Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Finiteness and Uniqueness of Duality Cascades in Three Dimensions for Affine Quivers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Duality cascades for affine D and E quivers still terminate uniquely, despite gaps in the tiling polytope.

desk verdict A real, carefully computed step beyond the A-quiver parallelotope story, but the physics conclusion is only as solid as the assumed D/E duality maps — worth reviewing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09141 v1 pith:YUWEBIAJ submitted 2024-11-14 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Sanefumi Moriyama , Kichinosuke Otozawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords dualitycascadesaffinequiversChern-SimonsmattertheoriesHanany-WittentransitionszonotopesparallelotopesWeylgroupsDynkinmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the duality cascades of three-dimensional supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories associated with affine D and E quivers always stop in finitely many steps and whether the stopping point is unique. It reformulates the cascade rules—apply finite Weyl reflections, then switch the affine node by an outer automorphism when a lower rank appears—in pure group-theoretic language, extending a treatment that for affine A quivers proved the associated fundamental-domain polytope is a parallelotope. For D and E quivers the polytope still tiles the relative-rank space by compatible discrete translations, but with gaps caused by the non-trivial Dynkin marks. The authors conclude that under a large-rank restriction on non-affine nodes, duality cascades terminate in finite steps with a unique endpoint. They also show that the gap condition is solved by the level assignment (-k,0,0,0,k) previously used in Fermi-gas computations, which explains why that assignment is tractable.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the polytope associated to duality cascades, defined in the space of relative ranks M_i = N_i - (mark_i) N, with three equivalent descriptions: H (inequalities from requiring the affine node remains lowest under finite Weyl reflections), V (convex hull of configurations with zero relative ranks), and Z (a zonotope generated by vectors q^-_ij and q^+_ij corresponding to positive roots of the affine algebra). Its discrete translations are induced by an outer automorphism followed by Weyl reflections; the compatibility of these translations is what makes the copies tile the space. The non-trivial Dynkin marks appear in the translation vectors but drop out of the distances between opposite parallel facets, which is the precise origin of the gaps.

What would settle it

Check whether the conjectured duality transformations of the D-hat4 quiver hold on the localized matrix-model partition functions, for example by computing Z_k(N, N+M1, 2N+M2, N+M3, N+M4) at levels (-k,0,0,0,k) under one Weyl reflection and verifying that the proposed map is an identity of the matrix integrals; a single counterexample would break the cascade-termination argument. Alternatively, enumerate all small rank vectors and all allowed sequences of Weyl reflections and outer automorphisms: any two sequences ending in different terminal configurations would disprove uniqueness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the finiteness and uniqueness of duality cascades for affine D-hat and E-hat quivers reduce to a statement about a zonotope in the space of relative ranks: the zonotope's translations are mutually compatible and exhaust the space except for gaps contributed by nodes whose Dynkin marks exceed one. Because the number of independent translation vectors equals the dimension of the parameter space, copies of the polytope never overlap; because the non-affine node's opposite facets are separated by a distance shorter than the corresponding translation by exactly the missing mark factors, the tiling is not exhaustive. The gaps disappear for the special D-hat4 levels (-k,0,0,0,k). With the non-affine node's rank taken large, the finite-step termination and uniqueness follow as for the A-hat case. For E-hat8 there is no outer automorphism, so duality cascades as defined do not run.

