Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Fermi-ball in a multicomponent dark matter framework and its gravitational wave signatures

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In an inert-doublet dark matter model, a strong first-order phase transition can form stable Fermi-balls that supply up to 32% of the dark matter and emit gravitational waves detectable by BBO and U-DECIGO.

desk verdict FOPT/GW part is solid phenomenology; the Fermi-ball fraction is an assumed normalization, not a predicted output. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00131 v1 pith:ZJQKF7Q5 submitted 2024-12-30 hep-ph

Nabarun Chakrabarty , Indrani Chakraborty , Himadri Roy This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 95.35.+d04.30.-w
keywords Fermi-balltwo-componentdarkmatterinertdoubletmodelfirst-orderphasetransitiongravitationalwavesBBOU-DECIGOrelicdensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the inert-doublet 'desert' region of a two-component dark matter model is a productive rather than empty part of parameter space. In the model studied, the fermion $\chi$ replenishes the relic density where the inert doublet alone is under-abundant, and the thermal scalar potential along the singlet direction develops coexisting minima. Those minima drive a strong first-order phase transition and trap $\chi$ particles carrying a global $U(1)$ charge into stable Fermi-balls, macroscopic dark-matter objects. The paper reports that Fermi-balls contribute $16.67\%$ (BM1) and $31.67\%$ (BM2) of the observed dark matter relic density, and that the same transition produces gravitational-wave spectra peaked near $0.01$-$0.1$ Hz, detectable by the proposed BBO and U-DECIGO observatories. If correct, this would be a concrete renormalizable (ultraviolet-complete) setting where a macroscopic dark-matter component and an observable gravitational-wave signal come from one mechanism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the finite-temperature effective potential $V_{\rm total}(\phi,T)$ along the singlet direction $\phi$, built from the tree-level potential $V_0(\phi)=-\frac12 m_S^2\phi^2-\frac13\mu_S\phi^3+\frac14\lambda_8\phi^4$ together with one-loop zero-temperature, thermal, and daisy-resummed corrections. The cubic term $-\mu_S\phi^3/3$ is what makes the potential develop coexisting minima, the false and true vacua; tunnelling between them defines the critical and nucleation temperatures and, through the bounce action, the transition-strength parameters $\phi_c/T_c$, $\alpha$, and $\beta/H$. The gravitational-wave spectrum is assembled from bubble-wall collisions, sound waves, and turbulence using those parameters. Fermi-ball formation uses the same coexisting minima: fermions $\chi$ with a conserved global charge are trapped in the false-vacuum region, and their Fermi-gas pressure balances vacuum pressure and surface tension in the energy expression $E = \frac{3\pi}{4}\left(\frac{3}{2\pi}\right)^{2/3}\frac{Q_{\rm FB}^{4/3}}{R} + 4\pi\sigma_0 R^2 + \frac{4\pi}{3}U_0 R^3$. The Fermi-ball relic density is then set by the trapped fraction $F_\chi$ and the relation $\Omega_{\rm FB}h^2 = 0.12\,F_\chi\left(\frac{c_\chi}{0.0146}\right)\left(\frac{U_0^{1/4}}{100\,{\rm GeV}}\right)$, with $c_\chi$ an input asymmetry parameter.

