Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Thermodynamic Theory of Linear Optical and Electro-Optic Properties of Ferroelectrics

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single thermodynamic free energy that couples lattice and electronic polarization predicts the full linear optical and electro-optic tensors of BaTiO3 across its ferroelectric phases.

desk verdict A genuinely new thermodynamic framework for ferroelectric optical properties, but the validation is partly circular and the low-temperature predictions rest on an acknowledged extrapolation beyond the quadratic regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03459 v1 pith:ZKNQEHKU submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Aiden Ross , Mohamed S.M.M. Ali , Akash Saha , Rui Zu , Venkatraman Gopalan , Ismaila Dabo , Long-Qing Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroelectricselectro-opticeffectPockelsopticaldispersionpolar-optictensorLandau-Ginzburg-Devonshiretheorybariumtitanatethermodynamicfreeenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the optical properties of ferroelectrics—refractive index, birefringence, and the linear electro-optic (Pockels) effect—follow from one thermodynamic free energy once the total polarization is split into a lattice part $P^L$ and an electronic part $P^e$. The lattice polarization renormalizes the electronic dielectric stiffness through biquadratic coupling tensors, and the dynamics of $P^e$ supply the optical dispersion. Applied to BaTiO$_3$, the theory reproduces measured temperature- and wavelength-dependent refractive indices and electro-optic coefficients across the cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, and rhombohedral phases, and predicts values below 270 K where experimental data are scarce. If correct, it unifies electro-, thermo-, and piezo-optic effects in a single framework and provides a predictive tool for photonic device design.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the free-energy density of Eq. (17), in which the lattice polarization follows an eighth-order Landau expansion and the electronic polarization enters through a stiffness $B^{e,\mathrm{ref}}(T) + g^{LL} P^L P^L$ modulated by the lattice polarization, plus higher-order couplings $g^{Le}$ and $g^{ee}$. Dispersion is added through an equation of motion for $P^e$ with an electronic effective mass $\mu^e$ and damping $\gamma^e$, yielding a Lorentz-like frequency-dependent susceptibility $\tilde{\chi}^e(\omega) = [B^e - \epsilon_0(i\omega\gamma^e + \omega^2\mu^e)]^{-1}$. All linear optical properties—refractive index, birefringence, and the electro-, thermo-, and piezo-optic tensors—are derivatives of this single free energy, so one set of constants links ferroelectric, optical, and dispersive behavior.

What would settle it

Measure the ordinary and extraordinary refractive indices or the electro-optic coefficients of bulk BaTiO$_3$ in the orthorhombic and rhombohedral phases below 270 K and compare with the predicted values; a deviation beyond the quadratic model's expected accuracy would show the truncation fails. Alternatively, compute $B^e$ with DFT for lattice polarizations above 0.2 C/m² along the orthorhombic and rhombohedral polarization directions to test whether the omitted sixth-rank polar-optic tensor changes the predicted $r$ coefficients.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a Landau–Ginzburg–Devonshire free energy density $f(T,P^L_i,P^e_j,\sigma_{ij},E_i)$ containing the lattice polarization $P^L$ and the induced electronic polarization $P^e$ as separate order parameters, with biquadratic couplings $g^{LL}$, $g^{Le}$, and $g^{ee}$, accounts for the linear optical and electro-optic response of ferroelectric crystals. In the visible and near-infrared the optical indicatrix is set by the electronic dielectric stiffness $B^e_{ij} = \epsilon_0\,\partial^2 f/\partial P^e_i \partial P^e_j$, and the lattice polarization modifies it through $\Delta B^e = g^{LL} P^L P^L + g^{Le} P^L P^e + g^{ee} P^e P^e + \cdots$. The total Pockels tensor is the sum of lattice and electronic terms, each the product of a polar-optic factor and the corresponding susceptibility; the lattice term dominates because $\chi^L$ is orders of magnitude larger than $\chi^e$. For BaTiO$_3$ the computed electro-optic coefficients at 633 nm, $r_{33}=109$ pm/V and $r_{51}=1396$ pm/V, agree with experiment, and the temperature dependence across all three ferroelectric phases emerges from the same free energy.

