Trion polaron problem in bulk and two-dimensional materials

A. Kudlis; I. A. Shelykh; I. V. Tokatly; K. Varga; V. Shahnazaryan

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Trion polaron problem in bulk and two-dimensional materials

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a trion — two electrons and a hole — dressed by optical phonons is described by an effective three-particle Hamiltonian predicting an exciton-to-trion binding ratio near 20 in bulk lead halide perovskites.

desk verdict A solid variational extension of LLP to trion polarons with useful material benchmarks, but the coherent-state ansatz leaves the small trion binding energies sensitive to approximation errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14756 v1 pith:YVQHLTDT submitted 2025-08-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

V. Shahnazaryan , A. Kudlis , K. Varga , I. A. Shelykh , I. V. Tokatly This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 71.38.-k71.35.-y

keywords trionpolaronFröhlichHamiltonianLee-Low-Pinesvariationalmethodleadhalideperovskitestwo-dimensionalpolarmaterialseffectiveCoulombpotentialsstochasticexcitonbindingenergy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to put the trion polaron — a charged exciton made of two electrons and one hole, dressed by a cloud of longitudinal optical (LO) phonons — on a microscopic footing for both bulk and two-dimensional polar crystals. The authors generalize the Lee-Low-Pines variational method, previously applied to single polarons and exciton polarons, to this three-body complex, obtaining an effective Hamiltonian in which the phonons survive only as renormalized carrier masses and static phonon-modified electron-hole and electron-electron potentials. Solving that three-body problem with a stochastic variational method, they produce material-specific trion-polaron binding energies: roughly 0.9–6.3 meV across six lead halide perovskites, above 100 meV in wide-gap polar monolayers, and a near-universal exciton-to-trion binding ratio E_X/E_T ≈ 20 in the perovskite family. If the effective Hamiltonian is right, it supplies a compact framework for charged-exciton-phonon physics, quantitative benchmarks for spectroscopy, and concrete guidance on where trion-polaron lines should be observable.

What carries the argument

The key object is the effective three-particle Hamiltonian (Eq. 4) from the three-body generalization of the Lee-Low-Pines method: after a center-of-mass removal, each phonon mode is displaced by a variational amplitude F_k(ρ1, ρ2) depending on the two electron-hole relative vectors, phonons sitting in the coherent state a_k|Ψ⟩ = 0. Minimizing over F_k gives renormalized masses and the static potentials V^eff_eh, V^eff_ee: Yukawa forms with polaron radii in 3D, integral kernels with nonlocal screening and dispersive LO modes in 2D. This converts the dynamical phonon field into static interactions and heavier masses, leaving a three-body problem solved with correlated Gaussians.

What would settle it

Solve the same three-body Fröhlich Hamiltonian with a method that does not assume a displaced phonon state — diagrammatic Monte Carlo, already applied to polarons and exciton polarons — and compare the trion binding energies and the E_X/E_T ratio; significant shifts at α ≈ 3 would expose the variational assumption. Experimentally, high-resolution spectroscopy of a bulk lead halide perovskite should reveal a trion-polaron line at the predicted 1–6 meV below the exciton; a clean absence of such a line at the predicted position across several perovskites would contradict the theory's numerical cl