What would settle it

Compute $c_\chi$ from an explicit asymmetry-generation mechanism for the global $U(1)$ charge: the promised 17-32% Fermi-ball relic requires $c_\chi = 4.93\times 10^{-3}$ and $7.29\times 10^{-3}$ at the two benchmarks, so a concrete calculation yielding $c_\chi \lesssim 10^{-3}$ would falsify the sizeable-Fermi-ball claim while leaving the gravitational-wave prediction intact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the inert-doublet desert region -- the inert doublet mass window near $100$-$500$ GeV where the doublet alone gives about $10\%$ of the observed relic -- can simultaneously satisfy three conditions. First, the singlet fermion $\chi$ brings the thermal relic density into the observed range. Second, the finite-temperature potential along the singlet direction has two coexisting minima, giving a strong first-order phase transition with $\phi_c/T_c = 1.491$ (BM1) and $2.018$ (BM2), and gravitational-wave spectra peaking at $\Omega_{\rm GW}h^2\sim 10^{-15}$ and $\sim 10^{-17}$, within reach of BBO and U-DECIGO respectively. Third, $\chi$ particles carrying the conserved global $U(1)_Q$ charge are trapped in the false vacuum and form stable Fermi-balls, whose relic abundance is $\Omega_{\rm FB}h^2/\Omega_{\rm obs}h^2 = 16.67\%$ and $31.67\%$ for the two benchmarks. The Fermi-ball contribution is computed from the trapped fraction $F_\chi$, the vacuum-energy scale $U_0^{1/4}$, and the input asymmetry parameter $c_\chi$; the paper concludes that this is a concrete embedding of Fermi-balls in a realistic two-component dark matter model with testable gravitational-wave signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The Fermi-ball abundance is set by an input particle-antiparticle asymmetry parameter $c_\chi$ (taken to be $4.93\times 10^{-3}$ and $7.29\times 10^{-3}$ for the two benchmarks) that the paper quotes rather than derives; if the fermion's primordial asymmetry were smaller or absent, the Fermi-ball contribution would shrink or vanish even though the first-order phase transition and its gravitational waves would remain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inert-doublet desert region becomes a concrete target for space-based gravitational-wave observatories: the two benchmark spectra peak near $10^{-15}$ and $10^{-17}$ in $\Omega_{\rm GW}h^2$, in the BBO and U-DECIGO bands respectively.
  • Fermi-balls can be the dominant new dark-matter source in these benchmarks, contributing $16.67\%$ and $31.67\%$ of the observed relic density, in both cases more than the inert doublet itself contributes.
  • The observed dark-matter relic is the sum of three components -- the inert doublet, the fermion, and Fermi-balls -- so the model's viable parameter space is wider than models in which thermal WIMPs alone must saturate the relic abundance.
  • Because the Fermi-ball relic and the gravitational-wave signal both trace back to the same cubic term and vacuum-energy scale $U_0$, the two observables are linked: a detector-visible transition comes with a Fermi-ball abundance set by the same $U_0^{1/4}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the asymmetry $c_\chi$ is an input in this paper, not a derived quantity; if an explicit mechanism for generating the $U(1)_Q$ asymmetry predicts $c_\chi$ well below $10^{-3}$, the Fermi-ball fraction collapses while the gravitational-wave signal survives.
  • Editorial extension: a detected gravitational-wave background in the BBO/U-DECIGO band would confirm the first-order phase transition but not by itself confirm Fermi-balls, because the Fermi-ball relic also depends on $c_\chi$ and on the trapping fraction $F_\chi$.
  • Editorial extension: the singlet-direction phase transition shows how a hidden sector with only weak Standard-Model couplings could produce macroscopic dark-matter objects and an observable stochastic gravitational-wave background without strong direct-detection signals.
  • Editorial extension: the same 'under-abundant thermal dark-matter candidate plus conserved-charge fermion' recipe could be applied to other desert regions of multicomponent dark matter, turning a relic-density deficit into a Fermi-ball production site.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-component dark matter model consisting of an inert doublet η, a singlet scalar S, and a singlet Dirac fermion χ that carries a global U(1)_Q symmetry. It revisits the 'desert' region where the inert doublet alone underproduces the relic density, and shows that adding χ can restore the observed abundance. Along the S direction, the finite-temperature scalar potential develops coexisting minima, leading to a first-order phase transition whose gravitational-wave spectrum is computed for two benchmark points and found to be potentially observable at BBO and U-DECIGO. The paper further claims that stable Fermi-balls form in this setup and contribute sizeably (16.67% and 31.67%) to the dark matter relic density.

