Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 126 references

The paper claims that a holographically driven black hole horizon becomes a turbulent surface with fractal dimension D≈2.65, the first such estimate from full nonlinear evolution.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 09:59 UTC pith:ZZCGG2FM

load-bearing objection A genuinely new numerical experiment with a useful Bondi–Sachs scheme, but the headline fractal dimension is measured in a gauge-dependent way the authors concede, so treat the number as provisional. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.12198 v2 pith:ZZCGG2FM submitted 2025-10-14 hep-th gr-qc

Holographic Turbulence and Numerical Estimate of the Fractal Dimension of the Turbulent Horizon

Jia Du , Yu Tian , Hongbao Zhang This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords holographic turbulenceAdS/CFTBondi-Sachs formalismfractal dimensioninverse energy cascadecompressible turbulenceblack hole horizonnumerical relativity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that a black hole horizon driven by a scalar source in a holographic spacetime becomes a genuinely turbulent surface, with a fractal dimension D≈2.65±0.02 and a boundary energy spectrum E(k)∼k^{−1.79±0.03}. This is the first estimate of the horizon fractal dimension obtained from fully nonlinear, driven black hole dynamics, and its agreement with earlier boundary-fluid simulations points toward a universal rough-geometry signature of turbulence. The deviation from the classical −5/3 scaling is attributed to the compressible character of the flow produced by scalar driving, and the cascade exponents match those seen in weakly coupled compressible two-dimensional fluid simulations. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as evidence that holography gives a concrete working definition of turbulent horizon roughness and a practical numerical route to measure it.

Core claim

The authors start from a static planar anti-de Sitter black hole and turn on a massive scalar field at the boundary whose value is updated by random, periodic white noise. Solving the full nonlinear gravitational-scalar system in a null-hypersurface gauge, they drive the boundary fluid into a quasi-steady two-dimensional turbulent state with an inverse energy cascade. Time-averaged fits over v=4000–10000 give E(k)∼k^{−1.79±0.03} in k∈(10,65); a Helmholtz decomposition yields compressible and incompressible components scaling as k^{−1.80±0.03} and k^{−1.99±0.03}, with the compressible part dominating. On the gravity side, the apparent horizon location z_H(v,x,y) is rough; applying the madogra

What carries the argument

The Bondi-Sachs null-foliation of the four-dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetime: on each ingoing-null hypersurface the field equations reduce to nested radial integrations, and the two evolution equations for the shear modes B and C are decoupled by a field redefinition and an SO(2) rotation whose angle is K=∫ dz ∂_z B sinh C. This makes the radial operators time-independent, so spectral evolution can be accelerated on GPUs. The fractal dimension is then read off the apparent horizon with the madogram γ_1(r)=½⟨|z_H(x+r)−z_H(x)|⟩, using the scaling γ_1∝r^{2−D} and D=D_transect+1.

Load-bearing premise

The results presume that v∈[4000,10000] is a statistically stationary turbulent window, but with no large-scale friction the system is still transferring energy to the largest scales, so the fitted exponents and D may be time-dependent; the authors also note that the horizon location z_H is coordinate-dependent.

