Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 113 references

Canadian Contributions to the Search for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two Canadian-led experiments aim to determine whether neutrinos are their own antiparticles by searching for neutrinoless double beta decay, with projected half-life sensitivities that would probe the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy.

desk verdict A solid, well-referenced review of Canadian 0νββ efforts; no new physics, but the descriptive claims hold up and it deserves refereeing as a review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14712 v1 pith:YWQ24U4M submitted 2025-06-17 nucl-ex

Thomas Brunner , Jason D. Holt , David McKeen , Alexander Wright This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-ex
keywords neutrinolessdoublebetadecayMajorananeutrinoleptonnumberviolationeffectivemassSNO+nEXOEXO-200nuclearmatrixelements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that Canadian research groups have been central to the global hunt for neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay, a hypothetical nuclear transformation that, if seen, would show that neutrinos are Majorana particles and that lepton number is violated by two units. It traces the history from an early 1980s germanium detector operated in a salt mine through the liquid-xenon EXO-200 experiment, and details current Canadian involvement in SNO+, nEXO, LEGEND-1000, and CUPID. The forward-looking claim is that SNO+ should reach a half-life sensitivity of $2\times10^{26}$ years and nEXO $1.35\times10^{28}$ years, enough to cover much of the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. Combined with ab initio nuclear matrix element calculations, such sensitivities would turn a discovery or a null result into a sharp statement about the effective Majorana neutrino mass.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay itself: a nucleus decaying to a daughter with two more protons and two electrons and nothing else, violating lepton number by two units. The experimental handle is the sum energy of the two electrons, which forms a sharp peak at the endpoint $Q_{\beta\beta}$; for $^{136}$Xe the paper quotes $Q_{\beta\beta} = 2457.83(37)$ keV. The interpretive chain runs from a measured half-life, through a phase-space factor and a nuclear matrix element, to the effective Majorana mass $\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle$. The load-bearing theoretical machinery is the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group, an ab initio many-body method that computes nuclear matrix elements for $^{76}$Ge, $^{100}$Mo, $^{130}$Te, and $^{136}$Xe directly from nuclear and weak forces, with quantified uncertainties. Experimentally, the core technology is the liquid-xenon time projection chamber, which reads out both ionization and scintillation, uses event multiplicity to reject gamma backgrounds, and localizes energy deposits for background discrimination.