Significance. If the Fermi-ball contribution were actually predicted by the model, this would be a useful concrete embedding of Fermi-balls in a UV-complete two-component dark matter framework with testable gravitational-wave signatures. The phase-transition and gravitational-wave calculations use standard public tools (micrOMEGAs, FindBounce), and the direct detection constraints are properly checked for both dark matter components. The paper also makes a clear and falsifiable statement about the detectability of the GW signal at BBO and U-DECIGO. However, the headline Fermi-ball result is not a prediction: it is fixed by an input parameter c_chi that is not derived from any asymmetry-generation mechanism, and the trapping fraction F_chi is quoted without derivation. The significance of the Fermi-ball part is therefore currently conditional on assumptions that are not part of the model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (37) and Table I] The Fermi-ball relic density is proportional to the input parameter c_chi: Ω_FB h^2 = 0.12 × F_chi × (c_chi/0.0146) × (U_0^(1/4)/100 GeV). The paper never defines c_chi in terms of the primordial U(1)_chi asymmetry of the model; it only states that c_chi is 'typically ~0.01' and then lists 'Required c_chi' values of 4.93×10^-3 and 7.29×10^-3 in the last row of Table I. These values are evidently chosen to reproduce the advertised 16.67% and 31.67% fractions. The claimed 'sizeable Fermi-ball contribution' is therefore an input assumption, not an outcome of the model. The authors should either derive c_chi from a concrete asymmetry-generation mechanism or clearly state that the Fermi-ball fraction is a free parameter and remove the implication that it is a model prediction.
  2. [Sec. IV, Table I (F_chi column)] The trapping fraction F_chi, quoted as 0.459 and 0.590 for BM1 and BM2, is central to the Fermi-ball relic density because Ω_FB scales linearly with it. The paper says only that F_chi 'can be obtained as a function of the bubble wall velocity v_b and M*_chi/T*' and that T* ≃ T_n, but no formula, calculation, or reference to the specific expression is provided. Without a reproducible derivation of F_chi, the numerical Fermi-ball fractions in Table I cannot be verified, and the result is not transparently supported by the manuscript.
  3. [Sec. IV, Eq. (35)-(36) and Fig. 4] The stability condition for Fermi-balls, Eq. (36), involves U_0 = ΔU(T)|_{T=0}, the zero-temperature energy difference between the false and true minima. The paper does not demonstrate that the two benchmarks actually possess coexisting minima at T = 0; Fig. 4 shows the potential only at T = T_c and T = T_n. The value of U_0^(1/4) is not reported, nor is m_χ + y_χ φ_t(0) evaluated for BM1 and BM2. The assertion that stable Fermi-balls form in these benchmarks is therefore not supported by the numerical results shown.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (18d)] In Eq. (18d), the field-dependent fermion mass is written as M_χ(φ) = (m_f + y_χ φ)^2; the symbol m_f appears to be a typo for m_χ, and the right-hand side should be squared to be a mass-squared, i.e., M_χ^2(φ) = (m_χ + y_χ φ)^2.
  2. [Sec. III, text before Fig. 1] The sentence 'we fix vS = MH = µS = 200 GeV, µS = 50 GeV' assigns µS twice. Presumably the intended values are vS = MH = 200 GeV and µS = 50 GeV.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (9b)] In the second Boltzmann equation, the term 'y2 H − (yEQ ηR )2' should read 'y_ηR^2 − (y_EQ^ηR)^2'; H is not a dark matter density variable.
  4. [Figure captions] The captions of Figs. 3, 4, and 5 appear to be interchanged: Fig. 3 shows the M_ηR–M_χ plane but its caption says 'Variation of V_total versus φ'; Fig. 4 shows V_total(φ) at T_c and T_n but its caption says 'Regions in the M_ηR–M_χ plane'; Fig. 5 shows GW spectra but its caption again says 'Variation of V_total versus φ'.
  5. [General] The text contains several typos, including 'co-exiting minima', 'Acknowledegment', and 'sizeable' spelled inconsistently; these should be corrected in a final version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Fermi-ball relic fraction is set by an unspecified input cχ (Eq. 37); Table I's 'Required cχ' is back-calculated to force the advertised 16-32%.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, Eq. (37) and Table I (last row, 'Required cχ')]
    "Finally, Fermi-balls contribute to the relic density by ΩFBh2 = 0.12 × Fχ (cχ/0.0146)(U0^{1/4}/100 GeV), (37), where cχ is a number typically∼ 0.01. ... The values of Fχ and the relative contributions of Fermi-balls to the observed relic density are shown in Table I. It is seen that the contributions are sizeable ... In the last row of the same table, we also estimate the value of cχ stipulated in the process. [Table I:] Required cχ: 4.93 × 10^−3, 7.29 × 10^−3."

