Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Observation of localization reversal and harmonic generation in nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that raising the field intensity in a nonlinear non-Hermitian lattice reverses the direction of the non-Hermitian skin effect, switching microwave localization from one end of the sample to the other, with the…

desk verdict A well-executed experiment showing power-controlled reversal of the non-Hermitian skin effect, with a real theory gap between fixed-intensity eigenmodes and the driven measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09179 v3 pith:ZS4ZQSIN submitted 2025-05-14 cond-mat.mes-hall

Junyao Wu , Rui-Chang Shen , Li Zhang , Fujia Chen , Bingbing Wang , Hongsheng Chen , Yihao Yang , Haoran Xue This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-Hermitianskineffectpoint-gaptopologynonlineartopologicalphasetransitionmicrowavemetamateriallocalizationreversalthirdharmonicgenerationsaturablenonreciprocalcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a nonlinearity-driven reversal of the non-Hermitian skin effect: in an array with a saturable nonreciprocal coupling, the eigenmodes accumulate at the right edge under low-intensity excitation and at the left edge once the intensity exceeds a threshold. The authors model the effect with a nonlinear Hatano-Nelson chain in which one hopping direction is a complex saturable function of local intensity, solve the nonlinear eigenproblem $\hat H(\psi)\psi = E\psi$ under a fixed total intensity, and identify the threshold as the closing of the point gap in the periodic-boundary spectrum: a topological phase transition between two nontrivial point-gap phases. They then observe the reversal in an 11-resonator microwave metamaterial at gigahertz frequencies, both through port transmission measurements and near-field scans. The same power-controlled switch appears in the spatial profile of third-harmonic signals generated by the skin modes. A sympathetic reader would therefore take the paper's contribution to be a demonstration that the boundary on which non-Hermitian wave energy accumulates can be chosen purely by pump power.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonlinear Hatano-Nelson model with a saturable, complex, nonreciprocal coupling: a one-dimensional tight-binding chain whose rightward hopping is the sum of a fixed reciprocal coupling and an intensity-dependent term $\tilde\kappa_{2,i}(I_i)$, while the leftward hopping is purely reciprocal. The saturable term makes the direction of the dominant hopping a function of field intensity: at small $I_i$ the rightward path exceeds the leftward one, and at large $I_i$ the saturated nonreciprocal part shrinks so the balance tilts leftward. The argument then identifies the point-gap winding of the periodic-boundary spectrum as the quantity that changes at the phase transition, because the reversal occurs exactly where this gap closes. The numerical instrument is a self-consistent nonlinear eigensolver with the fixed total intensity constraint, and the experimental instrument is an amplifier-plus-varactor coupling circuit that produces the required nonlinear nonreciprocal hopping.

What would settle it

Simulate or measure the actual driven 11-resonator circuit, not its eigenmode model: sweep the continuous-wave input power and record the steady-state field profile; if the measured localization switches at a power that does not correspond to the intensity at which the point gap of the self-consistent spectrum closes, or if the switch is absent in a direct driven-response computation, the claim that the reversal is a point-gap topological transition would fail. A simpler check is to extract the winding of the complex transmission spectrum across the transition and see whether it changes sign at the same power as the field reversal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the model, the lattice Hamiltonian is $\hat H=\sum_i f_0 \hat c_i^\dagger \hat c_i + \sum_i (t_{l,i}\hat c_i^\dagger \hat c_{i+1}+t_{r,i}\hat c_{i+1}^\dagger \hat c_i)$ with reciprocal hopping in both directions and an extra rightward hopping $t_{r,i}=\kappa_{1,i}+\tilde\kappa_{2,i}$, where the nonlinear nonreciprocal coupling takes the saturable form $\tilde\kappa_{2,i}(I_i)=((t_0-t_\infty)/(1+I_i/t_c)+t_\infty)e^{i\theta}$ and shrinks as the local intensity grows. Solving the self-consistent nonlinear eigenproblem at fixed total intensity $I=\sum_i|\psi_i|^2$ shows that the average mode position $\bar{x}_c$ passes through zero at a threshold intensity, and that this threshold coincides with the closing of the point gap of the periodic-boundary spectrum. In other words, the winding of the complex eigenvalues around a point changes sign, so the point-gap topology and the associated skin localization both reverse even though no lattice parameter is changed. The experimental chain of 11 microwave resonators realizes the required unidirectional coupling with amplifiers whose gain saturates with power; measured port voltages and near-field maps show right-edge localization at low input power, a nearly uniform distribution at intermediate power, and left-edge localization at high input power, and the third harmonic at $3f_{\rm in}$ follows the same spatial switch.

