Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 93 references

Spontaneous CP Violation and Flavor Changing Neutral Currents in Minimal SO(10)

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that minimal CP-conserving SO(10) forces a second light Higgs doublet whose flavor-changing couplings are locked to a single matrix $V_E$, producing a testable identity Eq.

desk verdict Genuinely new consistency relation connecting cLFV, meson mixing, and proton decay in minimal SO(10), but it still rests on unquantified tree-level hierarchies. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00196 v2 pith:YZ5SPW27 submitted 2024-11-29 hep-ph hep-ex

Xiyuan Gao This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords SO(10)grandunificationspontaneousCPviolationtwo-Higgs-doubletmodelflavor-changingneutralcurrentsprotondecayleptonflavormesonmixingYukawa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the minimal non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified theory, with real couplings enforced by CP symmetry, cannot break CP at the unification scale; the only physical CP violation must come from the electroweak Higgs doublets. That forces a second light Higgs doublet, fine-tuned below roughly 500 GeV, so the low-energy theory is a constrained two-Higgs-doublet model. The model's real, symmetric Yukawa matrices reduce all tree-level flavor-changing couplings to one unknown unitary mixing matrix $V_E$, which also governs the charged-lepton channels of proton decay. The consequence is a leading-order identity, Eq. 34, linking kaon mixing, lepton-flavor-violating collider events, and proton decay branching fractions; verifying it would hint at minimal SO(10), while failure by orders of magnitude would rule it out.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $3\times 3$ unitary matrix $V_E \equiv E^\dagger D$ that rotates between the charged-lepton and down-quark mass eigenbases at the GUT scale. In minimal SO(10) the Yukawa couplings are three real symmetric matrices, so this single matrix, together with the CKM and PMNS matrices, carries all the flavor structure left free by the fermion masses; the coefficients $C_{FF'}$ are dimensionless combinations of the four Higgs-doublet VEVs, generically of order one but not predicted. The paper uses $V_E$ twice: its third column fixes the $H,A\to \ell\ell'$ branching ratios, its ratio $|V_E^{\tau s}|/|V_E^{\tau b}|$ enters kaon mixing through the NMFV expression for $Y_D$, and its $2\times 2$ top-left block fixes the charged-lepton proton decay branching ratios. Unitarity of $V_E$ converts five measured ratios into four unknowns, yielding Eq. 34.