    Eq. (37) makes ΩFBh2 exactly proportional to the parameter cχ, and Table I lists 'Required cχ' values that are back-calculated from the desired Fermi-ball fractions (16.67% and 31.67%). The paper never derives cχ from a specified asymmetry-generation mechanism for the global U(1)Q charge, nor from the model parameters; it only says cχ is 'a number typically∼ 0.01'. Thus the advertised sizeable Fermi-ball contribution is not a model prediction but a restatement of the chosen input: setting cχ to zero removes the Fermi-ball abundance while leaving the FOPT and gravitational-wave predictions unchanged. Fχ is also quoted without a derivation, so both multiplicative factors in Eq. (37) are effectively inputs.

full rationale

The paper contains an independent, non-circular derivation for the first-order phase transition and gravitational-wave signal: the finite-temperature effective potential is specified, the critical and nucleation temperatures are computed, and the GW spectra for BM1 and BM2 are compared with BBO and U-DECIGO sensitivities. These results do not depend on the Fermi-ball normalization. The circularity is confined to the Fermi-ball relic-density claim. Equation (37) defines ΩFBh2 as a linear function of the free parameter cχ, and Table I reveals that the quoted cχ values are 'required' to reproduce the advertised 16.67% and 31.67% fractions. Because cχ is not derived from the model, the claim that Fermi-balls contribute sizeably to the observed dark-matter abundance is an input choice disguised as an output. The score is 7 rather than 10 because the FOPT/GW analysis is self-contained and the Fermi-ball formalism itself follows the external framework of Hong, Jung, and Xie; only the central abundance claim is forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central Fermi-ball claim rests on an assumed U(1)_Q asymmetry c_chi and on the standard finite-temperature effective potential framework. The model particles (eta, S, chi) are taken from prior literature, and Fermi-balls are composite objects rather than new fundamental entities, so no invented fundamental entity is listed. The dominant free parameter is c_chi, which directly controls the advertised Fermi-ball relic abundance.

free parameters (1)
  • c_chi = 4.93e-3 (BM1), 7.29e-3 (BM2), labelled 'Required c_chi'
    Omega_FB h^2 is linearly proportional to c_chi in Eq. (37). The values are chosen so that Fermi-balls contribute 16.7% and 31.7% of the relic density; no model mechanism fixes c_chi.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The universe possesses a primordial global U(1)_Q asymmetry of the fermion chi with c_chi of order 10^-2 at the phase transition, and no washout occurs afterward.
    Needed for Fermi-balls to form and for Eq. (37) to give the quoted Omega_FB h^2. The paper only states c_chi is 'typically ~0.01' and computes 'required' values in Table I, without providing an asymmetry generation mechanism.
  • standard math The finite-temperature one-loop effective potential with daisy resummation (Arnold-Espinosa) accurately describes the phase transition strength and bubble dynamics.
    Standard thermal field theory used in Eqs. (16)-(22) and the Arnold-Espinosa prescription; accepted background result, not re-derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The Fermi-ball stability condition and trapping fraction F_chi formalism of Hong, Jung and Xie (ref. [50]) apply unchanged to this two-component model.
    The paper cites ref. [50] for the Fermi-ball energy expression, the stability condition in Eq. (36), and F_chi, without re-deriving these for the present setup or showing the F_chi calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermi-ball in a multicomponent dark matter framework and its gravitational wave signatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJQKF7Q5

@misc{pith2026250100131,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermi-ball in a multicomponent dark matter framework and its gravitational wave signatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJQKF7Q5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00131}
}
read the original abstract

It has been known that under-abundant dark matter density of an inert doublet can be replenished by an additional dark matter component, say, a fermion. We find that such a scenario can lead to the formation of stable Fermi-balls through coexisting minima of the finite temperature scalar potential. More importantly, we demonstrate that the Fermi-balls contribute sizeably to the dark matter relic density. In addition, the aforesaid coexisting minima open up the possibility of a first-order phase transition. This, in turn, triggers emission of gravitational waves that can be tested at the proposed BBO and U-DECIGO detectors. Therefore, the present study becomes a concrete setup to embed Fermi-balls in a realistic two-component dark matter model, and, to test the same using gravitational wave signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00131 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Regions in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Collaboration,Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) three year results: Implications for cosmology, Astrophys

