Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 88 references

Thiolation and PEGylation of silicon carbide nanoparticle

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that few-nanometer silicon carbide nanoparticles can gain reactive thiol groups in water, be PEGylated through maleimide conjugation, and keep their blue-shifted photoluminescence, making them viable bioinert probes and…

desk verdict Plausible first thiolation of ultrasmall SiC NPs, but the key evidence is one 0.9% XPS component and no thiol-specific assay; deserves review but needs major strengthening. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08469 v2 pith:YZPSGHM4 submitted 2025-02-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords siliconcarbidenanoparticlesthiolfunctionalizationPEGylationmaleimideconjugationthiol–maleimideadditionXPSsurfaceanalysisphotoluminescencequantumsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a surface-chemistry recipe for attaching thiol (–SH) groups to few-nanometer silicon carbide (SiC) nanoparticles in water, then capping those thiols with maleimide-terminated PEG chains. The authors' central claim is that the thiolation works—X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and a thiol–maleimide coupling test all point to reactive sulfur on the particle surface—and that the particles keep their photoluminescence after modification, with a blue shift in the emission. If correct, the method supplies the missing thiol handle on SiC nanoparticles: a generic anchor for bioconjugation and sensing on a material that can also host room-temperature defect qubits. That combination is what would make ultrasmall fluorescent SiC particles useful as bioinert quantum sensors.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a two-step aqueous surface conversion: NaBH4 reduction of the oxidized SiC surface to hydroxyl-terminated SiC–OH, then reaction with thiourea in HBr/acetic acid to install C–SH and C=S sites. The paper tracks this conversion with infrared spectroscopy and XPS, using the S2p and C1s binding-energy fits, and uses thiol–maleimide addition to 4-arm PEG-maleimide as a chemical proof that the thiols are accessible. The photoluminescence emission energy serves as a secondary, surface-sensitive readout because in this size regime the emission is tied to the HOMO of the surface groups.

What would settle it

Run the identical thiourea/HBr protocol on SiC–COOH particles that skipped the NaBH4 reduction step, and on a non-SiC oxide particle such as silica, then measure the sulfur X-ray spectrum and assay maleimide coupling; a comparable 163.5 eV signal or comparable coupling on the controls would show the sulfur signal is not specific to the reduced SiC surface.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports thiol termination of few-nanometer silicon carbide nanoparticles: starting from HF/HNO3-etched SiC nanocrystals, it reduces the surface with NaBH4 and then converts the surface groups to thiols using thiourea in an HBr/acetic acid mixture. The resulting SiC–SH particles carry 4.4 at% sulfur by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), with a small S2p component assigned to C–SH and a larger sulfate fraction, and they react with 4-arm maleimide–PEG through thiol–maleimide addition to form SiC–S–PEG. The paper argues that PEGylation shifts the thione–thiol equilibrium toward thiol and protects the remaining thiols from oxidation. Photoluminescence measurements show that thiolated particles remain emissive, with a blue shift relative to the carboxyl-terminated starting material and a further blue shift after PEG conjugation, which the authors attribute to the surface HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) being pulled down by the more electronegative sulfur species. The intended consequence is a reactive, fluorescent, bioinert SiC nanoparticle surface that can later be combined with room-temperature defect qubits.