What would settle it

Measure the partial lifetimes of $p\to\pi^+\nu$, $p\to\pi^0 e^+$, $p\to K^0 e^+$ and their muon analogues, the $H,A\to e\mu, e\tau, \mu\tau$ event ratios at a high-luminosity hadron collider, and the neutral-kaon mixing observables $(\Delta M_K)_{\rm NP}$ and $h_d$ with lattice precision; if the two sides of Eq. 34 disagree by more than the few-percent radiative corrections estimated in Appendix B, the minimal CP-conserving SO(10) scenario is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that spontaneous CP violation in minimal SO(10) is possible only at the electroweak scale, and that the resulting second light Higgs doublet has Yukawa couplings fixed by three real symmetric matrices $Y_{10}$, $\widetilde{Y}_{10}$, $Y_{126}$. After rotating to mass eigenbases, all flavor-changing couplings of the new neutral scalars are given by $Y_E$, $Y_D$, $Y_U$, each a linear combination of the charged-lepton, down-quark, and up-quark mass matrices with $O(1)$ coefficients $C_{FF'}$ and the single unitary matrix $V_E = E^\dagger D$. Because $V_E$ also enters the charged-lepton proton decay amplitudes through the symmetric-Yukawa simplification of the general mixing matrices, the model has five experimental observables—two lepton-flavor-violating decay ratios, one kaon-mixing ratio, and two proton-decay combinations—determined by the four independent magnitudes of $V_E$. Eliminating those parameters yields Eq. 34, a tree-level prediction that must hold if minimal CP-conserving SO(10) is correct and next-to-leading-order corrections are small.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central identity assumes the vacuum configuration of the four Higgs-doublet VEVs is generic, so the dimensionless coefficients $C_{FF'}$ are all of order one, and assumes the unknown mixing matrix elements $|V_E^{\ell b}|$ are larger than $O(\lambda^2)$, placing the model in the next-to-minimal flavor-violating branch; if the coefficients sit in the minimal-flavor-violating green band of Figure 3, Eq. 34 need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A second, quasidegenerate Higgs doublet with $m_H \simeq m_A \simeq m_{H^\pm} \lesssim 500$ GeV is a consistency requirement of electroweak-scale SCPV, and the 125 GeV Higgs stays SM-like only because the mixing angles $\alpha_H,\alpha_A$ are small.
  • If proton decay is gauge-mediated, the ratio $\Gamma(p\to\pi^+\nu)/\Gamma(p\to K^+\nu)\approx 81.2$ is fixed, so a measured deviation would signal scalar-leptoquark contributions.
  • The third column of $V_E$ can be extracted from future $H,A\to e\mu,e\tau,\mu\tau$ event ratios; unitarity then determines the full column without knowing absolute cross sections.
  • In the quasidegenerate limit required by electroweak precision, the new-Higgs doublet contributes an approximately CP-conserving piece to $B_d$ and $B_s$ mixing, so large new CP-violating phases would disfavor the model.
  • If Eq. 34 is violated by orders of magnitude, that is evidence either that next-to-leading-order corrections are large or that minimal CP-conserving SO(10) is not the UV theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Hyper-Kamiokande sees proton decay mainly through $p\to\pi^+\nu$ while the LHC sees $H,A\to e\mu$ excesses, the tension would already test the NMFV branch before precision lattice results arrive.
  • A null measurement of $(\Delta M_K)_{\rm NP}$ does not by itself exclude the model, because the MFV green-band branch of Figure 3 hides the $V_E$ dependence; the decisive regime is where both $(\Delta M_K)_{\rm NP}$ and $h_d$ are sizable.
  • The $V_E$-lock mechanism is likely a generic feature of unified theories with a symmetric Yukawa sector, so an analogous identity could be derived for other grand-unified embeddings; testing Eq. 34 first would establish whether proton decay can serve as a general flavor probe beyond minimal SO(10).
  • The twin-peak signature, two mass-degenerate resonances near 300-500 GeV decaying to $e\mu$, $e\tau$, and $\mu\tau$, is a concrete collider target that would distinguish electroweak-scale SCPV from ordinary 2HDM constructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper explores spontaneous CP violation in the minimal non-supersymmetric SO(10) GUT with all renormalizable couplings real, a scalar sector of 45_H, 126_H, and a complex 10_H, and CP broken only by complex electroweak VEVs. It argues that electroweak-scale SCPV requires a light second Higgs doublet, and derives the low-energy Yukawa textures Y_E, Y_D, Y_U in terms of the unknown unitary matrix V_E and coefficients C_FF'. Assuming the NMFV branch for the down-quark sector and dropping the C_DU term, it correlates charged-lepton flavor-violating resonance ratios, B_d/B_s and K meson mixing, and proton decay branching fractions, culminating in the consistency relation Eq. (34). The paper also discusses constraints from electroweak precision, collider searches, and cosmology.

