REVIEW 3 cited by
Think, Prune, Train, Improve: Scaling Reasoning without Scaling Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in programming and mathematical reasoning tasks, but are constrained by limited high-quality training data. Synthetic data can be leveraged to enhance fine-tuning outcomes, but several factors influence this process, including model size, synthetic data volume, pruning strategy, and number of fine-tuning rounds. We explore these axes and investigate which conditions enable model self-improvement. We introduce the Think, Prune, Train process, a scalable framework that iteratively fine-tunes models on their own reasoning traces, using ground-truth pruning to ensure high-quality training data. This approach yields improved performance: on GSM8K, Gemma2-2B achieves a Pass@1 of 57.6% (from 41.9%), Gemma2-9B reaches 82%, matching LLaMA-3.1-70B, and LLaMA-3.1-70B attains 91%, even surpassing GPT-4o, demonstrating the effectiveness of self-generated reasoning and systematic data selection for improving LLM capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SyncLoop: A Multimodal Dual-Loop Framework for Self-Improving Mathematical Reasoning
SyncLoop jointly evolves multimodal training data and model capability through alternating SFT and RL, selecting error-prone samples to improve geometry reasoning.
-
LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing
Small reward models trained on LitBench reach 78% agreement with upvote-derived human preferences in creative writing, beating all zero-shot LLM judges tested.
-
Chained Recursive Language Models for Multi-Iteration Reasoning
Chained fresh-root model calls with plain-text artifacts improve reported long-context reasoning accuracy over a single-call baseline, but the evidence lacks error bars and compute-matched comparison.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.