Load-bearing premise

The claim of successful thiol termination rests on a tiny signal in the sulfur X-ray spectrum (0.9% of one peak, at 163.5 eV) being genuine surface thiol, while 87% of the sulfur signal is oxidized sulfate; if that small component is instead leftover thiourea or adsorbed sulfur, the central conclusion weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Maleimide-functionalized biomolecules, dyes, or polymers can be conjugated to SiC–SH nanoparticles, making the thiol a general bioconjugation anchor.
  • PEGylation preserves residual thiols and gives a soft, polymer-embedded particle that is more colloidally stable and less prone to oxidation.
  • The surface chemistry tunes the emission color: carboxyl, hydroxyl/thiol, and thioether terminations each shift the photoluminescence, so emission can report the surface state.
  • Because the particles remain fluorescent after both modifications, they can serve as bioinert imaging probes while retaining the possibility of hosting defect qubits for quantum sensing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that the photoluminescence shift after maleimide coupling could serve as an in situ readout of the coupling reaction, since the emission energy responds to sulfur bonding.
  • A decisive control the paper does not report is a thiol-specific colorimetric assay or Raman detection of the S–H stretch; either would separate true surface thiols from the sulfate signal that dominates the XPS spectrum.
  • The same reduction-then-thiourea sequence is generic enough that it may transfer to other oxide-terminated semiconductor nanoparticles, though the paper only demonstrates it on SiC.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports aqueous-phase thiol termination of few-nanometer silicon carbide nanoparticles (SiC-SH) and subsequent conjugation with 4-arm PEG-maleimide (SiC-S-PEG). The authors characterize the particles by AFM, HRTEM, FTIR, XPS, and photoluminescence, and they claim successful thiol termination based primarily on a small S2p component assigned to C–SH, plus reactivity toward maleimide-PEG inferred from changes in the S2p spectrum. They further report a blue shift in photoluminescence after thiolation and after PEGylation, and they argue that these surface-engineered SiC NPs are promising for bioimaging and quantum sensing.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, this would be the first report of thiol-terminated SiC nanoparticles and would provide a useful bioconjugation platform for fluorescent and potentially quantum-enabled SiC nanoprobes. The manuscript has strengths: the synthetic protocol is described in detail, AFM size distributions are provided for multiple samples, HRTEM and electron diffraction support the SiC composition, and the XPS fitting parameters are stated explicitly. However, the key chemical evidence for thiol termination is very thin: the only direct signal assigned to C–SH is 0.9% of the S2p3/2 intensity in a sample whose sulfur is 87% sulfate, and the FTIR data explicitly show no detectable S–H, C–S, or S–S vibrations. The PEGylation claim likewise rests on an inferred thioether component without an independent thiol-specific assay. The optical characterization is presented without normalization, error bars, or replicate data. The paper is therefore scientifically promising but not yet convincing in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Table 3] The central claim of successful thiol termination rests on a single S2p3/2 component at 163.5 eV assigned to C–SH with an intensity ratio of 0.9%, while 87% of the sulfur signal is assigned to sulfate and the total sulfur content is 4.4 at%. This corresponds to roughly 0.04 at% of the probed sample volume, and the manuscript itself states in the FTIR discussion that C–S, –S–H, and –S–S vibrations were not detectable. Because the 163.5 eV region can also contain contributions from residual thiourea, adsorbed sulfur species, or fitting artifacts, the present data do not by themselves establish that the particles carry thiol groups; an independent thiol-specific assay (e.g., Ellman's test, Raman/SERS, or a derivatization reaction with a detectable maleimide probe) and a negative control without thiourea are required.
  2. [Section 3, Table 3 and the paragraph beginning 'Interestingly, an additional low-energy peak'] The assignment of the 158.7 eV component to S–Nb bonds with the niobium XPS substrate is speculative and is not supported by a reference measurement of the bare substrate or of a thiol-containing solution on niobium. If unprotected thiols are consumed by the substrate, then the S2p signal cannot be used as a quantitative measure of the nanoparticle surface composition, and the 0.9% C–SH fraction could either overestimate or underestimate the actual nanoparticle-bound sulfur; this ambiguity directly affects the central claim and should be resolved by control experiments or by using a non-reactive substrate.
  3. [Section 3, Table 3 and the discussion of SiC-S-PEG] The increase of the 163.3 eV component from 0.9% to 25.4% after incubation with maleimide-PEG is interpreted as thioether formation and a shift of the thione–thiol equilibrium, but this interpretation is not unique. Thiol–maleimide conjugation consumes free thiols, and the new component could also contain unreacted maleimide, altered sulfate speciation, or adsorbed PEG-sulfur species; without a thiol-specific detection method or a control reaction with a non-maleimide PEG, the PEGylation claim remains underdetermined.
  4. [Section 3, Figure 6 and the photoluminescence paragraph] The PL spectra are presented without intensity normalization, error bars, replicate measurements, or quantum yield data, so the reported blue shifts and the claim that thiolation and PEGylation 'preserve favorable optical properties' are not quantitatively supported. The comparison between SiC-SH and SiC-S-PEG should at minimum include normalized spectra from repeated independent syntheses and, ideally, absolute quantum yield measurements.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, Figures 2 and 4] The FTIR spectra are captioned as 'Figure 2' even though Figure 2 has already been used for HRTEM; renumber the figures consistently throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Table 4] Table 4 contains the typo 'SiC-COOOH' instead of 'SiC-COOH'.
  3. [Section 3, FTIR paragraph] The phrase 'PEG of SiC-COOH NPs' is confusing; clarify which sample is meant, since SiC-S-PEG is the only PEGylated nanoparticle sample described in the methods.
  4. [Section 2.2, XPS methods] The sentence 'a 1:2 ratio of S2p1/2:S2p3/2' should specify that this is the intensity ratio used in the fit, and the spin-orbit splitting of 1.2 eV should be stated as a fixed parameter.
  5. [Section 3, before the PL paragraph] The sentence 'Combining elemental analysis, FTIR, and XRD confirms successful surface modification' refers to XRD data that are not presented anywhere in the manuscript; the only diffraction information is electron diffraction on SiC-SH, so either add the XRD data or correct the sentence.
  6. [Data Availability Statement] The Data Availability Statement contains typos and should read 'All data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an experimental characterization whose claims rest on direct spectral and microscopic evidence, not on a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization study; its claims (thiolation via aqueous-phase chemistry, PEGylation via thiol-Michael addition, retention of fluorescence) are supported by directly measured FTIR, XPS, EDS, HRTEM, AFM, and PL data rather than derived from a model whose parameters are fit to the quantity being predicted. The XPS peak-fitting constraints (S2p 1/2:S2p3/2 = 1:2, 1.2 eV separation, GL30 line shape) are standard instrumental conventions, and the 163.5 eV component at 0.9% relative intensity is the direct spectroscopic evidence assigned to C–SH, not a prediction generated from it. The paper explicitly acknowledges the FTIR limitation that C–S, –S–H, and –S–S vibrations “were not detectable,” and notes that “partial oxidation of thiol groups to organic sulfates cannot be ruled out”; these are honest evidentiary caveats, not circular reasoning. Self-citations to prior SiC nanoparticle synthesis and luminescence work [18,35,39,40,65–68] provide context and an interpretive framework (e.g., surface-group-dependent HOMO levels affecting emission), but the central thiol-termination and PEG-conjugation claims do not reduce to those references; they rest on independent sulfur-content and S2p measurements, comparison to the PEG-only control, and the observed maleimide reactivity. No equation, fitted parameter, or cited result is equivalent by construction to the paper's conclusions, so no circular step can be exhibited. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small fitted XPS component (0.9% assigned to C-SH), standard binding-energy assignments from the literature, an assumption about the COOH-rich starting surface from prior work, and an ad hoc explanation for an anomalous low-energy sulfur peak. No independent evidence is provided for the S-Nb species.

