Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Optimizing brightness of SPDC source in Laguerre-Gaussian modes using type-0 periodically-poled nonlinear crystal

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that, for a type-0 ppKTP SPDC source, the brightness of a given Laguerre-Gaussian mode is governed by two focal parameters, and that no single pump focal parameter can simultaneously maximize the brightness of…

desk verdict Useful engineering map for LG-mode SPDC brightness, but the central Fig. 4 numbers are computed through an approximation that is bounded on intermediates, not on the optima themselves. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10385 v2 pith:ZTJ5Z23G submitted 2025-06-12 quant-ph

Jungmo Lee , Kyungdeuk Park , Dongkyu Kim , Yonggi Jo , Dong-Gil Im , Yong Sup Ihn This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81V80 PACS 42.65.Lm42.50.Dv
keywords spontaneousparametricdown-conversionLaguerre-Gaussianmodestype-0ppKTPbrightnessoptimizationfocalparameterspaircollectionratecoincidenceamplitudehigh-dimensionalquantumcommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how to make an SPDC photon-pair source as bright as possible when the pairs are emitted into specific Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes, the spatial modes used for high-dimensional free-space quantum communication. It derives a coincidence amplitude for a type-0 periodically-poled KTP crystal that avoids three standard shortcuts: assuming degenerate signal and idler frequencies, assuming a narrow spectral bandwidth, and assuming a thin crystal. The resulting expression reduces, under two symmetry conditions, to a two-parameter brightness problem depending only on the pump focal parameter and a degenerate signal-idler focal parameter. The paper's central finding is that the optimal pump focal parameter differs from one LG mode to another, so a single fixed pump focus cannot maximize the pair collection rate for all modes at once; choosing the focus for some modes cuts the brightness of others by more than half.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the coincidence amplitude written in real space through an inverse Fourier transform of the angular-spectrum biphoton wavefunction, combined with the complex beam parameter g_k = 1 + i f_k u, where f_k = L/(k_k $w_k^{2}$) is the focal parameter and u = 2z/L. The reduction to two parameters rests on the degenerate approximation: setting ws = wi and ns = ni and assuming symmetric frequency deviations around half the pump frequency lets g_s, g_i, and the combined g*(gp,gs,gi) all be replaced by g_d_si = 1 + i f_d_si u, while the phase mismatch keeps its full non-degenerate form. This is what turns the brightness into a function of (fp, f_d_si) alone and makes the mode-by-mode optimization in Figs. 2-4 computable.