Load-bearing premise

The electronic dielectric stiffness depends on the lattice polarization only through constant quadratic coupling tensors, a relation that density-functional calculations show holds only up to a lattice polarization of about 0.2 C/m², so the model's low-temperature predictions rely on extrapolating beyond the validated range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below terahertz frequencies the electro-optic response of a ferroelectric is dominated by the polar-optic coupling times the lattice dielectric susceptibility, so enhancements of $\chi^L$ near phase transitions directly boost the Pockels coefficients.
  • The framework gives temperature- and wavelength-dependent dispersion consistently, so refractive indices, birefringence, and electro-optic coefficients can be computed from one parameter set instead of separate Sellmeier fits at each temperature.
  • Because the polar-optic tensors are fixed by the symmetry of the parent cubic phase, the theory automatically generates the symmetry-allowed optical and electro-optic tensors for the tetragonal, orthorhombic, and rhombohedral phases of BaTiO$_3$.
  • Legendre transforms of the free energy extend the description to constant-strain and thin-film boundary conditions, allowing phase-field modeling of optical properties in multidomain, defective, or strained ferroelectric films.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the quadratic polar-optic law breaks down above roughly 0.2 C/m², the low-temperature phases of BaTiO$_3$ are the natural test bed: measured deviations of the refractive indices beyond the model's stated accuracy would indicate that sixth-rank coupling terms are needed.
  • The same effective mass and damping constants that fit optical dispersion set the frequency ceiling for electro-optic modulation, implying a quantitative trade-off between $r$ and bandwidth that could be checked with GHz-range electro-optic experiments.
  • The lattice/electronic decomposition may connect Wannier-center first-principles calculations with continuum thermodynamics, potentially allowing macroscopic refractive-index measurements to extract microscopic polarization information.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire-type thermodynamic free energy that separates the total polarization into a lattice part P^L and an induced electronic part P^e, couples them biquadratically through tensors g^LL, g^Le, and g^ee, and derives the linear optical dielectric tensor, the polar-optic tensors, and the linear electro-optic (Pockels) tensor in the thermodynamic limit. It extends the model to finite optical frequencies through a Lorentz-like equation of motion for P^e with an effective mass and damping, and applies the formalism to BaTiO3, reporting temperature- and wavelength-dependent refractive indices, birefringence, and electro-optic coefficients through the cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, and rhombohedral phases. The abstract claims excellent agreement with experiments and first-principles calculations across these phase transitions.