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim: the trion polaron is described by an effective three-particle Hamiltonian from the Lee-Low-Pines variational method with a coherent phonon state displaced by a variational amplitude; the phonons leave behind a renormalized reduced mass and static electron-hole and electron-electron potentials. In bulk these become Yukawa-like potentials set by polaron radii; in 2D they are integral kernels with Keldysh-Rytova screening and dispersive LO modes. Stochastic-variational solutions give trion binding 0.9–6.3 meV in lead halide perovskites and 17–171 meV in polar monolayers, with an exciton-to-trion ratio near 20 in bulk.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the phonon cloud around the trion can be represented as one plain displacement of every phonon mode — each mode shifted by a variationally chosen amplitude — so correlated motion between phonons beyond that single displacement is ignored; such correlations could matter at the strongest couplings treated here (Fröhlich coupling constants up to about 3.3).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Resolving trion polarons in bulk lead halide perovskites will require spectral analysis finer than the exciton linewidth, since predicted binding sits at 1–6 meV against tens-of-meV linewidths.
In wide-gap polar monolayers, trion-polaron binding exceeds 100 meV for freestanding h-BN and AlN and stays large for dielectric constants up to about 4, making trions accessible to optical spectroscopy.
Polaron dressing places exciton and trion binding between the static- and high-frequency-screening limits, except where strong electron-hole mass asymmetry (GaN, trions) or heavy mass renormalization (AlN, excitons) breaks that ordering.
The near-universal exciton-to-trion binding ratio E_X/E_T ≈ 20 across lead trihalide perovskites provides a benchmark for the family, with the deviation in MAPbCl3 attributable to near-equal electron and hole masses.
In perovskite nanocrystals size quantization adds several meV to trion binding, so the framework extended by confinement can account for the ~7 meV trion binding observed in ~30 nm CsPbBr3 quantum dots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same coherent-state construction should transfer to other carrier complexes in polar crystals — biexcitons, charged biexcitons, trions in heterobilayers — since nothing in the derivation is specific to the two-electron-one-hole composition; it provides a template for multi-carrier polaron problems generally.
The coherent-state ansatz is least trustworthy at the largest Fröhlich couplings, so the most polar materials in Table I (MAPbCl3, CsPbCl3, α ≈ 3.3) are the natural place to benchmark this theory against diagrammatic Monte Carlo, which treats phonon correlations beyond a single displacement.
The 2D results assume freestanding monolayers; including substrate surface-optical phonons and dielectric screening in the effective potentials — beyond the static ε-scan of Fig. 1 — would test whether the >100 meV trion binding survives real device geometries.
The near-constant ratio across six perovskites with widely different masses and dielectric constants suggests the ratio is fixed by the functional form of the effective potentials rather than by material constants; an interpolation run across the tabulated parameter set would test that.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The short version: this paper gives a clean, internally consistent extension of the Lee–Low–Pines variational method to the trion polaron (two electrons plus a hole dressed by LO phonons), and it produces concrete binding-energy numbers for bulk perovskites and 2D polar monolayers. If your work touches exciton–phonon physics in those materials, this is worth a careful read.

What is actually new: LLP has been applied before to the exciton polaron and to bipolarons, but this is the first time it is generalized to a charged three-body complex. The effective potentials reduce properly to the known exciton polaron result and the weak-coupling bipolaron limit, and the m_h → m_e limit V_eh → -V_ee is a nice consistency check. The authors solve the three-body effective Hamiltonian with the stochastic variational method, which is a well-established numerical tool, and they benchmark against a simple Chandrasekhar ansatz, showing that trion binding is sensitive. The tables supply useful numbers, including the near-universal exciton-to-trion binding ratio about 20 for bulk perovskites—a handy relation for experiment.

The soft spots are proportionate. The entire phonon content rests on the single coherent-state displacement ansatz, which is the standard LLP assumption. At intermediate coupling, with Fröhlich α up to about 3.3, that is a known limitation, and trion binding energies are only 1–6 meV, so any error in the effective potentials can change them by a large relative amount. There is no comparison with an exact three-body method, and the derivation of the effective Hamiltonian sits in the supplemental material, not in the visible text. The SVM convergence criteria and basis sizes are not reported. These are fixable, not fatal; the paper is transparent that the approach is variational.

