Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 95 references

Macroscopic origin of the topologically twisted index on $T^2 \times \Sigma_{\mathfrak{g}}$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the supersymmetric, non-extremal limit of new Euclidean black strings in five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity is the holographic dual of the topologically twisted index of 4d N=1 SCFTs on T^2×Σ_g, with…

desk verdict The strongest current candidate for the gravitational origin of the TTI on T^2×Sigma_g; the core on-shell action derivation is solid, but the generic complex saddles are assumed to exist rather than directly constructed. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11299 v1 pith:YX7YTTMZ submitted 2026-08-11 hep-th

Nikolay Bobev , Vasil Dimitrov , Dario Martelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords topologicallytwistedindexblackstringsinAdS5minimalgaugedsupergravityEuclideansaddlesholographicon-shellactionChern-Simonstermsc-extremizationS5/CFT4
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to find the five-dimensional gravitational origin of the topologically twisted index of 4d N=1 SCFTs on $T^{2}$×Σ_g. It constructs a family of Euclidean, asymptotically locally AdS5 black-string solutions of minimal gauged supergravity and argues that their supersymmetric, non-extremal limit is a complex black saddle whose renormalized on-shell action equals −log Z_TTI = −π i c/(12τ). The same family, continued to Lorentzian signature, describes finite-temperature rotating electrically and magnetically charged black strings with $S^{1}$×Σ_g horizon topology, and its extremal limit gives BPS strings with real entropy. The match is significant because it derives the universal index formula from the bulk without invoking the Cardy limit and without extremality, linking black-string thermodynamics to the microscopic index.

