Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 87 references

A machine-learned probability distribution in the phase space of turbulent channel flow for synthetic turbulence and flow reconstruction

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A machine-learned probability distribution approximates the natural distribution of turbulent channel flow, enabling realistic synthetic fields and probabilistic reconstruction.

desk verdict A solid ML-for-turbulence paper with a genuinely new construction; the conditional sampling derivation leans on an unproven independence assumption that deserves a close look, but the empirical results are encouraging. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18058 v1 pith:Z3Q7YK6X submitted 2026-07-20 physics.flu-dyn

Frederik Aerts , Dirk Nuyens , Johan Meyers This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn PACS 47.27.-i47.27.E
keywords turbulentchannelflownaturaldistributioninvariantmeasureflow-basedgenerativemodelmatchingconditionalsamplingsyntheticturbulencereconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a machine-learned probability distribution can approximate the physical invariant distribution—the natural distribution—of turbulent channel flow at Re_tau=180. If true, one can sample realistic turbulent fields directly, bypassing the long spin-up needed to reach statistical stationarity, and can reconstruct flow fields from sparse observations with quantified uncertainty. The authors train a flow-based generative model on a minimal conditional flow unit and introduce a conditional sampling procedure that reuses the same network. They show the synthetic fields match DNS statistics up to fourth order, including intermittency, and that ensembles remain statistically stationary when used to initialize DNS, supporting the claim of dynamical invariance.

What carries the argument

The flow-based generative model trained via conditional flow matching, with a Gaussian conditional optimal transport path, maps random Gaussian fields to synthetic turbulence through straight-line trajectories. For conditional sampling, the modified ODE system (2.23) pins observed components to their measurements along the path while letting unobserved components evolve under the marginal generator. The minimal conditional flow unit—the smallest domain in homogeneous directions outside which conditioning on a central velocity component is indistinguishable from unconditional sampling—carries the argument, since it permits sequential conditional sampling to arbitrarily large domains under a l

What would settle it

For a mask that observes a large fraction of the domain (e.g., 75% of the velocity components), compute the ensemble variance of the reconstructions produced by Eq. (2.23) and compare it to the true conditional variance estimated from DNS snapshots; a systematic discrepancy that grows with the observed fraction would indicate the independence assumption is violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the learned distribution provides a good approximation to the natural distribution of the turbulent dynamical system (Abstract, §4). Three properties are demonstrated: physical ensemble statistics (mean profile, Reynolds stresses, energy spectra, skewness, flatness, heavy-tailed velocity increments), consistent conditional sampling (reconstruction errors match an LSE-based estimate, with ensemble variance as uncertainty), and dynamical invariance (synthetic fields used as DNS initial conditions show stationary energy spectra and TKE budget terms after a brief Kolmogorov-timescale transient). The minimal conditional flow unit is the key enabling object, making large-

