Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 81 references

Where does non-Universality in Assembly Bias come from?

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that universality in mass-selected halo bias follows from the Separate Universe response of the halo mass function, while non-universality in concentration-selected halos comes from neighboring massive halos steering mass…

desk verdict A credible Separate Universe explanation for concentration-selected halo bias non-universality, but the causal claim that it is entirely environmental needs a matched test against initial-condition assembly bias. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11798 v1 pith:ZEGX7ZJB submitted 2025-08-15 astro-ph.CO

Charuhas Shiveshwarkar , Marilena Loverde , Christopher M. Hirata , Drew Jamieson This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords separateuniverseframeworkassemblybiashaloprimordialnon-Gaussianityconcentration-selectedhalosb_phiresponseN-bodysimulationsuniversality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why the relation between the bias parameter $b_\phi$ and halo bias $b_h$ is universal for halos selected by mass but not for halos selected by concentration. Using Separate Universe simulations, where a long-wavelength change in the amplitude of primordial fluctuations is mimicked by a modified background, the authors show that mass-selected universality emerges from the response of the halo mass function itself, with no need to invoke spherical collapse. They propose that concentration-selected halos are non-universal because concentration tracks a halo's mass accretion history, and at low masses that history is driven by the gravitational influence of neighboring, more massive halos. At the highest masses, halos dominate their own environment, so accretion is self-driven and the $b_\phi$--$b_h$ relation returns to universality in matter-dominated cosmologies. If this is right, non-universality seen in high-redshift, high-bias galaxy samples is an artifact of the survey selection function, not a property of the underlying halo population.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Separate Universe framework: pairs of simulations whose background curvature or amplitude is perturbed are used to measure the response $b_\phi$ of the halo population to a change in the amplitude of primordial curvature fluctuations. The load-bearing relation is the mapping $b_\phi(b_h, \text{selection})$, whose universality holds for mass selection and fails for concentration selection. The physical mechanism carrying the argument is environmental gravitational control of mass accretion: neighboring massive halos alter the accretion of lower-mass halos and imprint that environment on concentration, while the most massive halos accrete under their own gravity, so selecting by concentration no longer introduces environmental dependence.