Significance. If the approach is made fully quantitative, it would be a useful extension of LGD theory: it connects ferroelectric order parameters to optical response in the visible range, provides a route to electro-, thermo-, and piezo-optic tensors from one free energy, and is compatible with phase-field modeling. The paper's conceptual separation of lattice and electronic polarization and its derivation of the polar-optic and electro-optic tensors from derivatives of a single free energy are clear strengths, as is the DFT+U+V calculation of the polarization-dependent electronic dielectric stiffness. The approach is not parameter-free: g^LL, the electronic effective mass, damping, reference stiffness, elasto-optic coefficients, and reference temperature are fitted to experimental data, so the predictive claims stand or fall on the quality and independence of the validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§II.B, Eq. (13), Fig. 3, §III] The central constitutive truncation is not valid in the regime in which the model is applied. Eq. (13) keeps only the quadratic term in P^L with constant g^LL, and the paper's own DFT+U+V results in Fig. 3 show that this relation is accurate only for |P^L| up to roughly 0.2 C/m^2, with a 6th-rank polar-optic term required beyond that. The spontaneous lattice polarization at 300 K in the tetragonal phase (from the Appendix A coefficients used to produce Fig. 4a) is already above 0.2 C/m^2, and it is larger in the orthorhombic and rhombohedral phases. The text acknowledges this caveat for the refractive indices but still applies the same quadratic form to the electro-optic tensors in all phases through Eqs. (22)-(27) and Table D1. The factor-of-two discrepancy in r13 at 633 nm in Table 1 (15 pm/V versus 8±2 pm/V) is consistent with this extrapolation. The claim of 'excellent agreement ... through multiple ferroelectric phase transitions' is therefore not supported for the lower-temperature phases. Please either include the next-order polar-optic term, restrict the claims to the validated polarization range, or provide a quantitative sensitivity analysis showing that the results are robust beyond 0.2 C/m^2.
  2. [§III, Fig. 4, Fig. 6, Table 1] The validation is substantially in-sample. The fit list in §III states that the model was fitted to room-temperature refractive indices and dispersion from Refs. [33-36,38], electro-optic coefficients at 546.1 nm between 280 K and 400 K from Ref. [37], and temperature-dependent birefringence from Refs. [34,35]. Figures 4b, 4c, and 6a then compare the model with those same datasets. The only clearly held-out comparison is Table 1 against the 633 nm data of Zgonik et al. [39], and even there r33 and r51 are strongly controlled by the fitted g^LL through the lattice electro-optic channel of Eq. (25). To support the claim of predictive power, the paper should provide a genuine out-of-sample test, for example by fitting on a subset of temperatures and wavelengths and predicting the remainder, together with parameter uncertainties.
  3. [Appendix A, Table A1, Eq. (17)] The numerical implementation omits terms that appear in the central free energy. Eq. (17) contains g^Le and g^ee coupling tensors, and Eqs. (22)-(27) use them in the polar-optic and electro-optic coefficients. The expanded BaTiO3 free energy in Appendix A and the parameter list in Table A1 contain only g^LL coefficients; no values are given for g^Le and g^ee, and the text does not state that they are zero. If they are zero for BaTiO3, that choice should be stated and justified; if they are nonzero, the numerical results are currently under-specified and not reproducible.
  4. [§III, §V, Table D1] The claim of agreement through multiple phase transitions overreaches the experimental evidence. No bulk electro-optic measurements below 280 K are presented; Table D1 lists predicted tensors for the orthorhombic and rhombohedral phases, and the only low-temperature comparison is the cryogenic thin-film result of Eltes et al., whose effective r_eff = 200 pm/V is not the same quantity as the bulk r51 = 125 pm/V reported here. The conclusion should distinguish predicted low-temperature tensors from tested room-temperature behavior.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The definition of g^ee appears to be copied from g^Le: it should be the second derivative of the electronic dielectric stiffness with respect to P^e twice, not with respect to P^e and P^L.
  2. [Appendix A] There are several typographical slips in the expansion: the first quadratic term in the lattice polarization repeats P2^L instead of listing P1^L, P2^L, P3^L, and Table A1 lists a11112222 twice.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption refers to a '2nd-rank polar optic tensor' where the text means a fourth-rank tensor quadratic in polarization; the terminology should be made consistent.
  4. [Table A1] The units given for μ^e and γ^e, such as 'Kg m m4/C2', are formatted confusingly and should be rewritten with clear SI units.
  5. [§II.D] The sentence preceding Eq. (36) says 'at a sufficient frequency so that we assume the lattice polarization remains static'; this should be clarified as 'at optical frequencies above the lattice resonances but below the electronic resonance window considered here'.
  6. [§III] The statement that the predicted r51 = 125 pm/V at 4 K shows 'close agreement' with r_eff = 200 pm/V from Eltes et al. should acknowledge that these are different quantities measured in different geometries and that the numerical ratio is approximately 1.6.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Validation is partly circular: room-temperature refractive indices, birefringence, and 546 nm electro-optic data are fitted, then the same datasets are presented as 'excellent agreement,' making the 633 nm coefficients and Fig. 4c consistency checks rather than independent predictions.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III (Results), first paragraph; Table 1]
    "The free energy density function coefficients are found by using the existing thermodynamic description of BaTiO3 [32], and fitting the optical properties and dynamic coefficients to available experimental data [33–37]. Specifically, we fit our model from room temperature refractive indices and dispersion from [33–36,38], the electro-optic coefficients measured at 546.1 nm between 280K – 400K from [37], and the temperature dependent birefringence from [34,35]."