What would settle it

A direct check is whether nEXO, during commissioning, achieves its design energy resolution of better than 1% at $Q_{\beta\beta}$ and a background rate consistent with its design model; if the measured background in the signal region exceeds the projected rate, the claimed 1.35e28 yr sensitivity after ten years cannot hold. Conversely, a statistically significant peak at the $Q$-value in SNO+ or nEXO data would directly confirm the paper's central physics claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the search for neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay is the most promising route to determining whether neutrinos are Majorana particles, and that Canadian groups are positioned to play leading roles in making that determination. The authors consolidate the case: the process $(A,Z)\to(A,Z+2)+2e^-$ would violate lepton number by two units; its signature is a mono-energetic peak at the decay $Q$-value atop the continuous two-neutrino background; and the decay rate is governed by the effective Majorana mass $\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle$, related to nuclear matrix elements that Canadian-led ab initio calculations now constrain. They state that current 100-kg-scale experiments have set limits around $10^{25}$--$10^{26}$ years, and that SNO+ (tellurium-loaded liquid scintillator) and nEXO (5 tonnes of enriched liquid xenon in a time projection chamber) are expected to push sensitivity to $2\times10^{26}$ years and $1.35\times10^{28}$ years respectively, probing the inverted hierarchy.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy will be probed within about a decade rests on projected detector performance: nEXO needs better than 1% energy resolution at $Q_{\beta\beta}$ and 90% $^{136}$Xe enrichment, SNO+ needs 0.5% tellurium loading, and CUPID needs 240 kg of $^{100}$Mo with particle identification; if these engineering and background targets are not met, the stated timeline extends.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the projected sensitivities hold, a null result from SNO+ and nEXO will push the lower limit on the neutrinoless double beta decay half-life beyond $10^{28}$ years, ruling out most of the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy parameter space.
  • A positive observation would establish that neutrinos are Majorana particles, that lepton number is not conserved in weak interactions, and would yield a measurement of the effective Majorana mass in the tens-of-meV range.
  • Improved ab initio nuclear matrix elements mean that a measured half-life can be converted into a sharper value of $\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle$, reducing the nuclear-theory uncertainty that has historically limited such extractions.
  • Barium tagging, by identifying the $^{136}$Ba daughter ion after a candidate decay, could make an upgraded nEXO essentially background-free and multiply its sensitivity by a factor of 2--3.
  • The same detector technologies are scalable: higher tellurium loading could take SNO+ to $1$--$2\times10^{27}$ years, and the CUPID-1T concept would reach about $9.1\times10^{27}$ years with a tonne of $^{100}$Mo.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • [Editorial inference] One implication the review leaves implicit: if both SNO+ and nEXO return null results at their projected sensitivities, the field would likely need a kilotonne-scale detector or a qualitatively new background-suppression technique to reach the normal neutrino mass hierarchy.
  • [Editorial inference] Comparing limits across the four isotopes (130Te, 136Xe, 76Ge, 100Mo) could test whether light-neutrino exchange is actually the dominant mechanism, since exotic Majorana-mass mechanisms would produce different relative decay rates in different nuclei.
  • [Editorial inference] The review's mention that readout electronics originally built for cosmic microwave background telescopes are being adapted for CUPID suggests a concrete cross-fertilization path: scalable digital frequency multiplexing could be what makes tonne-scale bolometric arrays practical.
  • [Editorial inference] A directly testable extension would be to combine current half-life limits from all isotopes with the new ab initio matrix elements in a joint statistical fit, producing a single posterior on $\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle$ and sharpening the paper's statement about probing the inverted hierarchy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review article surveys the physics motivation for neutrinoless double beta decay, the status of nuclear matrix element calculations, and the historical and current Canadian contributions to experimental searches. It traces Canadian involvement from the early 1980s Windsor salt-mine germanium experiment through EXO-200, SNO+, Majorana/LEGEND-1000, nEXO, and CUPID-related detector R&D, and it closes with projected half-life sensitivities for the coming generation. The paper's central claim is that Canadian groups have played and continue to play leading roles in the search for neutrinoless double beta decay, supported by citations to the primary literature and by a descriptive history of the experiments.

Significance. The paper's value lies in scholarly synthesis rather than in new results. It collects a dispersed history of Canadian contributions, connects them to current and planned experiments, and attributes specific results to the primary literature. It is transparent that the future sensitivities quoted for SNO+, nEXO, CUPID, and LEGEND-1000 are projections taken from collaboration design reports, and it explicitly limits its theoretical discussion to the standard light-neutrino-exchange mechanism. As a review article, it should serve as a useful reference for the community, and its central descriptive claim is not vulnerable to the eventual success or failure of the projected sensitivities. The manuscript is weakened only by typographical and minor clarity issues, none of which affect the substance of the review.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II] The phrase "electrowweak two-body currents" contains a typo and should read "electroweak two-body currents."
  2. [Section IV.C, Figure 4 caption] The caption refers to the "GERGA cryostat," but the experiment and cryostat are named GERDA; this should be corrected.
  3. [Section IV.B] The name "Ragahavan" in the discussion of the 1994 proposal should be spelled "Raghavan" to match reference [52].
  4. [Section IV.B] The sentence describing the liquid scintillator approach says the large mass and low background "compensated for the most modest energy resolution"; this should likely read "the more modest energy resolution."
  5. [Manuscript header] The manuscript is dated August 27, 2025, while the arXiv identifier indicates version 1 dated June 17, 2025; this date inconsistency should be reconciled.
  6. [Section VI] The conclusion could state explicitly that the sensitive numbers quoted for SNO+, CUPID, LEGEND-1000, and nEXO are design projections rather than measured or demonstrated sensitivities, to avoid any impression that these have already been achieved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a review article that reports cited external results; projected sensitivities are quoted from design reports, not derived by the paper.