What carries the argument

The central object is a cohomogeneity-one ansatz for the five-dimensional metric and U(1) gauge field with an $S^{1}$×Σ_g factor, reducing the equations of motion to a system of ODEs. The argument is carried by five radially conserved integrals of motion (q, \tilde q, j, μ_t, μ_s), which fix the asymptotic and near-horizon data, and by a localization identity expressing the on-shell Lagrangian as a radial derivative, so the action collapses to boundary terms. Supersymmetry is imposed through the timelike-class description of the classification of supersymmetric solutions of minimal gauged supergravity, which forces the topological twist p = ℓ5/3, the linear constraint Δ = −2πi/3, and vanishing of the holographic pressure coefficient, and yields the UV-IR relation used to evaluate the thermodynamics analytically.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the complex supersymmetric family for generic complex parameters, not just the almost-real sub-locus, and compare the directly renormalized on-shell action with −π i c/(12τ); a discrepancy, or an obstruction in the UV-IR interpolation beyond tenth order, would falsify the match.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the supersymmetric, non-extremal limit of its new Euclidean black strings is the holographic dual of the universal topologically twisted index, and that the regularized on-shell action in that limit is I = −π i c/(12τ), where c = 2πηΣ $ℓ5^{3}$/(3G5) = 32/3 (g−1)a. This reproduces the large-N field-theory answer log Z_TTI = iπ c_l/(12τ) for the universal twist with Δ = −2πi/3 and p = ℓ5/3. The saddles are smooth Euclidean geometries asymptotic to $T^{2}$×Σ_g; they are supersymmetric but generically complex, with real metric and imaginary Wilson line on a sub-locus, and they are neither extremal nor Cardy-limited. In the extremal limit they reduce to the known supersymmetric rotating black strings of the same theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the full complex supersymmetric family exists as smooth Euclidean interpolations between the UV and IR expansions; the paper verifies the series to tenth order but constructs numerically only the almost-real sub-locus, leaving the complex saddles of the central match unintegrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The supergravity derivation of the index does not need the Cardy limit; the τ-dependence of the on-shell action matches at finite β, not only for a small thermal circle.
  • At extremality the supersymmetric family degenerates to the BPS rotating black strings previously studied, giving a geometric count of their entropy from the same central charge.
  • The non-supersymmetric thermal black strings provide a holographic setting for genuine finite-temperature physics of the twisted 2d theory, including Hawking-Page transitions and hydrodynamic questions.
  • The Chern-Simons localization to boundary terms works without supersymmetry and could apply to other cohomogeneity-one holographic flows.
  • The supersymmetric solutions lie in the timelike class and pass to the null class in the extremal limit, a class-switching mechanism that may be generic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the leading-order match is not an accident of large N, adding four-derivative corrections should produce the first subleading term of the TTI; computing that correction would be a sharp test.
  • Replacing minimal supergravity by the STU model should yield the refined TTI with flavor fugacities, with R-symmetry extremization emerging from the bulk rather than being imposed.
  • The timelike-to-null class switching suggests that non-extremal timelike saddles could serve as a bridge to extremal BPS solutions, potentially making localization methods applicable to the null class.
  • The τ-dependence of the on-shell action points toward a modular or Farey-tail family of saddles; combining the explicit BTZ×Σ_g limit with SL(2,Z) transformations of the boundary torus may produce the full gravitational ensemble for the TTI.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a new family of cohomogeneity-one, asymptotically locally AdS5 solutions of five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity with R×S^1×Σ_g boundary in Lorentzian signature. In Euclidean signature these are smooth non-supersymmetric black saddles with T^2×Σ_g conformal boundary; the paper computes their regularized on-shell action, thermodynamic charges, quantum statistical relation, and Smarr relation using UV/IR series expansions, five radially conserved integrals of motion, and numerical shooting. It then imposes the supersymmetry constraints from the timelike class of [19] and shows that in the supersymmetric but non-extremal limit the on-shell action equals −π i c/(12τ) with c = 2πη_Σ ℓ_5^3/(3G_5), matching the universal topologically twisted index of 4d N=1 SCFTs at large N. Two analytic limits (extremal and BTZ×Σ) are also presented.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is an important step: it provides a macroscopic, supergravity-side derivation of the TTI on T^2×Σ_g for the universal R-symmetry twist, in the same spirit as the black-saddle constructions for the superconformal index. The paper is unusually careful with Chern-Simons patching, gauge invariance, and holographic renormalization; it also exhibits a non-supersymmetric localization of the on-shell action to the UV and IR boundaries, and verifies the QSR and supersymmetric constraints numerically to high precision. The explicit 10th-order expansions and the analytic extremal/BTZ limits are non-trivial checks. The main caveat is that the generic complex supersymmetric saddles underlying the central match are not directly constructed; only their real sub-locus is integrated numerically.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.4, eq. (5.46); §§5.2–5.3, eq. (5.38)] The central TTI match in eq. (5.38) is conditional on the existence of smooth complex Euclidean supersymmetric saddles for generic torus modulus τ. The numerical construction in Section 5.4 is restricted to the 'almost real' sub-locus (5.46), where ct, cφ, cΣ, β, ω, ℓΣ, ΩH, Ω∞ are real and ψH, ψ∞ are imaginary, so ω is real and τ = ω/(2πi) is purely imaginary; generic complex τ is not sampled. The 10th-order UV/IR matching in Sections 5.2–5.3 and the real-locus numerics do not establish existence of the complex saddles because the localization formula (4.30) evaluates the action only on actual solutions of the equations of motion. The paper itself flags this gap: Section 5.4 asks 'so how can we build a numerical shooter?', and Section 6 states that numerical existence is established only for the almost-real sub-family. Please either construct the complex solutions numerically (for example by complex shooting or by analytic continuation in ω), provide an analytic existence argument, or explicitly restrict the claim of (5.38) to the real sub-locus and state the generic-τ result as conditional.
  2. [§4.9, eq. (4.101); §5.3, eq. (5.38)] The gauge-invariant, Casimir-subtracted on-shell action used in the final supersymmetric result is defined after adding the local counterterm Θ in eq. (4.101). The paper leaves open whether Θ is compatible with supersymmetry ('It would be interesting to investigate whether this counterterm is compatible with supersymmetry'). Since the final match I = −π i c/(12τ) depends on this subtraction, and since the field-theory TTI is scheme-dependent (footnote 4), the agreement in (5.38) is established in a particular scheme. Please clarify whether the supersymmetric Ward identities fix Θ uniquely, or state more explicitly that the agreement is scheme-dependent in the same manner as the field-theory result, and that the chosen scheme coincides with that of [4,24].
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.9, eq. (4.112)] The entropy expression displayed after 'S = πic/(6τ) ± 2πi/3 Q' is garbled: the right-hand side appears to be a product of two parenthetical expressions rather than the simplified result, which should reduce to S = 3πc/(2 ℓΣ^2ℓφ) (up to the branch signs). Please correct the typesetting and verify the consistency with the geometric entropy (4.61).
  2. [§5.4, eq. (5.52)] The relation cΣ^2 = C(ℓΣ)(ℓΣ^2 − 1/3) is presented as a numerical finding with C(ℓΣ) undetermined. Please clarify whether this is a numerical fit or an analytic result, and state explicitly how it is used to motivate the special limit ℓΣ = 1/√3 in Section 5.5.
  3. [§5.2] The elimination of the (−+) and (−−) branches of the sign choices (sc0, sμt) is stated very briefly; please spell out the order at which the constraint (5.11) fails and the nature of the contradiction.
  4. [Tables 1 and 2] The table captions refer to row colors matching the curves in Figures 1 and 2, but the printed version does not include a color legend; the reader cannot map the table rows to the plotted curves.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The TTI match is not a fitted parameter or self-citation chain; the only mild circularity is the explicitly adopted common renormalization scheme for scheme-dependent CS/finite-counterterm terms.