What would settle it

In N-body simulations, isolate low-mass concentration-selected halos whose accretion histories are free of nearby massive halos, for example no neighbor within several virial radii over their lifetime, and measure their $b_\phi$; if these halos still show the same non-universal $b_\phi$--$b_h$ relation as the full population, the environmental-accretion mechanism is not the whole story. Equivalently, suppressing the gravitational effect of massive neighbors in the simulation should remove the non-universality if the claim is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is that the Separate Universe framework supplies a natural explanation of universality in mass-selected halo bias: the response of halo abundance to a change in the amplitude of primordial curvature fluctuations directly gives a universal relation between $b_\phi$ and $b_h$, independent of any particular spherical collapse model. The same framework, applied to concentration-selected halos, yields non-universality at low masses because a halo's concentration correlates with its accretion history, and those histories are environmentally modulated by the gravitational influence of neighboring massive halos. In scale-free (EdS) and $\Lambda$CDM $N$-body simulations, the paper reports that the $b_\phi$--$b_h$ relation for concentration-selected halos tends back toward universality at the highest halo masses, where halos gravitationally dominate their surroundings. The paper concludes that any residual non-universality in high-redshift, high-bias objects in realistic galaxy surveys is entirely due to the selection function.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the non-universality in concentration-selected halos is caused entirely by the gravitational influence of neighboring, more massive halos on mass accretion, with no comparable contribution from initial-condition assembly bias or non-local tidal effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Separate Universe explanation is correct, constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from mass-selected halo samples do not need a spherical-collapse correction to the $b_\phi$--$b_h$ relation.
  • Concentration-selected samples at low mass should show environment-dependent $b_\phi$; analyses that bin by concentration without accounting for neighbor statistics will misestimate the implications for $f_{\rm NL}$.
  • The universality at the high-mass end in matter-dominated cosmologies is a concrete prediction: the $b_\phi$--$b_h$ scatter for the most massive concentration-selected halos should shrink toward the mass-selected relation as mass increases.
  • For high-redshift surveys ($z \gtrsim 3$), if selection functions are correctly modeled, residual non-universality should vanish; observed non-universality would then be a diagnostic of selection systematics.
  • Because the proposed mechanism is environmental rather than initial, the non-universality should be removable by changing the large-scale environment around fixed-mass halos in simulations, not by altering initial conditions alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same environmental-accretion argument would predict that other secondary halo properties, such as spin, shape, or subhalo abundance, show analogous non-universality in $b_\phi$ whenever those properties are set by neighbor-driven accretion, and recover universality when self-gravity dominates.
  • Editorial inference: in $\Lambda$CDM at late times, the convergence to universality may be delayed or incomplete because the cosmological constant changes the growth environment; the paper's matter-dominated argument implies a testable redshift dependence of the mass at which non-universality disappears.
  • Editorial inference: a direct test would measure the correlation between low-mass halo accretion-rate fluctuations and the distance or mass of the nearest massive neighbor in the same simulations; if that correlation is absent where non-universality persists, the proposed mechanism is incomplete.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the relation between the response bias b_phi and the halo/galaxy bias b_h for dark-matter halos selected by mass or concentration, using the Separate Universe (SU) framework. The authors claim that the SU framework naturally explains the universality of b_phi versus b_h for mass-selected halos without relying on spherical collapse. For concentration-selected halos, they propose that non-universality arises from the gravitational influence of neighboring, more massive halos on mass accretion, with a tendency toward universality at the highest masses in matter-dominated cosmologies. They corroborate this explanation with N-body simulations in EdS and Lambda-CDM cosmologies and conclude that non-universality in high-redshift, high-bias galaxy samples is entirely an artifact of the survey selection function.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would provide a physical, simulation-based explanation of a key systematic in primordial non-Gaussianity constraints, namely the non-universal b_phi-b_h relation. The SU framework is a well-established external modeling tool, and the corroboration by N-body simulations is a positive feature. The proposed mechanism for concentration-selected halos, however, is the load-bearing step: the abstract does not provide a quantitative decomposition separating initial-condition assembly bias from late-time neighbor-driven accretion, so the significance of the claimed explanation cannot currently be assessed from the material available.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract (explanation for concentration-selected halos)] The proposed explanation attributes non-universality in concentration-selected halos solely to the gravitational influence of neighboring massive halos on mass accretion, but the abstract does not present a decomposition that excludes initial-condition assembly bias. Concentration correlates with proto-halo density, shear, and ellipticity, which can induce a non-universal b_phi-b_h relation before any neighbor accretion occurs. Without a matched analysis controlling for initial conditions, the causal mechanism is underdetermined.
  2. [Abstract (final sentence)] The statement that 'any non-universality in high redshift (z >~ 3), high-bias objects ... is entirely an artifact of the associated selection function' is too strong as presented. The abstract reports no quantitative model of realistic survey selection functions, and the extrapolation from a high-mass EdS trend to z >= 3 Lambda-CDM populations is not justified without showing that formation-time and neighbor statistics of those populations are equivalent. The quantitative meaning of 'entirely' needs to be defined and tested.
  3. [Abstract (N-body corroboration)] The abstract does not provide the quantitative measure of universality used, the statistical significance of the claimed convergence at high mass, or the simulation specifications (box size, resolution, halo finder, number of realizations). These details are necessary to verify that the simulation results actually corroborate the proposed mechanism rather than merely being consistent with it qualitatively. The full text may contain these details, but they are absent from the reviewed material.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'universality' should be defined precisely; in particular, the residual in the b_phi-b_h relation that counts as universal should be stated.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'entirely an artifact' would be more precise as 'entirely attributable to the selection function within the mechanisms considered,' since the abstract cannot rule out all conceivable sources of non-universality.
  3. [Abstract] The spelling 'focussing' is acceptable in British English, but the paper should use a single orthographic convention throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found in the available text; the Separate Universe framework and N-body simulations are independent inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