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unobserved part of the guided generator network can be treated as independent of the observed components, so that the previously trained marginal generator can be reused in Eq. (2.23); the paper does not prove this independence holds for a general trained network.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Synthetic initial conditions can be generated that skip the long transient to statistical stationarity in DNS, because samples already live on the attractor.
  • Flow reconstruction from sparse observations becomes a sampling problem, producing an ensemble of realistic fields with quantified uncertainty rather than a single conditional average.
  • The learned distribution can be reused for arbitrary masks of observed/unobserved variables without retraining, making the method flexible for varying sensor placements.
  • Non-Gaussian statistics such as intermittency, skewness, and nonlinear energy transfer are preserved, which Gaussian-based synthetic generators cannot capture.
  • The minimal conditional flow unit provides a domain-size-independent representation: sequential sampling extends fields to domains 24 times the training unit with adequate spectral fidelity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The local-conditioning approximation (conditioning only on the neighboring subdomain) relies on a screening effect; at higher Reynolds numbers or in flows with very long coherent structures, this screening may weaken, and the approximation may need larger units.
  • The independence assumption behind the guided generator (unobserved part independent of observations) is untested for general masks; if it fails, the conditional sampling ensembles could under- or over-estimate reconstruction uncertainty.
  • A natural extension is to condition on derived quantities such as wall shear stress or pressure, which the paper suggests but does not demonstrate; the same conditional-sampling mechanism should apply.
  • Because the model learns incompressibility implicitly, explicitly enforcing a divergence-free constraint at generation time could reduce small-scale discrepancies at higher Reynolds numbers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper trains a flow-matching generative model on a 'minimal conditional flow unit' (MCFU) to approximate the invariant phase-space distribution of turbulent channel flow at Re_tau=180, and evaluates the approximation through three properties: physical ensemble statistics, consistent conditional sampling, and dynamical invariance. The authors define the MCFU as the smallest domain outside which conditional fields are indistinguishable from unconditional fields in mean-square sense, estimate its size from two-point correlations, and use sequential conditional sampling to generate fields on larger domains. For conditional sampling they derive a guided flow-matching loss and propose an approximate minimizer that reuses the unconditional generator. Comparisons with DNS are reported for one-point, two-point, and higher-order statistics, for a flow-reconstruction problem, and for DNS initialized with synthetic fields. The paper concludes that the learned distribution is a good approximation to the natural distribution.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a notable step: it is one of the first explicit attempts to approximate the full three-dimensional invariant phase-space distribution of a wall-bounded turbulent flow rather than only selected statistics. The unconditional generation reproduces higher-order moments (skewness, flatness, increment distributions) and the dynamical-invariance test via DNS initialization is a meaningful and nonstandard validation. The study also has concrete strengths: a held-out test set, validation-based model selection, comparison against a carefully derived LSE-based error estimate, and DNS-based scrutiny of the generated fields. These elements make the empirical core credible. The main risk is the unproven conditional-independence approximation in the conditional sampling procedure, which is load-bearing for the reconstruction-uncertainty interpretation and for the sequential generation of large domains.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.4, Eq. (2.22)–(2.24)] The derivation of the conditional sampling ODE rests on an unproven independence restriction. The paper states that if the unobserved part M⊥ f(v,ξ|u_o) is 'restricted to be independent of u_o', then the guided conditional flow-matching loss (2.22) reduces to a selection of terms from the unconditional loss (2.18), allowing reuse of the marginal generator. However, the resulting ODE (2.23) has unobserved update M⊥ f*_θ(v,ξ), and v depends on u_o through the observed-part integration (2.24a), i.e., v = ξu_o + (1−ξ)(observed components of v0). Thus the approximation is effectively E[u_u | v] ≈ E[u_u | v, u_o]. The marginal generator was trained on the unconditional loss (2.18), not on the guided loss (2.22), so there is no training pressure enforcing this. If the approximation fails, Eq. (2.23) samples a distribution different from π(u_u|u_o), invalidating the uncertainty quantification in
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (2.10) and §3.2, Figs. 9–11] The MCFU construction and the sequential sampling rely on two approximations whose quantitative validity is not established: (i) the dimensions R_x≈πδ and R_z≈πδ/4 are inferred from a visually assessed threshold of squared correlations, with no explicit criterion for 'sufficiently small'; (ii) the local-conditioning approximation π(u_C|u_A,u_B)≈π(u_C|u_B) in Eq. (2.10) is motivated by the screening effect, but the footnote in §2.2 correctly notes that marginal decorrelation does not imply conditional independence and the relay effect can transmit information. The large-domain results in Figs. 9–11 show precisely the kind of artifacts one would expect if this approximation is imperfect: cut-through structures at the interfaces between conditioned blocks and underrepresentation of the largest streamwise/spanwise scales. Since the paper claims the MCFU representation enables sampling on 'ar
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, Fig. 2] The definition of R_h would benefit from a quantitative threshold, e.g., the distance beyond which ρ² drops below a stated value, rather than an informal visual estimate.
  2. [§3.1, Fig. 6] The sentence 'Only the largest spanwise scales of the streamwise velocity component are underrepresented as seen in figure 6(e)' is not easy to verify from the plotted curves; consider adding an inset or arrow.
  3. [§3.3, Figs. 12–13] The color legend is labeled '0.1 2 4 6 8 10'; it would be clearer to use a continuous colorbar with a title such as 't u_τ/δ'.
  4. [Eq. (3.1)] The numerator in the integrand appears to omit an ensemble-average bracket; please check the notation so that the equation matches the described quantity.
  5. [§2.5] The acronym MCFU is used in the abstract and in the text but is not defined at first use; define it when the minimal conditional flow unit is introduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is a standard flow-matching construction, and the validation uses held-out DNS data and DNS evolution rather than re-stating the training statistics.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The flow-matching loss (2.18) and the guided conditional loss (2.20) are standard mathematical constructions; the approximate conditional sampler (2.23) is obtained by explicitly reusing the marginal generator under an independence restriction, not by defining the target distribution to equal the trained generator. The central claim—that the learned distribution approximates the natural distribution—is tested against held-out DNS snapshots (10% test set), against DNS evolution in the dynamical-invariance test, and against an LSE-based reconstruction-error benchmark computed from DNS data (Appendix B). These are external checks, not identities with the training objective. The paper explicitly acknowledges the local-conditioning approximation is not guaranteed by marginal decorrelation alone, and the independence restriction in §2.4 is unproven; these are honest limitations rather than circular reductions. The self-citations (SPWind code, shifted periodic boundary conditions) are methodological references and are not load-bearing evidence for the main claim. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on several hand-chosen structural parameters (MCFU size, coarsening factor, integration steps) and on approximations in conditional sampling that are not rigorously derived. The flow-matching math is standard, but the physical-natural-distribution assumptions and the local-conditioning/screening approximations are domain assumptions specific to this paper.