Load-bearing premise

The steady-state field distributions measured under continuous-wave drive at given input powers are assumed to be the same as the nonlinear eigenmode solutions at a fixed total intensity, but the paper does not calculate the driven response or connect input power to that intensity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Raising input power alone moves the localization of all skin modes from one boundary of the array to the other, with an almost delocalized distribution near the transition.
  • The point gap in the periodic-boundary spectrum closes exactly where the average mode position $\bar{x}_c$ crosses zero, so the transition is of point-gap topological type rather than a line-gap transition.
  • Third-harmonic fields generated by the nonlinearity inherit the spatial profile of the fundamental skin modes, so the spatial distribution of the harmonic signal can be switched by input power.
  • The amplifier-based saturable coupling is compact enough to realize nonlinear non-Hermitian lattices in one and two dimensions, so the scheme can serve as a platform for other nonlinear and non-Hermitian models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the self-consistent eigenmode picture is correct, a direct driven-response simulation that maps input power $P_{\rm in}$ to the total intensity $I$ should reproduce the measured transition power; that mapping is an implicit assumption of the paper and is the natural next test.
  • The same saturable-nonreciprocity mechanism could be embedded in two-dimensional lattices, where the point-gap winding is replaced by higher-dimensional invariants; one would then expect the localization edge or corner itself to switch with intensity, which is testable with the same amplifier-varactor building block.
  • Because the third harmonic inherits the skin profile, a power-switchable frequency converter could be built in which both the conversion efficiency and the direction of the emitted harmonic field are controlled by the pump level, even though no geometric reconfiguration occurs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a theoretical and experimental study of a nonlinear Hatano-Nelson model with saturable nonreciprocal coupling. The central claim is that increasing the field intensity drives a point-gap topological phase transition in which the non-Hermitian skin effect reverses direction, with modes localized at one end at low intensity and at the opposite end at high intensity. The authors implement the model in a microwave metamaterial where unidirectional coupling is provided by an LNA-based amplifier whose gain saturates with local intensity. They observe the localization reversal in three independent ways: port transmission measurements on an 11-resonator chain, near-field electric-field scans, and third-harmonic generation whose spatial profile follows the skin mode. The theory solves a fixed-intensity nonlinear eigenproblem H(ψ)ψ=Eψ, while the experiment uses driven steady states under continuous-wave excitation. The nonlinear coupling parameters are extracted from a two-resonator transmission measurement and then used in the 11-resonator eigenmode calculation.