No circularity can be established from the available text. The Separate Universe framework is an external, standard modeling technique that modulates the background amplitude, and the N-body simulations provide independent data. The mass-selected universality result is derived from this independent framework rather than assumed, and the concentration-selected non-universality is proposed as an explanation and then corroborated against simulations. The abstract does not define b_phi in terms of the predicted bias, nor does it fit a parameter to the simulated relation and present that fit as a prediction. The causal decomposition into neighbor-driven accretion versus initial-condition assembly bias may be underdetermined from the abstract alone, and a fuller manuscript would be needed to assess whether any parameters were tuned, but underdetermination is not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears in the abstract. Therefore the available evidence does not support a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone, the central claim rests on the Separate Universe framework as a valid mapping between curvature amplitude and local density, on the N-body simulations being reliable proxies for gravitational evolution, and on the assumption that non-universality can be fully attributed to environmental effects on mass accretion. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Separate Universe framework correctly maps changes in the amplitude of primordial curvature fluctuations to changes in the local mean density, and the response of the halo mass function in this framework equals the b_phi - b_h relation.
    The abstract's entire argument uses SU to connect b_phi and b_h; if this mapping fails, the explanation collapses. Location: abstract's second sentence.
  • domain assumption The N-body simulations in EdS and LambdaCDM cosmologies accurately model halo formation, including the gravitational influence of neighboring massive halos on mass accretion.
    Simulation results are used to corroborate the proposed explanation; if resolution or subgrid choices affect concentration and accretion, the conclusions may change. Location: abstract's description of the simulation corroboration.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-universality in concentration-selected halos is due solely to the gravitational influence of neighboring, more massive halos on mass accretion, and not to other sources such as initial-condition assembly bias or non-local tidal effects.
    This is the proposed explanation in the abstract; it is a modeling choice that restricts possible causes. Location: abstract's explanation of lower-mass concentration-selected halos.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Where does non-Universality in Assembly Bias come from?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZEGX7ZJB

@misc{pith2026250811798,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Where does non-Universality in Assembly Bias come from?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZEGX7ZJB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11798}
}
abstract

Constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity (LPnG) obtained from galaxy power spectra are limited by the perfect degeneracy between the LPnG parameter $f_{\rm NL}$ and the bias parameter $b_{\phi}$ which encodes the response of galaxy clustering to a change in the amplitude of primordial curvature fluctuations. For galaxies observed by galaxy surveys, the relation between $b_{\phi}$ and the galaxy bias $b_{g}$ is poorly understood and differs significantly from the universal mass function ansatz. In this paper, we investigate this non-universality in the context of dark-matter halos using the Separate Universe framework, focussing on dark-matter halos selected by mass and/or concentration. We show that the Separate Universe framework provides a natural explanation of the observed universality in the bias of dark-matter halos selected purely by their mass, independent of the spherical collapse picture of halo formation. We further propose an explanation for the observed non-universality in halos selected by concentration and corroborate it with $N$-body simulations in scale-free (EdS) and $\Lambda\text{CDM}$ cosmologies. In particular, we show that the relation between $b_{\phi}$ and halo bias $b_{h}$ for halos selected by concentration in matter-dominated cosmologies tends towards universality at the highest halo masses due to such halos gravitationally dominating their environment throughout their evolution. We also argue that concentration-selected halos of lower masses exhibit non-universality due to their mass accretion being significantly affected by the gravitational influence of neighbouring, more massive halos. Our results suggest that any non-universality in high redshift ($z\gtrsim 3$), high-bias objects observed by realistic galaxy surveys is entirely an artifact of the associated selection function.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author P. D. \ Meerburg et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.04409 arXiv:1903.04409 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Ach\'ucarro et al

    author author A. Ach\'ucarro et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08128 arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Babich , author P

    author author D. Babich , author P. Creminelli , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/08/009 journal journal JCAP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 009 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0405356 arXiv:astro-ph/0405356 NoStop

    arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Bartolo , author E

    author author N. Bartolo , author E. Komatsu , author S. Matarrese , \ and\ author A. Riotto ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.022 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 402 ,\ pages 103 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0406398 arXiv:astro-ph/0406398 NoStop

    arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    Tanaka \ and\ author Y

    author author T. Tanaka \ and\ author Y. Urakawa ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/05/014 journal journal JCAP \ volume 05 ,\ pages 014 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1251 arXiv:1103.1251 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Pajer , author F

    author author E. Pajer , author F. Schmidt , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083502 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 88 ,\ pages 083502 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.0824 arXiv:1305.0824 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    de Putter , author O

    author author R. de Putter , author O. Dor\'e , \ and\ author D. Green ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/024 journal journal JCAP \ volume 10 ,\ pages 024 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05935 arXiv:1504.05935 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Enqvist \ and\ author M

    author author K. Enqvist \ and\ author M. S. \ Sloth ,\ 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00043-3 journal journal Nucl. Phys. B \ volume 626 ,\ pages 395 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0109214 arXiv:hep-ph/0109214 NoStop

    arXiv 2002

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    author author D. H. \ Lyth \ and\ author D. Wands ,\ 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01366-1 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 524 ,\ pages 5 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0110002 arXiv:hep-ph/0110002 NoStop

    2002 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Sasaki , author J

    author author M. Sasaki , author J. Valiviita , \ and\ author D. Wands ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.103003 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 74 ,\ pages 103003 ( year 2006 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0607627 arXiv:astro-ph/0607627 NoStop

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Dvali , author A

    author author G. Dvali , author A. Gruzinov , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083505 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 69 ,\ pages 083505 ( year 2004 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0305548 arXiv:astro-ph/0305548 NoStop

    2004 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dvali , author A

    author author G. Dvali , author A. Gruzinov , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.023505 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 69 ,\ pages 023505 ( year 2004 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0303591 arXiv:astro-ph/0303591 NoStop

    2004 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Alvarez et al

    author author M. Alvarez et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4671 arXiv:1412.4671 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Akrami et al

    author author Y. Akrami et al. ( collaboration Planck ),\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201935891 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 641 ,\ pages A9 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05697 arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cabass , author M

    author author G. Cabass , author M. M. \ Ivanov , author O. H. E. \ Philcox , author M. Simonovi\'c , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043506 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 106 ,\ pages 043506 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.01781 arXiv:22...

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chaussidon et al

    author author E. Chaussidon et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17623 arXiv:2411.17623 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Flaugher \ and\ author C

    author author B. Flaugher \ and\ author C. Bebek ,\ in\ 10.1117/12.2057105 booktitle Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V ,\ series Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , Vol.\ volume 9147 ,\ editor edited by\ editor ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Dor\'e et al

    author author O. Dor\'e et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4872 arXiv:1412.4872 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Besuner et al

    author author R. Besuner et al. ( collaboration Spec-S5 ),\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07923 arXiv:2503.07923 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025

  12. [20]

    Ferraro et al

    author author S. Ferraro et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 72 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09208 arXiv:1903.09208 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Schmittfull \ and\ author U

    author author M. Schmittfull \ and\ author U. c. v. \ Seljak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123540 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 97 ,\ pages 123540 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    M\"unchmeyer , author M

    author author M. M\"unchmeyer , author M. S. \ Madhavacheril , author S. Ferraro , author M. C. \ Johnson , \ and\ author K. M. \ Smith ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083508 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 100 ,\ pages 083508 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Fabbian , author D

    author author G. Fabbian , author D. Alonso , author K. Storey-Fisher , \ and\ author T. Cornish ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20992 arXiv:2504.20992 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Shiveshwarkar , author T

    author author C. Shiveshwarkar , author T. Brinckmann , \ and\ author M. Loverde ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/094 journal journal JCAP \ volume 05 ,\ pages 094 ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15038 arXiv:2312.15038 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    author author K. M. \ Smith \ and\ author M. LoVerde ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/11/009 journal journal JCAP \ volume 11 ,\ pages 009 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0055 arXiv:1010.0055 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Baumann , author S

