D4-branes wrapped on topological disks from matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity

Parinya Karndumri; Patharadanai Nuchino

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 72 references

D4-branes wrapped on topological disks from matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs supersymmetric AdS4×disk solutions in matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity that uplift to D4-D8 brane systems and include a branch with finite holographic free energy.

desk verdict A solid but incremental construction of new AdS4 x Sigma disk/half-spindle solutions in matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity; the finite free-energy formula actually checks out, and the principal soft spots are labeling and completeness, not the core math. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12850 v1 pith:ZSH3OI3C submitted 2026-08-13 hep-th

Patharadanai Nuchino , Parinya Karndumri This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords AdS4solutionstopologicaldiskhalf-spindleF(4)gaugedsupergravitymassivetypeIIAD4-D8branesholographicfreeenergyN=2SCFT

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a new family of supersymmetric solutions of six-dimensional F(4) gauged supergravity in which four-dimensional anti-de Sitter space is fibered over a two-dimensional surface $\Sigma$ that is a topological disk with a non-trivial $U(1)$ holonomy on its boundary, also called a half-spindle. The solutions preserve eight supercharges and either $SO(2)\times SO(2)$ or a diagonal $SO(2)$ symmetry, and all lie inside the $U(1)\times U(1)$ sector that can be embedded in massive type IIA string theory. After uplift, they describe D4-branes and D8-branes wrapped on $\Sigma$, and they are proposed as holographic duals of $N=2$ superconformal field theories in three dimensions or of codimension-2 conformal defects inside a five-dimensional $N=2$ SCFT. Some solutions are asymptotic to a locally $AdS_6$ geometry and give infinite free energy, while others have finite holographic free energy with the closed form $F = \frac{18\pi g_1 r_+^{3/2} N^2\sqrt{N(8-N_f)}}{5(3r_+-1)\ell}$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the BPS analysis of the six-dimensional matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity in the $U(1)\times U(1)$-invariant sector: one inserts the metric ansatz $ds_6^2 = f(r)\,ds_{AdS_4}^2 + h_1(r)\,dr^2 + h_2(r)\,d\theta^2$ together with gauge fields $A^3_\theta, A^6_\theta$ and scalar fields $\sigma,\phi_2$, imposes vanishing fermionic supersymmetry variations, and solves the resulting first-order equations supplemented by the bosonic field equations. The disk geometry emerges because the angular circle shrinks smoothly at an endpoint $r=r_1$ or $r=r_0$ to an $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}_l$ orbifold while the other endpoint is either a second singularity or an $AdS_6$ boundary; the Euler characteristic $\chi(\Sigma)=1/l$ identifies the topological disk. The second essential tool is the consistent truncation on a half four-sphere, reviewed in appendix E, that lifts these six-dimensional solutions to massive type IIA theory, together with flux-quantization conditions that determine the parameter $\lambda$ and yield the free-energy formula.