    W. Collaboration,Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) three year results: Implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl.170 (2007) 377, [astro-ph/0603449]

    arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Collaboration,Planck 2018 results

    P. Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    N. A. et al. (Planck Collaboration),Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6

    2020

  4. [4]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405 (2005) 279

    2005

  5. [5]

    B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg,Cosmological lower bound on heavy-neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett.39 (1977) 165

    1977

  6. [7]

    Collaboration,Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the pandax-4t experiment, Sci

    P. Collaboration,Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the pandax-4t experiment, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.62 (2019) 31011, [arXiv:1806.02229]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [9]

    Amole, M

    C. Amole, M. Ardid, I. J. Arnquist, D. M. Asner, D. Baxter, E. Behnke et al.,Dark matter search results from the complete exposure of the pico-60 c3f8 bubble chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 022001, [arXiv:1902.04031]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [10]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka,Two-component dark matter, JHEP 10 (2013) 158, [arXiv:1309.2986]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 100 references
  1. [11]

    L. Bian, R. Ding and B. Zhu,Two component higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B728 (2014) 105, [arXiv:1308.3851]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [12]

    S. Esch, M. Klasen and C. E. Yaguna,A minimal model for two-component dark matter, JHEP 09 (2014) 108, [arXiv:1406.0617]. 17

    2014 arXiv

  3. [13]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Poulose and P. Ghosh,Multipartite interacting scalar dark matter in the light of updated lux data, JCAP 04 (2017) 043, [arXiv:1607.08461]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [14]

    Ahmed, M

    A. Ahmed, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski and M. Iglicki,Multi-component dark matter: the vector and fermion case, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 905, [arXiv:1710.01853]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [15]

    Herrero-Garcia, A

    J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White and A. G. Williams,On the direct detection of multi-component dark matter: sensitivity studies and parameter estimation, JCAP 11 (2017) 021, [arXiv:1709.01945]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [16]

    Herrero-Garcia, A

    J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White and A. G. Williams,On the direct detection of multi-component dark matter: implications of the relic abundance, JCAP 01 (2019) 008, [arXiv:1809.06881]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [17]

    Poulin and S

    A. Poulin and S. Godfrey,Multicomponent dark matter from a hidden gauged su(3), Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 076008, [arXiv:1808.04901]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [18]

    Aoki and T

    M. Aoki and T. Toma,Boosted self-interacting dark matter in a multi-component dark matter model, JCAP 10 (2018) 020, [arXiv:1806.09154]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [19]

    M. Aoki, D. Kaneko and J. Kubo,Multicomponent dark matter in radiative seesaw models, Front. Phys.5 (2017) 53, [arXiv:1711.03765]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [20]

    Elahi and S

    F. Elahi and S. Khatibi,Multi-component dark matter in a non-abelian dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015019, [arXiv:1902.04384]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [21]

    Borah, R

    D. Borah, R. Roshan and A. Sil,Minimal two-component scalar doublet dark matter with radiative neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 055027, [arXiv:1904.04837]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [22]

    Bhattacharya, P

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, A. K. Saha and A. Sil,Two component dark matter with inert higgs doublet: neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider searches, JHEP 03 (2020) 090, [arXiv:1905.12583]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [23]

    Bhattacharya, N

    S. Bhattacharya, N. Chakrabarty, R. Roshan and A. Sil,Multicomponent dark matter in extended U(1) B-L: neutrino mass and high scale validity, JCAP 04 (2020) 013, [1910.00612]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [24]

    Chakrabarty, R

    N. Chakrabarty, R. Roshan and A. Sil,Two-component doublet-triplet scalar dark matter stabilizing the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 115010, [2102.06032]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [25]

    Blinov, S

    N. Blinov, S. Profumo and T. Stefaniak,The Electroweak Phase Transition in the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 07 (2015) 028, [1504.05949]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [26]