I would send this to a referee. The central argument holds up as a variational theory, the equations check out, and the material-specific benchmarks are likely to be useful. The referee should push on the sensitivity of the small trion binding energies to the coherent-state ansatz at intermediate coupling. A brief discussion of estimated error bars would strengthen the paper considerably.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a microscopic theory of the trion polaron (two electrons and one hole coupled to LO phonons) by extending the Lee-Low-Pines intermediate-coupling variational method to the three-body problem. After a canonical transformation to the center-of-mass frame and a phonon displacement with a coordinate-dependent variational function F_k(ρ1,ρ2), the authors obtain an effective three-particle Hamiltonian (Eq. (4)) with polaron-renormalized masses and static phonon-modified electron–hole and electron–electron potentials (Eqs. (5)–(6); bulk forms (7)–(8); 2D forms (11)–(12)). The effective problem is solved with the stochastic variational method (SVM) using fully correlated Gaussians. Binding energies of exciton polarons and trion polarons are computed for bulk lead-halide perovskites (Table I) and for several 2D polar monolayers (Table III), and the dependence on the dielectric environment is mapped (Fig. 1). The paper claims a near-universal exciton-to-trion binding ratio E_X/E_T ≈ 20 in bulk perovskites and large trion-polaron binding in wide-gap monolayers.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a compact and parameter-free variational framework for charged exciton–phonon complexes, extending the established exciton-polaron and bipolaron formalisms. The analytical effective potentials in 3D and the integral representations in 2D are useful building blocks. The method uses no fitted parameters; material parameters are taken from the literature, and the SVM solution is a variational upper bound. The predictions for bulk perovskites and 2D polar materials are concrete and could be confronted with spectroscopy. However, the quantitative reliability of the material-specific tables is conditional on the validity of the single-coherent-state ansatz at intermediate coupling (α up to ~3.3), and the central derivation is not in the main text. These issues require attention before the quantitative claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Eqs. (4)–(6), 'The model'] The derivation of the effective Hamiltonian is deferred to the Supplemental Material, which is not included in the manuscript under review. This is the central novel result and should be available for verification. In addition, Eq. (4) uses the symbol σ in the cross-kinetic term without definition; presumably σ=m_e/m_h, but this must be stated. Please also clarify whether the coordinate dependence of F_k(ρ1,ρ2) produces extra gradient terms in the kinetic energy after the displacement transformation, and if these are neglected, justify that approximation.
[Tables I and III; Eqs. (5)–(8), (11)–(12)] The material-specific binding energies rest on the LLP coherent-state ansatz a_k|Ψ⟩=0. For the parameters of Table I, α_e=3.31 and α_h=3.27 (MAPbCl3), the intermediate-coupling approximation may carry a non-negligible error. The reported trion binding energies are only 0.9–6.3 meV, so even a meV-level shift in the effective potentials changes them by a large factor. Provide a benchmark against a more accurate treatment—for example, diagrammatic Monte Carlo for the three-body Fröhlich Hamiltonian, or at least an all-coupling variational calculation for the two-body exciton polaron using Ref. [47]—for one representative material. Without such a check, the values in Tables I and III should be presented as variational upper bounds with an estimated error bar.
['Numerical techniques', Eqs. (13)–(14)] The SVM calculation reports converged energies but no basis size N, no convergence criterion, and no estimate of the numerical error of the 2D Gauss–Legendre quadratures. The entries in Table I span four orders of magnitude (0.142–147 meV); the smallest values (E0_T ~0.14 meV) are below any plausible precision unless convergence is demonstrated. Please report N, the energy as a function of N, and the quadrature accuracy. The Chandrasekhar comparison in Table II is not a sufficient benchmark because that ansatz is also variational.
[Results, bulk media; Table I] The headline claim of a 'near-universal ratio E_X/E_T ≈ 20' is not supported for MAPbCl3, where the polaron-dressed ratio is 84.3/6.33 ≈ 13.3. The bare and statically screened ratios are ~21 for all materials, but the polaron-dressed ratio deviates substantially when electron and hole masses are nearly equal. Please quantify the claim, e.g., state the range of ratios and explicitly note MAPbCl3 as an exception, or explain why the deviation is expected.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (4)] Define σ before its first use in the cross-kinetic term. The notation is also reused differently in Eq. (11) (σ_i,t), which is confusing.
[Eqs. (6)–(8)] The statement that V_eff_eh → −V_eff_ee as m_h→m_e is correct only as a limit. In Eq. (7) the written expression is singular at m_h=m_e because of the 1/Δm prefactors; state explicitly that the limit must be taken.
[Section '2D media'] The approximation sqrt((1+x)/(1+σ0 x)) ≈ 1/√σ0 is very crude and is mentioned without being used. Clarify whether it is used in any numerical result or is only a formal remark.
[Reference list] Ref. [47] is an arXiv preprint. If the manuscript is intended for journal publication, update the reference or note its published status.
[Table III] There are formatting glitches in the hBN row (e.g., '0 .83' instead of '0.83'). Please ensure the final version is clean.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: trion binding energies are variational outputs of a stated Fröhlich Hamiltonian, not fits or renamed inputs. Minor self-citation in 2D input parameters does not force the central result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level that matters for circularity. Starting from the Fröhlich Hamiltonian (1), the paper applies the LLP transformation and a phonon-displacement unitary with variational parameter F_k(ρ1,ρ2), imposed through the coherent-state condition a_k|Ψ⟩=0. Variational minimization produces the effective three-body Hamiltonian (4) and the static potentials (5)–(6), with explicit 3D forms (7)–(8) and 2D integral forms (11)–(12). No step fits the trion binding energy or the exciton/trion ratio to the data being predicted. The binding energies in Tables I–III are obtained by solving Eq. (4) with the stochastic variational method (SVM), and the Chandrasekhar comparison in Table II is an internal benchmark, not an input. The only notable self-citation is Table III, which imports renormalized masses and exciton binding energies from the authors' own Ref. [43]; these are inputs, not fitted targets, and the trion-binding outputs are not equivalent by construction to those inputs. Ref. [47] (also the authors' own, in preparation) is cited for context and not used in the numerical chain. The LLP coherent-state ansatz is a physical approximation whose accuracy at intermediate coupling is a legitimate correctness concern, but it is not a circularity. No quoted equation reduces to its own input, and no parameter fitted to trion data is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted free parameters: all material constants (masses, dielectric constants, phonon frequencies) are taken from cited experiments or first-principles work. The four listed axioms are the physical and variational premises on which the effective Hamiltonian rests. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption LLP coherent-state variational ansatz: phonons are assumed to be in a displaced coherent state satisfying a_k|Psi>=0 with variational displacement F_k(rho1,rho2).
This is the tool that eliminates phonons and produces the effective Hamiltonian, Eq. (4); it excludes entangled phonon states and many-phonon correlations beyond a mean displacement.
domain assumption Macroscopic Frohlich model with 2D nonlocal LO phonon dispersion from Refs [42,43] describes the electron-phonon coupling in monolayers.
Used to define V_k and omega_l,k in Eqs. (10)-(12); if the macroscopic dielectric model fails for a given monolayer, the 2D results shift.
domain assumption Single parabolic band with scalar electron and hole masses, one LO phonon branch, no band nonparabolicity or multiple phonon branches.
Hamiltonian Eq. (1) is built on these inputs; renormalized masses and potentials inherit this limitation.
domain assumption Phonon-mediated interactions are static after the LLP elimination; dynamic or retarded phonon exchange is neglected.
Effective potentials Eqs. (5)-(8) and (11)-(12) are static functions of rho; dynamical phonon exchange and frequency-dependent screening are not included.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Trion polaron problem in bulk and two-dimensional materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YVQHLTDT