Load-bearing premise

The entire cascade analysis for D, E, B and C quivers assumes that the duality transformations written down by analogy with Weyl reflections are exact IR dualities of the gauge theories; the paper explicitly postpones their gauge-theoretic derivation, so if those transformations are not the true dualities, the claimed finiteness and uniqueness do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For affine D-hat_n and E-hat_6,7 quivers, starting from any sufficiently large-rank configuration, every application of the cascade rules reaches the same terminal configuration in finitely many steps.
  • The fundamental domain is a zonotope generated by the positive roots of the corresponding finite Weyl group, so its vertex count equals the Weyl group order and its facet counts follow from maximal subgroups.
  • The special D-hat4 level choice (-k,0,0,0,k) satisfies the no-gap condition, explaining why Fermi-gas and WKB computations for those levels are well-behaved.
  • For B-hat3 and C-hat3, identical zonotopes but distinct affine Weyl groups produce different discrete translations and hence different gap patterns in the tiling.
  • The ratios of partition functions under the discrete translations, Z_k(Delta_i M)/Z_k(0), are proposed as the objects to study bilinear relations, extending the A-hat3 analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectured duality transformations pass matrix-model checks, the cascade viewpoint would give a geometric origin for q-Painlevé-type bilinear relations in D-type quivers: the ratios under discrete translations should be affine-Weyl covariant, in analogy with the A-hat case.
  • The no-gap conditions, such as q^-_12 q^-_34 q^+_12 q^+_34 = 0, might coincide with the conditions for N=4 supersymmetry enhancement; the paper lists that comparison as a future direction, and testing the overlap is a direct next step.
  • Because the tiling has gaps for generic levels, one should expect that for generic level choices two different cascade histories can end in different fundamental-domain copies; a small numerical search over rank vectors would reveal whether this failure of uniqueness occurs exactly when the non-affine node rank is not large.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper generalizes the geometric approach to duality cascades in three-dimensional N=3 supersymmetric Chern-Simons quiver theories from circular (affine A) quivers to affine D and E quivers (and to B and C quivers in an appendix). The authors rewrite the cascade process in group-theoretic language, define a polytope associated to duality cascades through three descriptions (H, Z, V), and analyze whether this polytope tiles the relative-rank parameter space by discrete translations. Their main finding is that for D and E quivers the polytope tiles the space only with gaps, which they attribute to the non-trivial Dynkin marks, and that the gaps vanish for special level choices such as (-k,0,0,0,k) for D4. They conclude that, under a restriction to large ranks for non-affine nodes, duality cascades still terminate in finite steps with a unique endpoint.