Significance. If the claims hold, this would be a valuable advance in nonlinear non-Hermitian topology, showing that intensity alone can switch the direction of the skin effect and can be used for reconfigurable wave manipulation and harmonic generation. The paper is commendable for showing consistency across multiple measurement modalities and for using parameters extracted from a separate two-resonator characterization rather than fitting to the observed reversal. The main risk is that the experiment-to-theory comparison bypasses the driven nonlinear response, so the topological interpretation is not yet fully substantiated. With a driven-response simulation and an explicit input-power-to-intensity calibration, the work could become a convincing demonstration.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (Nonlinear eigenproblem) and Fig. 3] The measured steady-state field distributions in Fig. 3b-d and 3i-k are responses of an 11-resonator system to a coherent multi-port drive at fixed input power P, while the comparison in Fig. 3e-h is made to eigensolutions of H(ψ)ψ=Eψ at fixed total intensity I. The manuscript never specifies a mapping between P and I and does not solve the driven nonlinear problem. Without such a driven-response calculation, the agreement is qualitative, and the high-power reversal could in principle arise from drive, loss, or detuning effects rather than from the predicted self-consistent skin-mode eigenphase. Please add a driven coupled-mode simulation with the same retrieved parameters, or provide a clear argument that the uniform 11-port excitation selects the nonlinear eigenmode.
  2. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 2e] The nonlinear coupling model is written as a function of local site intensity I_i, but the two-resonator characterization retrieves κ~2 as a function of input power P. The conversion between P and I_i (e.g., from the two-resonator coupled-mode equations) is not stated. Since t_c sets the saturation scale used in the N-site eigenproblem, this missing calibration weakens the quantitative interpretation of Fig. 3; please specify how I_i was obtained from the measured P or revise the comparison to use a directly calibrated intensity axis.
  3. [Fig. 1b,d-f and Eq. (3)] The transition is labeled a point-gap topological phase transition, but no point-gap winding number or equivalent invariant is computed for the nonlinear PBC spectrum. The x̄_c=0 and PBC-gap-closing criteria are suggestive but do not by themselves establish a change of the point-gap winding. Please compute the winding number for the self-consistent PBC solutions or clearly limit the claim to a gap-closing/localization-reversal transition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption statement 'with a fixed t0 = 2.05 (θ = −0.9π)' is ambiguous; please specify explicitly which panel uses which fixed parameter.
  2. [Theoretical model, PBC treatment] When connecting the chain into a closed loop for the PBC spectrum, the manuscript does not specify how the nonlinear coupling between sites N and 1 is defined, in particular which site intensity enters the saturable coupling; please clarify.
  3. [Fig. 3e-g] The term 'Simulated field distributions' is ambiguous; state clearly whether these are eigenmode intensities from the nonlinear eigenproblem or spectra from a driven-response model.
  4. [Fig. 4] The harmonic-generation experiment drives site 1 only, whereas the skin-mode excitation in Fig. 3 uses uniform multi-port drive; please discuss whether the single-port drive affects the interpretation of the third-harmonic localization reversal.
  5. [Fig. 2e] Please report parameter uncertainties for the fitted values t0, t∞, tc, and θ, and state how the fit was performed (e.g., least squares on magnitude and phase).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reversal prediction follows from the stated nonlinear eigenproblem with independently characterized coupling parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is derived from an explicit nonlinear Hatano-Nelson model with saturable nonreciprocal coupling (Eq. (2)), and the predicted reversal of skin-mode localization follows from solving the fixed-intensity nonlinear eigenproblem H(psi)psi=Epsi at open and periodic boundary conditions. The experimental parameters (t0, t_inf, tc, theta) are not fitted to the 11-resonator reversal; they are retrieved from independent two-resonator transmission measurements in Fig. 2d-e, and the same parameters are then used to compute the 11-resonator eigenmodes and field distributions compared in Fig. 3e-h. This is honest parameter characterization followed by a forward prediction, not a fit renamed as a prediction. The manuscript's use of point-gap closing as an indicator of the topological transition is a standard diagnostic for the non-Hermitian skin effect, and the localization reversal is a nontrivial consequence of the model rather than an input assumption. The absence of an explicit input-power-to-intensity mapping or a full driven-response calculation is a validation gap that concerns agreement with experiment, but it is not a circularity because no predicted quantity is defined in terms of the measured outcome by construction. Self-citations to prior work on the non-Hermitian skin effect and nonlinear topological phases are contextual and are not load-bearing for the derivation; no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is invoked to force the model choice. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its stated inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities (no new particles, forces, or dimensions). Its central claim rests on a phenomenological saturable nonlinear coupling model with several fitted parameters (t0, t_inf, tc, theta, kappa1, gamma0, f0), on the assumption that the eigenmode problem at fixed total intensity describes the driven steady state, and on extending point-gap topological reasoning to a nonlinear system where no rigorous topological invariant is defined.

