Low-Complexity Receiver Design for Affine Filter Bank Modulation

Bruno S. Chang; Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu; Kuranage Roche Rayan Ranasinghe

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 21 references

Low-Complexity Receiver Design for Affine Filter Bank Modulation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Gaussian Belief Propagation receiver can decode AFBM, a filter-bank ISAC waveform, with element-wise scalar operations and beat AFDM by about 2 dB at a bit error rate of 0.001.

desk verdict First AFBM receiver is a useful step, but the 2 dB gain over AFDM rests on an unexamined white-noise assumption that a referee should push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17010 v1 pith:ZSJKARHU submitted 2025-06-20 eess.SP

Kuranage Roche Rayan Ranasinghe , Bruno S. Chang , Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SP

keywords affinefilterbankmodulationGaussianbeliefpropagationdoubly-dispersivechannelsintegratedsensingandcommunicationslow-complexitydetectionout-of-bandemissionsfrequencydivisionmultiplexingsoftinterferencecancellation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Affine Filter Bank Modulation (AFBM) is a recently proposed waveform for integrated sensing and communications that keeps the low out-of-band emissions of filter-bank systems while remaining usable in doubly-dispersive channels, but no receiver had been designed for it. This paper claims that a Gaussian Belief Propagation (GaBP) detector, built from element-wise scalar operations, can decode AFBM without matrix inversion. In simulations over a three-path doubly-dispersive channel it reports a bit error rate about 2 dB better than AFDM at $10^{-3}$, with per-iteration complexity $\mathcal{O}(\bar{N}\bar{M})$ versus $\mathcal{O}(\bar{M}^{3})$ for LMMSE. The same simulations show that AFBM keeps very low out-of-band emissions relative to AFDM, so the spectral advantage does not have to be paid for in receiver complexity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the filtered time-domain channel matrix $\bar{\mathbf{H}}=\mathbf{G}^{H}\mathbf{H}\mathbf{G}(\mathbf{I}_{K}\otimes\mathbf{Q}_{P}\mathbf{C}_{f})\boldsymbol{\Xi}$, which collapses the AFBM transmit filter bank, doubly-dispersive channel, and receive demodulation into one linear model with known coefficients. On this model the paper runs Gaussian Belief Propagation: each receive element sends a Gaussian message whose mean and variance come from subtracting the interference of all other symbols (soft interference cancellation), the messages are combined into an extrinsic belief, a Bayes-optimal QPSK denoiser with damping produces soft replicas, and the consensus update fuses the resulting estimates. This mechanism carries the argument because it converts detection into repeated element-wise scalar updates, avoiding the matrix inversion required by LMMSE, while the scalar Gaussian approximation keeps the messages Gaussian.

What would settle it

Compute the empirical covariance of $\bar{\mathbf{w}}=\mathbf{G}^{H}\mathbf{n}$ for the two prototype filters used in the simulations and compare its off-diagonal entries with $\sigma_{n}^{2}$; if they are not negligible, rerun the BER curves with a whitened or colored-noise-aware GaBP detector and check whether the 2 dB gain at a bit error rate of $10^{-3}$ survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the AFBM transceiver, whose received signal after demodulation can be written as $\bar{\mathbf{r}}=\bar{\mathbf{H}}\mathbf{x}+\bar{\mathbf{w}}$ with $\bar{\mathbf{H}}=\mathbf{G}^{H}\mathbf{H}\mathbf{G}(\mathbf{I}_{K}\otimes\mathbf{Q}_{P}\mathbf{C}_{f})\boldsymbol{\Xi}$, can be inverted by a GaBP message-passing receiver that never forms or inverts the full Gram matrix. The receiver alternates soft interference cancellation, belief generation under a scalar Gaussian approximation, Bayes-optimal soft replica generation for QPSK, and a consensus update that merges the per-row estimates. The paper reports that this scheme matches or beats LMMSE detection: in the simulated doubly-dispersive channel the GaBP-based AFBM receiver outperforms AFDM by roughly 2 dB at a bit error rate of $10^{-3}$ across the chirp sizes tested, with per-iteration cost $\mathcal{O}(\bar{N}\bar{M})$ rather than $\mathcal{O}(\bar{M}^{3})$. It also verifies that AFBM retains very low out-of-band emissions relative to AFDM while its ambiguity function stays similar, so the sensing side of ISAC is not sacrificed.