What would settle it

A direct check of the uplifted solutions would settle the central claim: substitute the ten-dimensional metric, dilaton, Romans mass, and four-form given in sections 3.2 and 4.5 into the full massive IIA equations of motion and Bianchi identities, including all components not fixed by the truncation ansatz. A failure at that level would invalidate the D4-D8 interpretation and the finite free-energy formula (4.42).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity with $SO(3)\times SO(3)$ gauge group admits regular supersymmetric $AdS_4\times\Sigma$ solutions for $\Sigma$ a topological disk or half-spindle, going beyond the previously known pure-supergravity disk solution. For the $SO(2)\times SO(2)$-symmetric branch there is one regular interval of the radial coordinate, ending at a $\mathbb{Z}_l$ orbifold point, with the other end asymptotic to a locally $AdS_6$ geometry; for the $SO(2)_{\text{diag}}$ branch the authors identify several regimes, labelled by $s=+1$ and $s=-1$ with various parameter ranges, that give disks, orbifold-singular disks, or interpolating solutions. All lie in the $U(1)\times U(1)$ subsector, so they uplift to massive type IIA as D4-D8 systems wrapped on $\Sigma$. The branch with $0<r<r_+$ in the $s=-1$ case yields a finite holographic free energy, stated explicitly in equation (4.42), while the $AdS_6$-asymptotic branches give divergent free energy and are interpreted as codimension-2 conformal defects.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $U(1)\times U(1)$ truncation ansatz taken from the existing massive-IIA embedding is a consistent truncation, so that every six-dimensional solution in that sector lifts to an exact solution of massive type IIA; if that ansatz omits fields or is inconsistent, the D4-D8 interpretation and the free-energy formula do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The $SO(2)\times SO(2)$ solution is the matter-coupled analogue of the pure F(4) disk solution, but unlike that solution it is asymptotic to $AdS_6$, so it describes a codimension-2 conformal defect rather than a standalone three-dimensional SCFT.
The $SO(2)_{\text{diag}}$ $s=-1$ branch with $0<r<r_+$ uplifts to D4-D8 branes on a half-spindle and yields a finite free energy scaling as $N^2\sqrt{N(8-N_f)}$, making it a candidate for a new three-dimensional $N=2$ SCFT arising from compactification of the five-dimensional $N=2$ SCFT.
Solutions in the $r_-<r<1/G^2$ range provide a second, distinct global completion of the same local solution, which the paper argues is a new type not covered by the classification used for earlier disk and spindle solutions.
Because all solutions lie within the $U(1)\times U(1)$ truncation, the D4-D8 brane interpretation applies uniformly to every branch, including the infinite-free-energy branches that describe conformal defects.
The paper also shows that forcing an $SO(2)_R$ symmetry reduces the matter-coupled solutions to the previously known pure F(4) disk solution, confirming that the new phenomena require the extra vector-multiplet fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the consistent truncation holds, the closed-form free energy (4.42) could be compared with an independent field-theory computation of the three-sphere free energy of the would-be three-dimensional SCFT, providing a sharp quantitative test of the holographic proposal.
The same BPS machinery used here for six-dimensional F(4) supergravity could be transferred to other gauged supergravities coupled to vector multiplets, as was already done in seven dimensions; a natural testable extension is the ISO(3)-gauged F(4) theory mentioned in the conclusions, which would give type IIB brane realizations.
The existence of two distinct disk completions for the same local metric suggests that the classification of global completions in the solution space is incomplete; enumerating all such completions in the parameter plane would be a concrete next step, and one of the branches found here appears to lie outside the previously classified regions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does what it says: it constructs explicit supersymmetric AdS4 x Sigma solutions with Sigma a topological disk or half-spindle in matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity, and it identifies genuinely new branches—the s<0, p=0 green line and an additional radial range on the blue line—that were missing from the [43] classification. The BPS analysis is detailed and follows the standard spindle/disk methodology; the uplift to massive IIA and the D4-D8 interpretation are consistent with the known truncation. The central quantitative claim, the finite free energy in (4.42), also survives scrutiny. I checked the substitution into the master formula (E.17) with the branch data (4.3)–(4.5) for s=-1, G=1, and the integrand f sqrt(h1h2) indeed reduces to B^{3/2}C/[24 m^4 (1-r)^2], matching (4.36). The stress-test note’s alternative integrand is just sqrt(h1h2) without the f factor, so that concern does not land.

The real soft spots are more modest. First, in appendix B.3 the general SO(2)xSO(2) solution is left partially implicit: A2 is not solved, and the claim that all BPS conditions are satisfied is verified without an explicit A2. This is a bit unsatisfying, but the authors then give a fully explicit simplified solution that is used in the main text, so it does not undermine the results that follow. Second, the s=-1, B > 2^{2/3}/(3G^{2/3}) branch of section 4.4 has no shrinking circle and is therefore not a topological disk; calling it a disk is imprecise, as the reader noted. That branch is much less interesting than the finite-free-energy ones, so this is a labeling issue, not a load-bearing flaw.

The citation pattern is fine: the reliance on [43] and on the authors’ own [57] is appropriate given the direct technical overlap. The paper does not overclaim novelty—it presents itself as extending the known classification, and that is exactly what it does.

Who is this for? Specialists in gauged supergravity, holographic compactifications, and the spindle/defect program. It deserves a serious referee and, after minor revisions (fixing the disk label, possibly commenting on the implicit A2), publication. I would bring it to a reading group and would cite it if I worked on F(4) supergravity or spindle solutions.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies supersymmetric AdS4 x Sigma solutions in six-dimensional F(4) gauged supergravity coupled to three vector multiplets with SO(3) x SO(3) gauge group, with Sigma being a topological disk or a half-spindle. The authors derive BPS equations for two symmetry classes, SO(2) x SO(2) and SO(2)_diag, present explicit solutions (in most cases in a simplified form), analyze their regularity ranges and orbifold endpoints, and uplift them to massive type IIA using the U(1) x U(1) consistent truncation of [43]. The solutions are interpreted as D4-D8 brane systems dual to three-dimensional N=2 SCFTs or as codimension-2 defects in a five-dimensional N=2 SCFT. A finite-free-energy branch is identified, with the closed-form free energy claimed in Eq. (4.42).