    Jangid and H

    S. Jangid and H. Okada,Electroweak phase transition with radiative symmetry breaking in a type-II seesaw model with an inert doublet, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 015001, [2310.12591]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [27]

    Bandyopadhyay and S

    P. Bandyopadhyay and S. Jangid,Discerning singlet and triplet scalars at the electroweak phase transition and gravitational wave, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 055032, [2111.03866]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [28]

    Chakrabarty, H

    N. Chakrabarty, H. Roy and T. Srivastava,Single-step first order phase transition and 18 gravitational waves in a SIMP dark matter scenario, Nucl. Phys. B 998 (2024) 116392, [2212.09659]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [29]

    Bian, Y.-L

    L. Bian, Y.-L. Tang and R. Zhou,FIMP dark matter mediated by a massive gauge boson around the phase transition period and the gravitational waves production, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 035028, [2111.10608]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [30]

    X. Deng, X. Liu, J. Yang, R. Zhou and L. Bian,Heavy dark matter and Gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 055013, [2012.15174]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [31]

    Bian and X

    L. Bian and X. Liu,Two-step strongly first-order electroweak phase transition modified FIMP dark matter, gravitational wave signals, and the neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 055003, [1811.03279]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [32]

    Costa, S

    F. Costa, S. Khan and J. Kim,A two-component dark matter model and its associated gravitational waves, JHEP 06 (2022) 026, [2202.13126]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [33]

    Ghosh, T

    P. Ghosh, T. Ghosh and S. Roy,Interplay among gravitational waves, dark matter and collider signals in the singlet scalar extended type-II seesaw model, JHEP 10 (2023) 057, [2211.15640]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Chatterjee, A

    A. Chatterjee, A. Datta and S. Roy,Electroweak phase transition in the Z3-invariant NMSSM: Implications of LHC and Dark matter searches and prospects of detecting the gravitational waves, JHEP 06 (2022) 108, [2202.12476]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [35]

    Ghosh, H.-K

    T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, T. Han and H. Liu,Electroweak phase transition with an SU(2) dark sector, JHEP 07 (2021) 045, [2012.09758]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [36]

    Shibuya and T

    H. Shibuya and T. Toma,Impact of first-order phase transitions on dark matter production in the scotogenic model, JHEP 11 (2022) 064, [2207.14662]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Addazi and A

    A. Addazi and A. Marcianò,Gravitational waves from dark first order phase transitions and dark photons*, Chinese Physics C 42 (jan, 2018) 023107

    2018

  28. [38]

    Benincasa, A

    N. Benincasa, A. Hryczuk, K. Kannike and M. Laletin,Phase transitions and gravitational waves in a model ofZ3 scalar dark matter, JHEP 02 (2024) 207, [2312.04627]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [39]

    Allahverdi, C

    R. Allahverdi, C. Hauptmann and P. Huang,Enhanced dark matter abundance in first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 115005, [2409.02179]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [40]

    I. K. Banerjee, U. K. Dey and S. Khalil,Primordial Black Holes and Gravitational Waves in the U(1) B-L extended inert doublet model: a first-order phase transition perspective, JHEP 12 (2024) 009, [2406.12518]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [41]

    Biondini, P

    S. Biondini, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Strong electroweak phase transition in t-channel simplified dark matter models, JCAP 10 (2022) 044, [2207.12207]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das and I. Saha,Dark matter from phase transition generated PBH evaporation with gravitational waves signatures, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 035014, 19 [2401.12282]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, M. Knauss and I. Saha,Baryon asymmetry from dark matter decay in the vicinity of a phase transition, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) L091701, [2306.05459]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and I. Saha,Ligo-virgo constraints on dark matter and leptogenesis triggered by a first order phase transition at high scale, Phys. Rev. D109 (May, 2024) 095034

    2024

  35. [45]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and I. Saha,Leptogenesis and dark matter through relativistic bubble walls with observable gravitational waves, JHEP 11 (2022) 136, [2207.14226]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das and R. Roshan,Probing high scale seesaw and PBH generated dark matter via gravitational waves with multiple tilts, Nucl. Phys. B 1002 (2024) 116528, [2208.04965]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and S. K. Kang,A first order dark SU(2)D phase transition with vector dark matter in the light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data, JCAP 12 (2021) 039, [2109.11558]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and S. K. Kang,Gravitational waves from a dark U(1)D phase transition in light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 063501, [2105.01007]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Liu and L