Load-bearing premise

The detector assumes the filtered noise $\bar{\mathbf{w}}=\mathbf{G}^{H}\mathbf{n}$ is white with a single scalar variance, even though the overlapping Toeplitz filter columns generally color it; the paper gives no whitening step or proof that the coloring is negligible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

AFBM detection scales to larger frames: each GaBP iteration costs a product of the frame dimensions in element-wise operations instead of a cubic matrix inversion, so the practical gap over LMMSE widens as the frame grows.
The reported 2 dB gain over AFDM at a bit error rate of 0.001, if it persists across channel profiles, makes AFBM a stronger candidate for high-mobility ISAC links where spectral containment matters.
Because the receiver works on the collapsed filtered channel matrix, it can be reused with any prototype filter and any chirp size that satisfies the orthogonality condition, as the simulations with varying chirp size indicate.
The complexity comparison is per iteration; with damping and consensus the number of iterations is a modest multiplier, so the end-to-end cost remains far below LMMSE for the simulated sizes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: The 2 dB comparison is at one bit error rate operating point in one channel profile; the ordering at higher SNR or with more resolvable paths is untested, and the colored-noise question below should be checked before generalizing.
Editorial: The same GaBP structure should extend to higher-order QAM via the adaptive belief scaling cited in the paper, and to joint channel-and-data estimation if the channel matrix is estimated iteratively; the paper only demonstrates QPSK with a known channel.
Editorial: Because the filtered channel matrix inherits the Toeplitz and Kronecker structure of the AFBM filter bank, fast matrix-vector products may lower the per-iteration cost below the reported product of dimensions in practice; the paper does not exploit this.
Editorial: If the colored-noise concern is real, a whitening step or a colored-noise-aware variance model could be inserted into the GaBP updates without changing the architecture; the paper does not test either.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about this paper. First, it is the first receiver designed specifically for AFBM, and that is a useful step: AFBM is a new ISAC waveform from the same group, and nobody had shown how to detect it. Second, the central claim, that GaBP detection beats AFDM by about 2 dB at a BER of 10^-3, is supported only by simulations that leave out several parameters and ignore a potential noise-whitening problem. So my honest take is: plausible, worth reviewing, not yet solid.

What is genuinely good: the paper takes the AFBM signal model, derives an element-wise GaBP detector with per-iteration complexity O(NK * KL/2) instead of O((KL/2)^3) for LMMSE, and shows BER curves plus OOBE. The equations are standard GaBP/SGA and are mostly consistent. The complexity advantage is real if the algorithm converges, and the OOBE advantage of the filter bank over AFDM is unsurprising but well illustrated.

Now the soft spots, in rough order of severity. The biggest one is the noise model. In Eq. (16) the receiver uses r_bar = G^H r, so the effective noise is w_bar = G^H n. G is a block Toeplitz filter matrix with overlapping columns (for Hermite O=1.5 and PHYDYAS O=4). G^H n is generally colored, and no whitening step or proof that G^H G is a scaled identity is given. The GaBP variance updates in Eqs. (20)-(23) treat each observation as if it had independent white noise with variance sigma_n^2. If the coloring is significant, the likelihood is mismatched and the reported BER doesn't mean what it appears to mean. This issue deserves a whitening filter or at least a numerical check of diag versus off-diagonal entries of G^H G. It is not necessarily fatal; many receivers ignore noise coloring when it is mild. But the paper does not show that it is mild.

Second, the paper withholds several numbers needed to reproduce the simulations: normalized delays and Doppler shifts, the guard width xi, the damping factor beta_x, and all Monte Carlo details. The authors should give these values. There is also a typo in Eq. (25a): the same variable appears on both sides; presumably the RHS should be the undamped estimate from Eq. (24). The iteration indices in the soft IC description are a bit sloppy, for instance around Eq. (19). These are minor but should be fixed.

Third, the 2 dB gain over AFDM is claimed for a particular channel setup, but without the channel parameters it cannot be checked. The GaBP for AFDM may also not be optimally tuned, which could bias the comparison. Not necessarily a flaw, but a fair referee should ask.

Who is this for? People working on AFDM, AFBM, and filter-bank ISAC waveforms. If that is you, it is worth reading. If you are outside the area, the specific contribution is narrow: a new application of known message-passing to a new matrix model, not a new principle.

My recommendation: send it to peer review. A good referee can push on the noise whitening and the missing simulation details. If those are resolved, it becomes a solid contribution to the waveform-receiver literature.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Gaussian belief propagation (GaBP) receiver for affine filter bank modulation (AFBM), a waveform recently introduced for doubly-dispersive (DD) channels. The receiver models the input–output relationship as r̄ = H̄x + w̄ and performs detection through soft interference cancellation, belief generation, and soft replica generation with damping, using only element-wise scalar operations. The authors claim a per-iteration complexity of O(N̄M̄) versus O(M̄^3) for LMMSE, and simulation results show about 2 dB gain over AFDM at a BER of 10^-3, together with low out-of-band emissions.