What would settle it

Compute the exact coincidence amplitude of Eq. (10) without the degenerate approximation for two modes with large index difference, say (l,nsi)=(3,0) and (0,3), find their maximizing pump focal parameters, and compare with the degenerate-approximation values in Fig. 4; if the exact optima are close enough that one pump focus is near-optimal for both, the central incompatibility claim is quantitatively wrong. Alternatively, measure coincidence counts for both modes on a 30 mm ppKTP crystal while scanning the pump waist and check whether the measured brightness peaks occur at pump waists that differ by the predicted factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a no-go-type result about focal optimization: for the type-0 ppKTP system studied, the pair collection rate Rc for an LG mode with azimuthal index l and radial index nsi has a distinct optimal pump focal parameter f_opt_p, and these optima are not compatible across modes. In particular, when l is much larger than nsi, f_opt_p is large (above 2), and when nsi is much larger than l, f_opt_p is small (below 0.2); selecting the focus for one family reduces the other family's brightness by more than half relative to its maximum. The paper also claims a methodological advance: Eq. (10), with its detailed form Eq. (B25), computes the coincidence amplitude for type-0 ppKTP without degenerate, narrow-bandwidth, or thin-crystal assumptions, keeping the phase mismatch non-degenerate even while approximating the beam parameters by a degenerate value.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation's numbers come from an approximation that treats the signal and idler beams as if they had identical focusing; the paper checks this is accurate to a few percent for intermediate quantities but never checks whether it preserves which pump focus is best.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An experiment using multiple LG modes must either choose modes whose optimal pump focal parameters are close or accept a measured brightness reduction for the other modes; the paper quantifies this reduction as more than half when |l-nsi| is at least 3.
  • The two-parameter form of Rc makes it practical to search over pump focusing and collection optics for a fixed crystal temperature, since no integral over signal-idler frequency is needed during optimization.
  • Because the framework keeps the phase mismatch non-degenerate, it applies to wavelength-multiplexed and frequency-correlated type-0 sources, not only to degenerate operation.
  • The same two-parameter reduction can be used to optimize the Schmidt number, which the paper identifies as the next target for high-dimensional communication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the degenerate approximation preserves the location of the optima, the incompatibility is robust; a direct numerical evaluation of the unapproximated Eq. (10) would let one check whether any single pump focus is nearly optimal for a band of modes, which the paper does not report.
  • One way around the trade-off is to shape the pump so that different transverse regions carry different effective focal parameters; the paper's mode-by-mode f_opt_p map gives a target profile such a shaped-pump experiment could aim for.
  • The same conflict between focal optimization and mode diversity should appear in any collinear phase-matching geometry where the phase mismatch depends on the mode's k-space extent, so the result likely transfers beyond KTP to other periodically poled crystals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives the coincidence amplitude for photon pairs generated by type-0 SPDC in a ppKTP crystal and decomposed into Laguerre-Gaussian modes, avoiding the degenerate-state, narrow-bandwidth, and thin-crystal assumptions. The derivation is reformulated in real space, leading to Eq. (10), and then reduced by a 'degenerate approximation' in which the signal and idler complex beam parameters are replaced by a common parameter g_d_si under the conditions ws=wi, ns=ni, and symmetric signal/idler wave-vector deviations. The pair collection rate is computed as a function of the pump focal parameter fp and the degenerate focal parameter f^d_si, and these are optimized for various LG indices. The main practical claim is that a single pump focal parameter cannot simultaneously maximize the pair collection rate for different LG modes, with a sharp change of the optimal fp across the l=nsi diagonal and a reduction of more than half in Rc for modes on opposite sides of this diagonal.