    Eq. 40 gives r(ω) = f^L(ω)χ^L, with f^L(ω) determined by the fitted g^LL and by B^e(ω); Eqs. 37–39 show B^e(ω) contains the fitted μ^e and γ^e and the fitted B^e_ref(T)+g^LLP^2. Since g^LL, μ^e, and γ^e are fit to the 546.1 nm electro-optic data and to room-temperature refractive indices, the 'predicted' 633 nm coefficients in Table 1 are not an independent result: they are the fitted 546 nm response carried to a nearby wavelength by the fitted dispersion model. The same fitted parameters then appear as 'excellent agreement' with experiments cited as validation, so the claimed prediction is statistically forced by the fit.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section III (Results), Figure 4c discussion]
    "Figure 4c shows the temperature-dependent birefringence at various wavelengths and shows excellent agreement with the experimental values at 633nm, demonstrating an increased birefringence at shorter wavelengths."

    The same section first states that the model was fit using 'the temperature dependent birefringence from [34,35]'. Figure 4c then reports agreement with 'the experimental values at 633nm' from those same references. The temperature dependence enters through the fitted p and α coefficients (Eq. 15 and Table A1), so the plotted agreement is the model reproducing its own calibration target; it is a consistency check, not an out-of-sample prediction.

full rationale

The derivation of Eq. 17 from Eq. 13 is internally consistent: the biquadratic coupling is a Taylor expansion and the optical properties follow by differentiation (Eqs. 19–27). The DFT+U+V calculation in Fig. 3 independently supports the quadratic functional form up to roughly 0.2 C/m2, and the low-temperature predictions are genuine extrapolations beyond the fitted window (the text concedes refractive indices may deviate because the quadratic regime may be exceeded). The LGD potential [32], though self-cited, is an external empirical parameterization and is not circular by itself. However, the quantitative validation in Section III is partly circular. The g^LL, μ^e, γ^e, p, and α coefficients are fitted to room-temperature refractive indices, dispersion, 546.1 nm electro-optic coefficients, and temperature-dependent birefringence; the same datasets are then displayed as 'excellent agreement.' Table 1's 633 nm electro-optic coefficients are essentially the fitted 546 nm coefficients with a small dispersion correction from Eqs. 37–40, and Fig. 4c's birefringence agreement is a reproduction of the fitted temperature-dependent birefringence. Thus the central validation claim is partially a consistency check. The model retains independent predictive content in its symmetry structure, in the low-temperature extrapolation, and in the DFT-supported quadratic form, so this is partial rather than total circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central new physics in this paper is the biquadratic coupling between lattice and electronic polarizations, expressed through g tensors that are fitted to experimental and DFT data. The effective mass and damping parameters are also fitted to dispersion data. The Landau coefficients for the lattice polarization are borrowed from prior literature. The model's predictive range is limited by the truncation of the polar-optic expansion and the single-oscillator dispersion assumption.