full rationale

This paper is a review article whose central claim is historical and descriptive: Canadian groups have played leading roles in neutrinoless double beta decay searches. It derives no new experimental result and presents no new fit of its own. The forward-looking half-life sensitivities (SNO+ 2e26 yr, nEXO 1.35e28 yr, CUPID 1e27 yr) are quoted from collaboration design reports and are explicitly presented as projections ('expected', 'projected', 'anticipated'), not as measured outputs of the present paper's own derivation. The nuclear-matrix-element section cites published ab initio calculations, including works co-authored by the review authors, but those are external, peer-reviewed results with stated assumptions; they are used as evidence of Canadian contributions, not as an unverified authority invoked to forbid alternatives. There is no self-definitional step, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no known result renamed under new coordinates. The paper's assumption of the light-neutrino-exchange mechanism is an explicit caveat, not a circularity. The typographical errors are editorial and do not affect the technical content. Under the hard rules, an honest non-finding is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. Its central narrative rests on standard assumptions of the field (light-neutrino exchange dominance) and on the credibility of cited experimental and theoretical results, including projections from design reports.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The standard mechanism of light-neutrino exchange dominates the 0νββ rate, so that ⟨mββ⟩ relates to the half-life via Eq. (5) using the phase-space factor and NME.
    Section II introduces this assumption before any discussion of NMEs; alternative mechanisms are mentioned but not quantified.
  • domain assumption Nuclear matrix element calculations based on ab initio methods (VS-IMSRG) and their uncertainty estimates, as reported in Refs. [38,39], are correct.
    Section II relies on these results to claim that NME uncertainties refine ⟨mββ⟩ extraction by more than an order of magnitude; the review does not reproduce these calculations.
  • domain assumption The projected sensitivities of next-generation experiments (SNO+, nEXO, CUPID, LEGEND-1000) quoted from design reports will be achieved.
    Sections IV and V quote these projections as the basis for the conclusion that the next generation will probe the inverted mass hierarchy; they are engineering targets, not yet demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Canadian Contributions to the Search for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YWQ24U4M

@misc{pith2026250614712,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Canadian Contributions to the Search for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YWQ24U4M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14712}
}
abstract

The search for neutrinoless double beta decay has internationally been recognized as the most promising approach to determine the Majorana nature of neutrinos. This hypothesized decay would, if observed, violate lepton number in weak interactions by two units, hence, prove the existence of physics beyond the Standard Model. Current experiments with sensitivity to neutrinoless double beta decay half lives of $10^{26}$ years did not observe such a decay and worldwide efforts are ongoing to deploy experiments with half-life sensitivities beyond $10^{28}$ years. Canadian groups have been involved in this search for more than four decades. This article summarizes the historical experimental efforts and describes current Canadian contributions to neutrinoless double beta decay searches and their theoretical interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14712 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The neutrinoless double beta decay parameter space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The configuration of the Windsor Salt Mine germa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. A cutaway illustration of the SNO+ detector. From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A cutaway rendering of LEGEND-200 in the GERGA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A cutaway illustration of the EXO-200 detector at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. A cutaway illustration of the nEXO TPC inside the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. A cutaway illustration of the nEXO detector at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Rendering of the CUORE cryostat with different ther [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The EXO-200 experiment EXO started as an R&D effort towards a double-beta decay experiment using the isotope 136Xe in 2001 with the first Canadian groups, Carleton University and Lau- rentian University, joining in 2004. The EXO-200 detec- tor was constructed at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico, USA, from 2007 to 2010 with major contri...