Significance. The central idea is attractive and the paper has real strengths: Eq. (34) is a consistency relation among independent future observables in which V_E is eliminated by unitarity; the assumptions are stated openly, including the biased domain-wall term, the non-predicted C_FF' coefficients, and the indeterminate RG running above M_I; and the paper proposes a concrete, falsifiable test connecting proton decay to FCNC observables. If the NMFV branch and the neglected C_DU term were justified, this would be a valuable new probe of minimal SO(10). However, the manuscript does not quantify the tree-level contamination in the down-quark sector, the RG uncertainty admitted in Appendix B, or the hadronic and parameter-space uncertainties, so Eq. (34) is not yet established as a robust prediction of the model. The paper's value lies in proposing the test and identifying the conditions under which it would discriminate.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (28) with Eq. (19)] The derivation of Eq. (28) drops the C_DU term in Y_D without quantifying when it is negligible. From Eq. (19), Y_D^{bq} contains C_DE (m_tau/v) V_E^{tau b} V_E^{tau q} plus C_DU (m_t/v) V_CKM^{t b} V_CKM^{t q} (up to small corrections). The paper only imposes |C_DU| <~ 0.013 (Eq. (21)) and leaves C_DE unpredicted, 'in general all around O(1)' (Sec. 2.3). For the B_d channel, the ratio of the dropped term to the kept term is r = (C_DU/C_DE)(m_t/m_tau)(V_tb V_td)/(V_E^{tau b} V_E^{tau d}). Taking |C_DU| near the Eq. (21) bound, m_t/m_tau ~ 100, |V_td| ~ 0.008, and |V_E^{tau d}| as small as O(0.05) (compatible with unitarity and the NMFV condition), r is O(0.2-1) for C_DE ~ 0.2-1, not negligible. Hence h_d does not isolate |V_E^{tau b} V_E^{tau d}|^2, and the ratio |V_E^{tau s}|^2/|V_E^{tau b}|^2 entering Eq. (34) carries an O(1) tree-level model uncertainty. The paper needs a quantitative condition or a scan over C_FF' establishing when Eq. (34) is valid; as it stands, the central relation is not a locked prediction of the model.
  2. [Sec. 3.2 and Appendix B, Eq. (34)] Equation (34) is presented as a leading-order GUT-scale relation, but the observables are low-energy quantities. Appendix B explicitly states that the running between M_GUT and M_I is indeterminate because the physics around M_I is not accessible, and only the running below M_I is well defined, with corrections estimated at about 3% (Eq. (42)). The hadronic matrix elements in Appendix C also carry few-percent lattice uncertainties, and no error is propagated through Eqs. (28), (31), or (34). The paper should provide an explicit error budget and state what deviation from Eq. (34) would falsify minimal SO(10) rather than merely indicate next-to-leading-order corrections; otherwise the claim that the two sides 'can differ by orders of magnitude' is not a quantitative prediction.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Fig. 3] The entire derivation assumes the NMFV branch of Y_D and |V_E^{ell b}| much larger than O(lambda^2). The paper itself says in Sec. 4 that the vacuum configuration 'cannot be clearly predicted from the scalar potential of SO(10)', and Sec. 2.3 states that the C_FF' coefficients are not predicted. Figure 3 shows a narrow green band in which the relation of Eq. (28) fails because |V_E^{tau s}|/|V_E^{tau b}| is below about lambda^2. No probability, prior, or parameter-space scan is attached to this branch choice, so Eq. (34) is a conditional prediction of the NMFV branch rather than a generic prediction of minimal SO(10). This conditionality should be stated as prominently as the prediction itself.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (27)] The denominator for the B_d matrix element appears to contain a typo: it should be <B0_d|b_L d_R b_R d_L|B0_d>, not <B0_d|...|B0_s>.
  2. [Eq. (22)] The expression sigma(pp -> H,A) x Br(H,A -> ell ell') proportional to |Y_E^{ell ell'}|^2 conflates production and decay; the relation should be stated for efficiency-normalized event counts, as in Eq. (23), and should account for the mass dependence of the production cross section.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, text after Eq. (28)] The sentence 'assuming |V_E^{tau d}| is already extracted from the LFV decay of H or A' appears inconsistent with Eq. (23), which extracts the third-column elements |V_E^{ell b}|; the third-row element |V_E^{tau d}| would instead be obtained from unitarity once |V_E^{tau s}| and |V_E^{tau b}| are known.
  4. [Fig. 3] The vertical axis label |(Delta M_K)_NP| should include units (GeV), and the caption should define the white and green regions explicitly rather than only describing them in the text.
  5. [Table 1] The entries for h_d and h_s are quoted without stating whether the new-physics contribution is assumed to be real or complex; the phase sigma_q in Eq. (25) can matter for the correlation and should be specified.
  6. [Sec. 2.1] Typo: 'complified' should be 'complexified'; also 'an 126H' should be 'a 126H' in a few places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Eq 34 is a consistency relation among independent future observables with V_E eliminated via unitarity; no fitted input or self-citation is load-bearing.