@misc{pith2026250814756,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Trion polaron problem in bulk and two-dimensional materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YVQHLTDT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14756}
}

read the original abstract

We develop a microscopic theoryof the trion polaron: a bound state of two electrons and one hole, dressed by longitudinal optical (LO) phonons. Starting from the Frohlich Hamiltonian, which describes the interaction of charged particles with LO phonons in three-dimensional (bulk) and two-dimensional (monolayer) polar crystals, we adopt the intermediate coupling variational approximation of Lee, Low, and Pines, and generalize it for the three-body problem. This yields an effective three-particle Hamiltonian with renormalized electron-electron and electron-hole interactions, similar to those obtained for exciton polaron and bipolaron problems. We compute the binding energies for a family of bulk perovskite materials and several atomic monolayer materials characterized by pronounced polar effects, providing quantitative benchmarks for spectroscopic measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.14756 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

[47]

Polarons in two-dimensional polar materials: All-coupling variational theory

A. Kudlis, V. Shahnazaryan, and I. Tokatly, Polarons in two-dimensionalpolarmaterials: All-couplingvariational theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.10930 (2025)

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[1]

159 (Springer, 2010)

A.S.AlexandrovandJ.T.Devreese, Advances in polaron physics, Vol. 159 (Springer, 2010)

work page 2010
[2]

L. D. Landau, Electron motion in crystal lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3, 664 (1933)

work page 1933
[3]

S. I. Pekar, Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz16, 341 (1946)

work page 1946
[4]

L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, The effective mass of the polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz18, 419 (1948)

work page 1948
[5]

Fröhlich, H

H. Fröhlich, H. Pelzer, and S. Zienau, Xx. properties of slow electrons in polar materials, The London, Edin- burgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 221 (1950)

work page 1950
[6]

T. Lee, F. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow elec- trons in a polar crystal, Physical Review90, 297 (1953). 6

work page 1953
[7]

R. P. Feynman, Slow electrons in a polar crystal, Physical Review 97, 660 (1955)

work page 1955

Show all 79 references

[8]