    2001

  2. [2]

    It will deploy 5 tonnes of liquid xenon, enriched to 90% in the isotope 136Xe, in a monolithic single-phase TPC

    The nEXO experiment nEXO is a next-generation 0 νββ decay experiment that is being developed to reach a sensitivity beyond 1028 yr. It will deploy 5 tonnes of liquid xenon, enriched to 90% in the isotope 136Xe, in a monolithic single-phase TPC. A sectioned view of an engineering rendering of the TPC and cryostat is shown in Figure 6. Charge tiles [86, 87]...

  3. [3]

    Ba-tagging,

    Ba-tagging technology as upgrade path to nEXO The 136Xe search for 0νββ using TPC technology, ei- ther in gaseous or liquid xenon, opens the possibility for “Ba-tagging,” that is, the identification of the 136Xe ββ decay daughter isotope Ba-136 following a potential 0νββ event [93]. An effective Ba-tagging approach would allow a measurement free of any ba...

  4. [4]

    Lesgourgues and S

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Neutrino mass from Cos- mology, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012, 608515 (2012), arXiv:1212.6154 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO), Measurement of the rate of νe +d →p +p +e− interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 071301 (2001), arXiv:nucl-ex/0106015

    arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    Eguchi et al

    K. Eguchi et al. (KamLAND), First results from Kam- LAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappear- ance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0212021

    arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Esteban et al., The fate of hints: updated global anal- ysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09, 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

    I. Esteban et al., The fate of hints: updated global anal- ysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09, 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf

    T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131, 95 (1979)

    1979

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    Lattanzi and M

    M. Lattanzi and M. Gerbino, Status of neutrino prop- erties and future prospects - Cosmological and as- trophysical constraints, Front. in Phys. 5, 70 (2018), arXiv:1712.07109 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Minkowski, µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski, µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977)

    1977

  3. [11]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 10 315 (1979), arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]

    1979 arXiv

  4. [12]

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Non- conservation in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 155, 36 (1985)

    1985

  5. [13]

    S. L. Glashow, The Future of Elementary Particle Physics, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61, 687 (1980)

    1980

  6. [14]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980)

    1980

  7. [15]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980)

    1980

  8. [16]

    G. D. Moore, Sphaleron rate in the symmetric elec- troweak phase, Phys. Rev. D 62, 085011 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0001216

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    P. B. Arnold and L. D. McLerran, Sphalerons, Small Fluctuations and Baryon Number Violation in Elec- troweak Theory, Phys. Rev. D 36, 581 (1987)

    1987

  10. [18]

    P. B. Arnold and L. D. McLerran, The Sphaleron Strikes Back, Phys. Rev. D 37, 1020 (1988)

    1988

  11. [19]

    P. B. Arnold, D. Son, and L. G. Yaffe, The Hot baryon violation rate is O(α5 wT 4), Phys. Rev. D 55, 6264 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9609481

    1997 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Davidson, E

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rept. 466, 105 (2008), arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986)

    1986

  14. [22]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Resurrection of grand unified theory baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 131602 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203194

    2002 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, and M. Shaposhnikov, The Role of sterile neutrinos in cosmology and astro- physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59, 191 (2009), arXiv:0901.0011 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kotila and F

    J. Kotila and F. Iachello, Phase space factors for double-β decay, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034316 (2012), arXiv:1209.5722 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, A New Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Annihilation of Baryons, Phys. Lett. A 59, 254 (1976)

    1976

  18. [26]

    Banks and N

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011), arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    C. H. de Lima, D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, M. Shamma, and D. Tuckler, Probing Lepton Number Violation at Same- Sign Lepton Colliders, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2411.15303 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Agostini et al

    M. Agostini et al. , Toward the discovery of matter cre- ation with neutrinoless ββ decay, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025002 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cirigliano et al

    V. Cirigliano et al. , New Leading Contribution to Neu- trinoless Double-β Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 202001 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Cirigliano et al

    V. Cirigliano et al. , Toward Complete Leading-Order Predictions for Neutrinoless Doubleβ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172002 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Engel and J