free parameters (8)
  • g1111^LL = 0.185 m4/C2
    Biquadratic coupling between lattice polarization and electronic dielectric stiffness; fitted to room-temperature refractive index, birefringence, and DFT results.
  • g1122^LL = 0.025 m4/C2
    Biquadratic coupling component; fitted to experimental optical data.
  • g1212^LL = 0.1285 m4/C2
    Shear-type biquadratic coupling; fitted to experimental optical data.
  • mu^e (electronic polarization effective mass) = 35.5e-23 (kg/m)(m4/C2) [units as printed]
    Sets the electronic resonance frequency in the Lorentz-like dispersion model; fitted to wavelength-dependent refractive index data.
  • gamma^e (electronic polarization damping) = 3e-9 (kg/(m s))(m4/C2) [units as printed]
    Sets the width of the electronic oscillator; fitted to dispersion data.
  • B^e_ref(T0) = 0.2356 (unitless)
    Electronic dielectric stiffness of the reference cubic phase at T0=398 K; fitted to refractive index data.
  • p1111, p1122, p1212 (elasto-optic strain tensors) = 0.5328, 0.1584, -0.432 (unitless)
    Control the linear temperature dependence of B^e_ref through thermal expansion; fitted to temperature-dependent refractive index and birefringence data.
  • T0 (reference temperature) = 398 K
    Reference temperature for the thermal expansion term; chosen near the cubic-tetragonal transition.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The modern theory of polarization (Berry phase and Wannier centers) provides a valid decomposition of total polarization into lattice and electronic parts, with electrons in instantaneous equilibrium with ions.
    Invoked in Section II.A to define P_L and P_e via Eqs. 2-4; if this decomposition is invalid, the entire free energy is not a proper thermodynamic potential.
  • domain assumption The free energy density is analytic in the order parameters and can be truncated at the lowest-order symmetry-allowed terms.
    Used in Eq. 17 and Appendix A; the quadratic polar-optic truncation is central to the model and is known to fail for large polarizations.
  • domain assumption The Landau coefficients from Li et al. [32] accurately describe the lattice polarization free energy of BaTiO3 in all three ferroelectric phases.
    The coefficients a11, a1111, etc. are taken directly from prior LGD fitting and are not re-fit or validated in this paper.
  • domain assumption The electronic dispersion is described by a single Lorentz oscillator with temperature-independent effective mass and damping.
    Eq. 37 and the fitting in Appendix C assume mu and gamma are constant; this is a simplification that may not hold across all phases and wavelengths.
  • ad hoc to paper The quadratic relation between electronic dielectric stiffness and polarization remains valid for polarization values beyond 0.2 C/m2 where DFT indicates higher-order terms are needed.
    The model is applied to low-temperature phases where P exceeds the validated range, an extrapolation acknowledged in Section III and Figure 3.
invented entities (1)
  • Electronic polarization P^e as an independent thermodynamic order parameter independent evidence
    purpose: To describe the optical-frequency dielectric response separately from the lattice polarization within a thermodynamic free energy.
    P^e is defined as the displacement of Wannier centers under an electric field and is directly linked to the high-frequency refractive index and dispersion, which are experimentally measurable. It is not a speculative entity like a new particle or force, but a state variable with clear operational meaning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamic Theory of Linear Optical and Electro-Optic Properties of Ferroelectrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZKNQEHKU

@misc{pith2026241203459,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamic Theory of Linear Optical and Electro-Optic Properties of Ferroelectrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZKNQEHKU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03459}
}
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric materials underlie key optical technologies in optical communications, integrated optics and quantum computing. Yet, there is a lack of a consistent thermodynamic framework to predict the optical properties of ferroelectrics and the mutual connections among ferroelectric polarization, optical properties, and optical dispersion. For example, there is no existing thermodynamic model for establishing the relationship between the ferroelectric polarization and the optical properties in the visible spectrum. Here we present a thermodynamic theory of the linear optical and electro-optic properties of ferroelectrics by separating the lattice and electronic contributions to the total polarization. We introduce a biquadratic coupling between the lattice and electronic contributions validated by both first-principles calculations and experimental measurements. As an example, we derive the temperature and wavelength-dependent anisotropic optical properties of BaTiO3, including the full linear optical dielectric tensor and the linear electro-optic (Pockels) effect through multiple ferroelectric phase transitions, which are in excellent agreement with existing experimental data and first principles calculations. This general framework incorporates essentially all optical properties of materials, including coupling between the ionic and electronic order parameters, as well as their dispersion and temperature dependence, and thus offers a powerful theoretical tool for analyzing light-matter interactions in ferroelectrics-based optical devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03459 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Contributions to the total dielectric displacement. Bottom: Lattice polarization. Middle: induced electronic polarization. Top: contribution from the vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic Diagram of the frequency dependent contributions to the total dielectric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dependence of the electronic dielectric stiffness on the lattice polarization for tetragonal BaTiO3 using the DFT+U+V approach. The dashed line corresponds to the 2nd -rank polar optic tensor, and the solid line corresponds to a 6th -rank polar optic tensor description [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature-dependent polarization and refractive indices of BaTiO3 a) lattice polarization, b) refractive index at 589nm with experimental data from [34,36,38] c) Temperature-dependent birefringence at various wavelengths with experimental data from [34,35] [PITH_FUL…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temperature-dependent dielectric and electro-optic properties of BaTiO3 a) lattice dielectric constant, b) Temperature electro-optic effect at 𝜆 =546.1 nm (𝑟𝑐 = 𝑟333 − 𝑟113) with experimental data from [37] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wavelength and temperature-dependent refractive indices a) dispersion of the refractive index along the a-axis and c-axis. Solid lines correspond to the calculated dispersion, squares correspond to experimental data from [33], and dashed lines correspond to the thermod…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: figure 1: Second harmonic generation (SHG) measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: figure 2: Comparison between refractive indices at 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    A. R. Johnston and J. M. Weingart, Determination of the Low-Frequency Linear Electro- Optic Effect in Tetragonal BaTiO3, J. Opt. Soc. Am., JOSA 55, 828 (1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [39]