  1. other [Section 3, footnote 4 (scheme-dependence caveat before eq. (3.2))]
    "As emphasized in [51] the SCFT calculation of the TTI may suffer from scheme dependence. This will be mirrored in the supergravity analysis below where we find ambiguities in the evaluation of the gravitational on-shell action due to the presence of Chern-Simons terms in the action and potential finite counterterms in the holographic renormalization procedure. In our analysis we adopt the same scheme for the calculation of the TTI as in [4, 24] and show how to reproduce the answer in (3.2) from an appropriate evaluation of the holographically dual on-shell action."

    The gravitational on-shell action is ambiguous due to Chern-Simons and finite-counterterm choices, and the paper explicitly chooses the same renormalization scheme as the field-theory TTI computation [4, 24]. Therefore the scheme-dependent part of the equality I = -log Z_TTI is imposed by scheme choice rather than independently predicted. The core coefficient c/(12τ) and the holomorphic τ-dependence are scheme-independent, so this is a mild, bounded circularity rather than a complete reduction of the central claim to its input.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained against the external TTI benchmark: no parameter is fitted to -log Z_TTI. The central charge c in (5.40) follows from the standard holographic dictionary a = πℓ5^3/(8G5) applied to the gravity-defined combination (4.97), and the on-shell action (5.38) is obtained analytically from the thermodynamic quantities (5.35) after imposing supergravity supersymmetry constraints (5.29)–(5.31). The supersymmetry classification [19] is external, and the patch-wise Chern-Simons treatment attributed to [18] is independently re-derived in Appendix A, so the same-author citation is not load-bearing. The only mild circularity is the explicit scheme choice flagged in footnote 4: the paper adopts the same renormalization scheme as the field-theory TTI computation [4,24], so the scheme-dependent part of the equality is imposed rather than predicted. The scheme-independent holomorphic coefficient c/(12τ) remains an independent result. Separately, the paper only numerically constructs the almost-real sub-locus (real metric, imaginary Wilson line); the generic complex saddles for arbitrary τ are supported by 10th-order UV/IR matching and analytic limits rather than direct integration. This is an existence/completeness caveat, not a circularity, and therefore does not raise the score further.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard supergravity background results, the external TTI formula, and the holographic dictionary; no free parameter is fitted to the target TTI value. The scheme choice in holographic renormalization is the main non-uniqueness, and it is disclosed by the authors.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The external TTI result log Z = iπ/(12τ) c_l for the universal twist (from refs [4,5]) is correct and applicable to the holographic SCFTs considered.
    Used as the benchmark in Section 3 and matched in Section 5.3; the paper does not derive it from first principles.
  • domain assumption 5d minimal N=2 gauged supergravity is the correct effective theory for the universal TTI, i.e., the relevant degrees of freedom are the metric and graviphoton only.
    Assumed throughout; justified by universality of the energy-momentum multiplet and consistent truncations [26,27] cited in Section 1.
  • domain assumption The classification of supersymmetric solutions of [19] is correct and complete, and the non-extremal supersymmetric solutions fall in the timelike class.
    Invoked in Section 5.1 to impose supersymmetry and to exclude the null class for non-extremal flows.
  • domain assumption The holographic dictionary a = π ℓ_5^3/(8G_5) and c_l = 32/3 (g-1) a (eqs. (3.3), (5.40)) is valid at leading order in N.
    Used to translate the gravitational central charge c into the SCFT anomaly; standard AdS/CFT dictionary.
  • domain assumption The constant curvature metric on Σ_g is a valid representative, and the on-shell action is independent of the complex structure moduli of Σ_g.
    Sections 4 and 6; the paper invokes [88,89] for metric independence but does not prove it for these solutions.
  • standard math Standard mathematical tools: Stokes' theorem, patch-wise integration of Chern-Simons forms, and asymptotic expansions.
    Foundation for the derivations in Section 4 and Appendix A; no ad hoc mathematical postulate is introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Macroscopic origin of the topologically twisted index on $T^2 \times \Sigma_{\mathfrak{g}}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YX7YTTMZ