free parameters (1)
  • S2p C-SH component intensity ratio in SiC-SH = 0.9% of S2p3/2 signal
    Determined by XPS peak fitting with fixed spin-orbit parameters; this small value is the primary spectroscopic evidence for surface thiols (Section 3, Table 3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption XPS binding energy assignments from literature, e.g., S2p at ~163.5 eV corresponds to C-SH/C-S, sulfate at ~168.9 eV.
    Used in Section 3 (Table 3) to assign chemical states; if the 163.5 eV assignment is incorrect, the thiol evidence collapses.
  • domain assumption The NP EGEC etching method yields SiC NPs with a COOH-rich surface.
    Assumed from the authors' prior work (refs [18,35,39,40,65-68]); the baseline surface composition is used to interpret all later changes.
  • ad hoc to paper The low-energy S2p peak (<160 eV) in SiC-SH arises from S-Nb bonds with the niobium XPS substrate.
    Invoked to explain an anomalous peak; the paper itself says 'we speculate', with no independent evidence. Location: Section 3.
  • domain assumption PL shifts after functionalization are caused by changes in surface-group HOMO energy, as in the authors' earlier work.
    Used to interpret the blue shift (Section 3, Figure 6); alternative explanations such as size change or concentration effects are not excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thiolation and PEGylation of silicon carbide nanoparticle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZPSGHM4

@misc{pith2026250208469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thiolation and PEGylation of silicon carbide nanoparticle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZPSGHM4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08469}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we implement thiol termination on the surface of few-nanometer-sized silicon carbide (SiC) nanoparticles (NPs) to enable further applications, such as fluorescent biomarkers. Various spectroscopic techniques are employed to monitor the effectiveness of the surface treatment. A thiol-Michael addition reaction is performed by conjugating 4-arm PEGmaleimide molecules to the thiol groups of SiC NPs, further demonstrating the reactivity of thiol-terminated SiC NPs, which also acts as a protection layer against oxidation. These fluorescent thiolated SiC NPs, both with and without conjugated molecules, are directly applicable as bioinert probes. Since SiC NPs can potentially host room-temperature fluorescent defect quantum bits, our results are an important step to realize a bioinert, ultrasmall quantum sensor bioagents, which may open new avenues in biotechnology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08469 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FFT image of SiC-SH NPs (a) measured on an ensemble of SiC-SH NPs (b), HRTEM image of SiC-S-PEG (c), the size distribution of SiC-S-PEG (d). Size distribution was calculated by measuring the diameters of 250 NPs from several areas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. AFM images and size distributions of SiC-COOH (a), SiC-SH (b), SiC-S-PEG (c), and PEG (d) NPs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. (a) C1s, (b) Si2p, (c) S2p photoelectron spectra of SiC-COOH, SiC-SH, SiC-S-PEG NPs, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Speranza, Carbon Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Functionalization and Sensing Applications, Nanomaterials 11 (2021) 967

    G. Speranza, Carbon Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Functionalization and Sensing Applications, Nanomaterials 11 (2021) 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040967

  2. [2]

    Tell Us the Complete Story!,

    P.V. Kamat, S. Jin, Semiconductor Photocatalysis: “Tell Us the Complete Story!,” ACS Energy Lett. 3 (2018) 622–623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00196. 9

  3. [3]

    Kosco, M

    J. Kosco, M. Bidwell, H. Cha, T. Martin, C.T. Howells, M. Sachs, D.H. Anjum, S. Gonzalez Lopez, L. Zou, A. Wadsworth, W. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Tellam, R. Sougrat, F. Laquai, D.M. DeLongchamp, J.R. Durrant, I. McCulloch, Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from organic semiconductor heterojunction nanoparticles, Nat. Mater. 19 (2020) 559–565. https://...