J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov, Fröhlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments, Reports on Progress in Physics 72, 066501 (2009)

2009
[9]

Franchini, M

C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Polarons in materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 560 (2021)

2021
[10]

N. V. Prokof’ev and B. V. Svistunov, Polaron problem by diagrammatic quantum monte carlo, Physical review letters 81, 2514 (1998)

1998
[11]

A. S. Mishchenko, N. V. Prokof’Ev, A. Sakamoto, and B. V. Svistunov, Diagrammatic quantum monte carlo study of the fröhlich polaron, Physical Review B62, 6317 (2000)

2000
[12]

T. Hahn, S. Klimin, J. Tempere, J. T. Devreese, and C. Franchini, Diagrammatic monte carlo study of fröhlich polaron dispersion in two and three dimensions, Physical Review B 97, 134305 (2018)

2018
[13]

Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015003 (2017)

2017
[14]

W. H. Sio, C. Verdi, S. Poncé, and F. Giustino, Polarons from first principles, without supercells, Physical Review Letters 122, 246403 (2019)

2019
[15]

W. H. Sio, C. Verdi, S. Poncé, and F. Giustino, Ab initio theory of polarons: Formalism and applications, Physical Review B 99, 235139 (2019)

2019
[16]

Haken, Die theorie des exzitons im festen körper, Fortschritte der Physik6, 271 (1958)

H. Haken, Die theorie des exzitons im festen körper, Fortschritte der Physik6, 271 (1958)

1958
[17]

Mahanti and C

S. Mahanti and C. Varma, Effective electron-hole inter- actions in polar semiconductors, Physical Review B 6, 2209 (1972)

1972
[18]

Bajaj, Effect of electron-phonon interaction on the binding energy of a wannier exciton in a polarizable medium, Solid State Communications15, 1221 (1974)

K. Bajaj, Effect of electron-phonon interaction on the binding energy of a wannier exciton in a polarizable medium, Solid State Communications15, 1221 (1974)

1974
[19]

Pollmann and H

J. Pollmann and H. Büttner, Effective hamiltonians and bindings energies of wannier excitons in polar semicon- ductors, Physical Review B16, 4480 (1977)

1977
[20]

E. O. Kane, Pollmann-büttner variational method for ex- citonic polarons, Physical Review B18, 6849 (1978)

1978
[21]

E. A. Burovski, A. S. Mishchenko, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Diagrammatic quantum monte carlo for two-body problems: Applied to excitons, Physical Re- view Letters 87, 186402 (2001)

2001
[22]

Burovski, H

E. Burovski, H. Fehske, and A. S. Mishchenko, Exact treatment of exciton-polaron formation by diagrammatic monte carlo simulations, Physical Review Letters 101, 116403 (2008)

2008
[23]

A. S. Mishchenko, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, N. Na- gaosa, and H. Fehske, Optical signatures of exciton po- larons from diagrammatic monte carlo, Physical Review B 97, 045141 (2018)

2018
[24]

Rana and D

R. Rana and D. T. Limmer, On the interplay of elec- tronic and lattice screening on exciton binding in two- dimensional lead halide perovskites, Nano Letters 25, 4727–4733 (2025)

2025
[25]

M. R. Filip, J. B. Haber, and J. B. Neaton, Phonon screening of excitons in semiconductors: halide per- ovskites and beyond, Physical review letters127, 067401 (2021)

2021
[26]

A. M. Alvertis, J. B. Haber, Z. Li, C. J. Coveney, S. G. Louie, M. R. Filip, and J. B. Neaton, Phonon screening and dissociation of excitons at finite temperatures from first principles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2403434121 (2024)

2024
[27]

Z. Dai, C. Lian, J. Lafuente-Bartolome, and F. Giustino, Excitonic polarons and self-trapped excitons from first- principles exciton-phonon couplings, Physical Review Letters 132, 036902 (2024)

2024
[28]

Baranowski and P

M. Baranowski and P. Plochocka, Excitons in metal- halide perovskites, Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903659 (2020)

2020
[29]

Simbula, R

A. Simbula, R. Pau, Q. Wang, F. Liu, V. Sarritzu, S. Lai, M. Lodde, F. Mattana, G. Mula, A. Geddo Lehmann, et al., Polaron plasma in equilibrium with bright exci- tons in 2d and 3d hybrid perovskites, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2100295 (2021)