Significance. If the central claim is quantitatively correct, the paper provides a useful framework for designing high-brightness SPDC sources for high-dimensional free-space quantum communication. The derivation is detailed and first-principles, the monochromatic-pump and paraxial assumptions are stated explicitly, and the paper gives error bounds for several intermediate approximations. The numerical checks of the ws=wi condition in Fig. B1 and the separation of the phase-mismatch integral Q(T,u1-u2) from the focal parameters are valuable. However, the main quantitative results, including the optimized focal parameters and the 'more than half' reduction, are all obtained from the degenerate approximation, and the accuracy of that approximation at the level of the optimized quantities is not established. This missing validation is the main barrier to accepting the practical conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [§III and Appendix B.2, Eq. (B25)] The central optimization results (f_opt_p, Rmax_c, and the 'more than half' reduction in Sec. III) are computed from the degenerate approximation, in which gs, gi, and g*(gp,gs,gi) are replaced by gd_si. The appendix bounds the errors of intermediate quantities f1 and 2fp/f^d_si at less than 6%, but those quantities enter beta and G_d in powers up to 2nsi+l+1 and through denominators (1+fp/f^d_si)^{ms+mi+l+1}. A 6% error can shift a maximum in (fp, f^d_si) space, and the paper does not compare the approximate Rc with the exact Eq. (10)/(B6) at the optimized points or over a grid. I request a direct numerical validation for at least the modes used in Fig. 4(b), e.g., (l,nsi)=(0,3), (0,4), (3,0), (4,0), reporting f_opt_p and Rmax_c from both expressions; if exact evaluation is too costly, an error bound on the derivative of Rc with respect to fp under the approximation would be needed. This is load-bearing because the main practical conclusion is a statement about the location of maxima, not about the intermediate variables whose error is already bounded.
  2. [§II and Appendix B.2.a, Fig. B1] The reduction to ws=wi and ns=ni is justified only for the three configurations in Fig. B1, all with l=0. The modes treated in Fig. 4 include l up to 5 and nsi up to 5 with l different from zero, and for those modes the full five-parameter optimization is not checked. Since f_opt_p is defined after this restriction, it is possible that the true optimum over (fs, fi, ws, wi) lies away from the diagonal ws=wi and changes the f_opt_p pattern in Fig. 4(a). Please extend the numerical check in Fig. B1 to at least (l,nsi)=(3,0), (0,3), (4,0), (0,4) and to one asymmetric pair with l>0, or state clearly that the conclusions are conditional on the ws=wi, ns=ni restriction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (B27)] In the double sum of Eq. (B27), the second factor G^{*dl,nsi}_{ms1,mi1}(u2) should read G^{*dl,nsi}_{ms2,mi2}(u2), with the summation indices of the second conjugate amplitude.
  2. [Fig. B1] The three panels are labelled (a), (b), (a); the third panel should be labelled (c).
  3. [Sec. III, paragraph after Fig. 4(b)] The statement that choosing f_opt_p for l-nsi<=-3 reduces the pair collection rate for l-nsi>=3 by more than half compared to its Rmax_c is not accompanied by a numerical value or a direct comparison in the figure; please include the actual reduction ratio or a table of the relevant Rmax_c values.
  4. [References] The reference list contains typographical errors that should be corrected, for example 'Opitcs' in Ref. [1], '144 kim' in Ref. [3], 'ploarization' in Ref. [31], and 'correlatoion' in Ref. [17].
  5. [Introduction] In Sec. I, 'we explore the spectral spectrum' is redundant; 'spectral properties' or 'frequency spectrum' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the pair-collection rate and focal-parameter optimization are first-principles calculations of the paper's own model, with no fitted data and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the standard SPDC biphoton amplitude (Eqs. 1-6), reformulates it in x-space using known LG basis definitions (Eqs. 7-10), and then introduces the degenerate approximation in Appendix B.2 with explicit error bounds (Eqs. B14-B15, around Eq. B24). The optimized quantities f_opt_p, Rmax_c, and f_d_opt_si are maxima of the resulting closed-form R_c over the model's own parameters; they are not extracted from experimental data, so there is no fitted_input_called_prediction loop. The conditions ws=wi and ns=ni are taken from the independent prior work [9] and additionally checked numerically in Fig. B1, so this is not a self-citation chain. The only self-citations ([16], [17], [31]) appear in the introduction and motivation and are not load-bearing for the derivation. The central claim about incompatible pump focal parameters is a computed consequence of the model, not assumed as an input. The approximate nature of the degenerate approximation and its possible effect on the location of optima is a correctness or validation concern, not a circularity concern under the stated rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum optics plus several domain-specific approximations. No free parameters are fitted; crystal parameters are taken from prior literature. The most fragile element is the degenerate approximation, which is an ad hoc-to-paper simplification, though justified by error estimates.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Paraxial approximation and quasicollinear propagation: wave vectors decomposed as k = q + kz z, and signal/idler travel nearly parallel to the pump.
    Invoked in Eq. (1)-(2) and stated in Section II.
  • domain assumption Energy conservation (ωp=ωs+ωi) and transverse momentum conservation (qp=qs+qi) hold.
    Used in Eq. (2); standard for SPDC.
  • domain assumption Monochromatic Gaussian pump beam.
    Stated before Eq. (10): 'we assume a monochromatic pump beam... and the pump beam is in a Gaussian spatial mode.' This is not one of the three approximations the paper claims to avoid.
  • domain assumption Signal and idler wave numbers deviate symmetrically from degeneracy, (ks,ki) ≈ (kd+Δk, kd-Δk), with (Δk/kd)^2 ≪ 1.
    Appendix B.2.a, condition 2. Relies on type-0 same polarization leading to nearly identical refractive indices.
  • domain assumption The term f2 in the beam parameter product can be neglected under the conditions of [20] (L ≳ 1mm, n≳1.5, Λ≳5µm, λ_s(i)≲1.6µm, λ_p≲0.8µm).
    Appendix B.2.b, citing Bennink (2010). This is an external theoretical result the paper relies on.
  • standard math The integral formula (B5) for products of Laguerre polynomials holds.
    Used to evaluate the radial integral, from reference [44].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimizing brightness of SPDC source in Laguerre-Gaussian modes using type-0 periodically-poled nonlinear crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZTJ5Z23G