  4. [4]

    Efros, L.E

    A.L. Efros, L.E. Brus, Nanocrystal Quantum Dots: From Discovery to Modern Development, ACS Nano 15 (2021) 6192– 6210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c01399

  5. [5]

    Cotta, Quantum Dots and Their Applications: What Lies Ahead?, ACS Appl

    M.A. Cotta, Quantum Dots and Their Applications: What Lies Ahead?, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3 (2020) 4920–4924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c01386

  6. [6]

    M. Liu, N. Yazdani, M. Yarema, M. Jansen, V. Wood, E.H. Sargent, Colloidal quantum dot electronics, Nat Electron 4 (2021) 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00632-7

  7. [7]

    Hashim, A

    A. Hashim, A. Algidsawi, A. Hadi, M. Habeeb, Determination of Optical Parameters of Polymer Blend/Nanoceramics for Electronics Applications, 19 (2021) 327–336

  8. [8]

    Mohammed, M

    A. Mohammed, M. Habeeb, Effect of Si3N4/TaC nanomaterials on the structural and electrical characteristics of poly methyl methacrylate for electrical and electronics applications, East European Journal of Physics (2023) 157–164. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-2-15

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Algidsawi, A

    A. Algidsawi, A. Hashim, A. Hadi, M. Habeeb, Exploring the characteristics of SnO2 nanoparticles doped organic blend for low cost nanoelectronics applications, Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics and Optoelectronics 24 (2021) 472–477. https://doi.org/10.15407/spqeo24.04.472

  2. [10]

    Al-Sharifi, M

    N. Al-Sharifi, M. Habeeb, Improvement structural and dielectric properties of PS/SiC/Sb2O3 nanostructures for nanoelectronics devices, East European Journal of Physics (2023) 341–347. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-2-40

  3. [11]

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s0028 9-023-04913-3 (accessed April 16, 2025)

    Reinforcement of morphological, structural, optical, and antibacterial characteristics of PVA/CMC bioblend filled with SiO2/Cr2O3 hybrid nanoparticles for optical nanodevices and food packing industries | Polymer Bulletin, (n.d.). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s002...

  4. [12]

    Hashim, M

    A. Hashim, M. Habeeb, Structural and Optical Properties of (Biopolymer Blend-Metal Oxide) Bionanocomposites for Humidity Sensors, Journal of Bionanoscience 12 (2018) 660–663. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbns.2018.1578

  5. [13]

    Jaber, M

    Z. Jaber, M. Habeeb, W. Hadi, Synthesis and Characterization of (PVA-CoO-ZrO2) Nanostructures for Nanooptoelectronic Fields, East European Journal of Physics (2023) 228–

  6. [14]

    Abderrazak, E.S.B

    H. Abderrazak, E.S.B. Hadj Hmi, Silicon Carbide: Synthesis and Properties, in: R. Gerhardt (Ed.), Properties and Applications of Silicon Carbide, InTech, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/15736

  7. [15]

    Blevins, Development of a World Class Silicon Carbide Substrate Manufacturing Capability, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 33 (2020) 539– 545

    J.D. Blevins, Development of a World Class Silicon Carbide Substrate Manufacturing Capability, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 33 (2020) 539– 545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2020.3028036

  8. [16]

    Castelletto, B.C

    S. Castelletto, B.C. Johnson, C. Zachreson, D. Beke, I. Balogh, T. Ohshima, I. Aharonovich, A. Gali, Room Temperature Quantum Emission from Cubic Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, ACS Nano 8 (2014) 7938–7947. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502719y

  9. [17]

    Csóré, A

    A. Csóré, A. Gali, Point Defects in Silicon Carbide for Quantum Technology, in: Wide Bandgap Semiconductors for Power Electronics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021: pp. 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527824724.ch17

  10. [18]

    D. Beke, J. Valenta, G. Károlyházy, S. Lenk, Z. Czigány, B.G. Márkus, K. Kamarás, F. Simon, A. Gali, Room-Temperature Defect Qubits in Ultrasmall Nanocrystals, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 (2020) 1675–1681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00052

  11. [19]

    A. Gali, A. Gällström, N.T. Son, E. Janzén, Theory of Neutral Divacancy in SiC: A Defect for Spintronics, Materials Science Forum 645– 648 (2010) 395–397. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf. 645-648.395. 10

  12. [20]

