Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

General Learning of the Electric Response of Inorganic Materials

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A learned electric enthalpy functional, differentiated exactly, yields polarization, Born charges, and polarizability from one MACE-based potential.

desk verdict A promising field-aware MACE variant with a real representability problem around branch-resolved polarization; unverifiable from the supplied text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17870 v3 pith:ZQWSNSDG submitted 2025-08-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bradley A. A. Martin , Alex M. Ganose , Venkat Kapil , Tingwei Li , Keith T. Butler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords equivariantneuralnetworkpotentialselectricenthalpyfunctionalferroelectricpolarizationBorneffectivechargesdielectricresponseBerryphasefinite-fieldmoleculardynamicsfoundationmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces MACE-Field, an atomistic machine-learning potential that treats the electric field as one more input to a learned energy function. From that single electric enthalpy functional, the model obtains polarization, Born effective charges, and dielectric polarizability by exact differentiation, so the response tensors are consistent with the forces and with each other by construction. The paper claims that this simple field coupling, added to an existing equivariant foundation model, transfers across chemistries: it reproduces same-branch Berry-phase and spontaneous polarizations for diverse ferroelectrics, and its fine-tuned foundation version predicts dielectric and ferroelectric trends while retaining force-field accuracy. On individual materials, the model also produces BaTiO3 hysteresis loops and alpha-quartz infrared, Raman, and dielectric spectra from finite-field molecular dynamics at fidelity comparable to density-functional perturbation theory. If the central claim holds, quantitative electric response becomes a by-product of one learned enthalpy rather than a per-material calculation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electric enthalpy functional F({R}, E), learned by an O(3)-equivariant graph neural network (the MACE backbone) whose latent equivariant features couple to a uniform applied electric field. Because the energy readout is a scalar function of positions and field, differentiating it with respect to E yields P = -∂F/∂E; further derivatives give Z* and alpha. The design enforces Maxwell reciprocity (cross-derivatives commute), the acoustic sum rule, and the tensor symmetries of crystals by construction, so the response tensors inherit the symmetries of the energy rather than needing to be imposed.

What would settle it

Run a closed electric-field loop on a ferroelectric whose polarization crosses a polarization quantum, and compare the model's trajectory of P with the DFT Berry-phase reference; if MACE-Field switches branches at a different field or returns a path-dependent polarization inconsistent with the reference, the single-valued enthalpy assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central claim is that a physics-informed field coupling can give atomistic foundation models transferable dielectric and ferroelectric response. The specific construction is a field-aware O(3)-equivariant interatomic potential, MACE-Field, which learns a single electric enthalpy functional F({R}, E). The uniform field couples to latent equivariant features inside the MACE backbone, and the scalar energy readout preserves Maxwell reciprocity, the acoustic sum rule, and crystal tensor symmetries by construction. P, Z*, and alpha are then obtained by exact differentiation, so the predicted response tensors are not separate fitted outputs but derivatives of one scalar f