free parameters (7)
  • t0 (zero-intensity nonlinear coupling amplitude) = Not quoted in text; used as 2.05 in theory; retrieved from two-resonator transmission fits in experiment
    Sets the strength of the rightward nonlinear nonreciprocal hopping at zero intensity; must satisfy the inequality |t0 e^{i theta} + 1| > 1 for right-localized skin modes at low power.
  • t_inf (infinite-intensity saturation amplitude) = Not quoted in text; used as 0.2 in theory
    Saturation value of the nonlinear coupling at high intensity; must satisfy |t_inf e^{i theta} + 1| < 1 for the reversal to occur. Chosen and engineered to make the phase transition happen.
  • tc (saturation intensity scale) = Not quoted in text; used as 1 in theory
    Intensity scale at which the coupling transitions between t0 and t_inf; sets the power level of the transition. Fitted from transmission-versus-power data.
  • theta (phase of nonlinear coupling) = Near -0.9 pi in theory; engineered in experiment
    The phase of the unidirectional coupling; the reversal occurs only near theta = +/- pi where interference with the reciprocal coupling changes sign. The authors state the phase is 'carefully engineered' to ensure reversal.
  • kappa1 (linear reciprocal coupling) = Set to 1 by scaling in theory; measured in experiment
    The linear, reciprocal evanescent coupling between resonators; used as the unit of energy in the theoretical model.
  • gamma0 (resonator loss rate) = Not quoted in text; retrieved from two-resonator fits
    Intrinsic loss of each resonator (conductor, dielectric, lumped resistor); enters the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian as an imaginary on-site term.
  • f0 (resonance frequency) = 1.2 GHz for single resonator; operating frequencies around 1.013-1.056 GHz
    On-site resonance frequency of each resonator; the operating frequency is detuned from the bare resonance by the loading.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The steady state of the driven nonlinear microwave lattice is described by the nonlinear eigenproblem H(psi) psi = E psi with fixed total intensity I = sum |psi_i|^2.
    The paper solves eigenmodes at fixed I (Methods) and compares them directly to driven measurements at fixed input power P; no derivation of this equivalence is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The LNA-based unidirectional coupling is accurately modeled by the saturable form kappa2_tilde(I) = ((t0 - t_inf)/(1 + I/tc) + t_inf) e^{i theta}, with only the source-site intensity I_i entering.
    Eq. (2): this phenomenological form is fitted to two-resonator transmission data (Fig. 2e), not derived from circuit theory. The unidirectional dependence on I_i is asserted.
  • domain assumption Point-gap topology under PBC, computed with the self-consistent nonuniform couplings, remains a valid indicator of OBC skin-mode localization in the nonlinear system.
    The paper identifies the phase transition via PBC point-gap closing (Fig. 1b, white dashed lines) and the known NHSE bulk-boundary correspondence; for nonlinear systems the topological classification is not rigorously established, as the authors acknowledge.
  • domain assumption A uniform multi-port excitation 'averages' the initial energy and does not bias the measured spatial distribution, so the measured field profile represents the intrinsic skin-mode localization.
    In 'Reversal of the NHSE driven by nonlinearity': 'Such an excitation averages the initial energy of the system and mitigates the effect of input ports.' No quantitative justification is provided.
  • domain assumption The third harmonic field inherits the spatial distribution of the fundamental skin mode.
    In 'Harmonic generation produced by skin modes', this is observed but not modeled; the claim that the 3f_in distribution 'inherit[s] the localization property' is an interpretation of the data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of localization reversal and harmonic generation in nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZS4ZQSIN

@misc{pith2026250509179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of localization reversal and harmonic generation in nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZS4ZQSIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09179}
}
read the original abstract

The interplay between band topology and material nonlinearity gives rise to a variety of novel phenomena, such as topological solitons and nonlinearity-induced topological phase transitions. However, most previous studies fall within the Hermitian regime, leaving the impact of nonlinearity on non-Hermitian topology seldom explored. Here, we investigate the effects of nonlinearity on the non-Hermitian skin effect, a well-known non-Hermitian phenomenon induced by the point-gap topology unique to non-Hermitian systems. Interestingly, we discover a nonlinearity-induced point-gap topological phase transition accompanied by a reversal of the skin mode localization, which is distinct from previous nonlinearity-induced line-gap topological phases. This phenomenon is experimentally demonstrated in a nonlinear microwave metamaterial, where electromagnetic waves are localized around one end of the sample under a low-intensity pump, whereas at a high-intensity pump, the waves are localized around the other end. Our results open a new route towards nonlinear topological physics in non-Hermitian systems and are promising for reconfigurable topological wave manipulation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Theory of anomalous Landau-Zener tunneling induced by nonlinear coupling

    quant-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Nonlinear coupling in a Landau-Zener model creates a universal attractor fixed point that erases initial-state memory and yields a power-law adiabatic tunneling probability p = -α/β.