@misc{pith2026250610385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimizing brightness of SPDC source in Laguerre-Gaussian modes using type-0 periodically-poled nonlinear crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZTJ5Z23G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10385}
}
read the original abstract

Photon pairs generated via spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) can exhibit entanglement in the Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) mode basis, which enables high-dimensional free-space quantum communication by exploiting the high-dimensional space spanned by the LG modes. For such free-space quantum communication, the brightness of the quantum light source plays an important role due to the atmospheric turbulence and photon loss. A variety of studies have analyzed the SPDC brightness by decomposing biphoton states into LG modes, but they have often relied on a degenerate state, a narrow spectral bandwidth approximation, or a thin crystal approximation. However, these approaches are unsuitable for non-degenerate type-0 SPDC with a periodicallypoled nonlinear crystal, which offers higher brightness due to its superior nonlinear coefficients. In this study, we examine the spectrum of photon pairs in specific LG modes generated by a type-0 ppKTP crystal whileavoiding the constraints imposed by the aforementioned assumptions. In addition, we investigate the optimal focal parameters of the pump, signal, and idler to maximize the brightness for a given LG mode. Our findings show that it is not feasible to simultaneously optimize the brightness for different LG modes with a single pump focal parameter. The results of this study provide a comprehensive framework for developing highbrightness quantum light sources and contribute to the advancement of high-dimensional free-space quantum communication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10385 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Coincidence probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Pair collection rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Optimized pump focal parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Pair collection rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In such systems, the signal and idler photons propagate along the same optical path and share the same polarization state

    Degenerate state assumption The degenerate state assumption, in which the signal and idler photons have identical frequencies (i.e., ωs = ωi = ωp 2 ), is not suitable for collinear type-0 pp crystals. In such systems, the signal and idler photons propagate along the same optical path and share the same polarization state. As a result, conventional polariz...

    work page

  2. [2]

    There- fore, when utilizing multiple LG modes simultaneously in an experiment, it is necessary to select appropriate LG modes based on the f opt p of each mode

    Consequently, selecting f opt p for l − nsi ≤ −3 to maxi- 6 mize the pair collection rate reduces the pair collection rate for l − nsi ≥ 3 by more than half compared to its Rmax c . There- fore, when utilizing multiple LG modes simultaneously in an experiment, it is necessary to select appropriate LG modes based on the f opt p of each mode. Furthermore, i...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Narrow spectral bandwidth approximation The narrow spectral bandwidth approximation assumes that the spectral distributions of signal and idler photons are suffi- ciently narrow, mathematically expressed as ∆ωb s (i) ωc si ≪ 1, where ∆ωb s (i) represents the spectral bandwidth for the signal (or idler) photons, and ωc si denotes the central frequency of t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    While this approximation is valid for thin crystals with millimeter-scale lengths [28], it is unsuitable for systems requiring high brightness

    Thin crystal approximation The thin crystal approximation assumes that the pump focal parameter fp is sufficiently small, given by the relation, fp = L 2LR = L kpw2p ≪ 1, where L is the crystal length, LR is the Rayleigh range, kp is the pump wave number, and wp is the pump beam waist. While this approximation is valid for thin crystals with millimeter-sc...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Calculation of coincidence amplitude From Eq. (6), the coincidence amplitude C can be written in terms of k-space notation as follows: C ls,li ns,ni = Z Z dqsdqi Sp(ωs + ωi)fVp(qs + qi)[gLG ls ns (qs)]∗[gLG li ni (qi)]∗ Z L 2 − L 2 dz exp(i∆kzz). (B1) 8 From the properties of the delta function δ(x), the following relations hold: fVp(qs + qi) = Z dqp δ(qp...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Approximation of coincidence amplitude Unlike wp, which has a one-to-one correspondence with fp under the monochromatic pump condition, the signal and idler waists ws and wi do not uniquely correspond to fs and fi due to frequency variations. a. Approximation conditions To simplify the coincidence amplitude C, we propose two conditions:

    work page

  7. [7]