free parameters (3)
  • MCFU half-extent R_x≈πδ, R_z≈πδ/4 = R_x≈πδ, R_z≈πδ/4
    Chosen by eye from squared cross-correlations with an unspecified 'sufficiently small' threshold (§2.2, Fig. 2). Determines the domain of the learned distribution and the validity of sequential conditional sampling.
  • Coarsening factor 2 (field resolution 23.6×[0.34-6.2]×11.8) = Δx+≈23.6, Δy+∈[0.34,6.2], Δz+≈11.8
    The target distribution is learned on DNS fields filtered by a factor 2 and downsampled in y (§2.5); this truncates the small scales and introduces spectral leakage for non-periodic units.
  • Number of RK4 integration steps = 20
    Sampling integrates the learned ODE with 20 timesteps (§3, App. A); accuracy of the flow map at ξ=1 depends on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A coarse-grained natural density π exists via noise kernel K_ε (Eq. 2.4)
    The paper notes rigorous construction of SRB measures for turbulence is open, but assumes kernel smoothing yields a well-defined density for training.
  • ad hoc to paper Local conditioning approximation π(u_C|u_A,u_B)≈π(u_C|u_B) (Eq. 2.10)
    Used in sequential conditional sampling; the paper acknowledges the relay effect can violate it and invokes screening (§2.2).
  • ad hoc to paper Unobserved part of the guided generator can be treated as independent of u_o (§2.4)
    Allows reuse of the marginal generator in Eq. (2.23); not shown to hold for the trained network.
  • ad hoc to paper MCFU defined by single-component conditioning is adequate for half-domain or multi-component conditioning
    The reconstruction test conditions on an entire upstream half, and Fig. 8(b) shows imperfect decorrelation; the paper admits larger units might be needed.
  • domain assumption DNS snapshots are samples of the coarse-grained natural distribution
    Assumes the reference trajectory is stationary, ergodic, and validated against Kim et al. (§2.5); used as training target.
  • standard math Flow-matching/COT path theory (Lipman et al.)
    Marginal/conditional flow-matching loss equivalence is taken as established; standard math in generative modeling.
invented entities (1)
  • Minimal conditional flow unit (MCFU)
    purpose: A small non-periodic domain of size 2πδ×2δ×πδ/2 that serves as the training domain, enabling large-domain synthesis via sequential conditional sampling.
    Not a physical entity but a new methodological construct; its dimensions are inferred from DNS correlations and empirically supported by the paper's own validation, but it is not an independently testable physical hypothesis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A machine-learned probability distribution in the phase space of turbulent channel flow for synthetic turbulence and flow reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z3Q7YK6X

@misc{pith2026260718058,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A machine-learned probability distribution in the phase space of turbulent channel flow for synthetic turbulence and flow reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z3Q7YK6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18058}
}
abstract