  2. Versatile Control of Nonlinear Topological States in Non-Hermitian Systems

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Nonlinear hopping in both the Hermitian and non-Hermitian halves of a topological interface lattice fully delocalizes the zero mode and allows its profile to be designed arbitrarily.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nat. Photon.8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg,et al., Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013905 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature461, 772 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. Hossein Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, M. Kargarian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets, Pho- tonic topological insulators, Nat. Mater.12, 233 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Chen, S.-J

    W.-J. Chen, S.-J. Jiang, X.-D. Chen, B. Zhu, L. Zhou, J.-W. Dong, and C. T. Chan, Experimental realization of photonic topological insulator in a uniaxial metacrystal waveguide, Nat. Commun.5, 5782 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Wu and X

    L.-H. Wu and X. Hu, Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 223901 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Ma and G

    T. Ma and G. Shvets, All-Si valley-Hall photonic topo- logical insulator, New J. Phys.18, 025012 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Dong, X.-D

    J.-W. Dong, X.-D. Chen, H. Zhu, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Valley photonic crystals for control of spin and topology, Nat. Mater.16, 298 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    F. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Yang, K. Lai, Y. Yu, X. Lin, Y. Chong, G. Shvets, and B. Zhang, Topologically pro- tected refraction of robust kink states in valley photonic crystals, Nat. Phys.14, 140 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013). 7

    2013

  4. [12]

    Liang and Y

    G. Liang and Y. Chong, Optical resonator analog of a two-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203904 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    F. Gao, Z. Gao, X. Shi, Z. Yang, X. Lin, H. Xu, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, H. Chen, L. Lu,et al., Prob- ing topological protection using a designer surface plas- mon structure, Nat. Commun.7, 11619 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 745 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Smirnova, D

    D. Smirnova, D. Leykam, Y. Chong, and Y. Kivshar, Nonlinear topological photonics, Appl. Phys. Rev.7, 021306 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Zhou and J

    H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries, Phys. Rev. B99, 235112 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Martinez Alvarez, J

    V. Martinez Alvarez, J. Barrios Vargas, and L. Foa Tor- res, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 056802 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 761 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science368, 311 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Y. G. Liu, Y. Wei, O. Hemmatyar, G. G. Pyrialakos, P. S. Jung, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Com- plex skin modes in non-Hermitian coupled laser arrays, Light Sci. Appl.11, 336 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Y. Sun, X. Hou, T. Wan, F. Wang, S. Zhu, Z. Ruan, and Z. Yang, Photonic Floquet skin-topological effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063804 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    G.-G. Liu, S. Mandal, P. Zhou, X. Xi, R. Banerjee, Y.-H. Hu, M. Wei, M. Wang, Q. Wang, Z. Gao,et al., Local- ization of chiral edge states by the non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 113802 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Manna and B

    S. Manna and B. Roy, Inner skin effects on non- hermitian topological fractals, communications physics 6, 10 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser ar- rays, Ann

    S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser ar- rays, Ann. Phys.530, 1800023 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    B. Zhu, Q. Wang, D. Leykam, H. Xue, Q. J. Wang, and Y. Chong, Anomalous single-mode lasing induced by non- linearity and the non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 013903 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Z. Gao, X. Qiao, M. Pan, S. Wu, J. Yim, K. Chen, B. Midya, L. Ge, and L. Feng, Two-dimensional recon- figurable non-Hermitian gauged laser array, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 263801 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topo- logical sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180403 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Commun.11, 5382 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    W. Deng, W. Zhu, T. Chen, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Ultrasensitive integrated circuit sensors based on high- order non-Hermitian topological physics, Sci. Adv.10, eadp6905 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Lumer, Y

    Y. Lumer, Y. Plotnik, M. C. Rechtsman, and M. Segev, Self-localized states in photonic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 243905 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Dobrykh, A

    D. Dobrykh, A. Yulin, A. Slobozhanyuk, A. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Nonlinear control of electromagnetic topological edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163901 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Mukherjee and M

    S. Mukherjee and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of Flo- quet solitons in a topological bandgap, Science368, 856 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    M. S. Kirsch, Y. Zhang, M. Kremer, L. J. Maczewsky, S. K. Ivanov, Y. V. Kartashov, L. Torner, D. Bauer, A. Szameit, and M. Heinrich, Nonlinear second-order photonic topological insulators, Nat. Phys.17, 995 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Z. Hu, D. Bongiovanni, D. Juki´ c, E. Jajti´ c, S. Xia, D. Song, J. Xu, R. Morandotti, H. Buljan, and Z. Chen, Nonlinear control of photonic higher-order topological bound states in the continuum, Light Sci. Appl.10, 164 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    J¨ urgensen, S