@misc{pith2026260811299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Macroscopic origin of the topologically twisted index on $T^2 \times \Sigma_\mathfrakg$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YX7YTTMZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11299}
}
abstract

We construct a novel family of non-supersymmetric, asymptotically locally AdS$_5$ solutions of five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity. In Lorentzian signature the solutions describe finite temperature rotating electro-magnetically charged black strings with $S^1\times \Sigma_{\mathfrak{g}}$ horizon topology. In Euclidean signature the solutions are completely smooth and are asymptotic to $T^2\times \Sigma_{\mathfrak{g}}$. We present a detailed analysis of the thermodynamic properties of these gravitational backgrounds, compute their regularized on-shell action and analyze the extremal and supersymmetric limits. The supersymmetric, but non-extremal, limit of the Euclidean backgrounds is a family of complex black saddles and it provides the holographic dual description of the topologically twisted index of 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFTs placed on $T^2\times \Sigma_{\mathfrak{g}}$. We show that the supergravity regularized on-shell action in this limit is in agreement with the large $N$ limit of the topologically twisted index in the dual SCFT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Gauntlett and J.B

    J.P. Gauntlett and J.B. Gutowski,All supersymmetric solutions of minimal gauged supergravity in five-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 105009 [hep-th/0304064]

    arXiv 2003

  2. [1]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes,JHEP10(2019) 062 [1810.11442]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [2]

    Bobev, A.M

    N. Bobev, A.M. Charles and V.S. Min,Euclidean black saddles and AdS4 black holes,JHEP 10(2020) 073 [2006.01148]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,Supersymmetric partition functions on Riemann surfaces,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.96(2017) 13 [1605.06120]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [4]

    Hosseini, A

    S.M. Hosseini, A. Nedelin and A. Zaffaroni,The Cardy limit of the topologically twisted index and black strings in AdS5,JHEP04(2017) 014 [1611.09374]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Hosseini, K

    S.M. Hosseini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni,Microstates of rotating AdS5 strings,JHEP11 (2019) 090 [1909.08000]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [6]

    Benini and N

    F. Benini and N. Bobev,Exact two-dimensional superconformal R-symmetry and c-extremization,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 061601 [1211.4030]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [7]

    Benini and N

    F. Benini and N. Bobev,Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization, JHEP06(2013) 005 [1302.4451]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 95 references
  1. [8]

    Cassani and L

    D. Cassani and L. Papini,The BPS limit of rotating AdS black hole thermodynamics,JHEP 09(2019) 079 [1906.10148]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Cassani and S

    D. Cassani and S. Murthy,Quantum black holes: supersymmetry and exact results, 2502.15360

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Chong, M

    Z.W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 161301 [hep-th/0506029]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Romans,Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory,Nucl

    L.J. Romans,Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory,Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 395 [hep-th/9203018]

    1992 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gutowski and H.S

    J.B. Gutowski and H.S. Reall,Supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,JHEP02(2004) 006 [hep-th/0401042]

    2004 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Cacciatori and D

    S.L. Cacciatori and D. Klemm,Supersymmetric AdS(4) black holes and attractors,JHEP01 (2010) 085 [0911.4926]

    2010 arXiv

  7. [14]

    D. Marolf,Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge, inInternational Conference on Quantization, Gauge Theory, and Strings: Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Professor Efim Fradkin, pp. 312–320, 6, 2000 [hep-th/0006117]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Copsey and G.T

    K. Copsey and G.T. Horowitz,The Role of dipole charges in black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 024015 [hep-th/0505278]

    2006 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Tachikawa,Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms,Class

    Y. Tachikawa,Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 737 [hep-th/0611141]

    2007 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Hanaki, K

    K. Hanaki, K. Ohashi and Y. Tachikawa,Comments on charges and near-horizon data of black rings,JHEP12(2007) 057 [0704.1819]