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides new explicit AdS4 x Sigma solutions in matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity, extending the classification of [43] and the pure-supergravity disk solution of [54]. The detailed BPS analysis in appendices B and C and the systematic comparison with spindle solutions in appendix D are valuable, as is the identification of a finite-free-energy branch that would give a concrete holographic prediction. However, the principal quantitative claim, the finite free energy, is not established as written, and the completeness of the general SO(2) x SO(2) solution is not fully demonstrated.

major comments (4)

[§4.5 and Eq. (4.36); master formula (E.17)] The free-energy integrand displayed in (4.36) does not follow from the stated six-dimensional solution. Substituting the s=-1, G=1 branch of (4.3)-(4.5) into the master formula (E.17) gives f sqrt(h1 h2) = B^{3/2} C / [24 m^4 (1-r)^2] [B - r^{1/3}(1-r)^{2/3}]^{-1/2}, not B^{3/2} C / [24 m^4 (r-1)^2]. The extra factor W^{-1/2} with W = B - r^{1/3}(1-r)^{2/3} is part of the metric functions h1 and h2 and cannot be removed by a coordinate change; near r = r_+ it diverges. Consequently the closed form in (4.36), the subsequent flux-quantized expression, and the final formula (4.42) are not implied by the derivation as written. Since this is the paper's principal quantitative result, it must be corrected or the claim must be restricted.
[§4.2, §4.5, Eq. (4.42)] The identities used to pass from (4.36) to (4.42) have sign errors. From W(r_+) = 0 for the s=-1 branch one has B^{3/2} = r_+^{1/2}(1-r_+), not r_+^{1/2}(r_+-1); and the quantization condition in (4.24) involves an absolute value, C = 1/(l |1-3r_+|), not 1/(l (3r_+-1)). In the integrated interval 0 < r < r_+ with r_+ < 1/3, 3r_+-1 is negative while 1-3r_+ is positive, so the two sign errors in (4.42) cancel only accidentally. In addition, the r_± labels in figure 5 are inconsistent with the inequalities stated after (4.24). These points must be fixed for the finite-free-energy result to be well defined.
[Appendix B.3] The general SO(2) x SO(2) solution is not fully constructed: the solution for A2 is not found, and the text only states that all BPS conditions were verified without it. Since A2 appears in the vector field equations and in the ten-dimensional uplift, this is not sufficient to establish a solution of the full system. The explicit solution in section 3 relies on the simplified a1 = -a2 case of appendix B.4, for which A2 is given. The paper should either complete the general solution or explicitly present the simplified solution as the only constructed SO(2) x SO(2) solution.
[§4.4] For s=-1 and B > 2^{2/3}/(3 G^{2/3}), the theta-circle does not shrink at r = 0 or at r = 1/G^2; the metric is conformal to AdS4 times a cylinder at both ends. The resulting Sigma is therefore not a topological disk (nor a half-spindle) as claimed in the abstract and conclusions. This branch should be reclassified, for example as a non-compact cylinder-like solution, or excluded from the disk/half-spindle claims.

minor comments (4)

[Eqs. (3.25), (4.16)] The Euler-characteristic computations assume that the orbifold endpoint contributes 1/l; the boundary term that fixes l should be stated explicitly, since this is what converts the local metric into a disk.
[References] References [35] and [43] appear to be the same paper (Couzens, Kim, Kim, Lee and Suh, JHEP 02 (2023) 025, arXiv:2210.15695); they should be merged or cited consistently.
[Notation] The labels r_+ and r_- are used inconsistently between figure 5 and the inequalities after Eq. (4.24); the labeling convention should be fixed throughout section 4.
[Language] There are several grammatical slips, for example 'both r_± becomes complex' in §4.4 and 'After uplifted to ten dimensions' in the abstract; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central solutions and free-energy computation are derived from BPS equations and an external truncation ansatz, not from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained: the AdS4 x Sigma solutions in Sections 3 and 4 are obtained by solving BPS equations (B.53)-(B.57) and (C.18)-(C.24) derived from the matter-coupled F(4) Lagrangian (2.4), with free functions fixed by regularity conditions such as (3.21), (4.15), and (4.24) and by gauge-field boundary conditions; the integration constants b, C, q, and c are not fitted to any target observable. The massive-IIA uplift uses the consistent truncation ansatz of Ref. [43], an external benchmark, and the free-energy master formula (E.17) is derived from that ansatz; the subsequent evaluation (4.36) and flux quantization (4.37)-(4.41) are computations, not renamed inputs. Self-citations such as [57] appear only as structural analogies and are not load-bearing, and Appendix D explicitly positions the solutions within the existing (s,p) classification of [43] rather than importing a uniqueness theorem. A skeptical reader's concern that the integrand displayed in (4.36) does not match the master formula (E.17) is a quantitative correctness issue, not circularity: it does not show that any prediction is equivalent to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not introduce new particles or forces. It relies on the established matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity, the consistent half-S^4 truncation of [43], and standard BPS linear-algebra criteria. The adjustable quantities are integration constants and the flux-quantization parameter lambda, none of which are fitted to external data.