    M. J¨ urgensen, S. Mukherjee, and M. C. Rechtsman, Quantized nonlinear Thouless pumping, Nature596, 63 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    S. Kruk, A. Poddubny, D. Smirnova, L. Wang, A. Slobozhanyuk, A. Shorokhov, I. Kravchenko, B. Luther-Davies, and Y. Kivshar, Nonlinear light gener- ation in topological nanostructures, Nat. Nanotech.14, 126 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Smirnova, S

    D. Smirnova, S. Kruk, D. Leykam, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, D.-Y. Choi, and Y. Kivshar, Third-harmonic generation in photonic topological metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103901 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Wang, L.-J

    Y. Wang, L.-J. Lang, C. H. Lee, B. Zhang, and Y. Chong, Topologically enhanced harmonic generation in a nonlin- ear transmission line metamaterial, Nat. Commun.10, 1102 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Z. Lan, J. W. You, and N. C. Panoiu, Nonlinear one-way edge-mode interactions for frequency mixing in topolog- ical photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B101, 155422 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    J. W. You, Z. Lan, and N. C. Panoiu, Four-wave mixing of topological edge plasmons in graphene metasurfaces, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz3910 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Hadad, A

    Y. Hadad, A. B. Khanikaev, and A. Alu, Self-induced topological transitions and edge states supported by non- 8 linear staggered potentials, Phys. Rev. B93, 155112 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Leykam and Y

    D. Leykam and Y. D. Chong, Edge solitons in nonlinear- photonic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 143901 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Leykam, S

    D. Leykam, S. Mittal, M. Hafezi, and Y. D. Chong, Re- configurable topological phases in next-nearest-neighbor coupled resonator lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 023901 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    L. J. Maczewsky, M. Heinrich, M. Kremer, S. K. Ivanov, M. Ehrhardt, F. Martinez, Y. V. Kartashov, V. V. Kono- top, L. Torner, D. Bauer,et al., Nonlinearity-induced photonic topological insulator, Science370, 701 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    S. Xia, D. Kaltsas, D. Song, I. Komis, J. Xu, A. Szameit, H. Buljan, K. G. Makris, and Z. Chen, Nonlinear tuning of PT symmetry and non-Hermitian topological states, Science372, 72 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    T. Dai, Y. Ao, J. Mao, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, C. Zhai, Y. Li, J. Yuan, B. Tang, Z. Li,et al., Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys. 20, 101 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Yuce, Nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys

    C. Yuce, Nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Lett. A408, 127484 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Ezawa, Dynamical nonlinear higher-order non- Hermitian skin effects and topological trap-skin phase, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Dynamical nonlinear higher-order non- Hermitian skin effects and topological trap-skin phase, Phys. Rev. B105, 125421 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Jiang, E

    H. Jiang, E. Cheng, Z. Zhou, and L.-J. Lang, Nonlinear perturbation of a high-order exceptional point: Skin dis- crete breathers and the hierarchical power-law scaling, Chin. Phys. B32, 084203 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Many Manda, R

    B. Many Manda, R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, P. G. Kevrekidis, and V. Achilleos, Skin modes in a nonlinear Hatano-Nelson model, Phys. Rev. B109, 094308 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Ghaemi-Dizicheh, A class of stable nonlinear non- Hermitian skin modes, Phys

    H. Ghaemi-Dizicheh, A class of stable nonlinear non- Hermitian skin modes, Phys. Scr.99, 125411 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Yuce, Nonlinear skin modes and fixed points, Phys

    C. Yuce, Nonlinear skin modes and fixed points, Phys. Rev. B111, 054201 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    S. Wang, B. Wang, C. Liu, C. Qin, L. Zhao, W. Liu, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Nonlinear non-Hermitian skin effect and skin solitons in temporal photonic feedback lattices, arXiv:2409.19693 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    H. Lo, Y. Wang, R. Banerjee, B. Zhang, and Y. Chong, Switchable non-Hermitian skin effect in Bogoliubov modes, arXiv:2411.13841 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Padlewski, R

    M. Padlewski, R. Fleury, and H. Lissek, Observation of amplitude-driven nonreciprocity for energy guiding, Phys. Rev. B111, 125156 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  57. [65]

    C. W. Peterson, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states, Nature555, 346 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Acknowledgements The work at Zhejiang University was sponsored by the Key Research and Development Pro- gram of the Ministry of Science and Technol- ogy under Grants No

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for derivations of transmission coefficients and coupled-mode equation, nonlinear eigenproblem, exper- imental resonator-component details, and measurement setup. Acknowledgements The work at Zhejiang University ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.