Significance. If the claims hold, the contribution is significant for ISAC and high-mobility communications: it provides a low-complexity detection scheme for a waveform with good spectral containment, avoiding costly matrix inversions. The GaBP framework is standard and the complexity analysis is straightforward. The reported 2 dB gain, however, rests on simulation curves and on a noise model that is not fully justified; these issues need to be resolved before the performance claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Section III, Eq. (16) and Eq. (21)] The model sets r̄ = H̄x + w̄ with w̄ = G^H n, but Eq. (21) treats w̄ as white noise with scalar variance σ_n^2. The matrix G in Eq. (9) is an overlapping block Toeplitz filter matrix, so G^H G generally has nonzero off-diagonal entries; the paper provides neither a whitening step nor a proof that G^H G is a scaled identity. This mismatch can bias the GaBP variance updates in Eq. (21) and the consensus estimate in Eq. (26), so the reported BER gain may not hold outside the exact simulated setup. Please either whiten the observation or incorporate the true noise covariance into the variance updates.
[Section III, Eq. (25a)] The damping update is written as x̂^(i) = β_x x̂^(i) + (1−β_x) x̂^(i−1), which is self-referential: the right-hand side uses the quantity being defined. The equation should use the undamped estimate from Eq. (24), e.g., a separate notation such as x̃^(i), to be algebraically consistent. As written, the algorithm is not executable as stated.
[Section III, Soft IC and belief generation] The iteration indices are inconsistent. In Eq. (18), the soft replica at iteration i is denoted x̂^(i)_{n,m}; Eq. (19) uses x̂^(i−1); the soft IC equation below Eq. (19) uses x̂^(i) in the interference term; and the text says that replicas from a previous iteration are used. This prevents exact reproduction of the algorithm. Please unify the superscripts and define the order of updates clearly.
[Section IV, Figs. 1–2] The central claim of a 2 dB gain at BER 10^-3 is based solely on simulation curves with no confidence intervals, number of trials, or statistical significance statement. Given the noise-model concern in the first comment, the reader cannot assess whether the observed gain is robust or an artifact of the specific channel realization and filter choices. Please include error bars or at least state the number of independent Monte Carlo runs.

minor comments (4)

[Section II, Eq. (3)] The matrix Ξ̄ uses a block 0_{L/2} in the middle, but the text refers to 0_L as a full zero matrix of size L; the notation should be made consistent, e.g., 0_{L/2} for the zero block.
[Section III, Eq. (24)] The second tanh term contains a typo: the subscript is \bar{x}^{(i)}_{\bar n,\bar k} instead of \bar{x}^{(i)}_{\bar n,\bar m}. Please correct.
[Section IV, Fig. 3] The caption contains a typo: 'Abmibuity' should be 'Ambiguity'.
[Section II, Eq. (9)] The condition that P must be smaller than N is stated in the text, but in the simulations P=256 and N=256, and P=128,192,256 are used with N=256; please clarify the exact constraint and its relationship to the simulation settings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GaBP receiver derivation follows from the stated signal model, and the reported 2 dB gain is an external simulation result, not a fitted input or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain for the GaBP receiver is self-contained: Eqs. (9)-(16) define the AFBM signal model and the filtered input-output relationship rbar = Hbar x + wbar, and Eqs. (18)-(26) derive soft interference cancellation, belief generation, and soft replica updates from that model using the scalar Gaussian approximation. No parameter appearing in the derivation is fitted to the BER results: the damping factor beta_x and guard width xi are tunable algorithm/channel parameters, and the reported 2 dB advantage at BER 10^-3 is an empirical simulation outcome, not a value imposed by the model. The AFBM waveform itself is imported from prior work [17] by overlapping authors, but this is ordinary prior-work support: the receiver paper does not rely on [17] to validate its central claim, and the waveform definition does not assume the GaBP receiver result. The one potentially questionable modeling choice, treating G^H n as white noise with scalar variance sigma_n^2 in Eqs. (20)-(21) without a whitening step, is a correctness or robustness concern about whether the model matches the simulated channel statistics, not a circular reduction: the receiver equations still follow logically from the stated model, and the BER comparison is carried out against an independent simulation of AFDM baselines. No equation in the paper reduces to another by construction, and no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or algorithmic entities are introduced. AFBM is prior work and GaBP is standard; the contribution is a receiver structure built from existing components.

free parameters (4)