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that one smooth, single-valued learned energy function of atomic positions and electric field can carry the branch-resolved information of Berry-phase polarization, even though physical polarization is only defined up to a whole polarization quantum; the branch bookkeeping must come out right.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single learned enthalpy functional supplies P, Z*, and alpha as exact derivatives, so the response tensors are internally consistent with forces and with each other; no separate training targets are needed for each tensor.
  • Existing MACE energy/force foundation models can be upgraded to field-aware behavior through the plug-in coupling, transferring electric response across chemistries without per-material physics.
  • Finite-field molecular dynamics with MACE-Field reproduces experimental observables—hysteresis loops, infrared, Raman, and dielectric spectra—at accuracy comparable to DFPT for the benchmarked materials (BaTiO3, alpha-quartz).
  • Cross-chemistry polarization prediction is possible including branch-resolved Berry-phase and spontaneous polarization, meaning a foundation model can act as a surrogate for expensive DFPT polarization calculations.
  • Single-material fine-tuning remains the route to the most quantitative spectroscopic predictions; the foundation model is a strong prior, not a replacement for material-specific training in high-accuracy regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model's branch-resolved polarization predictions must inherit reference branch bookkeeping because physical polarization is defined only modulo a polarization quantum; a revealing stress test would drive the model through a nonpolar phase boundary and check whether the branch assignment stays consistent with the Berry-phase reference.
  • The same field-coupling construction—uniform field into equivariant latent features, exact differentiation of a scalar enthalpy—should port to other invariant or equivariant architectures, since nothing beyond the backbone is MACE-specific.
  • Finite-field MD with learned enthalpies could extend to other enthalpy derivatives such as piezoelectric and nonlinear optical coefficients, but those are not demonstrated here.
  • The foundation model's benchmark success suggests it could predict temperature-dependent dielectric constants or ferroelectric switching paths for new chemistries without retraining, though quantitative DFPT-comparable fidelity outside the benchmark set remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as submitted, consists of an abstract advertising a machine-learned interatomic potential called MACE-Field, claimed to learn an electric enthalpy functional F({R}, E) and to obtain polarization P, Born charges Z*, and dielectric polarizability alpha by exact differentiation, with benchmarks including BaTiO3 hysteresis and alpha-quartz spectra; the full text supplied, however, is a different paper on the symmetry classification of altermagnetism and type-IV magnetism in two dimensions (arXiv:2508.17864). No methods, architecture details, loss functions, data splits, training protocols, or benchmark results for MACE-Field are present in the submitted text. The central claims are therefore not checkable from the submitted material. In addition, the abstract's use of 'same-branch Berry-phase polarisation' raises a representability concern: a single-valued scalar enthalpy functional cannot generally reproduce branch-resolved Berry-phase polarization if the reference data crosses polarization-quantum branch boundaries, unless branch labels are encoded in training or post-processing, which the abstract does not explain.

Significance. If the MACE-Field approach were realized as described, it would constitute a practically important step: a plug-in field coupling for equivariant foundation models yielding dielectric and ferroelectric response from a single learned functional, with DFT/DFPT-level fidelity. Such a capability would be useful for high-throughput screening and finite-field molecular dynamics. However, the submitted manuscript provides none of the supporting evidence. The only full text is an unrelated manuscript on type-IV altermagnetism. The referee cannot evaluate the significance of a paper whose body does not contain the claimed work, and the theoretical concern about branch-resolved polarization from a single-valued derivative further requires a concrete resolution before the claim can be credited.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text (all sections)] The submitted full text is not the paper described in the abstract. The body concerns 'Symmetry Classification of Altermagnetism and Emergence of Type-IV Magnetism in Two Dimensions' (apparently arXiv:2508.17864), whereas the abstract introduces MACE-Field, an electric enthalpy functional with exact derivatives, benchmarks on BaTiO3 and alpha-quartz, and a multihead foundation model. None of the methods, datasets, training protocols, or numerical results for MACE-Field appear in the manuscript. The central claims are therefore entirely unsupported by the submitted material. This is not a local revision issue; the manuscript as submitted cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that P is obtained by exact differentiation of a single scalar functional F({R},E), i.e., P = -dF/dE, and reports 'same-branch Berry-phase' polarization comparisons. Berry-phase polarization is multivalued modulo a polarization quantum and is branch-dependent; a differentiable scalar F yields a single continuous branch. If the model cannot represent states differing by a polarization quantum, ferroelectric switching paths or comparisons across branch boundaries are either impossible or inherit reference branch bookkeeping. The manuscript must specify how branch alignment is defined, whether branch labels enter training, and how transitions across quantum boundaries are handled. Without this, the representability claim is not yet established.
  3. [Abstract (benchmarks)] The benchmark claims ('comparable to DFPT', reproduction of hysteresis loops and infrared/Raman/dielectric spectra, cross-chemistry polarization trends) are asserted without any error bars, held-out structure lists, or protocol descriptions. Since the submitted text contains no Results or Methods sections, these claims cannot be verified or meaningfully compared with existing DFPT or machine-learning benchmarks.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title/Abstract metadata] The arXiv identifier embedded in the pagination footer (2508.17864) differs from the manuscript's stated identifier (2508.17870), confirming that the supplied full text belongs to another submission. This mismatch should be corrected at the source.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'same-branch Berry-phase' is undefined. If the model is trained on branch-resolved labels, that should be stated explicitly; if not, the meaning of 'same-branch' is unclear.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No demonstrable circularity; the claimed P/Z*/alpha derivation by exact differentiation of a learned enthalpy is a mathematical identity, and the supplied full text is not the MACE-Field paper.