full rationale

Eq 34 is derived by combining Eq 23 (leptonic LFV ratios), Eq 28 (neutral-meson mixing ratio in the NMFV branch), and Eq 33 (proton decay ratios), then eliminating the four independent |V_E| magnitudes using unitarity. The final relation is an algebraic consequence of the model's tree-level flavor structure, not an input: the same V_E combinations appear on both sides only after the SO(10)-constrained Yukawa textures are imposed. The paper's own caveats — that C_FF' are not predicted (Sec 2.3), that the vacuum configuration cannot be clearly predicted (Sec 4), and that the Appendix A discussion is 'not robust' — are openly stated limitations and branch choices, not hidden fits. The skeptic's concern that the C_DU term dropped in Eq 28 is unquantified is a soundness or model-dependence issue, not circularity: Eq 34 remains an externally falsifiable consistency check that could fail by orders of magnitude. No load-bearing self-citations occur, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything below depends on the assumed scalar sector, the CP transformation, and the generic-character assumption for the VEV ratios. The paper is honest that it cannot predict either the vacuum configuration or V_E; its contribution is a set of relative-rate relations that are independent of these unknowns at leading order, provided the NMFV branch is realized. The counts: no parameters fitted to data, but two unquantified model parameters (C_FF', Higgs masses) and six structural assumptions; one effective perturbation is added to solve the domain-wall problem.

free parameters (2)
  • Coefficients C_FF' (ratios of Higgs VEVs, Eq 16) = unknown, assumed O(1), C_EU = C_DU small
    The scalar potential does not predict the VEV configuration (Sec 4). The low-energy Yukawa couplings Y_E, Y_D, Y_U are linear combinations of these ratios; the paper assumes O(1) values to derive the flavor relations, with C_EU = C_DU suppressed below 0.013 by B_s mixing (Eq 21).
  • Quasidegenerate second-Higgs masses m_H, m_A, m_H+ = approx 500 GeV, quasidegenerate
    Electroweak-scale SCPV requires a light second doublet; perturbative unitarity bounds m_H below about 485-545 GeV (Eq 7, [30]). Exact masses are not predicted, and the T parameter forces m_H+ ~ m_H ~ m_A (Sec 3.1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Exact CP invariance of the renormalizable Lagrangian with the CP transformation 45H -> 45H, 126H -> 126H, 10H -> 10H* (Eq 2).
    This defines the scenario. The paper notes that alternative CP definitions could allow imaginary couplings and high-scale SCPV (Sec 2, remark about [21]).
  • domain assumption Minimal scalar content: one CP-even 45H, one 126H, one complex 10H, with the breaking chain of Eq 1.
    Defines "minimal SO(10)" used throughout; other scalar sectors allow different intermediate symmetries [3,34].
  • domain assumption The low-energy spectrum contains exactly one additional light Higgs doublet, fine-tuned to the electroweak scale, with masses bounded by perturbative unitarity below about 500 GeV.
    Required for electroweak-scale SCPV; the paper relies on [28,30] and does not derive the fine-tuning or the spectrum from the scalar potential.
  • ad hoc to paper A tiny CP-odd biased term from quantum gravity destabilizes degenerate vacua with negligible low-energy effects.
    Invoked in Sec 2 to solve the domain wall problem; no explicit model or size estimate is provided.
  • domain assumption Tree-level GUT-scale matching with only small (percent-level) RG corrections between M_GUT and M_EW.
    Appendix B states the running between M_GUT and M_I is indeterminate and assumes the corrections remain small; if they are large, Eq 34 fails.
  • domain assumption No accidental cancellations among elements of the mass matrix relation Eq 36; V_E has no imposed texture.
    Appendix A says the discussion "is not robust" and "even with moderate cancellation, the predictions could change significantly."