Although a complete characterisation of the probability distribution in the phase space of turbulent flows remains elusive, accurately sampling this distribution is essential for both synthetic turbulence generation and turbulent flow reconstruction. Motivated by these applications, we examine to what extent a machine-learned distribution can approximate the physical invariant distribution of turbulent channel flow at $\mathrm{Re}_\tau=180$. We assess three important properties of the approximation: physical ensemble statistics, consistent conditional sampling, and dynamical invariance. To this end, a flow-based generative model is trained on a minimal conditional flow unit, which we define as the smallest domain outside which conditional fields, given a single observation at the domain centre, are indistinguishable from unconditional fields in terms of mean-square discrepancy to other conditional fields. We also introduce a consistent procedure for sampling from the conditional learned distribution. Comparisons with direct numerical simulation show that synthetic turbulent fields reproduce key statistical and dynamical features of turbulence, including intermittency and nonlinear energy transfer. The consistency of conditional sampling is demonstrated in a flow reconstruction problem, and subsequently used to generate synthetic turbulent velocity fields on a large domain. When adopted as initial conditions in direct numerical simulations, these fields yield physical and statistically stationary ensemble statistics, indicating that the learned distribution provides a good approximation to the natural distribution of the turbulent dynamical system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18058 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the natural distribution for the dynamical system representing cellular convection by Lorenz (1963): (a) invariant distribution obtained by the push forward of typical initial conditions, (b) marginal distribution 𝑝(𝑥1, 𝑥2) derived from the natural distribution, (c) Gaussian approximation to this marginal distribution, (d) reconstruction of 𝑥2 given 𝑥1 = 10 based on samples of the natural distributio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Definition of the minimal conditional flow unit in a turbulent channel flow: (a) the minimal conditional flow unit in red, (b) squared streamwise correlation at different wall-normal heights, (c) squared spanwise correlation at different wall-normal heights. The correlations are taken from the database by Kim et al. (1987). In (a) the subdomains 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶 used in the sequential conditional sampling argument are al… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the sampling process with the flow-based generative model: (a) The flow map 𝒗𝜉 = 𝛹 𝜉 𝝑 (𝒗0) deterministically maps an initial condition 𝒗0, sampled from a standard Gaussian, to a turbulent channel flow field 𝒗1 at fictitious time 𝜉 = 1. (b) Through sequential conditional sampling with minimal conditional flow units, turbulent channel flow fields on arbitrarily large domains can be generat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the one-point first- and second-order ensemble statistics between the synthetic and the DNS velocity fields: (a) mean velocity profile, (b) root-mean-square velocity fluctuations, and (c) Reynolds shear stress. 3. Applications in synthetic turbulence and …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the one-point third- and fourth-order ensemble statistics between the synthetic and the DNS velocity fields: (a,c) skewness 𝑆(𝜑) = ⟨𝜑 3 ⟩/⟨𝜑 2 ⟩ 3/2 , (b,d) flatness 𝐹(𝜑) = ⟨𝜑 4 ⟩/⟨𝜑 2 ⟩ 2 ; (a,b) velocity fluctuations, (c,d) turbulent shear stress. The d…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the one-dimensional energy spectra ⟨𝐸𝑢𝑢⟩, ⟨𝐸𝑣𝑣⟩, and ⟨𝐸𝑤𝑤⟩ between the synthetic and the DNS velocity fields on the minimal conditional channel flow unit of 2𝜋𝛿×2𝛿×𝜋𝛿/2 at three wall-normal heights: (a,d) 𝑦 + = 5.2, (b,e) 𝑦 + = 29, (c,f) 𝑦 + = 178. −5 0 5…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Reconstruction error in a flow reconstruction problem: (a) schematic representation of the problem, (b-d) mean-square error on the streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise velocity component. The mean ± one standard deviation for the wall-normal average are shown, both fo…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the streamwise velocity fluctuation field between the DNS (left) and the synthetic (right) velocity fields at different wall-normal heights: (a-b) 𝑦 + = 178, (c-d) 𝑦 + = 59.5, (e-f) 𝑦 + = 29, (g-h) 𝑦 + = 10, (i-j) 𝑦 + = 5.2. The procedure of generating ha…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the wall-normal velocity fluctuation field between the DNS (left) and the synthetic (right) velocity fields at different wall-normal heights: (a-b) 𝑦 + = 178, (c-d) 𝑦 + = 59.5, (e-f) 𝑦 + = 29, (g-h) 𝑦 + = 10, (i-j) 𝑦 + = 5.2. the streamwise length of the…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the one-dimensional energy spectra ⟨𝐸𝑢𝑢⟩, ⟨𝐸𝑣𝑣⟩, and ⟨𝐸𝑤𝑤⟩ between the synthetic and the DNS velocity fields on a domain of 8𝜋𝛿 × 2𝛿 × 3𝜋𝛿 at three wall-normal heights: (a,d) 𝑦 + = 5.2, (b,e) 𝑦 + = 29, (c,f) 𝑦 + = 178. The scales larger than those repres…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Time evolution of the premultiplied one-dimensional energy spectra averaged over an ensemble of 10 trajectories starting from synthetic initial conditions on a domain of 8𝜋𝛿 × 2𝛿 × 3𝜋𝛿. The spectra are shown at three wall-normal heights: (a,d) 𝑦 + = 5.2, (b,e) 𝑦 + = 2…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Time evolution of turbulent kinetic energy budget terms from a DNS on a domain of 8𝜋𝛿 ×2𝛿 ×3𝜋𝛿 initialised with a synthetic turbulent velocity field: (a) production, (b) turbulent transport, (c) dissipation. The line colour indicates the time of evaluation, with inter…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 1985 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.57.617 , url =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.57.617 1985