    Janzén, A

    E. Janzén, A. Gali, P. Carlsson, A. Gällström, B. Magnusson, N.T. Son, The silicon vacancy in SiC, Physica B: Condensed Matter 404 (2009) 4354–4358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.09.023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, Y

    G. Zhang, Y. Cheng, J.-P. Chou, A. Gali, Material platforms for defect qubits and single- photon emitters, Applied Physics Reviews 7 (2020) 031308. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006075

  14. [22]

    Son, C.P

    N.T. Son, C.P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, K.C. Miao, C. Babin, M. Widmann, M. Niethammer, J. Ul Hassan, N. Morioka, I.G. Ivanov, F. Kaiser, J. Wrachtrup, D.D. Awschalom, Developing silicon carbide for quantum spintronics, Applied Physics Letters 116 (2020) 190501. https://doi.org/...

  15. [23]

    Castelletto, C.T.-K

    S. Castelletto, C.T.-K. Lew, W.-X. Lin, J.-S. Xu, Quantum systems in silicon carbide for sensing applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87 (2023) 014501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6633/ad10b3

  16. [24]

    https://shop.elsevier.com/books/silicon- carbide-biotechnology/saddow/978-0-12- 385906-8 (accessed January 17, 2024)

    Silicon Carbide Biotechnology - 1st Edition, (n.d.). https://shop.elsevier.com/books/silicon- carbide-biotechnology/saddow/978-0-12- 385906-8 (accessed January 17, 2024)

  17. [25]

    Oliveros, A

    A. Oliveros, A. Guiseppi-Elie, S.E. Saddow, Silicon carbide: a versatile material for biosensor applications, Biomed Microdevices 15 (2013) 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-013-9742-3

  18. [26]

    D. Beke, Z. Szekrényes, D. Pálfi, G. Róna, I. Balogh, P.A. Maák, G. Katona, Z. Czigány, K. Kamarás, B. Rózsa, L. Buday, B. Vértessy, A. Gali, Silicon carbide quantum dots for bioimaging, Journal of Materials Research 28 (2013) 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.296

  19. [27]

    de Vries, S

    M.O. de Vries, S. Sato, T. Ohshima, B.C. Gibson, J. Bluet, S. Castelletto, B.C. Johnson, P. Reineck, Fluorescent Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, Advanced Optical Materials 9 (2021) 2100311. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202100311

  20. [28]

    Chen, E.R

    F. Chen, E.R. Zhao, T. Hu, Y. Shi, D.J. Sirbuly, J.V. Jokerst, Silicon carbide nanoparticles as a photoacoustic and photoluminescent dual-imaging contrast agent for long-term cell tracking, Nanoscale Adv. 1 (2019) 3514–3520. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NA00237E

  21. [29]

    Hashim, A

    A. Hashim, A. Hadi, H. Ibrahim, F.L. Rashid, Fabrication and Boosting the Morphological and Optical Properties of PVP/SiC/Ti Nanosystems for Tailored Renewable Energies and Nanoelectronics Fields, J Inorg Organomet Polym 34 (2024) 1678–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-023-02908-1

  22. [30]

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s1085 4-024-13435-1 (accessed April 16, 2025)

    Fabrication and characteristics of PMMA– PEG/SiO2–SiC quaternary nanocomposites for gamma ray shielding and flexible optoelectronics applications | Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, (n.d.). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s1085 4-024-13435-1 (ac...

  23. [31]

    Sattar, A

    Z. Sattar, A. Hashim, Fabrication of PMMA/PEG/SnO2/SiC quaternary multifunctional nanostructures and exploring the microstructure and optical features for radiation attenuation and flexible photonics applications, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 35 (2024) 2015. https://doi.org/10....

  24. [32]

    Hashim, S.M

    A. Hashim, S.M. Alshrefi, H.H. Abed, A. Hadi, Synthesis and Boosting the Structural and Optical Characteristics of PMMA/SiC/CdS Hybrid Nanomaterials for Future Optical and Nanoelectronics Applications, J Inorg Organomet Polym 34 (2024) 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-0...

  25. [33]

    Meteab, A

    M.H. Meteab, A. Hashim, B.H. Rabee, Synthesis and Characteristics of SiC/MnO2/PS/PC QuaternaryNanostructures for Advanced Nanodielectrics Fields, Silicon 15 (2023) 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02114-7

  26. [34]

    Sattar, A

    Z. Sattar, A. Hashim, Synthesis of PMMA/PEG/SiO2/SiC Multifunctional Nanostructures and Exploring the Microstructure and Dielectric Features for Flexible Nanodielectric Applications, Silicon 16 (2024) 6181–6192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-024-03138-x

  27. [35]

    D. Beke, Z. Szekrényes, Z. Czigány, K. Kamarás, Á. Gali, Dominant luminescence is not due to quantum confinement in molecular- sized silicon carbide nanocrystals, Nanoscale 7 11 (2015) 10982–10988. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR01204J