2021
[30]

W. Tao, C. Zhang, Q. Zhou, Y. Zhao, and H. Zhu, Mo- mentarily trapped exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites, Nature communications12, 1400 (2021)

2021
[31]

W. Tao, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhu, Dynamic exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites and implica- tions for optoelectronic applications, Accounts of chemi- cal research 55, 345 (2022)

2022
[32]

Dyksik, D

M. Dyksik, D. Beret, M. Baranowski, H. Duim, S. Moy- ano, K. Posmyk, A. Mlayah, S. Adjokatse, D. K. Maude, M. A. Loi,et al., Polaron vibronic progression shapes the optical response of 2d perovskites, Advanced Science11, 2305182 (2024)

2024
[33]

Biswas, R

S. Biswas, R. Zhao, F. Alowa, M. Zacharias, S. Shar- ifzadeh, D. F. Coker, D. S. Seferos, and G. D. Sc- holes, Exciton polaron formation and hot-carrier relax- ation in rigid dion–jacobson-type two-dimensional per- ovskites, Nature Materials , 1 (2024)

2024
[34]

Baranowski, A

M. Baranowski, A. Nowok, K. Galkowski, M. Dyksik, A. Surrente, D. Maude, M. Zacharias, G. Volonakis, S. D. Stranks, J. Even,et al., Polaronic mass enhancement and polaronic excitons in metal halide perovskites, ACS En- ergy Letters 9, 2696 (2024)

2024
[35]

H. Lei, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Feng, H. Zhou, W. Tang, J. Wang, L. Li, G. Nan, W. Xu,et al., Persistent ex- citon dressed by weak polaronic effect in rigid and har- monic lattice dion–jacobson 2d perovskites, ACS nano 18, 31485 (2024)

2024
[36]

J. Duan, J. Li, G. Divitini, D. Cortecchia, F. Yuan, J. You, S. Liu, A. Petrozza, Z. Wu, and J. Xi, 2d hy- brid perovskites: From static and dynamic structures to potential applications, Advanced Materials36, 2403455 (2024)

2024
[37]

K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. Castro Neto, 2d materials and van der waals het- erostructures, Science 353, aac9439 (2016)

2016
[38]

L. V. Keldysh, Coulomb interaction in thin semiconduc- tor and semimetal films, JETP Lett.29, 658 (1979)

1979
[39]

N. S. Rytova, The screened potential of a point charge in a thin film, Moscow University Physics Bulletin22, 18 (1967)

1967
[40]

Cudazzo, I

P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 085406 (2011)

2011
[41]

Sohier, M

T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Two-dimensional fröhlich interaction in transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers: Theoretical modeling and first-principles calculations, Physical Review B94, 085415 (2016)

2016
[42]

Sohier, M

T. Sohier, M. Gibertini, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, and 7 N. Marzari, Breakdown of optical phonons’ splitting in two-dimensional materials, Nano letters17, 3758 (2017)

2017
[43]

Shahnazaryan, A

V. Shahnazaryan, A. Kudlis, and I. Tokatly, Polarons and exciton-polarons in two-dimensional polar materials, Physical Review Letters135, 066202 (2025)

2025
[44]

J. Li, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Tao, W. Zhong, Z. Su, S. Xue, G. Miao, W. Wang, H. Peng, J. Guo, and X. Zhu, Observation of the nonanalytic behavior of opti- cal phonons in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024)

2024
[45]

W.H.SioandF.Giustino,Unifiedabinitiodescriptionof fröhlich electron-phonon interactions in two-dimensional and three-dimensional materials, Physical Review B105, 115414 (2022)

2022
[46]

W. H. Sio and F. Giustino, Polarons in two-dimensional atomic crystals, Nature Physics19, 629 (2023)

2023
[48]

W. Lee, A. M. Alvertis, Z. Li, S. G. Louie, M. R. Filip, J.B.Neaton,andE.Kioupakis,Phononscreeningofexci- tons in atomically thin semiconductors, Physical Review Letters 133, 206901 (2024)

2024
[49]

Alexandrov and J

A. Alexandrov and J. Ranninger, Theory of bipolarons and bipolaronic bands, Physical Review B 23, 1796 (1981)

1981
[50]

Adamowski, Formation of fröhlich bipolarons, Physical Review B 39, 3649 (1989)