full rationale

The abstract's chain of derivation is: MACE-Field learns a scalar electric enthalpy functional F({R}, E), and the electric response tensors are obtained as exact derivatives (P = -dF/dE, Z* and alpha as mixed second derivatives). This is a mathematical construction, not circular, because Maxwell reciprocity and the acoustic sum rule follow from the functional form rather than being fit to target data. The supervised benchmarks (cross-chemistry polarization, BaTiO3 hysteresis, alpha-quartz spectra) are consistent with standard ML evaluation; without information on data splits and loss weighting, the abstract provides no quotable equation or protocol showing that the reported 'predictions' are the same as the fitted targets by construction. The phrase 'same-branch Berry-phase polarisation' flags the known multivaluedness of Berry-phase polarization, but comparing within a branch is a legitimate evaluation choice and not itself a circular reduction; no evidence is given that branch labels are simultaneously used as training input and as the metric that forces the result. Critically, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.17864, a paper on type-IV altermagnetism, not the MACE-Field manuscript, so the derivation chain, loss functions, and benchmark protocols cannot be audited from the available material. In the absence of a quotable equivalence between an input and an output, no circular step can be identified under the required standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (1) the expressiveness of the MACE backbone and the chosen field-coupling form, a paper-specific design choice with no independent evidence that it spans the required enthalpy surface; (2) loss-weight choices in joint fine-tuning, not quantified in the abstract; (3) adequacy of semilocal DFT/DFPT as the ground truth for polarization and spectra; and (4) the standard modern-theory-of-polarization bookkeeping that makes branch-resolved P representable by a single-valued scalar enthalpy. No new physical entities are postulated; the field coupling is an architectural element. These ledger entries are placeholders: the full methods section would quantify or replace them.

free parameters (3)
  • Relative loss weights in joint fine-tuning (dielectric, ferroelectric, replay, force/energy terms)
    The abstract describes joint fine-tuning on dielectric, ferroelectric, and replay data; the balance between these losses is chosen by hand and determines the tradeoff between force accuracy and response accuracy. Values not given in the abstract.
  • Field-coupling strength and parameterization (uniform field coupling into latent equivariant features)
    The abstract states 'a uniform field couples to latent equivariant features' but does not specify the coupling form or whether its constants are learned or fixed; the functional form is a design choice the central claim depends on.
  • Learnable weights of the MACE backbone and readout heads
    All learnable weights are fitted to the training data; the abstract reports neither the parameter count nor the training set composition, both needed to assess whether reported benchmarks are in-sample.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Maxwell reciprocity and the acoustic sum rule hold exactly for any scalar, translationally invariant F({R}, E), with P = -dF/dE, Z* = d2F/dEdR, alpha = d2F/dE2
    The abstract claims these physical identities hold 'by construction' for a scalar energy readout; this is the mathematical backbone of the exact-differentiation scheme.
  • domain assumption Semilocal DFT/DFPT reference data are an adequate ground truth for learning dielectric and ferroelectric response
    All benchmarks compare against 'semilocal DFT/DFPT reference data'; the model inherits any functional errors, for example band gap errors and ferroelectric phase stability issues known for BaTiO3-type materials.
  • ad hoc to paper The uniform-field coupling to latent equivariant features is expressive enough to represent the true electric enthalpy surface
    The coupling form inside the MACE backbone is a design choice proposed by the authors; no first-principles argument guarantees it can represent anharmonic finite-field response, hysteresis branch structure, or cross-chemistry polarization.
  • domain assumption Finite-field MD with classical nuclei (Born-Oppenheimer approximation) reproduces IR, Raman, and dielectric spectra
    The spectra and hysteresis claims come from finite-field molecular dynamics; this assumes the adiabatic approximation and classical treatment of nuclear motion are adequate at the accuracy claimed ('comparable to DFPT').