  28. [36]

    Q. Mu, G. Jiang, L. Chen, H. Zhou, D. Fourches, A. Tropsha, B. Yan, Chemical Basis of Interactions Between Engineered Nanoparticles and Biological Systems, Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 7740–7781. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400295a

  29. [37]

    Y. Ji, Y. Wang, X. Wang, C. Lv, Q. Zhou, G. Jiang, B. Yan, L. Chen, Beyond the promise: Exploring the complex interactions of nanoparticles within biological systems, Journal of Hazardous Materials 468 (2024) 133800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133800

  30. [38]

    Alekseev, E

    S. Alekseev, E. Shamatulskaya, M. Volvach, S. Gryn, D. Korytko, I. Bezverkhyy, V. Iablokov, V. Lysenko, Size and Surface Chemistry Tuning of Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, Langmuir 33 (2017) 13561–13571. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02784

  31. [39]

    Beke, T.Z

    D. Beke, T.Z. Jánosi, B. Somogyi, D.Á. Major, Z. Szekrényes, J. Erostyák, K. Kamarás, A. Gali, Identification of Luminescence Centers in Molecular-Sized Silicon Carbide Nanocrystals, J. Phys. Chem. C 120 (2016) 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09503

  32. [40]

    Czene, N

    S. Czene, N. Jegenyes, O. Krafcsik, S. Lenk, Z. Czigány, G. Bortel, K. Kamarás, J. Rohonczy, D. Beke, A. Gali, Amino-Termination of Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, Nanomaterials 13 (2023) 1953. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13131953

  33. [41]

    Bělinová, I

    T. Bělinová, I. Machová, D. Beke, A. Fučíková, A. Gali, Z. Humlová, J. Valenta, M. Hubálek Kalbáčová, Immunomodulatory Potential of Differently-Terminated Ultra- Small Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, Nanomaterials 10 (2020) 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030573

  34. [42]

    S.-Y. Choh, D. Cross, C. Wang, Facile Synthesis and Characterization of Disulfide- Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Protein Delivery and Cell Encapsulation, Biomacromolecules 12 (2011) 1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101451k

  35. [43]

    Lowe, Thiol-ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis, Polym

    A.B. Lowe, Thiol-ene “click” reactions and recent applications in polymer and materials synthesis, Polym. Chem. 1 (2010) 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9PY00216B

  36. [44]

    Vericat, M.E

    C. Vericat, M.E. Vela, G. Benitez, P. Carro, R.C. Salvarezza, Self-assembled monolayers of thiols and dithiols on gold: new challenges for a well-known system, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 1805–1834. https://doi.org/10.1039/B907301A

  37. [45]

    G. Li, Z. Zhao, J. Liu, G. Jiang, Effective heavy metal removal from aqueous systems by thiol functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica, J Hazard Mater 192 (2011) 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.015

  38. [46]

    S. Xu, X. Han, A novel method to construct a third-generation biosensor: self-assembling gold nanoparticles on thiol-functionalized poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) nanospheres, Biosensors and Bioelectronics 19 (2004) 1117– 1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2003.09.007

  39. [47]

    Potta, C

    T. Potta, C. Chun, S.-C. Song, Chemically crosslinkable thermosensitive polyphosphazene gels as injectable materials for biomedical applications, Biomaterials 30 (2009) 6178– 6192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08. 015

  40. [48]

    Zhang, G

    S. Zhang, G. Leem, L. Srisombat, T.R. Lee, Rationally Designed Ligands that Inhibit the Aggregation of Large Gold Nanoparticles in Solution, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 113–

  41. [49]

    M.-H. Hsu, H. Chuang, F.-Y. Cheng, Y.-P. Huang, C.-C. Han, J.-Y. Chen, S.-C. Huang, J.- K. Chen, D.-S. Wu, H.-L. Chu, C.-C. Chang, Directly Thiolated Modification onto the Surface of Detonation Nanodiamonds, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014) 7198–7203. https://doi.org/10.10...

  42. [50]

    Tkachenko, N.A

    B.A. Tkachenko, N.A. Fokina, L.V. Chernish, J.E.P. Dahl, S. Liu, R.M.K. Carlson, A.A. Fokin, P.R. Schreiner, Functionalized Nanodiamonds Part 3: Thiolation of Tertiary/Bridgehead Alcohols, Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol053136g

  43. [51]

    Gooch, V

    N. Gooch, V. Hlady, Two surface gradients of polyethylene glycol for a reduction in protein adsorption, Surface Innovations 3 (2015) 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1680/sufi.15.00005

  44. [52]

    Corma, T

    A. Corma, T. Ródenas, M.J. Sabater, Aerobic oxidation of thiols to disulfides by 12 heterogeneous gold catalysts, Chem. Sci. 3 (2012) 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SC00466B