    Zgonik, P

    M. Zgonik, P. Bernasconi, M. Duelli, R. Schlesser, P. Günter, M. H. Garrett, D. Rytz, Y . Zhu, and X. Wu, Dielectric, Elastic, Piezoelectric, Electro-Optic, and Elasto-Optic Tensors of BaTiO3 Crystals, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5941 (1994)

    work page 1994

  3. [1]

    Abel et al., Large Pockels Effect in Micro- and Nanostructured Barium Titanate Integrated on Silicon, Nature Mater 18, 1 (2019)

    S. Abel et al., Large Pockels Effect in Micro- and Nanostructured Barium Titanate Integrated on Silicon, Nature Mater 18, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [2]

    Geler-Kremer, F

    J. Geler-Kremer, F. Eltes, P. Stark, D. Stark, D. Caimi, H. Siegwart, B. Jan Offrein, J. Fompeyrine, and S. Abel, A Ferroelectric Multilevel Non-Volatile Photonic Phase Shifter, Nat. Photon. 16, 7 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [3]

    Eltes et al., An Integrated Optical Modulator Operating at Cryogenic Temperatures, Nat

    F. Eltes et al., An Integrated Optical Modulator Operating at Cryogenic Temperatures, Nat. Mater. 19, 11 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [4]

    E. L. Wooten et al., A Review of Lithium Niobate Modulators for Fiber-Optic Communications Systems, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 6, 69 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [5]

    Y . Liu, G. Ren, T. Cao, R. Mishra, and J. Ravichandran, Modeling Temperature, Frequency, and Strain Effects on the Linear Electro-Optic Coefficients of Ferroelectric Oxides, Journal of Applied Physics 131, 163101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [6]

    W. Li, C. M. Landis, and A. A. Demkov, Domain Morphology and Electro-Optic Effect in Si- Integrated Epitaxial $\mathrm{BaTi}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ Films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 095203 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 54 references
  1. [7]

    V . B. Shirokov, P. E. Timoshenko, and V . V . Kalinchuk, Thermodynamic Analysis of Electro- Optic Coefficients of Ferroelectrics, Journal of Applied Physics 133, 063103 (2023)

    2023

  2. [8]

    L. D. Landau, On the Theory of Phase Transitions. I., Phys. Z. Sowjet. 11, 26 (1937)

    1937

  3. [9]

    A. F. Devonshire, Theory of Ferroelectrics, Advances in Physics 3, 85 (1954)

    1954

  4. [10]

    M. J. Haun, E. Furman, S. J. Jang, H. A. McKinstry, and L. E. Cross, Thermodynamic Theory of PbTiO3, Journal of Applied Physics 62, 3331 (1987)

    1987

  5. [11]

    Íñiguez, S

    J. Íñiguez, S. Ivantchev, J. M. Perez-Mato, and A. García, Devonshire-Landau Free Energy of BaTiO3 from First Principles, Phys. Rev. B 63, 144103 (2001)

    2001

  6. [12]

    Chen, Phase-Field Method of Phase Transitions/Domain Structures in Ferroelectric Thin Films: A Review, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 91, 1835 (2008)

    L.-Q. Chen, Phase-Field Method of Phase Transitions/Domain Structures in Ferroelectric Thin Films: A Review, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 91, 1835 (2008)

    2008

  7. [13]