    2007 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Colombo, V

    E. Colombo, V. Dimitrov, D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni,Patch-wise localization with Chern-Simons forms in five dimensional supergravity,2511.13824. – 69 –

  12. [20]

    Chamseddine and W.A

    A.H. Chamseddine and W.A. Sabra,Magnetic strings in five-dimensional gauged supergravity theories,Phys. Lett. B477(2000) 329 [hep-th/9911195]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Klemm and W.A

    D. Klemm and W.A. Sabra,Supersymmetry of black strings in D = 5 gauged supergravities, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 024003 [hep-th/0001131]

    2000 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bernamonti, M.M

    A. Bernamonti, M.M. Caldarelli, D. Klemm, R. Olea, C. Sieg and E. Zorzan,Black strings in AdS(5),JHEP01(2008) 061 [0708.2402]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hong,The topologically twisted index ofN= 4 SU(N) Super-Yang-Mills theory and a black hole Farey tail,JHEP10(2021) 145 [2108.02355]

    J. Hong,The topologically twisted index ofN= 4 SU(N) Super-Yang-Mills theory and a black hole Farey tail,JHEP10(2021) 145 [2108.02355]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hosseini, K

    S.M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, Y. Tachikawa and A. Zaffaroni,Anomalies, Black strings and the charged Cardy formula,JHEP09(2020) 167 [2006.08629]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hong and J.T

    J. Hong and J.T. Liu,The topologically twisted index ofN= 4 super-Yang-Mills on T2×S 2 and the elliptic genus,JHEP07(2018) 018 [1804.04592]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gauntlett and O

    J.P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 126007 [0707.2315]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gauntlett and O

    J.P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,D=5 SU(2) x U(1) Gauged Supergravity from D=11 Supergravity,JHEP02(2008) 083 [0712.3560]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Benini and A

    F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni,A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories,JHEP07(2015) 127 [1504.03698]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Kim,Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP08(2016) 059 [1605.06531]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Heydeman and C

    M. Heydeman and C. Toldo,Mixed ’t Hooft anomalies and the Witten effect for AdS black holes,JHEP06(2025) 191 [2412.03695]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

    E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283

    1979

  24. [32]

    Caldarelli and D

    M.M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm,Supersymmetry of Anti-de Sitter black holes,Nucl. Phys. B 545(1999) 434 [hep-th/9808097]

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Genolini,Wrapped M5-branes and complex saddle points,JHEP01(2022) 181 [2110.15955]

    P.B. Genolini,Wrapped M5-branes and complex saddle points,JHEP01(2022) 181 [2110.15955]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cassani and Z

    D. Cassani and Z. Komargodski,EFT and the SUSY Index on the 2nd Sheet,SciPost Phys. 11(2021) 004 [2104.01464]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Crisafio, A

    M.K. Crisafio, A. Fontanarossa and D. Martelli,Nuts, bolts and spindles,Lett. Math. Phys. 115(2025) 27 [2412.00428]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Benini, K

    F. Benini, K. Hristov and A. Zaffaroni,Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization,JHEP05(2016) 054 [1511.04085]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hosseini and A

    S.M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni,LargeNmatrix models for3dN= 2theories: twisted index, free energy and black holes,JHEP08(2016) 064 [1604.03122]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Azzurli, N

    F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P.M. Crichigno, V.S. Min and A. Zaffaroni,A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS4,JHEP02(2018) 054 [1707.04257]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Pernici and E

    M. Pernici and E. Sezgin,Spontaneous Compactification of Seven-dimensional Supergravity Theories,Class. Quant. Grav.2(1985) 673. – 70 –

    1985

  32. [40]

    Donos, J.P

    A. Donos, J.P. Gauntlett, N. Kim and O. Varela,Wrapped M5-branes, consistent truncations and AdS/CMT,JHEP12(2010) 003 [1009.3805]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gauntlett, N

    J.P. Gauntlett, N. Kim and D. Waldram,M Five-branes wrapped on supersymmetric cycles, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 126001 [hep-th/0012195]

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 367 [1108.4389]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. Choi, D. Gang and N. Kim,Black holes and large N complex saddles in 3D-3D correspondence,JHEP06(2021) 078 [2012.10944]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bobev, A.M

    N. Bobev, A.M. Charles, D. Gang, K. Hristov and V. Reys,Higher-derivative supergravity, wrapped M5-branes, and theories of classR,JHEP04(2021) 058 [2011.05971]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Terashima and M

    Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki,SL(2,R) Chern-Simons, Liouville, and Gauge Theory on Duality Walls,JHEP08(2011) 135 [1103.5748]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. Gang, N. Kim and S. Lee,Holography of 3d-3d correspondence at LargeN,JHEP04 (2015) 091 [1409.6206]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Gang and N

    D. Gang and N. Kim,LargeNtwisted partition functions in 3d-3d correspondence and Holography,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 021901 [1808.02797]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,N= 1 supersymmetric indices and the four-dimensional A-model,JHEP08(2017) 090 [1707.05774]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gonz´ alez Lezcano, J

    A. Gonz´ alez Lezcano, J. Hong, J.T. Liu and L.A. Pando Zayas,Sub-leading Structures in Superconformal Indices: Subdominant Saddles and Logarithmic Contributions,JHEP01 (2021) 001 [2007.12604]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Arabi Ardehali and S

    A. Arabi Ardehali and S. Murthy,The 4d superconformal index near roots of unity and 3d Chern-Simons theory,JHEP10(2021) 207 [2104.02051]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Closset, L

    C. Closset, L. Di Pietro and H. Kim,’t Hooft anomalies and the holomorphy of supersymmetric partition functions,JHEP08(2019) 035 [1905.05722]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Benini, N

    F. Benini, N. Bobev and P.M. Crichigno,Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes,JHEP 07(2016) 020 [1511.09462]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bobev and P.M

    N. Bobev and P.M. Crichigno,Universal RG Flows Across Dimensions and Holography, JHEP12(2017) 065 [1708.05052]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gauntlett, D

    J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks and D. Waldram,Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S**2 x S**3,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 711 [hep-th/0403002]

    2004 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Benvenuti, S

    S. Benvenuti, S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli and J. Sparks,An Infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals,JHEP06(2005) 064 [hep-th/0411264]

    2005 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gauntlett, O.A.P

    J.P. Gauntlett, O.A.P. Mac Conamhna, T. Mateos and D. Waldram,New supersymmetric AdS(3) solutions,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 106007 [hep-th/0608055]

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Maldacena and C

    J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Maldacena,The Gravity duals of N=2 superconformal field theories,JHEP 10(2012) 189 [0904.4466]. – 71 –

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Benini, Y

    F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa and B. Wecht,Sicilian gauge theories and N=1 dualities,JHEP01 (2010) 088 [0909.1327]

    2010 arXiv

  52. [60]

    I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev and B. Wecht,AdS/CFT Dual Pairs from M5-Branes on Riemann Surfaces,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 121901 [1112.5487]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev and B. Wecht,Four-Dimensional SCFTs from M5-Branes,JHEP 06(2012) 005 [1203.0303]

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Szepietowski,Comments on a-maximization from gauged supergravity,JHEP12(2012) 018 [1209.3025]

    P. Szepietowski,Comments on a-maximization from gauged supergravity,JHEP12(2012) 018 [1209.3025]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Matthew Cheung, J.P

    K.C. Matthew Cheung, J.P. Gauntlett and C. Rosen,Consistent KK truncations for M5-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 225003 [1906.08900]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Nunez and C. Rosen,Consistent truncations of supergravity and1 2-BPS RG flows in4dSCFTs,JHEP03(2020) 080 [1912.13516]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Cassani, G

    D. Cassani, G. Josse, M. Petrini and D. Waldram,N= 2 consistent truncations from wrapped M5-branes,JHEP02(2021) 232 [2011.04775]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bobev, V

    N. Bobev, V. Dimitrov and A. Vekemans,Wrapped M5-branes and AdS5 black holes,JHEP 05(2023) 012 [2212.10360]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Fayyazuddin and J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of N=2, N=1 field theories from three-branes in F theory,JHEP07(1998) 013 [hep-th/9806159]

    1998 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Aharony and Y

    O. Aharony and Y. Tachikawa,A Holographic computation of the central charges of d=4, N=2 SCFTs,JHEP01(2008) 037 [0711.4532]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Cassani, G

    D. Cassani, G. Josse, M. Petrini and D. Waldram,Systematics of consistent truncations from generalised geometry,JHEP11(2019) 017 [1907.06730]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Suryanarayana and M.C

    N.V. Suryanarayana and M.C. Wapler,Charges from Attractors,Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) 5047 [0704.0955]