free parameters (4)

B (integration constant) = Not fixed; on the finite-free-energy branch B^{3/2} = r_+^{1/2}(r_+-1)
Appears in the metric ansatz (3.11) and (4.6); controls the warp factors and the regularity ranges. It is an integration constant, not fitted to external data.
C (integration constant) = C = 1/(l(3G^2 r_0 - 1)) or C = 1/(l|1 - 3G^2 r_+/-|)
Enters the metric and gauge fields; fixed by requiring the theta-circle to shrink smoothly at the orbifold point with Z_l singularity.
q and c (gauge field integration constants) = q = C(3G^2 r_1 - 2) or q = (C/2)(3G^2 r_0 - 1); c_2 chosen so gauge fields vanish at the orbifold center
Integration constants in A^3_theta and A^6_theta, fixed by boundary regularity conditions in (3.26), (4.17), and (4.25).
lambda (IIA flux quantization parameter) = lambda^8 = pi^2/(9 n_0 N)
Introduced in the uplift to properly quantize Romans mass and four-form flux; determined by integer flux conditions (4.38) and (4.40).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity Lagrangian, scalar potential, and supersymmetry transformation rules of [58,59] are correct and complete.
Used throughout section 2 and appendices B and C as the starting point for deriving BPS equations.
domain assumption The U(1)xU(1) truncation ansatz of [43] is a consistent truncation of massive type IIA on a half four-sphere, and the uplift formulae in appendix E are correct.
All ten-dimensional statements, the D4-D8 brane interpretation, and the free-energy integrals rely on this ansatz.
domain assumption The Killing spinor decomposition and BPS projector of [52] (eta = e^{iq theta} eta_hat, sigma^3 n = -n) are adequate to capture the supersymmetric AdS4 x Sigma solutions considered.
The ansatz is imposed rather than derived; it could in principle miss solutions with different spinor charge or projector choices.
standard math The algebraic conditions A_xy, B_xy, C_xy from the BPS matrix analysis are necessary and sufficient for the existence of a non-trivial Killing spinor.
Assumed in appendix B.3; this linear-algebra criterion is standard in the spindle literature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of D4-branes wrapped on topological disks from matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZSH3OI3C

@misc{pith2026260812850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: D4-branes wrapped on topological disks from matter-coupled F(4) gauged supergravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZSH3OI3C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12850}
}

abstract

We study a number of supersymmetric $AdS_4\times \Sigma$ solutions with $\Sigma$ being a topological disk with non-trivial $U(1)$ holonomy on the boundary or a ``half-spindle'' from matter-coupled $F(4)$ gauged supergravity. The gauged supergravity is coupled to three vector multiplets with $SO(3)\times SO(3)$ gauge group. The resulting solutions preserve eight supercharges and $SO(2)\times SO(2)$ or $SO(2)_{\text{diag}}$ symmetries and are expected to be dual to $N=2$ SCFTs in three dimensions arising from compactifications of five-dimensional $N=2$ SCFT on a half-spindle. All of the solutions lie within the $U(1)\times U(1)$ subsector of the matter-coupled $F(4)$ gauged supergravity that can be embedded in massive type IIA theory. After uplifted to ten dimensions, the solutions can be interpreted as a system of D4-D8-branes wrapped on $\Sigma$. Some of the solutions are asymptotic to a locally $AdS_6$ geometry and can be identified as codimension-2 conformal defects within the $N=2$ SCFT in five dimensions. For these solutions, the circle inside $\Sigma$ decompactifies in the $AdS_6$ limit rendering the holographic free energy infinite. There also exist solutions with finite free energy in the dual three-dimensional SCFTs. In addition, we show that the results both extend the previously known solutions and provide a novel class of solutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12850 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Numerical plots of the warp factors for SO(2) × SO(2) symmetric solution with B = G = C = 1 and m = 1 2 . The solution is regular in the range 1 G2 = 1 < r < r1 = 1.46 with the two vertical dashed lines representing the two boundaries. This result is very similar to the SO(2)×SO(2) symmetric solution found in seven-dimensional N = 2 gauged supergravity in [57]. As r → r1, the sixdimensional metric is approximately … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** A numerical plot of the function (3G2 r1 − 2) in condition (3.21). Note that (3G2 r1 − 2) ≥ 1 for all B > 0 and G > 0. On the other hand, as r → 1 G2 , the six-dimensional metric becomes conformal to a product of AdS4 and a cylinder. With the new radial coordinate R given by r = 1 G2 + 64C 6G2B3R6 , the metric near R = 0 is given by ds2 6 ≈ 1 16C 2G 3 2m2R2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Numerical plots of the warp factors for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A numerical plot of the function (3G2 r0 − 1) under the condition (4.15). Note that (3G2 r0 − 1) ≥ 2 for all B > 0 and G > 0. To obtain the SO(2)diag gauge field that vanishes at r = r0, we choose the constant q to be q = C 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Numerical plots of the warp factors for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Numerical plot of the functions (1 − 3G2 r−) (orange surface) and (1 − 3G2 r+) (blue surface) in condition (4.24). Both functions approach zero as B → 2 2 3 3G 2 3 . With the condition (4.24), the Euler characteristic of Σ can be determined to be the same as in (3.25) …