Damping factor beta_x = Not specified (only constrained to 0 < beta_x < 1)
Used in Eq. (25a) to avoid convergence to local minima; the simulation value is not reported.
Guard width xi = Not specified
Free parameter in the chirp orthogonality condition 2(f_max+xi)(l_max+1)+l_max <= P; its value affects chirp design and the BER curves.
Prototype filter choice and overlap factor = Hermite with O=1.5; PHYDYAS with O=4
User-chosen standard filter designs that directly affect OOBE and BER; they are not fitted to the target result.
DAFT chirp parameters c1 and c2 = Chosen to satisfy the orthogonality condition; exact values not given
These define the affine transform and the effective channel; they are tuned to the channel delay and Doppler bounds but not reported.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Perfect knowledge of the filtered channel matrix H_bar at the receiver.
Section III states the I/O relationship under this assumption; no channel estimator is proposed, so the BER results are conditional on perfect CSI.
domain assumption Matched-filtered noise w_bar = G^H n is white with per-sample variance sigma_n^2.
Equations (20)-(21) use sigma_n^2 as the noise variance in the scalar Gaussian approximation; the paper does not justify whiteness for the overlapping Toeplitz filter G.
domain assumption Scalar Gaussian approximation of interference plus noise and independence of per-edge estimation errors.
Section III-B explicitly invokes the SGA and the independence assumption to derive Gaussian beliefs; these approximations are standard but unverified for this channel matrix.
domain assumption GaBP convergence for the AFBM H_bar matrix.
The paper cites convergence conditions from [20] but does not show they hold for the AFBM channel matrix.
domain assumption Complex orthogonality of the AFBM transceiver from the previous AFBM paper [17].
The signal model and filter compensation rely on [17, Eq. (12)]; this paper does not reprove it.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-Complexity Receiver Design for Affine Filter Bank Modulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZSJKARHU

@misc{pith2026250617010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-Complexity Receiver Design for Affine Filter Bank Modulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZSJKARHU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17010}
}

read the original abstract

We propose a low-complexity receiver structure for the recently introduced Affine Filter Bank Modulation (AFBM) scheme, which is a novel waveform designed for integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) systems operating in doubly-dispersive (DD) channels. The proposed receiver structure is based on the Gaussian Belief Propagation (GaBP) framework, making use of only element-wise scalar operations to perform detection of the transmitted symbols. Simulation results demonstrate that AFBM in conjunction with GaBP outperforms affine frequency division multiplexing (AFDM) in terms of bit error rates (BERs) in DD channels, while achieving very low out-of-band emissions (OOBE) in high-mobility scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17010 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** BER performance of the proposed GaBP technique for both the AFDM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** OOBE and Abmibuity function Performance of AFDM and AFBM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[1]

A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,

J. Wu and P. Fan, “A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,”IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 450– 476, 2016

2016
[2]

From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

K. R. Rayan Ranasinghe, K. Ando, and G. T. Freitas de Abreu, “From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,” in2025 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2025, pp. 865–870

2025
[3]

A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

K. R. R. Ranasinghe, K. Ando, H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, T. Takahashi, M. D. Renzo, and D. G. G, “A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05944

arXiv 2025
[4]

Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

Z. Wei, H. Qu, Y . Wang, X. Yuan, H. Wu, Y . Du, K. Han, N. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 068–11 092, 2023

2023
[5]

The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,

N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, M. Furkan Keskin, O. Kaltiokallio, M. Valkama, D. Dardari, X. Shen, Y . Shen, M. Bayraktar, and H. Wymeersch, “The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 676–723, 2024

2024
[6]

Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for afdm systems in doubly-dispersive channels,

K. R. R. Ranasinghe, H. Seok Rou, G. Thadeu Freitas de Abreu, T. Taka- hashi, and K. Ito, “Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for afdm systems in doubly-dispersive channels,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1602–1619, 2025

2025
[7]

Comparison of CP-OFDM and OFDM/OQAM in doubly dispersive channels,

J. Du and S. Signell, “Comparison of CP-OFDM and OFDM/OQAM in doubly dispersive channels,” inFuture Generation Communication and Networking (FGCN 2007), vol. 2, 2007, pp. 207–211

2007
[8]

H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, J. Choi, D. Gonz ´alez G., M. Kountouris, Y . L. Guan, and O. Gonsa, “From orthogonal time–frequency space to affine frequency-division multiplexing: A comparative study of next- generation waveforms for integrated sensing and communications in doubly dispersive channels,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 71–86, 2024

2024

Show all 21 references

[9]

Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,

A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,”IEEE Trans- actions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8214–8229, 2023

2023
[10]

DAFT-spread affine frequency division multiple access for downlink transmission,

Y . Tao, M. Wen, Y . Ge, T. Mao, L. Xiao, and J. Li, “DAFT-spread affine frequency division multiple access for downlink transmission,” in GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2024, pp. 2991–2996

