Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Are Clinical T5 Models Better for Clinical Text?
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2412.05845.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T15:29:07.815853Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: pith, observed 2026-08-07T15:29:10.180060Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 33b18d1d-f2a8-472d-8408-a8a9248a7f85 · inbound
Diagnosing our datasets: How does my language model learn clinical information? cites this paper.
Diagnosing our datasets: How does my language model learn clinical information? Are Clinical T5 Models Better for Clinical Text?
Reference 33
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T15:29:10.339675Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.