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of General Learning of the Electric Response of Inorganic Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZQWSNSDG

@misc{pith2026250817870,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: General Learning of the Electric Response of Inorganic Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZQWSNSDG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17870}
}
abstract

We introduce \texttt{MACE-Field}, a field-aware, $O(3)$-equivariant interatomic potential that learns a single electric enthalpy functional $\mathcal F(\{\mathbf R\},\mathbf E)$ and obtains $\mathbf P$, $Z^*$, and $\boldsymbol\alpha$ by exact differentiation. A uniform field couples to latent equivariant features inside the \texttt{MACE} backbone, while the scalar energy readout preserves Maxwell reciprocity, the acoustic sum rule, and crystal tensor symmetries by construction. Because this coupling is a plug-in on top of standard \texttt{MACE}, existing energy/force foundation models can be upgraded to become field-aware. Benchmarked against semilocal DFT/DFPT reference data, a directly trained cross-chemistry ferroelectric model reproduces the same-branch Berry-phase and spontaneous polarisations across diverse inorganic crystals. Starting from the multihead foundation model \texttt{mace-mp-mh-0} and its OMAT-PBE head, joint fine-tuning on dielectric, ferroelectric, and replay data yields \texttt{MACE-Field-MH-0} foundation models, which predict $Z^*$, $\boldsymbol\alpha$, derived dielectric constants, and cross-chemistry polarisation trends with fidelity that captures branch-resolved polarisation and spontaneous-polarisation, while retaining strong force-field accuracy. Further, single-material \texttt{MACE-Field} models and \texttt{MACE-Field-MH-0} reproduce \ce{BaTiO3} hysteresis loops and $\alpha$-quartz infrared, Raman, and dielectric spectra from finite-field molecular dynamics, comparable to DFPT. These results show that a simple, physics-informed field coupling can endow atomistic foundation models with transferable dielectric and ferroelectric response, while targeted single-material training remains advantageous for the most quantitative spectroscopic predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transition from Homogeneous to Domain-Wall-Mediated Polarization Switching in BaTiO3: A Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Study

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    ML-MD simulations reveal a supercell-size-driven transition from homogeneous to domain-wall-mediated polarization switching in BaTiO3, with >50% coercive field increase linked to polarization fluctuations via Shannon entropy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    author author R. D. \ King-Smith \ and\ author D. Vanderbilt ,\ title title Theory of polarization of crystalline solids ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1651 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 47 ,\ pages 1651 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.1651 1993

  2. [2]

    Resta ,\ title title Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.899 journal journal Rev

    author author R. Resta ,\ title title Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.899 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 899 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.899 1994

  3. [3]

    Gonze \ and\ author C

    author author X. Gonze \ and\ author C. Lee ,\ title title Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.10355 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 55 ,\ pages 10355 ( year 1997 ) ,\ note publisher: Americ...

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.10355 1997

  4. [4]

    author author R. W. \ Nunes \ and\ author X. Gonze ,\ title title Berry-phase treatment of the homogeneous electric field perturbation in insulators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.155107 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 63 ,\ pages 155107 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.155107 2001

  5. [5]

    Souza , author J

    author author I. Souza , author J. \'I \ n iguez ,\ and\ author D. Vanderbilt ,\ title title First-principles approach to insulators in finite electric fields ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117602 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 117602 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.117602 2002

  6. [6]

    Behler \ and\ author M

    author author J. Behler \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ title title Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 146401 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 2007

  7. [7]

    author author K. T. \ Sch \"u tt et al. ,\ title title Schnet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions ,\ in\ @noop booktitle NIPS \ ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Batzner et al

    author author S. Batzner et al. ,\ title title E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 2453 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 2022

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Drautz ,\ title title Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 journal journal Phys

    author author R. Drautz ,\ title title Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 014104 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Batatia et al

    author author I. Batatia et al. ,\ title title Mace: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  3. [11]

    Falletta , author A

    author author S. Falletta , author A. Cepellotti , author A. Johansson , author C. W. \ Tan , author M. L. \ Descoteaux , author A. Musaelian , author C. J. \ Owen ,\ and\ author B. Kozinsky ,\ title title Unified differentiable learning of electric response ,\ https://doi.org...