Significance. If the proposed duality transformations were established, the paper would provide a substantial and interesting generalization of the parallelotope criterion for finiteness and uniqueness of duality cascades, with explicit polytope data (numbers of vertices, facets, zonotope generators) for D4, D5, E6, E7 and E8. The identification of gaps in tiling and their relation to the special level choice (-k,0,0,0,k) offers a plausible geometric explanation for the tractability of the corresponding matrix models, and the distinction between B3 and C3 tilings is a nice illustration of the role of the affine Weyl group. The paper is explicit about its main limitation: the duality transformations are assumed, not derived, and the physical conclusion is therefore conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1.1, Eq. (3.1); also 4.1, 4.8, A.1, A.3] The central physical claim—that D/E duality cascades terminate finitely with a unique endpoint—rests on the duality transformations in (3.1), (4.1), (4.8) and (A.1), (A.3) being genuine IR dualities of the N=3 Chern-Simons theories. The paper explicitly states in Section 3.1.1: "Here we assume the duality transformations (3.1) and postpone the justifications from the viewpoint of gauge theories to future studies," and Section 6 reiterates that the transformations are "based purely on the consistency with the Weyl reflections." A Weyl-algebra action on the pair (k,N) is not a duality: a gauge-theory duality must, at minimum, preserve or suitably transform the localized partition function or follow from a brane construction. Since no such check is provided, the tiling analysis describes a formally consistent group action but does not establish the finiteness and uniqueness of physical duality cascades.
  2. [3.1.3, after Eq. (3.22); Section 6] The inference from "the polytope tiles the space with gaps" to "with large ranks for the non-affine node, duality cascades still terminate uniquely" is not justified. The gap structure is analyzed for the polytope, but the precise region of the relative-rank parameter space covered by the discrete translations is never characterized, and no statement is proved to the effect that restricting to large non-affine rank removes the gaps or implies that every cascade reaches the fundamental domain. The no-gap condition (3.22) is derived for a special level choice; for generic levels with gaps, the claimed large-rank restriction remains a qualitative assertion rather than a proved theorem.
  3. [3.1.2] The equivalence of the H, Z and V descriptions is argued rather than proved. The paper shows V ⊂ Z ⊂ H and states that the reverse inclusions follow "by the same argument" as for the A-quiver case, citing the proof in [39]. However, the A-quiver proof relies on the S-rule for ordinary 5-brane orders; for D/E quivers the generalized S-rule involving mirror images of 5-branes is itself a proposed assumption rather than a derived statement. Since the H description defines the actual fundamental domain while the Z description is used to prove translation compatibility and to count facets, the tiling analysis depends on a rigorous equivalence of these descriptions, which is not supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [3.1.3, Eq. (3.22)] The sentence "The condition is solved when three of q_i^2 are equal" is unclear; please spell out the full solution set of the no-gap condition (3.22) explicitly, including the possible vanishing of individual charges.
  2. [3.1.1, Fig. 6] The figures quoted in the text (especially Fig. 6 on duality cascades for D4 and Fig. 15 on B3/C3 tilings) are not included in the manuscript, making it difficult to verify the worked examples and the claimed difference between the B3 and C3 tilings.
  3. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.1), (A.3)] The rank transformations for the non-simply-laced quivers contain factors of 2 in the absolute-value terms (e.g., N3 → 2N2 − N3 + |k3| for B3); the origin of these factors from the non-simply-laced structure should be explained explicitly.
  4. [Section 5] The proposed ratios Z_k(Δ_i M)/Z_k(0) under discrete translations are presented without any explicit expression or test; this is appropriate as a future direction, but the passage should clearly label these as conjectural.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the D/E gap analysis is an explicit computation from stated Weyl-inspired duality maps; the unverified gauge-theory status of those maps is a correctness caveat, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the paper takes from prior work (including the authors' [39,40]) the A-quiver result that cascade termination/uniqueness is equivalent to parallelotope tiling, then rewrites the working hypothesis in group-theoretic language. For the D and E quivers, the duality maps are not derived from gauge theory; they are posited by Weyl-reflection analogy and explicitly flagged as assumptions: 'Here we assume the duality transformations (3.1) and postpone the justifications from the viewpoint of gauge theories to future studies' (Sec. 3.1.1), and Sec. 6 states that (3.1), (4.1), (4.8) are 'based purely on the consistency with the Weyl reflections.' That is an unverified premise, not a circularity: the paper does not claim to derive the maps from something that already contains the conclusion, and the geometric conclusion is explicitly conditional on those maps. The H, V, and Z descriptions are computed explicitly for D4, D5, Dn, E6, E7, and E8; the facet and vertex counts, zonotope vectors, and discrete translation vectors are new data, not restatements of the input transformations. The no-gap condition (3.22) is derived from the computed distances between opposite facets, and the special level choice (-k,0,0,0,k) is then checked against this condition rather than used to fit it. No step exhibits Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to [39,40,44,46,47] provide context and prior framework, but the D/E conclusions are supported by the paper's own explicit computations, so the citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The open question of whether the assumed transformations are genuine IR dualities is a real correctness risk, acknowledged by the authors, and should be assessed physically; it is not a circularity defect in the geometric derivation conditional on those maps. The 'large ranks for the non-affine node' restriction is left qualitative, which is a completeness concern rather than a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The ledger shows no fitted free parameters. The load-bearing assumptions are the working hypothesis of duality cascades, the assumed physical validity of the Weyl-reflection-inspired duality transformations, and the equivalence of the three geometric descriptions, plus the standard zonotope tiling theorem. One invented conceptual entity (mirror-image S-rule) is introduced for D-type quivers.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The working hypothesis of duality cascades: fix an affine node (reference), apply finite Weyl reflections, and change the affine node via outer automorphisms when a lower rank appears.
    Adopted from [39,40] and applied to all quivers in Sections 2, 3 and 4; the geometric questions are rephrased in terms of this hypothesis, so the conclusions hold only within this model of duality cascades.
  • ad hoc to paper For D, E, B and C quivers, the duality transformations of levels and ranks are given by the Weyl-reflection-inspired formulas (3.1), (4.1), (4.8), (A.1), (A.3).
    The authors explicitly assume these are the actual IR dualities and postpone gauge-theoretic justification to future work (Section 3.1.1). The central claim inherits this assumption.
  • domain assumption For D and E quivers, the H, Z and V descriptions of the associated polytope are equivalent, including an S-rule invariance under the finite Weyl group.
    In Section 3.1.2 the authors argue V subset Z subset H and then 'regard the three descriptions as identical'; the S-rule for D quivers is acknowledged as not fully established.
  • standard math A zonotope tiles space by translations when its facet centers have rank equal to the space dimension (Shephard, McMullen).
    Invoked in Section 2.2 for the A-quiver parallelotope proof and used as the compatibility criterion for discrete translations in later sections.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized S-rule allows at most |q+ij| D3-branes to connect 5-brane i to the mirror image of 5-brane j in D-type quivers.
    Proposed in Section 3.1.2 to define the Z description; no independent evidence is cited, and the paper states the S-rule is not fully established.
invented entities (1)
  • Mirror images of 5-branes in the generalized S-rule
    purpose: Allow the Z-description zonotope to be built for D-type quivers by bounding D3-branes stretched between a 5-brane and a mirror image.
    The paper states 'the S-rule is not fully established for the ˆD quivers' and proposes the mirror-image assignment to reproduce the vectors (3.10); this is a new postulate without independent verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finiteness and Uniqueness of Duality Cascades in Three Dimensions for Affine Quivers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUWEBIAJ

@misc{pith2026241109141,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finiteness and Uniqueness of Duality Cascades in Three Dimensions for Affine Quivers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUWEBIAJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09141}
}
read the original abstract

For three-dimensional circular-quiver supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories, the questions, whether duality cascades always terminate and whether the endpoint is unique, were rephrased into the question whether a polytope defined in the parameter space of relative ranks for duality cascades is a parallelotope, filling the space by discrete translations. By regarding circular quivers as affine Dynkin diagrams, we generalize the arguments into other affine quivers. We find that, after rewriting properties into the group-theoretical language, most arguments work in the generalizations. Especially, we find that, instead of the original relation to parallelotopes, the corresponding polytope still fills the parameter space but with some gaps. This indicates that, under certain restrictions, duality cascades still terminate uniquely.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09141 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A circular quiver diagram (top) and the corresponding circ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Three descriptions for the fundamental domain of duality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Compatibility of the discrete translations of duality cascad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The relation between vectors of the zonotope and positiv [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Db4 quiver for the super Chern-Simons theory. As in figure 1, lines connecting nodes U(Ni)ki and U(Nj )kj denote pairs of bifundamental matters (Ni , Nj ) and (Ni , Nj ). 3 Db quivers In the previous section, we have recapitulated duality cascades for the super Chern-S…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An example of duality cascades for the super Chern-Simon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: S-rule for the Db4 quiver. The original S-rule stating that the numbers of D3-branes connecting two 5-branes i and j are bounded by |q − ij | via the Weyl reflections r1 = (1 ↔ 2, ¯1 ↔ ¯2), r2 = (2 ↔ 3, ¯2 ↔ ¯3), r3 = (3 ↔ 4, ¯3 ↔ ¯4) depicted in light grey. Besides it…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Db5 quiver. Other than the outer automorphism, most of the studies in the previous subsection work similarly. The duality transformations or the Weyl reflections can be inferred easily as in (3.1) and we abbreviate them here. As before, we label the ranks as N0 = N, N1…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dbn quiver. with the two expressions explicitly given by, for example, q + 12 = k1223345 = |q + 12|(1, 2, 2, 1, 1) = |k1 + 2k2 + 2k3 +k4 +k5|(1, 2, 2, 1, 1) in the space of relative ranks M = (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5). These vectors correspond to the positive roots of the D…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Eb6 quiver. reflections to determine the vertices for the V description. Out of them the most important and the most non-trivial one is the Z description, which is obtained from the V description by reading off the vectors of the zonotope as in (3.10) for the Db4 quiv…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Eb7 quiver. opposite facets ±M3 + · · · = 0 are different by k3 + k23 + k34 + k35 + k123 + k234 + k235 + k345 + k356 + k1234 + k1235 + k2345 + k2356 + k3456 + k12345 + k23345 + k12356 + k23456 + k123345 + k123456 + k233456 + k1223345 + k1233456 + k2334556 + k12233456 …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Eb8 quiver. Each node i denotes the gauge group factor U(Ni)ki . We label the ranks by N0 = N, N1 = 2N + M1, N2 = 3N + M2, N3 = 4N + M3, N4 = 2N + M4, N5 = 3N + M5, N6 = 2N + M6, N7 = N + M7. (4.10) In the Z description out of the three equivalent ones, the vectors of…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Quiver diagrams of type Bb3 (left) and type Cb3 (right). group for Bb3 is r1 : k1 → −k1, k2 → k2 + k1, N1 → N2 − N1 + |k1|, r2 : k2 → −k2, k0 → k0 + k2, k1 → k1 + k2, k3 → k3 + k2, N2 → N0 + N1 + N3 − N2 + |k2|, r3 : k3 → −k3, k2 → k2 + 2k3, N3 → 2N2 − N3 + |k3|, (A.1…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The identical polytope associated to duality cascades fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Discrete translations for the Bb3 quiver (left) and the Cb3 quiver (right). Although the polytopes are identical, the difference in affine quivers causes difference in discrete translations in duality cascades, which leads to different fillings and different gaps in t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Duality cascades and parallelotopes,