    J. E. Geusic, S. K. Kurtz, L. G. Van Uitert, and S. H. Wemple, ELECTRO‐OPTIC PROPERTIES OF SOME ABO3 PEROVSKITES IN THE P ARAELECTRIC PHASE, Applied Physics Letters 4, 141 (1964)

    1964

  8. [14]

    DiDomenico Jr

    M. DiDomenico Jr. and S. H. Wemple, Oxygen‐Octahedra Ferroelectrics. I. Theory of Electro‐optical and Nonlinear Optical Effects, Journal of Applied Physics 40, 720 (1969)

    1969

  9. [15]

    3 (Elsevier, 1972), pp

    Electrooptical and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Crystals, in Applied Solid State Science, V ol. 3 (Elsevier, 1972), pp. 263–383

    1972

  10. [16]

    S. H. Wemple and M. DiDomenico, Theory of the Elasto-Optic Effect in Nonmetallic Crystals, Phys. Rev. B 1, 193 (1970)

    1970

  11. [17]

    J. D. Zook and T. N. Casselman, Electro-Optic Effects in Paraelectric Perovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 960 (1966)

    1966

  12. [18]

    F. N. H. Robinson, Nonlinear Optical Coefficients, Bell System Technical Journal 46, 913 (1967)

    1967

  13. [19]

    Flytzanis and J

    Chr. Flytzanis and J. Ducuing, Second-Order Optical Susceptibilities of III-V Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 178, 1218 (1969)

    1969

  14. [20]

    Garrett, Nonlinear Optics, Anharmonic Oscillators, and Pyroelectricity, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 4, 70 (1968)

    C. Garrett, Nonlinear Optics, Anharmonic Oscillators, and Pyroelectricity, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 4, 70 (1968)

    1968

  15. [21]

    Resta, Theory of the Electric Polarization in Crystals, Ferroelectrics 136, 51 (1992)

    R. Resta, Theory of the Electric Polarization in Crystals, Ferroelectrics 136, 51 (1992). 28

    1992

  16. [22]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of Polarization of Crystalline Solids, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  17. [23]

    R. W. Nunes and D. Vanderbilt, Real-Space Approach to Calculation of Electric Polarization and Dielectric Constants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 712 (1994)

    1994

  18. [24]

    Souza, J

    I. Souza, J. Íñiguez, and D. Vanderbilt, First-Principles Approach to Insulators in Finite Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117602 (2002)

    2002

  19. [25]

    S. Pal, N. Strkalj, C.-J. Yang, M. C. Weber, M. Trassin, M. Woerner, and M. Fiebig, Origin of Terahertz Soft-Mode Nonlinearities in Ferroelectric Perovskites, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021023 (2021)

    2021

  20. [26]

    Ghosez, J.-P

    Ph. Ghosez, J.-P. Michenaud, and X. Gonze, Dynamical Atomic Charges: The Case of $\mathrm{AB}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ Compounds, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6224 (1998)

    1998

  21. [27]

    Veithen, X

    M. Veithen, X. Gonze, and Ph. Ghosez, Nonlinear Optical Susceptibilities, Raman Efficiencies, and Electro-Optic Tensors from First-Principles Density Functional Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. B 71, 125107 (2005)

    2005

  22. [28]

    V . L. Campo and M. Cococcioni, Extended DFT + U + V Method with On-Site and Inter- Site Electronic Interactions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 055602 (2010)

    2010

  23. [29]

    Gebreyesus, L

    G. Gebreyesus, L. Bastonero, M. Kotiuga, N. Marzari, and I. Timrov, Understanding the Role of Hubbard Corrections in the Rhombohedral Phase of ${\mathrm{BaTiO}}_{3}$, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235171 (2023)

    2023

  24. [30]

    V . L. Ginzburg, Polarizasyon and Piezoelectric Effect in BaTiO3 near the Ferroelectric Transition Point, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 19, 36 (1949)

    1949

  25. [31]

    H. A. Lorentz, Versuch Einer Theorie der Electrischen und Optischen Erscheinungen in Bewegten Körpern, in Collected Papers: Volume V, edited by H. A. Lorentz (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1937), pp. 1–138

    1937

  26. [32]

