist.gov/10.22#E67, release 1.2.2 of 2024-09-15. https://dlmf.nist.gov/. F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schnei der, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl,...

    2024

  93. [101]

    Noninflatio nary model with scale invariant cosmological perturbation s,

    P. Peter, E. J. C. Pinho, and N. Pinto-Neto, “Noninflatio nary model with scale invariant cosmological perturbation s,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (Jan, 2007) 023516. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023516

    2007 doi

  94. [102]

    On the generality of refined al gebraic quantization,

    D. Giulini and D. Marolf, “On the generality of refined al gebraic quantization,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 16 no. 7, (Jan., 1999) 2479–2488 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/7/321

    1999 doi

  95. [103]

    Mixmaster universe,

    C. W. Misner, “Mixmaster universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (May, 1969) 1071–1074. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.1071

    1969 doi

  96. [104]

    Quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario,

    I. Agullo, A. Ashtekar, and W. Nelson, “Quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (Dec, 2012) 251301. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.251301

    2012 doi

  97. [105]

    Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativisti c cosmology,

    V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov, and E. M. Lifshitz, “ Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativisti c cosmology,” Adv. Phys. 19 (1970) 525–573

    1970

  98. [106]

    On the Influence o f Matter and Physical Fields Upon the Nature of Cosmological Singularities,

    V. A. Belinsky and I. M. Khalatnikov, “On the Influence o f Matter and Physical Fields Upon the Nature of Cosmological Singularities,” Sov. Sci. Rev. A 3 (1981) 555–590

    1981

  99. [107]

    A General Solution of the Einstein Equations with a Time Singularity,

    V. a. Belinsky, I. m. Khalatnikov, and E. m. Lifshitz, “ A General Solution of the Einstein Equations with a Time Singularity,” Adv. Phys. 31 (1982) 639–667

    1982

  100. [109]

    Perfect fluids in general relativity: Ve locity potentials and a variational principle,

    B. F. Schutz, “Perfect fluids in general relativity: Ve locity potentials and a variational principle,” Phys. Rev. D 2 (Dec, 1970) 2762–2773. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2762

    1970 doi

  101. [110]

    Hamiltonian theory of a relativistic pe rfect fluid,

    B. F. Schutz, “Hamiltonian theory of a relativistic pe rfect fluid,” Phys. Rev. D 4 (Dec, 1971) 3559–3566. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.4.3559

    1971 doi

  102. [2001]

    https://books.google.co.in/books?id=GVwzb1rZW9kC

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.