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spontaneous CP Violation and Flavor Changing Neutral Currents in Minimal SO(10)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZ5SPW27

@misc{pith2026241200196,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spontaneous CP Violation and Flavor Changing Neutral Currents in Minimal SO(10)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZ5SPW27}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00196}
}
abstract

We explore spontaneous CP violation (SCPV) in the minimal non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified theory (GUT), with a scalar sector comprising a CP-even $45_H$, a $126_H$, and a complex $10_H$. All renormalizable couplings are real due to CP symmetry, and the Kobayashi-Maskawa phase arises solely from complex electroweak vacuum expectation values. The model requires an additional Higgs doublet fine-tuned below 500 GeV and constrains new Yukawa couplings, linking certain flavor-violating (FV) processes. Future proton decay observations may reveal correlated FV decay ratios, offering insights into minimal SO(10).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00196 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Geometrical illustration of spontaneous CP violation together with U(1)Y , based on the planar diagram of T.Lee [18] (FIG-1). The “Mexican Hat”-like potential itself has rotation (U(1)Y ) and reflection (CP) symmetries, but the stable physical solution does not, when the balls fall into the valleys and the spring is relaxed. The light-red ball implies there is a mirror solution θ → −θ, and nature has to choose one a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proton decay, LFV, and neutral meson oscillation are linked through a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. |(∆MK)NP| versus hd, where the dependence of |V τs E |/|V τ b E | is represented by the color scale on the right. The white color indicates |V τs E |/|V τ b E | ≳ 1, implying large mixing angles in VE. The relationship of Eq 28 generally holds, except for the narrow green band of |V τs E |/|V τ b E | ≲ λ 2 ∼ 0.04. Parameter extraction becomes challenging when hd → 0 and |(∆MK)NP| → 0, since SM is revealed in this li… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Lifetimes for various proton decay modes as a function of the magnitudes of elements in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski,Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons, Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193–266

    1975

  2. [2]

    Shafi and C

    Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Gauge Hierarchies and the Unification Mass, Phys. Lett. B85 (1979) 52–56

    1979

  3. [3]

    Bertolini, L

    S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky,Intermediate mass scales in the non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification: A Reappraisal, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 015013, [0903.4049]

    arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati,A Natural Left-Right Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2558

    1975

  5. [5]

    Senjanovic and R

    G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra,Exact Left-Right Symmetry and Spontaneous Violation of Parity, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 1502

    1975

  6. [6]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam,Lepton Number as the Fourth Color, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 275–289

    1974

  7. [7]

    Preda, G

    A. Preda, G. Senjanovic and M. Zantedeschi,SO(10): A case for hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B838 (2023) 137746, [2201.02785]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Minimal SO(10) ante portas: the importance of being effective

    A. Preda, G. Senjanović and M. Zantedeschi,Minimal SO(10) near the edge: The importance of being effective, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 015036, [2410.19408]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    R. Foot, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas,Electric charge quantization, J. Phys. G19 (1993) 361–372, [hep-ph/9209259]

    1993 arXiv

  2. [10]

    K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra,Is There a Connection Between Quantization of Electric Charge and a Majorana Neutrino?, Phys. Rev. Lett.63 (1989) 938

    1989

  3. [11]

    Dueck and W

    A. Dueck and W. Rodejohann,Fits to SO(10) Grand Unified Models, JHEP 09 (2013) 024, [1306.4468]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    K. S. Babu, B. Bajc and S. Saad,Yukawa Sector of Minimal SO(10) Unification, JHEP 02 (2017) 136, [1612.04329]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ohlsson and M

    T. Ohlsson and M. Pernow,Fits to Non-Supersymmetric SO(10) Models with Type I and II Seesaw Mechanisms Using Renormalization Group Evolution, JHEP 06 (2019) 085, [1903.08241]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    N. Haba, Y. Shimizu and T. Yamada,Neutrino Mass in Non-SupersymmetricSO(10) GUT, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 095005, [2304.06263]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    L. D. Landau,On the conservation laws for weak interactions, Nucl. Phys.3 (1957) 127–131

    1957

  8. [16]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri,Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.383 (2021) 1669–1804, [1810.05338]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa,CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys.49 (1973) 652–657

    1973

  10. [18]

    T. D. Lee,A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 1226–1239. 20

    1973

  11. [19]