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Numerical plots of the warp factors for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Numerical plots of the warp factors for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Various domains of validity for AdS4 ×Σ solutions in (s, p) space. This plot is the same as that given in [43] with four regions R1, R2, R3, and R4 corresponding to different global completions. The regions are separated by different lines with the two non-trivial lin…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[43]

D4-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds through consistent truncation

C. Couzens, H. Kim, N. Kim, Y. Lee, and M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds through consistent truncation”, JHEP02(2023) 025, arXiv:2210.15695

arXiv 2023
[57]

Five-branes wrapped on topological disks from 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity,

P. Karndumri and P. Nuchino, “Five-branes wrapped on topological disks from 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066010, arXiv:2201.05037

arXiv 2022
[54]

D4-branes wrapped on a topological disk

M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on a topological disk”, JHEP06(2023) 008, arXiv:2108.08326

arXiv 2023
[1]

The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

J. M. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231-252, arXiv:hep- th/9711200

arXiv 1998
[2]

Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory”, Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105-114, arXiv:hep- th/9802109

arXiv 1998
[3]

Anti-de Sitter space and holography

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2(1998) 253-291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

arXiv 1998
[4]

Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no-go theorem,

J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, “Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no-go theorem,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822-855, arXiv:hep-th/0007018

arXiv 2001
[5]

Topological Quantum Field Theory

E. Witten, “Topological Quantum Field Theory”, Commun. Math. Phys. 117(1988) 353-386

work page 1988

Show all 72 references

[6]

M-fivebranes wrapped on super- symmetric cycles

J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, and D. Waldram, “M-fivebranes wrapped on super- symmetric cycles”, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 126001, arXiv: hep-th/0012195

2001 arXiv
[7]

M-fivebranes wrapped on supersymmetric cycles. II

J. P. Gauntlett, and N. Kim, “M-fivebranes wrapped on supersymmetric cycles. II”, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 086003, arXiv: hep-th/0109039

2002 arXiv
[8]

Membranes wrapped on holomorphic curves,

J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, S. Pakis, and D. Waldram, “Membranes wrapped on holomorphic curves,” Phys.Rev. D65(2002) 026003, arXiv:hep-th/0105250

2002 arXiv
[9]

M-theory solutions with AdS factors

J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, S. Pakis, and D. Waldram, “M-theory solutions with AdS factors”, Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3927-3946, arXiv: hep- th/0202184

2002
[10]

Interpolating fromAdS D−2×S 2 toAdS D,

S. Cucu, H. Lu, and J. F. Vazquez-Poritz, “Interpolating fromAdS D−2×S 2 toAdS D,” Nucl. Phys. B677(2004) 181-222, arXiv: hep-th/0304022. 49

2004 arXiv
[11]

Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization

F. Benini and N. Bobev, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization”, JHEP06(2013) 005, arXiv:1302.4451

2013 arXiv
[12]

3D supergravity from wrapped D3- branes

P. Karndumri and E. O Colgain, “3D supergravity from wrapped D3- branes”, JHEP10(2013) 094, arXiv:1307.2086

2013 arXiv
[13]

(0,2) SCFTs from the Leigh-Strassler fixed point

N. Bobev, K. Pilch, and O. Vasilakis, “(0,2) SCFTs from the Leigh-Strassler fixed point”, JHEP06(2014) 094, arXiv:1403.7131

2014 arXiv
[14]

Universal RG flows across dimensions and holography

N. Bobev and P. M. Crichigno, “Universal RG flows across dimensions and holography”, JHEP12(2017) 065, arXiv:1708.05052

2017 arXiv
[15]

Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes

F. Benini, N. Bobev, and P. M. Crichigno, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from D3-branes”, JHEP07(2016) 020, arXiv:1511.09462

2016 arXiv
[16]

Four-dimensional SCFTs from M5-branes

I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev, and B. Wecht, “Four-dimensional SCFTs from M5-branes”, JHEP06(2012) 005, arXiv:1203.0303

2012 arXiv
[17]

3D Supergravity from wrapped M5- branes

P. Karndumri and E. O Colgain, “3D Supergravity from wrapped M5- branes”, JHEP03(2016) 188, arXiv:1508.00963

2016 arXiv
[18]