    author author D. Baumann , author S. Ferraro , author D. Green , \ and\ author K. M. \ Smith ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/001 journal journal JCAP \ volume 05 ,\ pages 001 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2173 arXiv:1209.2173 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Dalal , author O

    author author N. Dalal , author O. Dor\'e , author D. Huterer , \ and\ author A. Shirokov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123514 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 77 ,\ pages 123514 ( year 2008 a ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    Barreira ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/013 journal journal JCAP \ volume 11 ,\ pages 013 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05673 arXiv:2205.05673 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    author author A. Barreira ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/013 journal journal JCAP \ volume 11 ,\ pages 013 ( year 2022 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05673 arXiv:2205.05673 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Fondi , author L

    author author E. Fondi , author L. Verde , author F. Villaescusa-Navarro , author M. Baldi , author W. R. \ Coulton , author G. Jung , author D. Karagiannis , author M. Liguori , author A. Ravenni , \ and\ author B. D. \ Wandelt ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/02/048 journal journal...

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Dalal \ and\ author W

    author author N. Dalal \ and\ author W. J. \ Percival ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21024 arXiv:2503.21024 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    author author J. M. \ Sullivan \ and\ author U. Seljak ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21736 arXiv:2503.21736 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Seljak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.021302 journal journal Phys

    author author U. Seljak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.021302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 021302 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1770 arXiv:0807.1770 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2009 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Barreira \ and\ author E

    author author A. Barreira \ and\ author E. Krause ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/044 journal journal \ volume 2023 ,\ eid 044 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09066 arXiv:2302.09066 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    LoVerde \ and\ author K

    author author M. LoVerde \ and\ author K. M. \ Smith ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/003 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ volume 2011 ,\ pages 003 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  27. [35]

    Desjacques , author D

    author author V. Desjacques , author D. Jeong , \ and\ author F. Schmidt ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 733 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09787 arXiv:1611.09787 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Barreira , author G

    author author A. Barreira , author G. Cabass , author F. Schmidt , author A. Pillepich , \ and\ author D. Nelson ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/013 journal journal JCAP \ volume 12 ,\ pages 013 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.09368 arXiv:2006.09368 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Lazeyras , author A

    author author T. Lazeyras , author A. Barreira , author F. Schmidt , \ and\ author V. Desjacques ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/023 journal journal JCAP \ volume 01 ,\ pages 023 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07251 arXiv:2209.07251 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Slosar , author C

    author author A. Slosar , author C. Hirata , author U. Seljak , author S. Ho , \ and\ author N. Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/031 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ volume 2008 ,\ pages 031 ( year 2008 a ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  31. [39]

    Hu , author C.-T

    author author W. Hu , author C.-T. \ Chiang , author Y. Li , \ and\ author M. LoVerde ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023002 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 94 ,\ pages 023002 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01412 arXiv:1605.01412 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Li , author W

    author author Y. Li , author W. Hu , \ and\ author M. Takada ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.063507 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 93 ,\ pages 063507 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    \ Chiang , author M

    author author C.-T. \ Chiang , author M. LoVerde , \ and\ author F. Villaescusa-Navarro ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 041302 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12412 arXiv:1811.12412 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Shiveshwarkar , author D

    author author C. Shiveshwarkar , author D. Jamieson , \ and\ author M. Loverde ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103503 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 103 ,\ pages 103503 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04691 arXiv:2012.04691 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Slosar , author C

    author author A. Slosar , author C. Hirata , author U. Seljak , author S. Ho , \ and\ author N. Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/031 journal journal JCAP \ volume 08 ,\ pages 031 ( year 2008 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3580 arXiv:0805.3580 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ramakrishnan , author A

    author author S. Ramakrishnan , author A. Paranjape , author O. Hahn , \ and\ author R. K. \ Sheth ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stz2344 journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 489 ,\ pages 2977 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.02007 arXiv:1903.02007 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    author author W. H. \ Press \ and\ author P. Schechter ,\ 10.1086/152650 journal journal \ volume 187 ,\ pages 425 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974 doi