    J. Engel and J. Men´ endez, Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 046301 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    J. M. Yao et al. , Abinitio benchmarks of neutrinoless double-β decay in light nuclei with a chiral Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. C 103, 014315 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    S. R. Stroberg et al., Nucleus-Dependent Valence-Space Approach to Nuclear Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 032502 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    S. R. Stroberg et al., Non-Empirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 307 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Gysbers et al

    P. Gysbers et al. , Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first prin- ciples, Nature Phys. 15, 428 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Miyagi, S

    T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, P. Navr´ atil, K. Hebeler, and J. D. Holt, Converged ab initio calculations of heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014302 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    J. M. Yao et al., Ab Initio Treatment of Collective Cor- relations and the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 48Ca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 232501 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Belley et al., Ab Initio Neutrinoless Double-Beta De- cay Matrix Elements for 48Ca, 76Ge, and 82Se, Phys

    A. Belley et al., Ab Initio Neutrinoless Double-Beta De- cay Matrix Elements for 48Ca, 76Ge, and 82Se, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 042502 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Novario et al

    S. Novario et al. , Coupled-Cluster Calculations of Neu- trinoless Double-β Decay in 48Ca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 182502 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Goeppert-Mayer, Double beta-disintegration, Phys

    M. Goeppert-Mayer, Double beta-disintegration, Phys. Rev. 48, 512 (1935)

    1935

  33. [41]

    Hu et al

    B. Hu et al. , Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of 208Pb to nuclear forces, Nature Phys.18, 1196 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Belley, T

    A. Belley, T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, and J. D. Holt, Ab initio calculations of neutrinoless ββ decay refine neutrino mass limits, arXiv (2023), arXiv:2307.15156 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Belley et al

    A. Belley et al. , Ab initio Uncertainty Quantification of Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in 76Ge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 182502 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    M. J. Dolinski, A. W. Poon, and W. Rodejohann, Neu- trinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects, An- nual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 69, 219 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    W. H. Furry, On transition probabilities in double beta- disintegration, Phys. Rev. 56, 1184 (1939)

    1939

  38. [46]

    S. R. Elliott, A. A. Hahn, and M. K. Moe, Direct evi- dence for two-neutrino double-beta decay in 82Se, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2020 (1987)

    1987

  39. [47]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, et al. , Nufit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neu- trino oscillations, J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 216

    2024

  40. [48]

    Jagam, J

    P. Jagam, J. Simpson, J. Campbell, B. Robertson, and H. Malm, Background events in the energy region be- low 4 MeV detected with a 208 cm3 intrinsic germanium detector: I. Characteristic γ-radiation, Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods A 239, 214 (1985)

    1985

  41. [49]

    J. J. Simpson et al. , New limit for neutrinoless double β decay of 76Ge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 141 (1984)

    1984

  42. [50]

    Jagam et al

    P. Jagam et al. , Performance of an intrinsic ger- manium three-crystal ultralow background gamma-ray spectrometer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A267, 486 (1988)

    1988

  43. [51]

    Jagam and J

    P. Jagam and J. Simpson, Measurements of Th, U and K concentrations in a variety of materials, Nuclear In- struments and Methods A 324, 389 (1993)

    1993

  44. [52]

    R. S. Raghavan, New approach to the search for neu- trinoless double beta decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1411 (1994)

    1994

  45. [53]

    Chen, The SNO Liquid Scintillator Project, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 145, 65 (2005), NOW 2004

    M. Chen, The SNO Liquid Scintillator Project, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 145, 65 (2005), NOW 2004

    2005

  46. [54]

    Andringa et al., Current Status and Future Prospects of the SNO+ Experiment, Advances in High Energy Physics 2016, 6194250 (2016)

    S. Andringa et al., Current Status and Future Prospects of the SNO+ Experiment, Advances in High Energy Physics 2016, 6194250 (2016). 11

    2016

  47. [55]

    Albanese et al

    V. Albanese et al. , The SNO+ experiment, Journal of Instrumentation 16 (08), P08059

  48. [56]