  2. [2]

    Synchronization of turbulence in channel flow , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.397 , language =

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.397 2022

  3. [3]

    Regeneration of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.014501 , language =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.014501 2005

  4. [4]

    Logarithmic-layer turbulence: a view from the wall , volume =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.114603 , language =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.4.114603 2019

  5. [5]

    Stochastic estimation of organized turbulent structure: homogeneous shear flow , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112088001442 , language =

    doi:10.1017/s0022112088001442 1988

  6. [6]

    Robust flow reconstruction from limited measurements via sparse representation , volume =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.103907 , language =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.4.103907 2019

  7. [7]

    Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.1028 , language =

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    High-fidelity reconstruction of turbulent flow from spatially limited data using enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial network , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0066077 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0066077 2021

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    Symmetry-preserving discretization of turbulent flow , volume =. J. Comput. Phys. , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00126-8 , language =

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    Synchronization of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.084102 , language =

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    and Kumar, Abhishek and Ermon, Stefano and Poole, Ben , year =

    Song, Yang and Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha and Kingma, Diederik P. and Kumar, Abhishek and Ermon, Stefano and Poole, Ben , year =. Score-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2011.13456 , language =

    2011 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    Generative modeling of turbulence , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0082562 , language =

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    A physics-informed diffusion model for high-fidelity flow field reconstruction , volume =. J. Comput. Phys. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2023.111972 , language =

    2023

  6. [14]

    and Martínez-Tossas, Luis A

    Rybchuk, Alex and Hassanaly, Malik and Hamilton, Nicholas and Doubrawa, Paula and Fulton, Mitchell J. and Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. , title =. Phys. Fluids , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0172559 , url =

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Pope, Stephen B. , doi =. Turbulent flows , publisher=

  8. [16]

    Synthetic turbulence inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.2130744 , language =

    2006 doi

  9. [17]

    A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations , volume =. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2006.02.006 , language =

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    Shifted periodic boundary conditions for simulations of wall-bounded turbulent flows , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4941912 , language =

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Conditional neural field latent diffusion model for generating spatiotemporal turbulence , volume =. Nat. Commun. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54712-1 , language =

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Turbulence:

    Frisch, Uriel , month = nov, year =. Turbulence:

  13. [21]

    and Azizpour, Hossein and Vinuesa, Ricardo , month = may, year =

    Vishwasrao, Abhijeet and Gutha, Sai Bharath Chandra and Cremades, Andres and Wijk, Klas and Patil, Aakash and Gorle, Catherine and McKeon, Beverley J. and Azizpour, Hossein and Vinuesa, Ricardo , month = may, year =. Diff-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.00214 , language =

    doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Atmosphere , author =

    Multi-. Atmosphere , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.3390/atmos15010060 , language =

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    A deep-learning approach for reconstructing. Sci. Rep. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29525-9 , language =

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 1994 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112094001886 , language =

    1994 doi

  17. [25]

    A minimal multiscale. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.2227003 , language =

    2006 doi

  18. [26]

    Denoising

    Ho, Jonathan and Jain, Ajay and Abbeel, Pieter , month = dec, year =. Denoising. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2006.11239 , language =