    We confirm that the pair collection rateRc is also maximized under this condition

    Previous studies [9] indicate that under the condition ws = wi, the coincidence probability P l nsi is maximized when ns = ni. We confirm that the pair collection rateRc is also maximized under this condition. As shown in Figs. B1 (a) and (b), Under the condition ns = ni, the maximum Rc is achieved when ws = wi. Therefore, we proceed with calculations und...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (B10) For type-0 SPDC, where signal and idler photons share polarization [29], their refractive indices are nearly identical, validating this assumption

    We assume that ks and ki deviate approximately symmetrically from the degenerate wave number kd = k( ωp 2 ), which leads to the following relation: (ks, ki) ≈ (kd + ∆k, kd − ∆k). (B10) For type-0 SPDC, where signal and idler photons share polarization [29], their refractive indices are nearly identical, validating this assumption. Additionally, for small ...

    work page

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Opitcs (Gordon and Breach Science, 1988)

    D.N. Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Opitcs (Gordon and Breach Science, 1988)

    1988

  2. [10]

    Quantum communication,

    N. Gisin, and R. Thew, “Quantum communication,” Nat. Pho- 13 tonics 1, 165 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 kim,

    R. Ursin et al., “Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 kim,” Nat. Phys. 3, 481 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Linear optical quantum computing with pho- tonic qubits,

    P. Kok, W.J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T.C. Ralph, J.P. Dowling, and G.J. Milburn, “Linear optical quantum computing with pho- tonic qubits,” Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Experimental demonstration of topological error correction,

    X.-C. Yao et al., “Experimental demonstration of topological error correction,” Nature 482, 489 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Advances in quan- tum metrology,

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Advances in quan- tum metrology,” Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem,

    A. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  8. [16]

    Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptogra- phy over 1120 kilometres,

    J. Yin et al., “Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptogra- phy over 1120 kilometres,” Nature 582, 501 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Full characteriza- tion of the quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled biphotons,

    F. M. Miatto, A. M. Yao, and S. M. Barnett, “Full characteriza- tion of the quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled biphotons,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 033816 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    High- Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges,

    D. Cozzolino, B. D. Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, “High- Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges,” Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1900038 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Overcoming Noise in Entanglement Distribu- tion,

    S. Ecker et al., “Overcoming Noise in Entanglement Distribu- tion,” Phys. Rev. X9, 041042 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution by Rotation-Invariant Twisted Photons,

    G. Vallone et al., “Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution by Rotation-Invariant Twisted Photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  13. [21]

    Twisted light transmission over 143 km,

    M. Krenn et al., “Twisted light transmission over 143 km,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13648 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Demonstration of a 10 Mbit/s quantum com- munication link by encoding data on two Laguerre-Gaussian modes with different radial indices,

    K. Pang et al., “Demonstration of a 10 Mbit/s quantum com- munication link by encoding data on two Laguerre-Gaussian modes with different radial indices,” Opt. Lett.43, 5639 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    A high-brightness source of polarization-entangled photons optimized for applications in free space,

    A. Fedrizzi, T. Herbst, A. Poppe, T. Jennewein, and A. Zelinger, “A high-brightness source of polarization-entangled photons optimized for applications in free space,” Opt. Express20, 9640 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Highly- enhanced active beam-wander-correction for free-space quan- tum communications,

    D. Lim, D. Kim, K. Park, D.-G. Im, and Y . S. Ihn, “Highly- enhanced active beam-wander-correction for free-space quan- tum communications,” Opt. Express 31, 39981 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Quantum-correlatoion- based free-space optical link with an active reflector,

    D. Kim, D. Lim, K. Park, and Y . S. Ihn, “Quantum-correlatoion- based free-space optical link with an active reflector,” Curr. Appl. Phys. 41, 156–162 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Flux enhancement of photons entangled in orbital angular momentum,