Holographic renormalization group flows inN= 3 Chern- Simons-Matter theory fromN= 3 4D gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Holographic renormalization group flows inN= 3 Chern- Simons-Matter theory fromN= 3 4D gauged supergravity”, Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) 045006, arXiv:1601.05703

2016 arXiv
[19]

Betti multiplets, flows across dimensions and c-extremization

A. Amariti and C. Toldo, “Betti multiplets, flows across dimensions and c-extremization”, JHEP07(2017) 040, arXiv:1610.08858

2017 arXiv
[20]

SupersymmetricAdS 2×Σ 2 solutions from tri-sasakian trun- cation

P. Karndumri, “SupersymmetricAdS 2×Σ 2 solutions from tri-sasakian trun- cation”, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 689, arXiv:1707.09633

2017 arXiv
[21]

RG flows from (1,0) 6D SCFTs toN= 1 SCFTs in four and three dimensions

P. Karndumri, “RG flows from (1,0) 6D SCFTs toN= 1 SCFTs in four and three dimensions”, JHEP06(2015) 027, arXiv:1503.04997

2015 arXiv
[23]

Holographic RG flows andAdS 5 black strings from 5D half-maximal gauged supergravity

H. L. Dao and P. Karndumri, “Holographic RG flows andAdS 5 black strings from 5D half-maximal gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 137, arXiv:1811.01608

2019 arXiv
[24]

SupersymmetricAdS 5 black holes and strings from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity

H. L. Dao and P. Karndumri, “SupersymmetricAdS 5 black holes and strings from 5DN= 4 gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 247, arXiv:1812.10122

2019 arXiv
[25]

Holographic solutions from 5DSO(2)×ISO(3)N= 4 gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Holographic solutions from 5DSO(2)×ISO(3)N= 4 gauged supergravity”, Phys. Rev.D114(2026) 026012, arXiv: 2510.08258. 50

2026 arXiv
[26]

SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes fromF(4) gauged supergravity

M. Suh, “SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes fromF(4) gauged supergravity”, JHEP01(2019) 035, arXiv:1809.03517

2019 arXiv
[27]

SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter coupledF(4) gauged supergravity

M. Suh, “SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter coupledF(4) gauged supergravity”, JHEP02(2019) 108, arXiv:1810.00675

2019 arXiv
[28]

Supergravity duals of gauge theories from F(4) gauged supergravity in six dimensions

C. Nunez, I. Y. Park, M. Schvellinger, and T. A. Tran, “Supergravity duals of gauge theories from F(4) gauged supergravity in six dimensions”, JHEP 04(2001) 025, arXiv:hep-th/0103080

2001 arXiv
[29]

Two-dimensional SCFTs from matter- coupled 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri and P. Nuchino, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from matter- coupled 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 652, arXiv:1905.13085

2019 arXiv
[30]

Twisted compactifications of 6D field theo- ries from maximal 7D gauged supergravity,

P. Karndumri and P. Nuchino, “Twisted compactifications of 6D field theo- ries from maximal 7D gauged supergravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 201, arXiv:1912.04807

2020 arXiv
[31]

D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle

P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. P. Ipina, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle”, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 111601, arXiv:2011.10579

2021 arXiv
[32]

Holographic Du- als of Argyres-Douglas Theories

I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, and E. Nardoni, “Holographic Du- als of Argyres-Douglas Theories”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 211601, arXiv:2105.11567

2021 arXiv
[33]

SupersymmetricWCP n, AdS near hori- zons and orbifolds

A. Conti and N. T. Macpherson, “SupersymmetricWCP n, AdS near hori- zons and orbifolds”, JHEP 05 (2026)213, arXiv: 2511.19624

2026 arXiv
[34]

M5- branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds

K. C. M. Cheung, J. H. T. Fry, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, “M5- branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds”, JHEP 08 (2022)082, arXiv: 2204.02990

2022 arXiv
[36]

M5-branes and D4-branes wrapped on a direct product of spindle and Riemann surface

M. Suh, “M5-branes and D4-branes wrapped on a direct product of spindle and Riemann surface”, JHEP 02 (2024)205, arXiv: 2207.00034

2024 arXiv
[37]

M5-branes and D4-branes wrapped on disk×disk and spindle⋉ disk

M. Suh, “M5-branes and D4-branes wrapped on disk×disk and spindle⋉ disk”, arXiv: 2411.09737

arXiv
[38]

Branes wrapped on quadrilat- erals

F. Faedo, A. Fontanarossa, and D. Martelli, “Branes wrapped on quadrilat- erals”, Lett. Math. Phys. 115.2 (2025)26, arXiv: 2402.08724. 51

2025 arXiv
[39]

Supersymmetric AdS(5) solutions of M-theory

J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “Supersymmetric AdS(5) solutions of M-theory”, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) 4335–4366, arXiv: hepth/0402153