  45. [53]

    Sulfur compounds

    B J Lindberg, K Hamrin, G Johansson, U Gelius, A Fahlman, C Nordling, K Siegbahn, Molecular Spectroscopy by Means of ESCA II. Sulfur compounds. Correlation of electron binding energy with structure, Phys. Scr. 1 (1970) 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031- 8949/1/5-6/020

  46. [54]

    McKenas, J.M

    C.G. McKenas, J.M. Fehr, C.L. Donley, M.R. Lockett, Thiol–Ene Modified Amorphous Carbon Substrates: Surface Patterning and Chemically Modified Electrode Preparation, Langmuir 32 (2016) 10529–10536. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02961

  47. [55]

    B. Du, X. Jiang, Y. Huang, S. Li, J.C. Lin, M. Yu, J. Zheng, Tailoring Kidney Transport of Organic Dyes with Low-Molecular-Weight PEGylation, Bioconjugate Chem. 31 (2020) 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b007 07

  48. [56]

    Al Mahrooqi, V.V

    J.H. Al Mahrooqi, V.V. Khutoryanskiy, A.C. Williams, Thiolated and PEGylated silica nanoparticle delivery to hair follicles, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 593 (2021) 120130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120130

  49. [57]

    Mun, P.W.J

    E.A. Mun, P.W.J. Morrison, A.C. Williams, V.V. Khutoryanskiy, On the Barrier Properties of the Cornea: A Microscopy Study of the Penetration of Fluorescently Labeled Nanoparticles, Polymers, and Sodium Fluorescein, Mol. Pharmaceutics 11 (2014) 3556–3564. https://doi.org/10.102...

  50. [58]

    Mun, A.C

    E.A. Mun, A.C. Williams, V.V. Khutoryanskiy, Adhesion of thiolated silica nanoparticles to urinary bladder mucosa: Effects of PEGylation, thiol content and particle size, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 512 (2016) 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.026

  51. [59]

    Caliari, J.A

    S.R. Caliari, J.A. Burdick, A Practical Guide to Hydrogels for Cell Culture, Nat Methods 13 (2016) 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3839

  52. [60]

    Piluso, G.A

    S. Piluso, G.A. Skvortsov, M. Altunbek, F. Afghah, N. Khani, B. Koç, J. Patterson, 3D bioprinting of molecularly engineered PEG- based hydrogels utilizing gelatin fragments, Biofabrication 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac0ff0

  53. [61]

    S. Sun, Y. Cui, B. Yuan, M. Dou, G. Wang, H. Xu, J. Wang, W. Yin, D. Wu, C. Peng, Drug delivery systems based on polyethylene glycol hydrogels for enhanced bone regeneration, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1117647

  54. [62]

    Masi, P.L

    A.D. Masi, P.L. Scognamiglio, E. Battista, P.A. Netti, F. Causa, PEG-based cleavable hydrogel microparticles with controlled porosity for permiselective trafficking of biomolecular complexes in biosensing applications, J. Mater. Chem. B 10 (2022) 1980–1990. https://doi.org/10....

  55. [63]

    Rendler, J

    T. Rendler, J. Neburkova, O. Zemek, J. Kotek, A. Zappe, Z. Chu, P. Cigler, J. Wrachtrup, Optical imaging of localized chemical events using programmable diamond quantum nanosensors, Nat Commun 8 (2017) 14701. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14701

  56. [64]

    K. Wang, H. Peng, B. Wang, Recent Advances in Thiol and Sulfide Reactive Probes, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 115 (2014) 1007–

  57. [65]

    D. Beke, Z. Szekrényes, I. Balogh, M. Veres, É. Fazakas, L.K. Varga, K. Kamarás, Z. Czigány, A. Gali, Characterization of luminescent silicon carbide nanocrystals prepared by reactive bonding and subsequent wet chemical etching, Applied Physics Letters 99 (2011). https://pubs....

  58. [66]

    Mazurak, R

    A. Mazurak, R. Mroczyński, D. Beke, A. Gali, Silicon-Carbide (SiC) nanocrystal technology and characterization and its applications in memory structures, Nanomaterials 10 (2020) 2387

  59. [67]

    Mukesh, B.G

    N. Mukesh, B.G. Márkus, N. Jegenyes, G. Bortel, S.M. Bezerra, F. Simon, D. Beke, A. Gali, Formation of Paramagnetic Defects in the Synthesis of Silicon Carbide, Micromachines 14 (2023) 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081517

  60. [68]

    D. Beke, A. Fučíková, T.Z. Jánosi, G. Károlyházy, B. Somogyi, S. Lenk, O. Krafcsik, 13 Z. Czigány, J. Erostyák, K. Kamarás, J. Valenta, A. Gali, Direct Observation of Transition from Solid-State to Molecular-Like Optical Properties in Ultrasmall Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles, ...