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P. Silva,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept.516 (2012) 1–102, [1106.0034]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    H. E. Haber and Z. Surujon,A Group-theoretic Condition for Spontaneous CP Violation, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 075007, [1201.1730]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chang, R

    D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Connection Between Cosmological Matter - Antimatter Asymmetry and CP Nonconservation inK Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.53 (1984) 1419

    1984

  14. [22]

    Chang, R

    D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra and M. K. Parida,A New Approach to Left-Right Symmetry Breaking in Unified Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 1052

    1984

  15. [23]

    K. M. Patel,Minimal spontaneous CP-violating GUT and predictions for leptonic CP phases, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 075041, [2212.04095]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Higgs Parity Grand Unification, JHEP 11 (2019) 033, [1905.12722]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. J. Baldwin and K. Harigaya,Electroweak-Charged Dark Matter and SO(10) Unification with Parity, 2407.01696

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    B. Bajc, A. Melfo, G. Senjanovic and F. Vissani,Yukawa sector in non-supersymmetric renormalizable SO(10), Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 055001, [hep-ph/0510139]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bertolini, L

    S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky,Seesaw Scale in the Minimal Renormalizable SO(10) Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 095014, [1202.0807]

    2012 arXiv

  20. [28]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović,Higgs-boson effects in grand unified theories, Phys. Rev. D27 (Apr, 1983) 1601–1612

    1983

  21. [29]

    Nebot, F

    M. Nebot, F. J. Botella and G. C. Branco,Vacuum Induced CP Violation Generating a Complex CKM Matrix with Controlled Scalar FCNC, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 711, [1808.00493]

    2019

  22. [30]

    Nierste, M

    U. Nierste, M. Tabet and R. Ziegler,Cornering Spontaneous CP Violation with Charged-Higgs-Boson Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 031801, [1912.11501]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    G. C. Branco and R. N. Mohapatra,Complex CKM from spontaneous CP violation without flavor changing neutral current, Phys. Lett. B643 (2006) 115–123, [hep-ph/0607271]

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Milagre and L

    A. Milagre and L. Lavoura,Unitarity constraints on large multiplets of arbitrary gauge groups, Nucl. Phys. B1004 (2024) 116542, [2403.12914]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jarkovská, M

    K. Jarkovská, M. Malinský and V. Susič,Trouble with the minimal renormalizable SO(10) GUT, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 055003, [2304.14227]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ferrari, T

    S. Ferrari, T. Hambye, J. Heeck and M. H. G. Tytgat,SO(10) paths to dark matter, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 055032, [1811.07910]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    N. G. Deshpande, E. Keith and P. B. Pal,Implications of LEP results for SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D46 (1993) 2261–2264

    1993

  28. [36]

    N. G. Deshpande, E. Keith and P. B. Pal,Implications of LEP results for SO(10) grand unification with two intermediate stages, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 2892–2896, [hep-ph/9211232]. 21

    1993 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev and L. B. Okun,Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67 (1974) 3–11

    1974

  30. [38]

    Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature, Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 3357–3378

    1974

  31. [39]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Soft CP Violation at High Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.42 (1979) 1651

    1979

  32. [40]

    G. R. Dvali and G. Senjanovic,Is there a domain wall problem?, Phys. Rev. Lett.74 (1995) 5178–5181, [hep-ph/9501387]

    1995 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. R. Dvali, A. Melfo and G. Senjanovic,Nonrestoration of spontaneously broken P and CP at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 7857–7866, [hep-ph/9601376]

    1996 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Vilenkin,Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 852–857

    1981

  35. [43]

    G. B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser and E. W. Kolb,Cosmology of Biased Discrete Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 1558

    1989

  36. [44]

    Rai and G

    B. Rai and G. Senjanovic,Gravity and domain wall problem, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 2729–2733, [hep-ph/9301240]