    X. Liu and L. Bian,Dark matter and electroweak phase transition in the mixed scalar dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 055028, [1706.06042]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [50]

    J.-P. Hong, S. Jung and K.-P. Xie,Fermi-ball dark matter from a first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 075028, [2008.04430]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [51]

    Belyaev, G

    A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, I. P. Ivanov, F. Rojas-Abatte and M. Thomas,Anatomy of the inert two higgs doublet model in the light of the lhc and non-lhc dark matter searches, Physical Review D97 (2018) 035011, [arXiv:1612.00511]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [52]

    L. L. Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver and M. H. G. Tytgat,The inert doublet model: an archetype for dark matter, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics02 (2007) 028, [hep-ph/0612275]

    2007 arXiv

  43. [53]

    L. L. Honorez and C. E. Yaguna,The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, Journal of High Energy Physics09 (2010) 046, [arXiv:1003.3125]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [54]

    Arhrib, Y.-L

    A. Arhrib, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and T.-C. Yuan,An updated analysis of inert higgs doublet model in light of the recent results from lux, planck, ams-02 and lhc, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics06 (2014) 030, [arXiv:1310.0358]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [55]

    Choubey and A

    S. Choubey and A. Kumar,Inflation and dark matter in the inert doublet model, Journal of High Energy Physics11 (2017) 080, [arXiv:1707.06587]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [56]

    L. L. Honorez and C. E. Yaguna,A new viable region of the inert doublet model, Journal of 20 Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics01 (2011) 002, [arXiv:1011.1411]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [57]

    Ilnicka, M

    A. Ilnicka, M. Krawczyk and T. Robens,Inert doublet model in light of lhc run i and astrophysical data, Physical Review D93 (2016) 055026, [arXiv:1508.01671]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [58]

    Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran,Observing the dark scalar doublet and its impact on the standard-model higgs boson at colliders, Physical Review D76 (2007) 095011, [arXiv:0708.2939]

    2007 arXiv

  49. [59]

    Lundstrom, M

    E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsjo,The inert doublet model and lep ii limits, Physical Review D79 (2009) 035013, [arXiv:0810.3924]

    2009 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Gustafsson, S

    M. Gustafsson, S. Rydbeck, L. Lopez-Honorez and E. Lundstrom,Status of the inert doublet model and the role of multileptons at the lhc, Physical Review D86 (2012) 075019, [arXiv:1206.6316]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Kalinowski, W

    J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, T. Robens, D. Sokolowska and A. F. Zarnecki,Benchmarking the inert doublet model for e + e - colliders, Journal of High Energy Physics12 (2018) 081, [arXiv:1809.07712]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Chakraborti and P

    S. Chakraborti and P. Poulose,Interplay of Scalar and Fermionic Components in a Multi-component Dark Matter Scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 420, [1808.01979]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [63]

    E. W. Kolb,The Early Universe, vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019, 10.1201/9780429492860

    2019 doi

  54. [64]

    Semenov,LanHEP: A Package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory

    A. Semenov,LanHEP: A Package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory. Version 3.0, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 431–454, [0805.0555]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov,micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates, Comput. Phys. Commun.192 (2015) 322–329, [1407.6129]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [66]

    LUX collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al.,Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 021303, [1608.07648]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Cui et al.,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys

    PandaX-IIcollaboration, X. Cui et al.,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 181302, [1708.06917]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Aprile et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Tonyear Exposure of XENON1T, Phys

    XENON collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Tonyear Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 111302, [1805.12562]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [69]

    J. M. Alarcon, L. S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and J. A. Oller,The strangeness content of the nucleon from effective field theory and phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B730 (2014) 342–346, [1209.2870]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [70]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Physical Review D7 (1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  61. [71]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry behavior at finite temperature, Physical Review D9 (1974) 3320–3341. 21

    1974

  62. [72]

    Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999.hep-ph/9901312

    1999 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Laine and A

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, vol. 925. Springer, 2016, 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9