    S. Palacios, R. de J. Le ´on-Montiel, M. Hendrych, A. Valencia, and J. P. Torres, “Flux enhancement of photons entangled in orbital angular momentum,” Opt. Express 19, 14108 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Heralding efficiency and correlated-mode coupling of near-IR fiber-coupled photon pairs,

    P. B. Dixon et al., “Heralding efficiency and correlated-mode coupling of near-IR fiber-coupled photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 043804 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Optimal collinear Gaussian beams for sponta- neous parametric down-conversion,

    R. S. Bennink, “Optimal collinear Gaussian beams for sponta- neous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 053805 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Optimal focusing for maximal collection of entangled narrow-band photon pairs into single- mode fibers,

    D. Ljunggren and M. Tengner, “Optimal focusing for maximal collection of entangled narrow-band photon pairs into single- mode fibers,” Phys. Rev. A72, 062301 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Absolute emis- sion rates of spontaneous parametric down-conversion into sin- gle transverse Gaussian modes,

    A. Ling, A. Lamas-Linares, and C. Kurtsiefer, “Absolute emis- sion rates of spontaneous parametric down-conversion into sin- gle transverse Gaussian modes,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 043834 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    Efficient fiber coupling of down-conversion photon pairs,

    A. Dragan, “Efficient fiber coupling of down-conversion photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. A.70, 053814 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    J. P. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, and L. Torner, “Quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled two-photon states,“ Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301(2003)

    2003

  25. [33]

    Generalized description of the spatio-temporal biphoton state in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    B. Baghdasaryan, C. Sevilla-Guti ´errez, F. Steinlechner, and S. Fritzsche, “Generalized description of the spatio-temporal biphoton state in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 063711 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Spectral proper- ties of transverse Laguerre-Gauss modes in parametric down- conversion,

    C. Sevilla-Guti ´errez, V . R. Kaipalath, B. Baghdasaryan, M. Gr¨afe, S. Fritzsche, and F. Steinlechner, “Spectral proper- ties of transverse Laguerre-Gauss modes in parametric down- conversion,” Phys. Rev. A109, 023534 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Angular momentum decomposition of entangled photons with an arbitrary pump,

    A. M. Yao, “Angular momentum decomposition of entangled photons with an arbitrary pump,” New J. Phys. 13, 053048 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Full-Field Quantum Correlations of Spatially Entangled Photons,

    V . D. Salakhutdinov, E. R. Eliel, and W. L ¨offler, “Full-Field Quantum Correlations of Spatially Entangled Photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 173604 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Efficient heralding of polarization- entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous para- metric down conversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,

    F. Steinlechner, M. Gilaberte, M. Jofre, T. Scheidl, J. P. Torres, V . Pruneri, and R. Ursin, “Efficient heralding of polarization- entangled photons from type-0 and type-II spontaneous para- metric down conversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 2068 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Robust, high brightness, degener- ate entangled photon source at room temperature,

    M. Jabir and G. Samanta, “Robust, high brightness, degener- ate entangled photon source at room temperature,” Sci. Rep. 7, 12613 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Ultra- bright fiber-coupled ploarization-entangled photon source with spectral brightness surpassing 2.0 mhz/mw/nm,

    K. Park, J. Lee, D.-G. Im, D. Kim, and Y . S. Ihn, “Ultra- bright fiber-coupled ploarization-entangled photon source with spectral brightness surpassing 2.0 mhz/mw/nm,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15620 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    An entanglement-based wavelength-multiplexed quan- tum communication network,

    S. Wengerowsky, S. K. Joshi, F. Steinlecher, H. Hubel, and R. Ursin, “An entanglement-based wavelength-multiplexed quan- tum communication network,” Nature 564, 225 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Kim, Noise-resistant quantum communica- tions using hyperentanglement,

    J.-H. Kim, Y . Kim, D.-G. Im, C.-H. Lee, J.-W. Chae, G. Scar- celli, and Y .-H. “Kim, Noise-resistant quantum communica- tions using hyperentanglement,” Optica 8, 1524 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Duality between partial coherence and partial entangle- ment,