    S. D. Biller, Probing majorana neutrinos in the regime of the normal mass hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 87, 071301 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Wright, Robust Signal Extraction Methods and Monte Carlo Sensitivity Studies for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory and SNO+ Experiments , Ph.D

    A. Wright, Robust Signal Extraction Methods and Monte Carlo Sensitivity Studies for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory and SNO+ Experiments , Ph.D. thesis, Queen’s University (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    Rountree, Science and Technology of a Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Spectrometer (LENS) and Development of the MiniLENS Underground Prototype , Ph.D

    D. Rountree, Science and Technology of a Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Spectrometer (LENS) and Development of the MiniLENS Underground Prototype , Ph.D. the- sis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2009)

    2009

  51. [59]

    A. P. Babichev et al. , Development of the laser isotope separation method (avlis) for obtaining weight amounts of highly enriched 150nd isotope, Quantum Electronics 35, 879 (2005)

    2005

  52. [60]

    Bialek et al., A rope-net support system for the liquid scintillator detector for the SNO+ experiment, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 827, 152 (2016)

    A. Bialek et al., A rope-net support system for the liquid scintillator detector for the SNO+ experiment, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 827, 152 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Hans et al

    S. Hans et al. , Purification of telluric acid for SNO+ neutrinoless double-beta decay search, Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods A 795, 132 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Auty et al

    D. Auty et al. , A method to load tellurium in liquid scintillator for the study of neutrinoless double beta de- cay, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 1051, 168204 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Anderson et al., Development, characterisation, and deployment of the SNO+ liquid scintillator, Journal of Instrumentation 16 (05), P05009

    M. Anderson et al., Development, characterisation, and deployment of the SNO+ liquid scintillator, Journal of Instrumentation 16 (05), P05009

  56. [64]

    M. R. Anderson et al. (The SNO+ Collaboration), Mea- surement of neutron-proton capture in the SNO+ water phase, Phys. Rev. C 102, 014002 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Anderson et al

    M. Anderson et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), Measure- ment of the 8B solar neutrino flux in SNO+ with very low backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 99, 012012 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Allega et al

    A. Allega et al. (SNO+Collaboration), Improved search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in water with the SNO + detector, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112012 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Allega et al

    A. Allega et al. (The SNO+ Collaboration), Evidence of Antineutrinos from Distant Reactors Using Pure Water at SNO+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091801 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Agostini et al

    M. Agostini et al. (GERDA Collaboration), Final re- sults of gerda on the search for neutrinoless double- β decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Allega et al

    A. Allega et al. (The SNO+ Collaboration), Event-by- event direction reconstruction of solar neutrinos in a high light-yield liquid scintillator, Phys. Rev. D 109, 072002 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. , LEGEND-1000 Preconceptual Design Report, arXiv arXiv, 2107.11462 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    S. I. Alvis et al., Search for neutrinoless double-β decay in 76Ge with 26 kg yr of exposure from the Majorana Demonstrator, Physical Review C 100, 025501 (2019), arXiv:1902.02299 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Redshaw, E

    M. Redshaw, E. Wingfield, J. McDaniel, and E. G. My- ers, Mass and double-beta-decay Q value of136Xe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 053003 (2007)

    2007

  65. [73]

    Bauer et al

    M. Bauer et al. , MaGe: a Monte Carlo framework for the Gerda and Majorana double beta decay experi- ments, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 39, 362 (2006)

    2006

  66. [74]

    Conti et al

    E. Conti et al. (EXO-200), Correlated fluctuations be- tween luminescence and ionization in liquid xenon, Phys. Rev. B 68, 054201 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0303008

    2003 arXiv

  67. [75]

    J. B. Albert et al. (EXO-200), Measurements of the ion fraction and mobility of α- andβ-decay products in liq- uid xenon using the EXO-200 detector, Phys. Rev. C 92, 045504 (2015), arXiv:1506.00317 [nucl-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Ackerman et al