    T. Furukawa, S. Moriyama and H. Sasaki, “Duality cascades and parallelotopes,” J. Phys. A 56 (2023) no.16, 165401 [arXiv:2205.08039 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Supergravity and a confinin g gauge theory: Duality cascades and χ SB resolution of naked singularities,

    I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, “Supergravity and a confinin g gauge theory: Duality cascades and χ SB resolution of naked singularities,” JHEP 08 (2000), 052 [arXiv:hep-th/0007191 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2000

  3. [2]

    The Duality cascade,

    M. J. Strassler, “The Duality cascade,” [arXiv:hep-th/0505153 [h ep-th]]

    arXiv

  4. [3]

    Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopole s, and three- dimensional gauge dynamics,

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopole s, and three- dimensional gauge dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997), 152-190 [arXiv:hep-th/9611230 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1997

  5. [4]

    N=6 s uperconformal Chern- Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, “N=6 s uperconformal Chern- Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” JHEP 10 (2008), 091 [arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [5]

    N = 5 , 6 Superconformal Chern- Simons Theories and M2-branes on Orbifolds,

    K. Hosomichi, K. M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee and J. Park, “ N = 5 , 6 Superconformal Chern- Simons Theories and M2-branes on Orbifolds,” JHEP 09 (2008), 002 [arXiv:0806.4977 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2008

  7. [6]

    Fractional M2-bra nes,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-bra nes,” JHEP 11 (2008), 043 [arXiv:0807.4924 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [7]

    D-brane C harges in Gravitational Duals of 2+1 Dimensional Gauge Theories and Duality Cascades,

    O. Aharony, A. Hashimoto, S. Hirano and P. Ouyang, “D-brane C harges in Gravitational Duals of 2+1 Dimensional Gauge Theories and Duality Cascades,” JHEP 01 (2010), 072 [arXiv:0906.2390 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    ABJ(M) and Fractional M2’s with Fra ctional M2 Charge,

    J. Evslin and S. Kuperstein, “ABJ(M) and Fractional M2’s with Fra ctional M2 Charge,” JHEP 12 (2009), 016 [arXiv:0906.2703 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Non-perturbative tests of duality casc ades in three dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories,

    M. Honda and N. Kubo, “Non-perturbative tests of duality casc ades in three dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories,” JHEP 07 (2021), 012 [arXiv:2010.15656 [hep-th]]. 44

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    From weak to strong co upling in ABJM theory,

    N. Drukker, M. Marino and P. Putrov, “From weak to strong co upling in ABJM theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 306 (2011), 511-563 [arXiv:1007.3837 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Nonperturbative aspe cts of ABJM theory,

    N. Drukker, M. Marino and P. Putrov, “Nonperturbative aspe cts of ABJM theory,” JHEP 11 (2011), 141 [arXiv:1103.4844 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Summing Up All Genus Free En ergy of ABJM Matrix Model,

    H. Fuji, S. Hirano and S. Moriyama, “Summing Up All Genus Free En ergy of ABJM Matrix Model,” JHEP 08 (2011), 001 [arXiv:1106.4631 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [13]

    ABJM theory as a Fermi gas,

    M. Marino and P. Putrov, “ABJM theory as a Fermi gas,” J. Stat . Mech. 1203 (2012), P03001 [arXiv:1110.4066 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Instanton Effects in ABJM Theory from Fermi Gas Approach,

    Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama, “Instanton Effects in ABJM Theory from Fermi Gas Approach,” JHEP 01 (2013), 158 [arXiv:1211.1251 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Instanton Bound S tates in ABJM Theory,

    Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama, “Instanton Bound S tates in ABJM Theory,” JHEP 05 (2013), 054 [arXiv:1301.5184 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Non-per turbative effects and the refined topological string,

