REVIEW 2 cited by
Form factors with two operator insertions and the principle of maximal transcendentality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present the first calculations of two-point two-loop form factors (FFs) with a two identical operators insertion in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. In this article, we consider the supersymmetry protected half-BPS primary and unprotected Konishi operators. Unlike the FFs of a single operator insertion of the half-BPS primary, the FFs involving two half-BPS operators are found to contain lower transcendentality weight terms in addition to the highest ones. Moreover, in contrast to Sudakov FFs, the highest weight terms of the FFs of a double half-BPS no longer match with that of a double Konishi. We also find that the principle of maximal transcendentality, which dictates the presence of identical highest weight terms in the scalar FFs of half-BPS and quark/gluon FFs in QCD, does not hold true anymore for insertions of two identical operators. We discover the absence of any additional ultraviolet counterterm that could arise from the contact interaction between two composite operators.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Form factors from string amplitudes
A bosonic string disk amplitude with one closed and many open strings is proposed as a UV completion of tree-level form factors in scalar and Yang-Mills theories.
-
Three loop master integrals for ${\mathcal{O}} (\alpha \alpha_s^2)$ corrections to quark form factor
The authors derive analytic expressions for all 303 three-loop master integrals with one massive propagator appearing in the mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to the quark form factor, expressed through generalized po...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.