    2016 doi

  64. [74]

    R. R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory, Physical Review D45 (1992) 4695, [hep-ph/9204216]

    1992 arXiv

  65. [75]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Physical Review D47 (1993) 3546, [hep-ph/9212235]

    1993 arXiv

  66. [76]

    A. D. Linde,Decay of the false vacuum at finite temperature, Nuclear Physics B216 (1983) 421

    1983

  67. [77]

    M. S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Relic gravitational waves and extended inflation, Physical Review Letters 65 (1990) 3080–3083

    1990

  68. [78]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 4514–4535

    1992

  69. [79]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 2026–2029

    1992

  70. [80]

    Kosowsky and M

    A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions, Physical Review D47 (1993) 4372–4391, [astro-ph/9211004]

    1993 arXiv

  71. [81]

    M. S. Turner, E. J. Weinberg and L. M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first-order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D46 (Sep, 1992) 2384–2403

    1992

  72. [82]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041301, [1304.2433]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [83]

    J. T. Giblin and J. B. Mertens,Gravitational radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid, Physical Review D90 (2014) 023532, [1405.4005]

    2014 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 123009, [1504.03291]

    2015 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 103520, [1704.05871]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Kosowsky, A

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack and T. Kahniashvili,Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 024030, [astro-ph/0111483]

    2002 arXiv

  77. [87]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer,Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 063521, 22 [astro-ph/0603476]

    2006 arXiv

  78. [88]

    Gogoberidze, T

    G. Gogoberidze, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky,The spectrum of gravitational radiation from primordial turbulence, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 083002, [arXiv:0705.1733]

    2007 arXiv

  79. [89]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition, JCAP 12 (2009) 024, [arXiv:0909.0622]

    2009 arXiv

  80. [90]

    Niksa, M

    P. Niksa, M. Schlederer and G. Sigl,Gravitational waves produced by compressible mhd turbulence from cosmological phase transitions, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 144001, [arXiv:1803.02271]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [91]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer elisa

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer elisa. ii: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001, [arXiv:1512.06239]

    2016 arXiv

  82. [92]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,Phase transitions in an expanding universe: Stochastic gravitational waves in standard and non-standard histories, JCAP 01 (2021) 001, [arXiv:2007.08537]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [93]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with lisa: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [arXiv:1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with lisa: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [arXiv:1910.13125]

    2020 arXiv

  84. [95]

    P. J. Steinhardt,Relativistic detonation waves and bubble growth in false vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 2074

    1982

  85. [96]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and G. Servant,Energy budget of cosmological first-order phase transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028, [arXiv:1004.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  86. [97]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Physical Review D49 (1994) 2837, [astro-ph/9310044]

    1994 arXiv

  87. [98]

    Further,vb is the bubble wall velocity in general related to the Jouget velocityvJ = 1/ √ 3+ √ α2+2α/3 1+α [94–96]

    that quantifies the speed of phase transition. Further,vb is the bubble wall velocity in general related to the Jouget velocityvJ = 1/ √ 3+ √ α2+2α/3 1+α [94–96]. One reckons vb ≃ vJ unless there is supercooling. The factors κc, κs and κt respectively are efficiency factors re...

  88. [99]

    Nicolis,Relic gravitational waves from colliding bubbles and cosmic turbulence, Classical and Quantum Gravity21 (2004) L27, [gr-qc/0303084]

    A. Nicolis,Relic gravitational waves from colliding bubbles and cosmic turbulence, Classical and Quantum Gravity21 (2004) L27, [gr-qc/0303084]

    2004 arXiv

  89. [100]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevsek and M. Pintar,FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions, Comput. Phys. Commun.256 (2020) 107480, [2002.00881]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [101]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Physical Review D83 (2011) 044011, [1101.3940]

    2011 arXiv

  91. [102]

    S. S. et al.,The status of decigo, Journal of Physics: Conference Series840 (2017) 012010

    2017

  92. [103]

    T. I. et al.,Improvement of the target sensitivity in decigo by optimizing its parameters for quantum noise including the effect of diffraction loss, Galaxies 9 (2021) 14, [2012.11859]. 23

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.