    Y. Hatsuda, M. Marino, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama, “Non-per turbative effects and the refined topological string,” JHEP 09 (2014), 168 [arXiv:1306.1734 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Membrane instantons from a semiclassic al TBA,

    F. Calvo and M. Marino, “Membrane instantons from a semiclassic al TBA,” JHEP 05 (2013), 006 [arXiv:1212.5118 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Exact Results on th e ABJM Fermi Gas,

    Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama and K. Okuyama, “Exact Results on th e ABJM Fermi Gas,” JHEP 10 (2012), 020 [arXiv:1207.4283 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Exact ABJM Partition Function fro m TBA,

    P. Putrov and M. Yamazaki, “Exact ABJM Partition Function fro m TBA,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012), 1250200 [arXiv:1207.5066 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [20]

    ABJ Fractional Brane from AB JM Wilson Loop,

    S. Matsumoto and S. Moriyama, “ABJ Fractional Brane from AB JM Wilson Loop,” JHEP 03 (2014), 079 [arXiv:1310.8051 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Exact results on ABJ theory and th e refined topological string,

    M. Honda and K. Okuyama, “Exact results on ABJ theory and th e refined topological string,” JHEP 08 (2014), 148 [arXiv:1405.3653 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Instanton Effects in Rank Deformed Su- perconformal Chern-Simons Theories from Topological Strings,

    S. Moriyama, S. Nakayama and T. Nosaka, “Instanton Effects in Rank Deformed Su- perconformal Chern-Simons Theories from Topological Strings,” J HEP 08 (2017), 003 [arXiv:1704.04358 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Orthosymplectic Chern-Simons Ma trix Model and Chi- rality Projection,

    S. Moriyama and T. Suyama, “Orthosymplectic Chern-Simons Ma trix Model and Chi- rality Projection,” JHEP 04 (2016), 132 [arXiv:1601.03846 [hep-th]]. 45

    2016 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Orientifold ABJM Matrix Model: Chira l Projections and Worldsheet Instantons,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Orientifold ABJM Matrix Model: Chira l Projections and Worldsheet Instantons,” JHEP 06 (2016), 068 [arXiv:1603.00615 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Dualities in ABJM Matrix Model from Closed String Viewpoint,

    K. Kiyoshige and S. Moriyama, “Dualities in ABJM Matrix Model from Closed String Viewpoint,” JHEP 11 (2016), 096 [arXiv:1607.06414 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Matrix Models from Oper ators and Topological Strings, 2,

    R. Kashaev, M. Marino and S. Zakany, “Matrix Models from Oper ators and Topological Strings, 2,” Annales Henri Poincare 17 (2016) no.10, 2741-2781 [arXiv:1505.02243 [hep- th]]

    2016 arXiv

  20. [27]

    The ABCDEF’s of Ma trix Models for Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theories,

    D. R. Gulotta, C. P. Herzog and T. Nishioka, “The ABCDEF’s of Ma trix Models for Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theories,” JHEP 04 (2012), 138 [arXiv:1201.6360 [hep- th]]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [28]

    N=4 Chern-Simons theories with aux iliary vector multi- plets,

    Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “N=4 Chern-Simons theories with aux iliary vector multi- plets,” JHEP 10 (2008), 040 [arXiv:0807.2144 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Partition Functions of Superconf ormal Chern-Simons The- ories from Fermi Gas Approach,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Partition Functions of Superconf ormal Chern-Simons The- ories from Fermi Gas Approach,” JHEP 11 (2014), 164 [arXiv:1407.4268 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Exact Instanton Expansion of Su perconformal Chern- Simons Theories from Topological Strings,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Exact Instanton Expansion of Su perconformal Chern- Simons Theories from Topological Strings,” JHEP 05 (2015), 022 [arXiv:1412.6243 [hep- th]]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Large N non-perturb ative effects in N = 4 superconformal Chern-Simons theories,

    Y. Hatsuda, M. Honda and K. Okuyama, “Large N non-perturb ative effects in N = 4 superconformal Chern-Simons theories,” JHEP 09 (2015), 046 [arXiv:1505.07120 [hep- th]]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Superconformal Chern -Simons Theories from del Pezzo Geometries,

    S. Moriyama, T. Nosaka and K. Yano, “Superconformal Chern -Simons Theories from del Pezzo Geometries,” JHEP 11 (2017), 089 [arXiv:1707.02420 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Symmetry Breaking in Qua ntum Curves and Super Chern-Simons Matrix Models,