    1994 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki and K. Saikawa,Gravitational Waves from Collapsing Domain Walls, JCAP 05 (2010) 032, [1002.1555]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    N. Chen, T. Li, Z. Teng and Y. Wu,Collapsing domain walls in the two-Higgs-doublet model and deep insights from the EDM, JHEP 10 (2020) 081, [2006.06913]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    V. S. Mummidi and K. M. Patel,Leptogenesis and fermion mass fit in a renormalizable SO(10) model, JHEP 12 (2021) 042, [2109.04050]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R. N. Mohapatra and B. Sakita,SO(2n) Grand Unification in an SU(N) Basis, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 1062

    1980

  41. [49]

    B. Bajc, G. Senjanovic and F. Vissani,b - tau unification and large atmospheric mixing: A Case for noncanonical seesaw, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 051802, [hep-ph/0210207]

    2003 arXiv

  42. [50]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker,The Strength of Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies and the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977) 883–885

    1977

  43. [51]

    C. Miró, M. Nebot and D. Queiroz,Light states in real multi-Higgs models with spontaneous CP violation, 2411.00084

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Inoue, M

    S. Inoue, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and Y. Zhang,CP-violating phenomenology of flavor conserving two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 115023, [1403.4257]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Aad et al.,A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52–59, [2207.00092]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52–59, [2207.00092]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber,The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: The Approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 075019, [hep-ph/0207010]

    2003 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Agashe, M

    K. Agashe, M. Papucci, G. Perez and D. Pirjol,Next to minimal flavor violation, hep-ph/0509117

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    D’Ambrosio, G

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia,Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B645 (2002) 155–187, [hep-ph/0207036]. 22

    2002 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi,A New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964–967

    1990

  50. [58]

    H.-J. He, N. Polonsky and S.-f. Su,Extra families, Higgs spectrum and oblique corrections, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 053004, [hep-ph/0102144]

    2001 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Grimus, L

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid and P. Osland,A Precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models, J. Phys. G35 (2008) 075001, [0711.4022]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group collaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001

    2024

  53. [61]

    Aaltonen et al.,High-precision measurement of theW boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376 (2022) 170–176

    CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al.,High-precision measurement of theW boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376 (2022) 170–176

    2022

  54. [62]

    K. S. Babu, S. Jana and V. P. K.,Correlating W-Boson Mass Shift with Muon g-2 in the Two Higgs Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 121803, [2204.05303]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking

    A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept.457 (2008) 1–216, [hep-ph/0503172]

    2008 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking

    A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept.459 (2008) 1–241, [hep-ph/0503173]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Tumasyan et al.,Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks inτ τfinal states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 07 (2023) 073, [2208.02717]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks inτ τfinal states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 07 (2023) 073, [2208.02717]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    K. J. F. Gaemers and F. Hoogeveen,Higgs Production and Decay Into Heavy Flavors With the Gluon Fusion Mechanism, Phys. Lett. B146 (1984) 347–349

    1984

  59. [67]

    Dicus, A

    D. Dicus, A. Stange and S. Willenbrock,Higgs decay to top quarks at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B333 (1994) 126–131, [hep-ph/9404359]

    1994 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Aad et al.,ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, 2405.04914

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, 2405.04914

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark pair in 140 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 08 (2024) 013, [2404.18986]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Bona et al.,Overview and theoretical prospects for CKM matrix and CP violation from the UTfit Collaboration, PoS WIFAI2023(2024) 007

    M. Bona et al.,Overview and theoretical prospects for CKM matrix and CP violation from the UTfit Collaboration, PoS WIFAI2023(2024) 007

    2024

  63. [71]

    Tumasyan et al.,Search for heavy resonances and quantum black holes in eµ, eτ, and µτ final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2023) 227, [2205.06709]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Search for heavy resonances and quantum black holes in eµ, eτ, and µτ final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2023) 227, [2205.06709]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Crivellin, A

    A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu and C. Greub,Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 094031, [1303.5877]

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Charles, S

    J. Charles, S. Descotes-Genon, Z. Ligeti, S. Monteil, M. Papucci, K. Trabelsi et al.,New physics in B meson mixing: future sensitivity and limitations, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 056023, [2006.04824]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Abada et al.,FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2, Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al.,FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. ST228 (2019) 261–623. 23

    2019

  67. [75]