    2006 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Diffusion

    Dhariwal, Prafulla and Nichol, Alex , month = jun, year =. Diffusion. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2105.05233 , language =

    doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lipman, Yaron and Havasi, Marton and Holderrieth, Peter and Shaul, Neta and Le, Matt and Karrer, Brian and Chen, Ricky T. Q. and Lopez-Paz, David and Ben-Hamu, Heli and Gat, Itai , month = dec, year =. Flow. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.06264 , language =

    doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    Lipman, Yaron and Chen, Ricky T. Q. and Ben-Hamu, Heli and Nickel, Maximilian and Le, Matt , month = feb, year =. Flow. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210.02747 , language =

    doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hierarchy of minimal flow units in the logarithmic layer , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.3464157 , language =

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 1987 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112087000892 , language =

    1987 doi

  24. [32]

    Chen, Ricky T. Q. and Rubanova, Yulia and Bettencourt, Jesse and Duvenaud, David , month = dec, year =. Neural. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1806.07366 , language =

    doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Esser, Patrick and Kulal, Sumith and Blattmann, Andreas and Entezari, Rahim and Müller, Jonas and Saini, Harry and Levi, Yam and Lorenz, Dominik and Sauer, Axel and Boesel, Frederic and Podell, Dustin and Dockhorn, Tim and English, Zion and Lacey, Kyle and Goodwin, Alex and Ma...

    doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Effect of the computational domain on direct simulations of turbulent channels up to. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4862918 , language =

    2014 doi

  27. [35]

    Three-dimensional generative adversarial networks for turbulent flow estimation from wall measurements , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.432 , language =

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    On spectral linear stochastic estimation , volume =. Exp. Fluids , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00348-006-0199-5 , language =

    2006 doi

  29. [37]

    The principles of diffusion models , copyright =

    Lai, Chieh-Hsin and Song, Yang and Kim, Dongjun and Mitsufuji, Yuki and Ermon, Stefano , year =. The principles of diffusion models , copyright =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.21890 , language =

    doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cvitanovi\'c, Predrag and Artuso, Roberto and Mainieri, Ronnie and Tanner, Gregor and Vattay, Gábor , year =. Chaos:

  31. [39]

    Inflow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060322 , language =

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Diffusion by a. Phys. Fluids , author =. 1970 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1692799 , number =

    1970 doi

  33. [41]

    Flow Turbul

    Efficient. Flow Turbul. Combust. , author =. 2008 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10494-008-9151-5 , language =

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    Random. J. Fluids Eng. , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1115/1.1369598 , number =

    2001 doi

  35. [43]

    Dissipation in. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014637 , language =

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    Generation of. J. Comput. Phys. , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.5882 , language =

    1998

  37. [45]

    A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations , volume =. J. Comput. Phys. , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00090-1 , language =

    2003 doi

  38. [46]

    Indiana Univ

    Statistical. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , author =. 1952 , pages =. doi:10.1512/iumj.1952.1.51004 , language =

    1952 doi

  39. [47]

    Hydrodynamic turbulence as a problem in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics , volume =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218747109 , language =

    2012 doi

  40. [48]

    Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M. , year =. Statistical fluid mechanics: mechanics of turbulence , isbn =

  41. [49]

    A mathematical example displaying features of turbulence , volume =. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , author =. 1948 , pages =. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160010401 , language =

    1948 doi

  42. [50]

    What. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. , author =. 1978 , pages =. doi:10.1143/PTPS.64.339 , language =

    1978 doi

  43. [51]

    Flow Turbul

    A. Flow Turbul. Combust. , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10494-013-9488-2 , language =

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Adrian, R. J. , editor =. Stochastic. Eddy. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  45. [53]

    Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition:. Exp. Fluids , author =. 1994 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF01874409 , language =

    1994 doi

  46. [54]

    Aerodynamic. AIAA J. , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.2514/1.2159 , number =

    2004 doi

  47. [55]

    Karhunen–. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.12.001657 , language =

    1995 doi

  48. [56]

    AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM , year =

    Anna Bertram and Philipp Bekemeyer and Matthias Held , title =. AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM , year =. doi:10.2514/6.2021-2602 , URL =

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    What. J. Stat. Phys. , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1023/A:1019762724717 , language =