2024
[11]

Spectrum design for orthogonal chirp division multiplexing transmissions,

M. S. Omar and X. Ma, “Spectrum design for orthogonal chirp division multiplexing transmissions,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1990–1994, 2020

1990
[12]

Special cases of DFT-based modulation and demodulation for affine frequency division multiplexing,

V . Savaux, “Special cases of DFT-based modulation and demodulation for affine frequency division multiplexing,”IEEE Transactions on Com- munications, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 7627–7638, 2024

2024
[13]

A novel filter-bank multicarrier scheme to mitigate the intrinsic interference: Application to mimo systems,

R. Zakaria and D. Le Ruyet, “A novel filter-bank multicarrier scheme to mitigate the intrinsic interference: Application to mimo systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1112– 1123, 2012

2012
[14]

Pruned DFT-spread FBMC: Low PAPR, low la- tency, high spectral efficiency,

R. Nissel and M. Rupp, “Pruned DFT-spread FBMC: Low PAPR, low la- tency, high spectral efficiency,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4811–4825, 2018

2018
[15]

A novel DFT precoded filter bank system with iterative equalization,

R. P. Junior, C. A. F. d. Rocha, B. S. Chang, and D. Le Ruyet, “A novel DFT precoded filter bank system with iterative equalization,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 478–482, 2021

2021
[16]

A generalized DFT precoded filter bank system,

——, “A generalized DFT precoded filter bank system,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1176–1180, 2022

2022
[17]

Affine filter bank modulation: A new waveform for high mobility communications,

H. L. Senger, G. P. Gonc ¸alves, B. S. Chang, H. S. Rou, K. R. R. Ranasinghe, G. T. F. de Abreu, and D. L. Ruyet, “Affine filter bank modulation: A new waveform for high mobility communications,”
[18]

Joint channel estimation and data detection for afdm receivers with oversampling,

K. R. Rayan Ranasinghe, Y . Ge, G. T. Freitas de Abreu, and Y . Liang Guan, “Joint channel estimation and data detection for afdm receivers with oversampling,” in2025 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2025, pp. 823– 828

2025
[19]

Design of adaptively scaled belief in multi-dimensional signal detection for higher-order modulation,

T. Takahashi, S. Ibi, and S. Sampei, “Design of adaptively scaled belief in multi-dimensional signal detection for higher-order modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1986–2001, 2019

1986
[20]

On convergence conditions of gaussian belief propagation,

Q. Su and Y .-C. Wu, “On convergence conditions of gaussian belief propagation,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1144–1155, 2015

2015
[2025]

Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03589

[Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03589

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,

J. Wu and P. Fan, “A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions,”IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 450– 476, 2016

2016

[2] [2]

From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

K. R. Rayan Ranasinghe, K. Ando, and G. T. Freitas de Abreu, “From theory to reality: A design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,” in2025 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2025, pp. 865–870

2025

[3] [3]

A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,

K. R. R. Ranasinghe, K. Ando, H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, T. Takahashi, M. D. Renzo, and D. G. G, “A flexible design framework for integrated communication and computing receivers,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05944

arXiv 2025

[4] [4]

Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

Z. Wei, H. Qu, Y . Wang, X. Yuan, H. Wu, Y . Du, K. Han, N. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 068–11 092, 2023

2023

[5] [5]

The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,

N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, M. Furkan Keskin, O. Kaltiokallio, M. Valkama, D. Dardari, X. Shen, Y . Shen, M. Bayraktar, and H. Wymeersch, “The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 676–723, 2024

2024

[6] [6]

Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for afdm systems in doubly-dispersive channels,

K. R. R. Ranasinghe, H. Seok Rou, G. Thadeu Freitas de Abreu, T. Taka- hashi, and K. Ito, “Joint channel, data, and radar parameter estimation for afdm systems in doubly-dispersive channels,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1602–1619, 2025

2025

[7] [7]

Comparison of CP-OFDM and OFDM/OQAM in doubly dispersive channels,

J. Du and S. Signell, “Comparison of CP-OFDM and OFDM/OQAM in doubly dispersive channels,” inFuture Generation Communication and Networking (FGCN 2007), vol. 2, 2007, pp. 207–211

2007

[8] [8]

H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, J. Choi, D. Gonz ´alez G., M. Kountouris, Y . L. Guan, and O. Gonsa, “From orthogonal time–frequency space to affine frequency-division multiplexing: A comparative study of next- generation waveforms for integrated sensing and communications in doubly dispersive channels,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 71–86, 2024

2024