    Z. Bai, N. H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C. T. Sachrajda, A. Soni and J. Yu,KL − KS Mass Difference from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 112003, [1406.0916]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Wang,Calculating ∆mK with lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2021(2022) 141, [2301.01387]

    B. Wang,Calculating ∆mK with lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2021(2022) 141, [2301.01387]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Blum et al.,Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022, 2203.10998

    T. Blum et al.,Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022, 2203.10998

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Abouzaid et al.,Precise Measurements of Direct CP Violation, CPT Symmetry, and Other Parameters in the Neutral Kaon System, Phys

    KTeV collaboration, E. Abouzaid et al.,Precise Measurements of Direct CP Violation, CPT Symmetry, and Other Parameters in the Neutral Kaon System, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 092001, [1011.0127]

    2011 arXiv

  71. [79]

    HFLA Vcollaboration, Y. S. Amhis et al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, andτ-lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 052008, [2206.07501]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Fileviez Perez,Fermion mixings versus d = 6 proton decay, Phys

    P. Fileviez Perez,Fermion mixings versus d = 6 proton decay, Phys. Lett. B595 (2004) 476–483, [hep-ph/0403286]

    2004 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Nath and P

    P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez,Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes, Phys. Rept.441 (2007) 191–317, [hep-ph/0601023]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Abe et al.,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report, 1805.04163

    Hyper-Kamiokande collaboration, K. Abe et al.,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report, 1805.04163

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Takenaka et al.,Search for proton decay via p → e+π0 and p → µ+π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, A. Takenaka et al.,Search for proton decay via p → e+π0 and p → µ+π0 with an enlarged fiducial volume in Super-Kamiokande I-IV, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 112011, [2010.16098]

    2020

  76. [84]

    Abe et al.,Search for Nucleon Decay vian → ¯νπ 0 and p → ¯νπ + in Super-Kamiokande, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K. Abe et al.,Search for Nucleon Decay vian → ¯νπ 0 and p → ¯νπ + in Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 121802, [1305.4391]

    2014 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Kobayashi et al.,Search for nucleon decay via modes favored by supersymmetric grand unification models in Super-Kamiokande-I, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K. Kobayashi et al.,Search for nucleon decay via modes favored by supersymmetric grand unification models in Super-Kamiokande-I, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 052007, [hep-ex/0502026]

    2005 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Matsumoto et al.,Search for proton decay via p → µ+K0 in 0.37 megaton-years exposure of Super-Kamiokande, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, R. Matsumoto et al.,Search for proton decay via p → µ+K0 in 0.37 megaton-years exposure of Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 072003, [2208.13188]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Abe et al.,Search for proton decay viap → νK + using 260 kiloton·year data of Super-Kamiokande, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K. Abe et al.,Search for proton decay viap → νK + using 260 kiloton·year data of Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 072005, [1408.1195]

    2014 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Senjanović,Natural Philosophy versus Philosophy of Naturalness, Mod

    G. Senjanović,Natural Philosophy versus Philosophy of Naturalness, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 (2020) 2030006, [2001.10988]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Dvali,Cosmological Relaxation of Higgs Mass Before and After LHC and Naturalness, 1908.05984

    G. Dvali,Cosmological Relaxation of Higgs Mass Before and After LHC and Naturalness, 1908.05984

    1908 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Y. Aoki, T. Izubuchi, E. Shintani and A. Soni,Improved lattice computation of proton decay matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 014506, [1705.01338]

    2017 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Gabbiani, E

    F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini,A Complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 321–352, [hep-ph/9604387]. 24

    1996 arXiv

  84. [92]

    R. J. Dowdall, C. T. H. Davies, R. R. Horgan, G. P. Lepage, C. J. Monahan, J. Shigemitsu et al.,Neutral B-meson mixing from full lattice QCD at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 094508, [1907.01025]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    RBC, UKQCD collaboration, P. A. Boyle, F. Erben, J. M. Flynn, N. Garron, J. Kettle, R. Mukherjee et al.,Kaon mixing beyond the standard model with physical masses, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 034501, [2404.02297]. 25

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.