    N. Kubo, S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Symmetry Breaking in Qua ntum Curves and Super Chern-Simons Matrix Models,” JHEP 01 (2019), 210 [arXiv:1811.06048 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Spectral Theories and Topological Strings on de l Pezzo Geometries,

    S. Moriyama, “Spectral Theories and Topological Strings on de l Pezzo Geometries,” JHEP 10 (2020), 154 [arXiv:2007.05148 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Quantum Representation of Affine Weyl Groups and Associated Quantum Curves,

    S. Moriyama and Y. Yamada, “Quantum Representation of Affine Weyl Groups and Associated Quantum Curves,” SIGMA 17 (2021), 076 [arXiv:2104.06661 [math.QA]]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Quantum curves and q-deformed Painlev´ e equa- tions,

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini, “Quantum curves and q-deformed Painlev´ e equa- tions,” Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) no.9, 1961-2001 [arXiv:1710.11603 [hep-th]]. 46

    2019 arXiv

  30. [37]

    M2-bra nes and q-Painlev´ e equations,

    G. Bonelli, F. Globlek, N. Kubo, T. Nosaka and A. Tanzini, “M2-bra nes and q-Painlev´ e equations,” Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022) no.6, 109 [arXiv:2202.10654 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [38]

    40 bilinear relations of q-Painlev´ e V I from N = 4 super Chern-Simons theory,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “40 bilinear relations of q-Painlev´ e V I from N = 4 super Chern-Simons theory,” JHEP 08 (2023), 191 [arXiv:2305.03978 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Du ality cascades and affine Weyl groups,

    T. Furukawa, K. Matsumura, S. Moriyama and T. Nakanishi, “Du ality cascades and affine Weyl groups,” JHEP 05 (2022), 132 [arXiv:2112.13616 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Hanany-Witten Transition in Quantum Curves,

    N. Kubo and S. Moriyama, “Hanany-Witten Transition in Quantum Curves,” JHEP 12 (2019), 101 [arXiv:1907.04971 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Space-filling zonotopes

    G.C. Shephard, “Space-filling zonotopes”, Mathematika 21 (1974) 261-269

    1974

  35. [43]

    Space tiling zonotopes

    P. McMullen, “Space tiling zonotopes”, Mathematika 22 (1975) 202-211

    1975

  36. [44]

    Affine Symmetries for ABJM Partitio n Function and its Generalization,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Affine Symmetries for ABJM Partitio n Function and its Generalization,” [arXiv:2312.04206 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Partition functions of 3d ˆD-quivers and their mirror duals from 1d free fermions,

    B. Assel, N. Drukker and J. Felix, “Partition functions of 3d ˆD-quivers and their mirror duals from 1d free fermions,” JHEP 08 (2015), 071 [arXiv:1504.07636 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Superconformal Chern-Simons P artition Functions of Affine D-type Quiver from Fermi Gas,

    S. Moriyama and T. Nosaka, “Superconformal Chern-Simons P artition Functions of Affine D-type Quiver from Fermi Gas,” JHEP 09 (2015), 054 [arXiv:1504.07710 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fermi gas formalism for D-type quiver Chern-Simons theory with non-uniform ranks,

    N. Kubo and T. Nosaka, “Fermi gas formalism for D-type quiver Chern-Simons theory with non-uniform ranks,” [arXiv:2403.12808 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Geometric aspects of P ainlev´ e equations,

    K. Kajiwara, M. Noumi and Y. Yamada, “Geometric aspects of P ainlev´ e equations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50 (2017), 073001

    2017

  41. [49]

    Geometry of generalized permutohedra,

    J.S. Doker, “Geometry of generalized permutohedra,” Univers ity of California, Berkeley (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    More about the 52 four-dimension al parallelotopes,

    M. Deza and V.P. Grishukhin, “More about the 52 four-dimension al parallelotopes,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 12 (2008), 901-916

    2008

  43. [51]

    Cherkis bow varieties and Coulom b branches of quiver gauge theories of affine type A,

    H. Nakajima and Y. Takayama, “Cherkis bow varieties and Coulom b branches of quiver gauge theories of affine type A,” Selecta Mathematica 23 (2017), 2553-2633. 47

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.