    N. Ackerman et al. (EXO-200), The EXO-200 detec- tor, part II: auxiliary systems, JINST 17 (02), P02015, arXiv:2107.06007 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Auger et al

    M. Auger et al. , The EXO-200 detector, part I: De- tector design and construction, JINST 7, P05010, arXiv:1202.2192 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. B. Albert et al. (EXO-200), Improved measurement of the 2νββ half-life of 136Xe with the EXO-200 detector, Phys. Rev. C 89, 015502 (2014), arXiv:1306.6106 [nucl- ex]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    K. Fujii et al., High-accuracy measurement of the emis- sion spectrum of liquid xenon in the vacuum ultravio- let region, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 795, 293 (2015)

    2015

  72. [80]

    J. B. Albert et al. (EXO), Search for Neutrino- less Double-Beta Decay with the Upgraded EXO- 200 Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 072701 (2018), arXiv:1707.08707 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ackerman et al

    N. Ackerman et al. (EXO-200), Observation of Two- Neutrino Double-Beta Decay in 136Xe with EXO-200, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 212501 (2011), arXiv:1108.4193 [nucl-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Auger et al

    M. Auger et al. (EXO-200), Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in 136Xe with EXO-200, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 032505 (2012), arXiv:1205.5608 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [83]

    J. B. Albert et al. (EXO-200), Search for Majorana neu- trinos with the first two years of EXO-200 data, Nature 510, 229 (2014), arXiv:1402.6956 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  76. [84]

    S. A. Kharusi et al. (EXO-200), Search for two-neutrino double-beta decay of 136Xe to the excited state of 136Ba with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103001 (2023), arXiv:2303.01103 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Anton et al

    G. Anton et al. (EXO-200), Search for Neutrinoless Double-β Decay with the Complete EXO-200 Dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 161802 (2019), arXiv:1906.02723 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    S. A. Kharusi et al. , Search for Majoron-emitting modes of 136Xe double beta decay with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Phys. Rev. D 104, 112002 (2021), arXiv:2109.01327 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [87]

    S. A. Kharusi et al. (EXO-200), Search for MeV electron recoils from dark matter in EXO-200, Phys. Rev. D107, 012007 (2023), arXiv:2207.00897 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Jamil et al

    A. Jamil et al. (nEXO), VUV-sensitive Silicon Pho- tomultipliers for Xenon Scintillation Light Detection in nEXO, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65, 2823 (2018), 12 arXiv:1806.02220 [physics.ins-det]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [89]

    J. B. Albert et al., Investigation of radioactivity-induced backgrounds in EXO-200, Phys. Rev. C 92, 015503 (2015), arXiv:1503.06241 [physics.ins-det]

    2015 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Jewell et al

    M. Jewell et al. (nEXO), Characterization of an Ioniza- tion Readout Tile for nEXO, JINST 13 (01), P01006, arXiv:1710.05109 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Li et al

    Z. Li et al. (nEXO), Simulation of charge readout with segmented tiles in nEXO, JINST 14 (09), P09020, arXiv:1907.07512 [physics.ins-det]

    1907 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Adhikari et al

    G. Adhikari et al. (nEXO), nEXO: neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 10 28 year half-life sensitivity, J. Phys. G 49, 015104 (2022), arXiv:2106.16243 [nucl- ex]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Gallina et al

    G. Gallina et al. , Characterization of the Hamamatsu VUV4 MPPCs for nEXO, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 940, 371 (2019), arXiv:1903.03663 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Gallina et al

    G. Gallina et al. , Performance of novel VUV-sensitive Silicon Photo-Multipliers for nEXO, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1125 (2022), arXiv:2209.07765 [physics.ins-det]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    S. A. Kharusi et al. (nEXO), nEXO Pre-Conceptual Design Report, arXiv (2018), arXiv:1805.11142 [physics.ins-det]

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Rasiwala et al

    H. Rasiwala et al. (nEXO Ba-tagging group), ‘Searching for a needle in a haystack;’ A Ba-tagging approach for an upgraded nEXO experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 541, 298 (2023), arXiv:2303.04698 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [97]