    2007 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Ntokos and I

    P. Ntokos and I. Papadimitriou,Black hole superpotential as a unifying entropy function and BPS thermodynamics,JHEP03(2022) 058 [2112.05954]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Cassani and D

    D. Cassani and D. Martelli,Supersymmetry on curved spaces and superconformal anomalies, JHEP10(2013) 025 [1307.6567]

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Cassani and D

    D. Cassani and D. Martelli,The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed S1 x S3,JHEP08(2014) 044 [1402.2278]

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Benetti Genolini, D

    P. Benetti Genolini, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and J. Sparks,The holographic supersymmetric Casimir energy,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 021902 [1606.02724]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Benetti Genolini, D

    P. Benetti Genolini, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and J. Sparks,Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry,JHEP02(2017) 132 [1612.06761]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Papadimitriou,Supercurrent anomalies in 4d SCFTs,JHEP07(2017) 038 [1703.04299]

    I. Papadimitriou,Supercurrent anomalies in 4d SCFTs,JHEP07(2017) 038 [1703.04299]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Sabra and O

    W.A. Sabra and O. Vaughan,Euclidean Supergravity in Five Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B760 (2016) 14 [1603.09244]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Benetti Genolini, J.P

    P. Benetti Genolini, J.P. Gauntlett, Y. Jiao, J. Park and J. Sparks,Equivariant localization for D = 5 gauged supergravity,JHEP03(2026) 080 [2508.08207]. – 72 –

    2026 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Pasini and C.S

    G. Pasini and C.S. Shahbazi,Five-dimensional null and time-like supersymmetric geometries, Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 175003 [1512.02211]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Caldarelli and D

    M.M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm,All supersymmetric solutions of N=2, D = 4 gauged supergravity,JHEP09(2003) 019 [hep-th/0307022]

    2003 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Boruch, R

    J. Boruch, R. Emparan, L.V. Iliesiu and S. Murthy,The gravitational index of 5d black holes and black strings,JHEP06(2025) 145 [2501.17909]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Larsen and K

    F. Larsen and K. Sharma,Complex BPS Black Holes in AdS3×S 3,2605.28737

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Nanda, P

    K.K. Nanda, P. Shanmugapriya and A. Virmani,Index saddle for the D1-D5-P black string and its decoupling limit,2606.27093

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cassani and L

    D. Cassani and L. Papini,Squashing the boundary of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes, JHEP12(2018) 037 [1809.02149]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Emparan and H.S

    R. Emparan and H.S. Reall,A Rotating black ring solution in five-dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 101101 [hep-th/0110260]

    2002 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Elvang, R

    H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H.S. Reall,A Supersymmetric black ring,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 211302 [hep-th/0407065]

    2004 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Sparks,Localization in supergravity, 2, 2026 [2602.21782]

    J. Sparks,Localization in supergravity, 2, 2026 [2602.21782]

    2026

  80. [88]

    Anderson, C

    M.T. Anderson, C. Beem, N. Bobev and L. Rastelli,Holographic Uniformization,Commun. Math. Phys.318(2013) 429 [1109.3724]

    2013 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Bobev, F.F

    N. Bobev, F.F. Gautason and K. Parmentier,Holographic Uniformization and Black Hole Attractors,JHEP06(2020) 095 [2004.05110]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Dijkgraaf, J.M

    R. Dijkgraaf, J.M. Maldacena, G.W. Moore and E.P. Verlinde,A Black hole Farey tail, hep-th/0005003

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Bobev, K

    N. Bobev, K. Hristov and V. Reys,AdS5 holography and higher-derivative supergravity, JHEP04(2022) 088 [2112.06961]

    2022 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bobev, V

    N. Bobev, V. Dimitrov, V. Reys and A. Vekemans,Higher derivative corrections and AdS5 black holes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L121903 [2207.10671]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Cassani, A

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez and E. Turetta,Corrections to AdS5 black hole thermodynamics from higher-derivative supergravity,JHEP11(2022) 059 [2208.01007]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Cassani, A

    D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez and E. Turetta,Boundary terms and conserved charges in higher-derivative gauged supergravity,JHEP06(2023) 203 [2304.06101]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Martin and A

    I. Martin and A. Restuccia,Magnetic monopoles over topologically nontrivial Riemann surfaces,Lett. Math. Phys.39(1997) 379 [hep-th/9603035]. – 73 –

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.