  61. [69]

    X. Dong, A. Al-Jumaily, I. Escobar, Investigation of the Use of a Bio-Derived Solvent for Non-Solvent-Induced Phase Separation (NIPS) Fabrication of Polysulfone Membranes, Membranes 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8020023

  62. [70]

    Ivashchenko, A

    L. Ivashchenko, A. Vasin, V. Ivashchenko, M. Ushakov, A. Rusavsky, Blue light emission from PECVD deposited nanostructured SiC, MRS Proceedings 910 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0910-A12-03

  63. [71]

    Y. Fu, W.J. Kao, In situ forming poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels via thiol-maleimide Michael-type addition, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 98A (2011) 201–

  64. [72]

    Khandare, A

    J.J. Khandare, A. Jalota-Badhwar, S.D. Satavalekar, S.G. Bhansali, N.D. Aher, F. Kharas, S.S. Banerjee, PEG-conjugated highly dispersive multifunctional magnetic multi- walled carbon nanotubes for cellular imaging, Nanoscale 4 (2012) 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR11540E

  65. [73]

    Shtenberg, M

    Y. Shtenberg, M. Goldfeder, A. Schroeder, H. Bianco-Peled, Alginate modified with maleimide-terminated PEG as drug carriers with enhanced mucoadhesion, Carbohydrate Polymers 175 (2017) 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.076

  66. [74]

    Aramendia, L

    J. Aramendia, L. Gomez-Nubla, M.L. Tuite, K.H. Williford, K. Castro, J.M. Madariaga, A new semi-quantitative Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) method for detection of maleimide (2,5-pyrroledione) with potential application to astrobiology, Geoscience Frontiers 12 (202...

  67. [75]

    Parker, A.J

    D.M. Parker, A.J. Lineweaver, A.D. Quast, I. Zharov, J.S. Shumaker-Parry, Thiol-terminated nanodiamond powders for support of gold nanoparticle catalysts, Diamond and Related Materials 116 (2021) 108449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2021.108449

  68. [76]

    Jeon, Easily Processable, Highly Transparent and Conducting Thiol- Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxides Langmuir-Blodgett Films, Molecules 26 (2021) 2686

    K.-W. Jeon, Easily Processable, Highly Transparent and Conducting Thiol- Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxides Langmuir-Blodgett Films, Molecules 26 (2021) 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092686

  69. [77]

    Sąsiadek, I

    W. Sąsiadek, I. Bryndal, M. Ptak, R. Lisiecki, T. Lis, J. Hanuza, Thione-thiol tautomerism in new 4-methyl-3-nitopyridine derivative in the solid state – X-ray, electron absorption and emission, IR and Raman studies discussed in term of quantum chemical DFT calculations, Journ...

  70. [78]

    Abbehausen, R.E.F

    C. Abbehausen, R.E.F. de Paiva, A.L.B. Formiga, P.P. Corbi, Studies of the tautomeric equilibrium of 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione: Theoretical and experimental approaches, Chemical Physics 408 (2012) 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.09.01 9

  71. [79]

    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chem mater.7b00374 (accessed January 23, 2025)

    In Situ Chemical Imaging of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer Evolution in Li–S Batteries | Chemistry of Materials, (n.d.). https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chem mater.7b00374 (accessed January 23, 2025)

  72. [80]

    R. Pai, V. Natu, M. Sokol, M. Carey, M.W. Barsoum, V. Kalra, Tuning functional two- dimensional MXene nanosheets to enable efficient sulfur utilization in lithium-sulfur batteries, Cell Reports Physical Science 2 (2021) 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100480

  73. [81]

    Carmalt, C.W

    C.J. Carmalt, C.W. Dinnage, I.P. Parkin, A.J.P. White, D.J. Williams, Synthesis of a Homoleptic Niobium(V) Thiolate Complex and the Preparation of Niobium Sulfide via Thio “Sol−Gel” and Vapor Phase Thin-Film Experiments, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 3668–

  74. [82]

    Gnanasekar, K.S

    P. Gnanasekar, K.S. Ranjith, P. Manivel, Y.K. Han, J. Kulandaivel, Hierarchical NbS2/MoS2- Carbon Nanofiber Electrode for Highly Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction at All Ranges of pH, ACS Applied 14 Energy Materials 3 (2020) 6717–6725. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac...

  75. [83]

    Károlyházy, D

    G. Károlyházy, D. Beke, D. Zalka, S. Lenk, O. Krafcsik, K. Kamarás, Á. Gali, Novel Method for Electroless Etching of 6H–SiC, Nanomaterials 10 (2020) 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030538

  76. [120]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0724588

  77. [211]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33106

  78. [233]

    https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023- 2-25

  79. [1022]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.24762

  80. [3672]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/ic020097l

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.