    2002 doi

  50. [58]

    Deterministic. J. Atmos. Sci. , author =. 1963 , pages =. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2 , language =

    1963 doi

  51. [59]

    Multi-scale reconstruction of turbulent rotating flows with proper orthogonal decomposition and generative adversarial networks , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.573 , language =

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 1991 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112091002033 , language =

    1991 doi

  53. [61]

    Villani, Cédric , year =. Optimal

  54. [62]

    Conditional flow matching for generative modelling of near-wall turbulence with quantified uncertainty , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2026.11193 , language =

    2026

  55. [63]

    Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent velocity fields using a generative adversarial network-based artificial intelligence framework , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.5127031 , number =

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    From coarse wall measurements to turbulent velocity fields through deep learning , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0058346 , number =

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    ACM Trans. Graph. , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3197517.3201304 , language =

    2018

  58. [66]

    Deep unsupervised learning of turbulence for inflow generation at various. J. Comput. Phys. , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109216 , urldate =

    2020

  59. [67]

    Bayesian conditional diffusion models for versatile spatiotemporal turbulence generation , volume =. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117023 , language =

    2024

  60. [68]

    Generative learning for forecasting the dynamics of high-dimensional complex systems , volume =. Nat. Commun. , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53165-w , language =

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Generative adversarial networks , volume =. Commun. ACM , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3422622 , number =

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    Gappy data and reconstruction procedures for flow past a cylinder , volume =. J. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0022112004001338 , language =

    2004 doi

  63. [71]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , author =

    Chaotic dynamics of coherent structures , volume =. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , author =. 1989 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(89)90123-1 , language =

    1989 doi

  64. [72]

    Quadrant. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034550 , language =

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    Turbulence generation and data assimilation in wall-bounded flows with a latent diffusion model , copyright =

    Steinbrenner, Fabian and Turan, Baris and Teng, Hao and Xiao, Heng , year =. Turbulence generation and data assimilation in wall-bounded flows with a latent diffusion model , copyright =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.02143 , language =

    doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    Amorós-Trepat, Marc and Medrano-Navarro, Luis and Liu, Qiang and Guastoni, Luca and Thuerey, Nils , title =. Phys. Fluids , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0304492 , url =

    2026 doi

  67. [75]

    Is plane-channel flow a friendly case for the testing of large-eddy simulation subgrid-scale models? , volume =. Phys. Fluids , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.2722422 , number =

    2007 doi

  68. [76]

    The screening effect in. Ann. Stat. , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1214/aos/1015362194 , language =

    2002

  69. [77]

    2010. Ann. Stat. , author =. 2011 , pages =

    2010

  70. [78]

    Geostatistics:

    Chilès, Jean-Paul and Delfiner, Pierre , year =. Geostatistics:

  71. [79]

    Liu, Liyuan and Jiang, Haoming and He, Pengcheng and Chen, Weizhu and Liu, Xiaodong and Gao, Jianfeng and Han, Jiawei , month = oct, year =. On the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1908.03265 , language =

    1908 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    and Maheswaranathan, Niru and Ganguli, Surya , month = nov, year =

    Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha and Weiss, Eric A. and Maheswaranathan, Niru and Ganguli, Surya , month = nov, year =. Deep. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1503.03585 , language =

    doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Generative adversarial nets , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  74. [82]

    Symposia on Turbulence in Liquids , author =

    On the role of conditional averages in turbulence theory , volume =. Symposia on Turbulence in Liquids , author =. 1977 , pages =

    1977

  75. [83]

    2010 , chapter =

    Johan Meyers and Charles Meneveau , title =. 2010 , chapter =

    2010

  76. [84]

    Andersen, H. H. , year =. Linear and graphical models: for the multivariate complex normal distribution , isbn =

  77. [85]

    Schur complements and statistics , volume =

    Ouellette, Diane Valérie , year =. Schur complements and statistics , volume =. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(81)90232-9 , journal =

    doi

  78. [86]

    Les rencontres physiciens-math

    On the nature of turbulence , author=. Les rencontres physiciens-math

  79. [87]

    and Meyers, J

    Bon, T. and Meyers, J. , year =. Stable channel flow with spanwise heterogeneous surface temperature , volume =. doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.1113 , journal =

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.