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Cheng et al

    author author B. Cheng et al. ,\ title title Latent ewald summation for long-range electrostatics in machine-learning potentials ,\ @noop journal journal npj Comput. Mater. \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025

  5. [13]

    Rinaldi et al

    author author M. Rinaldi et al. ,\ title title Charge-constrained atomic cluster expansion for long-range electrostatics ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04062 2411.04062 NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Lou , author A

    author author K. Lou , author A. M. \ Ganose , et al. ,\ title title Anisonet: Equivariant graph networks for anisotropic dielectric tensors ,\ @noop journal journal Faraday Discuss. \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ note arXiv:2405.07915 NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Kapil , author D

    author author V. Kapil , author D. P. \ Kov \'a cs , author G. Cs \'a nyi ,\ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ title title First-principles spectroscopy of aqueous interfaces using machine-learned electronic and quantum nuclear effects ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/D3FD00113J journal...

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Butler, K T

    author author Martin, B A. A., Butler, K T. ,\ @noop title MACE-Field : General learning of the electric response of inorganic materials ,\ howpublished https://github.com/mdi-group/2025-04-mace-field ( year 2025 ),\ note gitHub repository; accessed 22 Aug 2025 NoStop

    2025

  9. [17]

    note With D= _0 E+ P and P= _0 ^ (1) E , one has = _0 ^ (1) and _ = _0( I+ ^ (1) ) . Stop

  10. [18]

    Our use of the multipole series is solely as symmetry guidance for constructing equivariant couplings; numerical prefactors in eq:multipole do not enter the learned architecture

    note Different quadrupole conventions exist (traced vs.\ traceless tensors, differing numerical factors). Our use of the multipole series is solely as symmetry guidance for constructing equivariant couplings; numerical prefactors in eq:multipole do not enter the learned archit...

  11. [19]

    author author A. H. \ Larsen , author J. J. \ Mortensen , author J. Blomqvist , author I. E. \ Castelli , author R. Christensen , author M. Du ak , author J. Friis , author M. N. \ Groves , author B. Hammer , author C. Hargus , author E. D. \ Hermes , author P. C. \ Jennings ,...

    2017

  12. [20]

    author author T. E. \ Smidt et al. ,\ title title A database of ferroelectric materials and their switching pathways ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Data \ volume 7 ,\ pages 261 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  13. [21]

    author author M. K. \ Horton , author P. Huck , author R. X. \ Yang , author J. M. \ Munro , author S. Dwaraknath , author A. M. \ Ganose , author R. S. \ Kingsbury , author M. Wen , author J. X. \ Shen , author T. S. \ Mathis , author A. D. \ Kaplan , author J. Riebesell , au...

    2025

  14. [22]

    Jain et al

    author author A. Jain et al. ,\ title title The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 journal journal APL Mater. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 011002 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Huck , author A

    author author P. Huck , author A. Jain , author D. Gunter , author D. Winston , author S. Cholia ,\ and\ author K. A. \ Persson ,\ title title A community contribution framework for sharing materials data with the materials project ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2015....

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    Huck , author D

    author author P. Huck , author D. Gunter , author S. Cholia , author D. Winston , author A. T. \ N'Diaye ,\ and\ author K. A. \ Persson ,\ title title User applications driven by the community contribution framework mpcontribs in the materials project ,\ https://doi.org/10.100...

    1982 doi

  17. [25]

    Andreoni \ and\ editor S

    editor W. Andreoni \ and\ editor S. Yip ,\ eds.,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44677-6 title Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods: Theory and Modeling ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Cham ,\ year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    note See Ref. @citealp smidt-2020-ferrodb , Secs.\ ``Identifying ferroelectricity from first principles'' and ``Post–processing spontaneous polarisation values''; 255 structure pairs satisfy the ``COMPLETED'' workflow criteria there. Stop

    2020

  19. [27]

    note Public MP documentation describes DFPT workflows for dielectric properties (using VASP) within the semilocal GGA family; our export consisted of GGA–PBE calculations restricted to insulating entries. Stop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.