    M. K. Moe, New approach to the detection of neutrino- less double beta decay, Phys. Rev. C 44, 931 (1991)

    1991

  90. [98]

    Sinclair et al

    D. Sinclair et al. , Prospects for Barium Tagging in Gaseous Xenon, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 309, 012005 (2011)

    2011

  91. [99]

    Brunner et al

    T. Brunner et al. , An RF-only ion-funnel for extrac- tion from high-pressure gases, Int. J. Mass Spectrome- try 379, 110 (2015), arXiv:1412.1144 [physics.ins-det]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Anker et al

    A. Anker et al. , Report from the Workshop on Xenon Detector 0 νββ Searches: Steps Towards the Kilo- tonne Scale, in Workshop on Xenon Detector 0 νββ Searches: Steps Towards the Kilotonne Scale (2024) arXiv:2404.19050 [nucl-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Green et al

    M. Green et al. , Observation of single collisionally cooled trapped ions in a buffer gas, Phys. Rev. A 76, 023404 (2007), arXiv:physics/0702122

    2007 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Murray, J

    K. Murray, J. Dilling, R. Gornea, Y. Ito, T. Koffas, A. A. Kwiatkowski, Y. Lan, M. P. Reiter, V. Varentsov, and T. Brunner, Design of a multiple-reflection time-of- flight mass spectrometer for barium-tagging, Hyperfine Interact. 240, 97 (2019), arXiv:1910.01667 [physics.ins- det]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Ray et al

    D. Ray et al. , Ion Manipulation from Liquid Xe to Vacuum: Ba-Tagging for a nEXO Upgrade and Future 0 νββ Experiments, Atoms 12, 71 (2024), arXiv:2410.18138 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    This would require more than 10,000 channels to be read out, with multiplexed systems playing a crucial role in the readout solution

    containing a tonne of the isotope 100Mo with a pro- jected 3σ discovery sensitivity of 9.1×1027 yr. This would require more than 10,000 channels to be read out, with multiplexed systems playing a crucial role in the readout solution. While NTD-Ge thermal sensors meet CUPID’s r...

    2022

  97. [105]

    W. R. Armstrong et al. (CUPID), CUPID pre-CDR (2019), arXiv:1907.09376 [physics.ins-de]

    2019 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Alfonso et al

    K. Alfonso et al. (CUPID), CUPID: The Next- Generation Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Experi- ment, J. Low Temp. Phys. 211, 375 (2023)

    2023

  99. [107]

    Alfonso et al

    K. Alfonso et al. (CUPID), CUPID, the CUORE Upgrade with Particle Identification, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2503.02894 [physics.ins-det]

    2025 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Armatol et al

    A. Armatol et al. , Toward CUPID-1T (2022), arXiv:2203.08386 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Singh et al

    V. Singh et al. , Large-area photon calorimeter with Ir-Pt bilayer transition-edge sensor for the CUPID experiment, Phys. Rev. Applied 20, 064017 (2023), arXiv:2210.15619 [physics.ins-det]

    2023 arXiv

  102. [110]

    A. N. Bender et al. , Digital frequency domain multi- plexing readout electronics for the next generation of millimeter telescopes, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153, 91531A (2014)

    2014

  103. [111]

    Bandura et al

    K. Bandura et al. , ICE: a scalable, low-cost FPGA-based telescope signal processing and network- ing system, J. Astron. Inst. 05, 1641005 (2017), arXiv:1608.06262 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  104. [112]

    B. A. Benson et al. (SPT-3G), SPT-3G: A Next- Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polariza- tion Experiment on the South Pole Telescope, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9153, 91531P (2014), arXiv:1407.2973 [astro-ph.IM]

    2014 arXiv

  105. [113]

    J. A. Sobrin et al. (SPT-3G), The Design and Integrated Performance of SPT-3G, Astrophys. J. Supp. 258, 42 (2022), arXiv:2106.11202 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.