J. Adamowski, Formation of fröhlich bipolarons, Physical Review B 39, 3649 (1989)

1989
[51]

V. M. Fomin and M. A. Smondyrev, Bipolaron confine- ment in two-dimensional layers, Physical Review B49, 12748 (1994)

1994
[52]

Macridin, G

A. Macridin, G. Sawatzky, and M. Jarrell, Two- dimensional hubbard-holstein bipolaron, Physical Re- view B 69, 245111 (2004)

2004
[53]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Sous, D. Reichman, M. Berciu, A. Mil- lis, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Bipolaronic high- temperature superconductivity, Physical Review X 13, 011010 (2023)

2023
[54]

K. F. Mak, K. He, C. Lee, G. H. Lee, J. Hone, T. F. Heinz, and J. Shan, Tightly bound trions in monolayer mos2, Nature materials12, 207 (2013)

2013
[55]

G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 021001 (2018)

2018
[56]

J. D. Ziegler, Y. Cho, S. Terres, M. Menahem, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, O. Yaffe, T. C. Berkelbach, and A. Chernikov, Mobile trions in electrically tunable 2d hybrid perovskites, Advanced Materials35, 2210221 (2023)

2023
[57]

N. S. Makarov, S. Guo, O. Isaienko, W. Liu, I. Robel, and V. I. Klimov, Spectral and dynamical properties of sin- gle excitons, biexcitons, and trions in cesium–lead-halide perovskite quantum dots, Nano letters16, 2349 (2016)

2016
[58]

M. Fu, P. Tamarat, H. Huang, J. Even, A. L. Rogach, and B. Lounis, Neutral and charged exciton fine struc- ture in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals revealed by magneto-optical spectroscopy, Nano letters17, 2895 (2017)

2017
[59]

M. A. Becker, R. Vaxenburg, G. Nedelcu, P. C. Sercel, A. Shabaev, M. J. Mehl, J. G. Michopoulos, S. G. Lam- brakos, N. Bernstein, J. L. Lyons,et al., Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites, Nature553, 189 (2018)

2018
[60]

C. Zhu, T. Nguyen, S. C. Boehme, A. Moskalenko, D. N. Dirin, M. I. Bodnarchuk, C. Katan, J. Even, G. Rainò, and M. V. Kovalenko, Many-body correlations and exci- ton complexes in cspbbr 3 quantum dots, Advanced Ma- terials 35, 2208354 (2023)

2023
[61]

Tamarat, E

P. Tamarat, E. Prin, Y. Berezovska, A. Moskalenko, T. P. T. Nguyen, C. Xia, L. Hou, J.-B. Trebbia, M. Zacharias, L. Pedesseau,et al., Universal scaling laws for charge-carrier interactions with quantum confinement in lead-halide perovskites, Nature Communications 14, 229 (2023)

2023
[62]

K. Cho, T. Sato, T. Yamada, R. Sato, M. Saruyama, T. Teranishi, H. Suzuura, and Y. Kanemitsu, Size de- pendence of trion and biexciton binding energies in lead halide perovskite nanocrystals, ACS nano18, 5723 (2024)

2024
[63]

J. L. Movilla, J. Planelles, and J. I. Climente, Binding energy of polaronic trions and biexcitons in cspbbr 3 nanocrystals, Physical Review B111, 155304 (2025)

2025
[64]

Kittel,Quantum Theory of Solids(Wiley, 1987)

C. Kittel,Quantum Theory of Solids(Wiley, 1987)

1987
[65]

A. M. Soufiani, F. Huang, P. Reece, R. Sheng, A. Ho- Baillie, and M. A. Green, Polaronic exciton binding en- ergy in iodide and bromide organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites, Applied Physics Letters107 (2015)

2015
[66]

Franchini, and G

M.Bokdam, T.Sander, A.Stroppa, S.Picozzi, D.Sarma, C. Franchini, and G. Kresse, Role of polar phonons in the photo excited state of metal halide perovskites, Scientific reports 6, 28618 (2016)

2016
[67]

Yamada, T

M.Nagai, T.Tomioka, M.Ashida, M.Hoyano, R.Akashi, Y. Yamada, T. Aharen, and Y. Kanemitsu, Longitudi- nal optical phonons modified by organic molecular cation motions in organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites, Physical review letters 121, 145506 (2018)

2018
[68]