    B. E. A. Saleh, A. F. Abouraddy, A. V . Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, “Duality between partial coherence and partial entangle- ment,” Phys. Rev. A62, 043816 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    Justify- ing the thin-crystal approximation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion for collinear phase matching,

    B. Baghdasaryan, F. Steinlechner, and S. Fritzsche, “Justify- ing the thin-crystal approximation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion for collinear phase matching,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 063508 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Quantum Entanglement of High Angular Momenta,

    R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, W.N. Plick, M. Krenn, C. Schaeff, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, “Quantum Entanglement of High Angular Momenta,” Science 338, 640 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Explicit an- alytical expressions for the electromagnetic field components of typical structured light beams,

    P. Song, Z. Cui, Y . Hui, J. Wang, and Y . Han, “Explicit an- alytical expressions for the electromagnetic field components of typical structured light beams,” J. Quant. Spectros. Radiat. Transfer 241, 106715 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Role of beam waist in Laguerre–Gauss expansion of vortex beams,

    G. Vallone, “Role of beam waist in Laguerre–Gauss expansion of vortex beams,” Opt. Lett. 42, 1097 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Hua, et al., Annual-ring-type quasi-phase-matching crys- tal for generation of narrowband high-dimensional entangle- ment, Phys

    Y .-L. Hua, et al., Annual-ring-type quasi-phase-matching crys- tal for generation of narrowband high-dimensional entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013836 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Bandwidth control of the bipho- ton wavefunction exploiting spatiotemporal correlations,

    J. M. Varga, J. Lasa-Alonso, M. Molezuelas-Ferreras, N. Tis- chler, and G. Molina-Terriza, “Bandwidth control of the bipho- ton wavefunction exploiting spatiotemporal correlations,” Opt. Commun. 504, 127461 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    The pro- duction of multiringed Laguerre-Gaussian modes by computer- generated holograms,

    J. Arlt, K. Dholakia, L. Allen and M. J. padgett, “The pro- duction of multiringed Laguerre-Gaussian modes by computer- generated holograms,” J. Mod. Opt. 45, 1231 (1998)

    1998

  42. [50]

    Divergence of an orbital-angular momentum- carrying beam upon propagation,

    M. J. Padgett, F. M. Miatto, M. P. J. Lavery, A. Zeilinger, and R. W. Boyd, “Divergence of an orbital-angular momentum- carrying beam upon propagation,” New J. Phys. 17, 023011 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Analysis of the Spatial Properties of Correlated Photon in Collinear Phase Matching,

    L. Yin, J. Li, W. Zhai, M. Xia, Y . Hu, X. Zheng, “Analysis of the Spatial Properties of Correlated Photon in Collinear Phase Matching,” Photonics 8, 12 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Some integrals of the products of Laguerre polynomials,

    L. Poh-aun, S. Ong, and H. M. Srivastave, “Some integrals of the products of Laguerre polynomials,” Int. J. Comput. Math. 78, 303 (2001). 14

    2001

  45. [53]

    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127903 (2004)

    2004

  46. [54]

    Enhanc- ing the purity of single photons in parametric down-conversion through simultaneous pump-beam and crystal-domain engi- neering,

    B. Baghdasaryan, F. Steinlechner, and S. Fritzsche, “Enhanc- ing the purity of single photons in parametric down-conversion through simultaneous pump-beam and crystal-domain engi- neering,” Phys. Rev. A108, 023718 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Coherent manipulation of a three- dimensional maximally entangled state,

    S. Liu, Z. Zhou, S. Liu, Y . Li, Y . Li, C. Yang, Z. Xu, Z. Liu, G. Guo, and B. Shi, “Coherent manipulation of a three- dimensional maximally entangled state,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 062316 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    High- dimensional maximally entangled photon pairs in parametric down-conversion,

    R. Bernecker, B. Baghdasaryan, and S. Fritzsche, “High- dimensional maximally entangled photon pairs in parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A110, 033718 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.