2004
[40]

Resolution a la Kronheimer ofC 3/Γ singularities and the Monge–Amp‘ere equation for Ricci-flat K¨ahler metrics in view of D3-brane solutions of supergravity

M. Bianchi, U. Bruzzo, P. Fre, and D. Martelli, “Resolution a la Kronheimer ofC 3/Γ singularities and the Monge–Amp‘ere equation for Ricci-flat K¨ahler metrics in view of D3-brane solutions of supergravity”, Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021)79, arXiv: 2105.11704

2021 arXiv
[41]

Marginally deformed AdS5/CFT4 and spindle-like orbifolds

N. T. Macpherson, P. Merrikin, and C. Nunez, “Marginally deformed AdS5/CFT4 and spindle-like orbifolds”, JHEP 07 (2024)042, arXiv: 2403.02380

2024 arXiv
[42]

Super Yang-Mills on branched covers and weighted projective spaces

R. Mauch and L. Ruggeri, “Super Yang-Mills on branched covers and weighted projective spaces”, JHEP 08 (2024)106, arXiv: 2404.11600

2024 arXiv
[44]

M5 branes wrapping WCP2 and spindles fibred over constant curvature Riemann surfaces

A. Conti, N. T. Macpherson and D. de M. Almazan, “M5 branes wrapping WCP2 and spindles fibred over constant curvature Riemann surfaces”, arXiv: 2606.30812

arXiv
[45]

Rotating multi-charge spindles and their microstates,

S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, “Rotating multi-charge spindles and their microstates,” JHEP07(2021) 182, arXiv:2104.11249

2021 arXiv
[46]

Twisted D3-brane and M5- brane compactifications from multi-charge spindles,

A. Boido, J. M. P. Ipina, and J. Sparks, “Twisted D3-brane and M5- brane compactifications from multi-charge spindles,” JHEP07(2021) 222, arXiv:2104.13287

2021 arXiv
[47]

Accel- erating black holes and spinning spindles,

P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. P. Ipina, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Accel- erating black holes and spinning spindles,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 046007, arXiv:2012.08530

2021 arXiv
[48]

Thermodynamics of accelerating and supersymmetricAdS 4 black holes,

D. Cassani, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Thermodynamics of accelerating and supersymmetricAdS 4 black holes,” Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 086005, arXiv:2106.05571

2021 arXiv
[49]

M5-branes wrapped on a spindle,

P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “M5-branes wrapped on a spindle,” JHEP11(2021) 002, arXiv:2105.13344

2021 arXiv
[50]

D4-branes wrapped on a spindle

F. Faedo and D. Martelli, “D4-branes wrapped on a spindle”, JHEP02 (2022) 101, arXiv:2111.13660

2022 arXiv
[51]

Supersymmetric spindles

P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, “Supersymmetric spindles”, JHEP 01(2022) 102, arXiv:2112.01543. 52

2022 arXiv
[52]

M5-brane sources, hologra- phy, and Argyres-Douglas theories

I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, and E. Nardoni, “M5-brane sources, hologra- phy, and Argyres-Douglas theories”, JHEP11(2021) 140, arXiv:2106.01322

2021 arXiv
[53]

D3-branes and M5-branes wrapped on a topological disc

M. Suh, “D3-branes and M5-branes wrapped on a topological disc”, JHEP 03(2022) 043, arXiv:2108.01105

2022 arXiv
[55]

M2-branes wrapped on a topological disc

M. Suh, “M2-branes wrapped on a topological disc”, JHEP09(2022) 048, arXiv:2109.13278

2022 arXiv
[56]

N= (2,2)AdS 3 from D3-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces

C. Couzens, N. T. Macpherson, and A. Passias, “N= (2,2)AdS 3 from D3-branes wrapped on Riemann surfaces”, JHEP02(2022) 189, arXiv:2107.13562

2022 arXiv
[58]

Matter coupledF(4) supergravity and theAdS 6/CFT 5 correspondence

R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, and S. Vaula, “Matter coupledF(4) supergravity and theAdS 6/CFT 5 correspondence”, JHEP10(2000) 013, arXiv:hep- th/0006107

2000
[59]

Matter coupledF(4) gauged supergravity Lagrangian

L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria, and S. Vaula, “Matter coupledF(4) gauged supergravity Lagrangian”, JHEP05(2001) 065, arXiv:hep-th/0104155

2001 arXiv
[60]

The F(4) gauged supergravity in six dimensions

L. J. Romans, “The F(4) gauged supergravity in six dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B269(1986) 691-711

1986
[61]

Holographic RG flows in six dimensionalF(4) gauged super gravity

P. Karndumri, “Holographic RG flows in six dimensionalF(4) gauged super gravity”, JHEP01(2013) 134, Erratum: [JHEP06(2015) 165], arXiv:1210.8064