  38. [46]

    author author J. M. \ Bardeen , author J. R. \ Bond , author N. Kaiser , \ and\ author A. S. \ Szalay ,\ 10.1086/164143 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 304 ,\ pages 15 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  39. [47]

    Kaiser ,\ @noop journal journal Mon

    author author N. Kaiser ,\ @noop journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 227 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  40. [48]

    author author J. R. \ Bond \ and\ author S. T. \ Myers ,\ 10.1086/192267 journal journal \ volume 103 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  41. [49]

    author author R. G. \ Bower ,\ 10.1093/mnras/248.2.332 journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 248 ,\ pages 332 ( year 1991 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/248/2/332/3437756/mnras248-0332.pdf https://acade...

    1991 doi

  42. [50]

    Cooray \ and\ author R

    author author A. Cooray \ and\ author R. K. \ Sheth ,\ 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00276-4 journal journal Phys. Rept. \ volume 372 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0206508 arXiv:astro-ph/0206508 NoStop

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    \ Chiang , author W

    author author C.-T. \ Chiang , author W. Hu , author Y. Li , \ and\ author M. Loverde ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123526 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 97 ,\ pages 123526 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01310 arXiv:1710.01310 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    \ Chiang , author C

    author author C.-T. \ Chiang , author C. Wagner , author F. Schmidt , \ and\ author E. Komatsu ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/048 journal journal JCAP \ volume 05 ,\ pages 048 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3411 arXiv:1403.3411 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Biagetti , author T

    author author M. Biagetti , author T. Lazeyras , author T. Baldauf , author V. Desjacques , \ and\ author F. Schmidt ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stx714 journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 468 ,\ pages 3277 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04901 arXiv:1611.04901...

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hadzhiyska \ and\ author S

    author author B. Hadzhiyska \ and\ author S. Ferraro ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14873 arXiv:2501.14873 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    author author P. S. \ Behroozi , author R. H. \ Wechsler , \ and\ author H.-Y. \ Wu ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 762 ,\ pages 109 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.4372 arXiv:1110.4372 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    author author R. H. \ Wechsler , author J. S. \ Bullock , author J. R. \ Primack , author A. V. \ Kravtsov , \ and\ author A. Dekel ,\ 10.1086/338765 journal journal \ volume 568 ,\ pages 52 ( year 2002 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0108151 arXiv:astro-ph/0108151 [astro-p...

    2002 arXiv

  49. [57]

    author author C. A. \ Correa , author J. S. B. \ Wyithe , author J. Schaye , \ and\ author A. R. \ Duffy ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stv1363 journal journal \ volume 452 ,\ pages 1217 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00391 arXiv:1502.00391 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Diemer \ and\ author M

    author author B. Diemer \ and\ author M. Joyce ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/aafad6 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 871 ,\ pages 168 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07326 arXiv:1809.07326 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Dalal , author M

    author author N. Dalal , author M. White , author J. R. \ Bond , \ and\ author A. Shirokov ,\ 10.1086/591512 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 687 ,\ pages 12 ( year 2008 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3453 arXiv:0803.3453 [astro-ph] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Hahn , author C

    author author O. Hahn , author C. Porciani , author A. Dekel , \ and\ author C. M. \ Carollo ,\ 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15271.x journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 398 ,\ pages 1742 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic....

    2009

  53. [61]

    Borzyszkowski , author C

    author author M. Borzyszkowski , author C. Porciani , author E. Romano-Díaz , \ and\ author E. Garaldi ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stx873 journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 469 ,\ pages 594 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Diemer \ and\ author A

    author author B. Diemer \ and\ author A. V. \ Kravtsov ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/108 journal journal \ volume 799 ,\ eid 108 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.4730 arXiv:1407.4730 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    author author C. W. \ Misner , author K. S. \ Thorne , \ and\ author J. A. \ Wheeler ,\ @noop title Gravitation \ ( publisher W. H. Freeman ,\ address San Francisco ,\ year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  56. [65]

    Nicolis , author R

    author author A. Nicolis , author R. Rattazzi , \ and\ author E. Trincherini ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 79 ,\ pages 064036 ( year 2009 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2197 arXiv:0811.2197 [hep-th] NoStop

    2009 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Paranjape \ and\ author N

    author author A. Paranjape \ and\ author N. Padmanabhan ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stx659 journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 468 ,\ pages 2984 ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/468/3/2984/13628828/stx...