    Y . L. Li, L. E. Cross, and L. Q. Chen, A Phenomenological Thermodynamic Potential for BaTiO3 Single Crystals, Journal of Applied Physics 98, 064101 (2005)

    2005

  27. [33]

    C. Wong, Y . Y . Teng, J. Ashok, and P. L. H. Varaprasad, Barium Titanate (BaTiO3), in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic Press, Burlington, 1997), pp. 789–803

    1997

  28. [34]

    S. H. Wemple, M. Didomenico, and I. Camlibel, Dielectric and Optical Properties of Melt- Grown BaTiO3, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 29, 1797 (1968)

    1968

  29. [35]

    K. Buse, S. Riehemann, S. Loheide, H. Hesse, F. Mersch, and E. Krätzig, Refractive Indices of Single Domain BaTiO3 for Different Wavelengths and Temperatures, Physica Status Solidi (a) 135, K87 (1993)

    1993

  30. [36]

    L. V . Deshpande, M. B. Joshi, and R. B. Mishra, Angle of Polarization and Refractive Indices of BaTiO3, J. Opt. Soc. Am., JOSA 70, 1163 (1980)

    1980

  31. [38]

    A. R. Johnston, Dispersion of Electro‐Optic Effect in BaTiO3, Journal of Applied Physics 42, 3501 (1971)

    1971

  32. [40]

    T. Yang, B. Wang, J.-M. Hu, and L.-Q. Chen, Domain Dynamics under Ultrafast Electric- Field Pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 107601 (2020). 29

    2020

  33. [41]

    Cheng, B

    X. Cheng, B. Wang, and L.-Q. Chen, Polarization near Dislocation Cores in SrTiO 3 Single Crystals: The Role of Flexoelectricity, Applied Physics Letters 124, 132905 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Yang and L.-Q

    T. Yang and L.-Q. Chen, Dynamical Phase-Field Model of Coupled Electronic and Structural Processes, Npj Comput Mater 8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Cammarata and J

    A. Cammarata and J. M. Rondinelli, Contributions of Correlated Acentric Atomic Displacements to the Nonlinear Second Harmonic Generation and Response, ACS Photonics 1, 96 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    B. K. VanLeeuwen and V . Gopalan, The Antisymmetry of Distortions, Nat Commun 6, 8818 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    R. Zu et al., Large Enhancements in Optical and Piezoelectric Properties in Ferroelectric Zn1-xMgxO Thin Films through Engineering Electronic and Ionic Anharmonicities, Advanced Physics Research 2, 2300003 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A Modular and Open-Source Software Project for Quantum Simulations of Materials, J

    P. Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A Modular and Open-Source Software Project for Quantum Simulations of Materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    Prandini, A

    G. Prandini, A. Marrazzo, I. E. Castelli, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, Precision and Efficiency in Solid-State Pseudopotential Calculations, Npj Comput Mater 4, 1 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Lejaeghere et al., Reproducibility in Density Functional Theory Calculations of Solids, Science 351, aad3000 (2016)

    K. Lejaeghere et al., Reproducibility in Density Functional Theory Calculations of Solids, Science 351, aad3000 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Timrov, N

    I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, HP – A Code for the Calculation of Hubbard Parameters Using Density-Functional Perturbation Theory, Computer Physics Communications 279, 108455 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    R. Zu, B. Wang, J. He, J.-J. Wang, L. Weber, L.-Q. Chen, and V . Gopalan, Analytical and Numerical Modeling of Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Anisotropic Crystals Using ♯SHAARP Package, Npj Comput Mater 8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    R. Zu, B. Wang, J. He, L. Weber, A. Saha, L.-Q. Chen, and V . Gopalan, Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Anisotropic Multilayers with Complete Multireflection of Linear and Nonlinear Waves Using ♯SHAARP .Ml Package, Npj Comput Mater 10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    R. C. Miller, Optical Harmonic Generation in Single Crystal BaTi O 3, Phys. Rev. 134, A1313 (1964)

    1964

  46. [54]

    W. N. Herman and L. M. Hayden, Maker Fringes Revisited: Second-Harmonic Generation from Birefringent or Absorbing Materials, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 12, 416 (1995)

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.