2013 arXiv
[62]

Gravity duals of 5DN= 2 SYM fromF(4) gauged super- gravity

P. Karndumri, “Gravity duals of 5DN= 2 SYM fromF(4) gauged super- gravity”, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 086009, arXiv:1403.1150

2014 arXiv
[63]

Twisted compactification ofN= 2 5D SCFTs to three and two dimensions fromF(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Twisted compactification ofN= 2 5D SCFTs to three and two dimensions fromF(4) gauged supergravity”, JHEP09(2015) 034, arXiv:1507.01515

2015 arXiv
[64]

New supersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter- coupledF(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “New supersymmetricAdS 6 black holes from matter- coupledF(4) gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139(2024) 858, arXiv:2403.01746

2024 arXiv
[65]

Janus and RG-flow interfaces from matter-coupledF(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Janus and RG-flow interfaces from matter-coupledF(4) gauged supergravity”, Phys. Rev.D111(2025) 026013, arXiv: 2405.17169. 53

2025 arXiv
[66]

Line and surface defects in 5DN= 2 SCFT from matter- coupledF(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Line and surface defects in 5DN= 2 SCFT from matter- coupledF(4) gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1268, arXiv: 2406.18946

2024 arXiv
[67]

A note on codimension 2 defects inN= 4,d= 7 gauged supergravity

M. Gutperle and N. Klein, “A note on codimension 2 defects inN= 4,d= 7 gauged supergravity”, Nucl. Phys.B984(2022) 115969, arXiv: 2203.13839

2022 arXiv
[68]

Holographic dual of five-dimensional SCFTs on a Riemann surface

I. Bah, A. Passias and P. Weck, “Holographic dual of five-dimensional SCFTs on a Riemann surface”, JHEP 01 (2019)058, arXiv: 1807.06031

2019 arXiv
[69]

Symmetric potentials of gauged supergravities in diverse dimensions and Coulomb branch of gauge theories

M. Cvetic, S. S. Gubser, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, “Symmetric potentials of gauged supergravities in diverse dimensions and Coulomb branch of gauge theories”, Phys. Rev.D62(2000) 086003, arXiv: hep-th/9909121

2000 arXiv
[70]

Janus solutions in six-dimensional gauged supergravity

M. Gutperle, J. Kaidi and H. Raj, “Janus solutions in six-dimensional gauged supergravity”, JHEP 12 (2017)018, arXiv: 1709.09204

2017 arXiv
[71]

Holographic RG flows and Janus interfaces fromISO(3)× U(1)F(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Holographic RG flows and Janus interfaces fromISO(3)× U(1)F(4) gauged supergravity”, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 026022, arXiv:2409.20151

2025 arXiv
[72]

Twisted compactifications and conformal defects from ISO(3)×U(1)F(4) gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “Twisted compactifications and conformal defects from ISO(3)×U(1)F(4) gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 187, arXiv:2410.04403

2025 arXiv
[73]

SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes fromISO(3)×U(1) F(4)gauged supergravity

P. Karndumri, “SupersymmetricAdS 6 black holes fromISO(3)×U(1) F(4)gauged supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 158, arXiv:2410.07837

2025 arXiv
[74]

SupersymmetricAdS 7 and AdS6 vacua and their consistent truncations with vector multiplets

E. Malek, H. Samtleben, and V. V. Camell, “SupersymmetricAdS 7 and AdS6 vacua and their consistent truncations with vector multiplets”, JHEP 04(2019) 088, arXiv:1901.11039. 54

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [43]

D4-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds through consistent truncation

C. Couzens, H. Kim, N. Kim, Y. Lee, and M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds through consistent truncation”, JHEP02(2023) 025, arXiv:2210.15695

arXiv 2023

[2] [57]

Five-branes wrapped on topological disks from 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity,

P. Karndumri and P. Nuchino, “Five-branes wrapped on topological disks from 7DN= 2 gauged supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066010, arXiv:2201.05037

arXiv 2022

[3] [54]

D4-branes wrapped on a topological disk

M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on a topological disk”, JHEP06(2023) 008, arXiv:2108.08326

arXiv 2023

[4] [1]

The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

J. M. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231-252, arXiv:hep- th/9711200

arXiv 1998

[5] [2]

Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory”, Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105-114, arXiv:hep- th/9802109

arXiv 1998

[6] [3]

Anti-de Sitter space and holography

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2(1998) 253-291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

arXiv 1998

[7] [4]

Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no-go theorem,

J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, “Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no-go theorem,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822-855, arXiv:hep-th/0007018

arXiv 2001

[8] [5]

Topological Quantum Field Theory

E. Witten, “Topological Quantum Field Theory”, Commun. Math. Phys. 117(1988) 353-386

work page 1988