Sendner, P

M. Sendner, P. K. Nayak, D. A. Egger, S. Beck, C. Müller, B. Epding, W. Kowalsky, L. Kronik, H. J. Snaith, A. Pucci,et al., Optical phonons in methylammo- nium lead halide perovskites and implications for charge transport, Materials Horizons3, 613 (2016)

2016
[69]

Sanders, D

N. Sanders, D. Bayerl, G. Shi, K. A. Mengle, and E. Kioupakis, Electronic and optical properties of two- dimensional gan from first-principles, Nano Letters17, 7345–7349 (2017)

2017
[70]

L. Zhao, S. Xu, M. Wang, and S. Lin, Probing the thermodynamic stability and phonon transport in two- dimensional hexagonal aluminum nitride monolayer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 27675 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09706

2016 doi
[71]

Li, F.-n

W. Li, F.-n. Xue, P.-b. Zhao, and Y. Lu, Electronic struc- ture and phonon transport properties of hfse2 under in- plane strain and finite temperature, Physica Scripta99, 105916 (2024)

2024
[72]

Wang, Y.-S

H. Wang, Y.-S. Lan, B. Dai, X.-W. Zhang, Z.- G. Wang, and N.-N. Ge, Improved thermoelectric performance of monolayer hfs2 by strain engineer- ing, ACS Omega 6, 29820 (2021), pMID: 34778655, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04286

2021 doi
[73]

A.PanditandB.Hamad,Theeffectoffinite-temperature and anharmonic lattice dynamics on the thermal conduc- tivity of zrs2 monolayer: self-consistent phonon calcula- tions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 425405 (2021)

2021
[74]

Suzuki and K

Y. Suzuki and K. Varga,Stochastic Variational Approach to Quantum-Mechanical Few-Body Problems, Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics (Springer, 8 Berlin/Heidelberg, 1998) pp. i–xiv, 1–314

1998
[75]

Courtade, M

E. Courtade, M. Semina, M. Manca, M. Glazov, C. Robert, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. Pierre,et al., Charged excitons in monolayer wse 2: Experiment and theory, Physical Review B96, 085302 (2017)

2017
[76]

J. Shi, Y. Li, J. Wu, H. Wu, Y. Luo, D. Li, J. J. Jasieniak, and Q. Meng, Exciton character and high- performance stimulated emission of hybrid lead bromide perovskite polycrystalline film, Advanced Optical Mate- rials 8, 1902026 (2020)

2020
[77]

Chernikov, T

A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2, Physical review letters 113, 076802 (2014)

2014
[78]

J. Xie, L. Liao, Y. Gong, Y. Li, F. Shi, A. Pei, J. Sun, R. Zhang, B. Kong, R. Subbaraman,et al., Stitching h- bn by atomic layer deposition of lif as a stable interface for lithium metal anode, Science advances 3, eaao3170 (2017)

2017
[79]

S. Roux, C. Arnold, E. Carré, A. Plaud, L. Ren, F. Fos- sard, N. Horezan, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, C. Maestre, et al., Exciton self-trapping in twisted hexagonal boron nitride homostructures, Physical Review X 15, 021067 (2025)

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [47]

Polarons in two-dimensional polar materials: All-coupling variational theory

A. Kudlis, V. Shahnazaryan, and I. Tokatly, Polarons in two-dimensionalpolarmaterials: All-couplingvariational theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.10930 (2025)

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

[2] [1]

159 (Springer, 2010)

A.S.AlexandrovandJ.T.Devreese, Advances in polaron physics, Vol. 159 (Springer, 2010)

work page 2010

[3] [2]

L. D. Landau, Electron motion in crystal lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3, 664 (1933)

work page 1933

[4] [3]

S. I. Pekar, Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz16, 341 (1946)

work page 1946

[5] [4]

L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, The effective mass of the polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz18, 419 (1948)

work page 1948

[6] [5]

Fröhlich, H

H. Fröhlich, H. Pelzer, and S. Zienau, Xx. properties of slow electrons in polar materials, The London, Edin- burgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 221 (1950)

work page 1950

[7] [6]

T. Lee, F. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow elec- trons in a polar crystal, Physical Review90, 297 (1953). 6

work page 1953

[8] [7]

R. P. Feynman, Slow electrons in a polar crystal, Physical Review 97, 660 (1955)

work page 1955