    2017 doi

  58. [67]

    author author J. S. \ Bullock , author T. S. \ Kolatt , author Y. Sigad , author R. S. \ Somerville , author A. V. \ Kravtsov , author A. A. \ Klypin , author J. R. \ Primack , \ and\ author A. Dekel ,\ 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x journal journal \ volume 321 ,\ pages 559...

  59. [68]

    Springel , author R

    author author V. Springel , author R. Pakmor , author O. Zier , \ and\ author M. Reinecke ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stab1855 journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 506 ,\ pages 2871 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03567 arXiv:2010.03567 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2021 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Lesgourgues ,\ @noop \ ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2932 arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    author author J. Lesgourgues ,\ @noop \ ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2932 arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  61. [70]

    author author G. L. \ Bryan \ and\ author M. L. \ Norman ,\ 10.1086/305262 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 495 ,\ pages 80 ( year 1998 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9710107 arXiv:astro-ph/9710107 NoStop

    1998 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Klypin , author S

    author author A. Klypin , author S. Trujillo-Gomez , \ and\ author J. Primack ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/102 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 740 ,\ pages 102 ( year 2011 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3660 arXiv:1002.3660 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Frigo \ and\ author S

    author author M. Frigo \ and\ author S. G. \ Johnson ,\ 10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301 journal journal IEEE Proc. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 216 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2004

  64. [73]

    Lazeyras \ and\ author F

    author author T. Lazeyras \ and\ author F. Schmidt ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/008 journal journal JCAP \ volume 09 ,\ pages 008 ( year 2018 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07531 arXiv:1712.07531 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2018 arXiv

  65. [74]

    \ Kim \ and\ author R

    author author Y.-R. \ Kim \ and\ author R. Croft ,\ 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13240.x journal journal Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. \ volume 387 ,\ pages 377 ( year 2008 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701012 arXiv:astro-ph/0701012 NoStop

    2008

  66. [75]

    Ishikawa , author N

    author author S. Ishikawa , author N. Kashikawa , author J. Toshikawa , author M. Tanaka , author T. Hamana , author Y. Niino , author K. Ichikawa , \ and\ author H. Uchiyama ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d64 journal journal The Astrophysical Journal \ volume 841 ,\ pages 8 ( year 2...

    doi

  67. [76]

    Asgari , author A

    author author M. Asgari , author A. J. \ Mead , \ and\ author C. Heymans ,\ 10.21105/astro.2303.08752 \ ( year 2023 ),\ 10.21105/astro.2303.08752 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08752 arXiv:2303.08752 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Shen et al

    author author Y. Shen et al. ,\ 10.1086/513517 journal journal Astron. J. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 2222 ( year 2007 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702214 arXiv:astro-ph/0702214 NoStop

    2007 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Voivodic \ and\ author A

    author author R. Voivodic \ and\ author A. Barreira ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/069 journal journal JCAP \ volume 05 ,\ pages 069 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04637 arXiv:2012.04637 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2021 arXiv

  70. [79]

    author author J. A. \ Peacock \ and\ author R. E. \ Smith ,\ 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 318 ,\ pages 1144 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/318/4/114...

    2000

  71. [80]

    author author F. K. \ Manasse \ and\ author C. W. \ Misner ,\ 10.1063/1.1724316 journal journal J. Math. Phys. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 735 ( year 1963 b ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  72. [81]

    Baumann , author A

    author author D. Baumann , author A. Nicolis , author L. Senatore , \ and\ author M. Zaldarriaga ,\ 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/051 journal journal JCAP \ volume 07 ,\ pages 051 ( year 2012 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2488 arXiv:1004.2488 [astro-ph.CO] NoStop

    2012 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Schmidt \ and\ author D

    author author F. Schmidt \ and\ author D. Jeong ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083513 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 86 ,\ pages 083513 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.