What would settle it

Repeat the same driving protocol with explicit large-scale drag or with a much longer run and re-fit the spectrum in successive windows: if the exponent drifts outside ±0.03 or D moves beyond ±0.02, the quoted values are transient. Alternatively, recompute D from a covariant intrinsic horizon quantity instead of the coordinate surface z=z_H: a significant change would mark the number as a gauge artifact.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The horizon's fractal dimension can be extracted from a direct, fully nonlinear bulk evolution, not only from boundary-fluid perturbation theory.
  • Scalar (compressible) driving yields a total cascade steeper than the classical −5/3 scaling, consistent with weakly coupled compressible fluid simulations.
  • The measured D≈2.65 is compatible with the earlier boundary-fluid result, reinforcing the idea of a universal fractal dimension for turbulent horizons.
  • The decoupled Bondi-Sachs scheme widens the accessible inertial range for holographic turbulence at moderate computational cost.
  • At higher resolution below the driving scale, the incompressible branch near k^{−2} should become visible and should give a second, slightly smaller fractal dimension.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If D≈2.65 is an invariant property of the turbulent horizon, then horizon fluctuations carry a roughness signature that could in principle be probed through horizon-membrane observables in the dual plasma.
  • A decisive test is to switch to a divergence-free driving protocol: the paper's incompressible exponent near −2 predicts the fractal dimension should drop toward ≈2.58, distinguishing forcing-dependent roughness from a universal number.
  • Because z_H is coordinate-dependent, recomputing the dimension from a covariant intrinsic horizon quantity would show whether D is a geometric property or a gauge artifact.
  • The quoted exponents are averaged over a window before energy condensation; rerunning with large-scale friction or a longer averaging window would test whether −1.79 and 2.65 are true steady-state values.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs driven, fully nonlinear turbulent black holes in asymptotically AdS4 by solving the Einstein-scalar system in a Bondi–Sachs null foliation, with a random boundary scalar source serving as the external driving force. It reports an inverse energy cascade in the dual (2+1)-dimensional compressible fluid, a time-averaged total energy spectrum E(k) ~ k^{-1.79±0.03} in an inertial range k∈(10,65), compressible and incompressible components scaling as k^{-1.80±0.03} and k^{-1.99±0.03}, and a horizon fractal dimension D=2.65±0.02 obtained from the madogram of the apparent-horizon location z_H(v,x,y). The authors claim this is the first estimate of the fractal dimension from fully nonlinear driven black-hole dynamics and note agreement with the boundary-fluid result of Ref. [49].

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it provides a first fully nonlinear, driven-evolution estimate of a turbulent horizon's fractal character, going beyond earlier derivative-expansion and force-free constructions, and it connects a bulk geometric measurement to a boundary spectral exponent. The paper also contains a useful technical contribution: a Bondi–Sachs scheme in which the evolution equations for the spatial metric are decoupled through an SO(2) rotation, allowing efficient GPU-based evolution. The numerical setup is described in unusual detail in Appendices A and B, and the reported exponents are given with time-averaging uncertainties. However, the central quantitative claims currently rest on a short inertial range and on a coordinate-dependent definition of the horizon's fractal dimension, both of which the manuscript itself partially acknowledges.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.B, Figs. 6–7; App. B1] The inertial range used for the power-law fits is k∈(10,65), a factor of only 6.5 (about 0.8 decades), with the driving scale at kf≈100 and the grid resolution quoted only as '330 or 512 Fourier modes' in each spatial direction. No convergence or resolution study is reported (no variation of Nx, Ny, Nz, or δv; no comparison of results between 330 and 512 modes; no estimate of discretization error). The fitted exponent −1.79±0.03 and the fractal dimension D=2.65±0.02 are therefore not robustly separated from systematic effects. The authors should provide a resolution test (at least two well-separated resolutions) and a discussion of whether the short range and the proximity of kf to the dissipation scale render the exponents fitting-range dependent.
  2. [Sec. V and Sec. VI] The headline claim D≈2.65 is a 'fractal dimension of the turbulent black hole,' but the measurement is made on the graph z_H(v,x,y), the location of the apparent horizon in a particular Bondi–Sachs areal-radius gauge. The manuscript itself states in Sec. VI that 'since the fractal dimension of the turbulent black hole is a geometric quantity, its definition should be covariantly defined and be further investigated.' This is an admission that the present number has not been shown to be a geometric invariant. Because residual gauge freedom in the Bondi–Sachs construction (radial redefinitions consistent with the areal condition, and spatial diffeomorphisms preserving the gauge conditions) changes the function z_H, the madogram and hence D can change. The agreement with Ref. [49] does not remove this concern, since that work also used a coordinate-based estimator. At minimum, the authors sh
  3. [Sec. IV.B, Figs. 5 and 7] The time average over v=4000–10000 is said to describe a quasi-steady turbulent state, but the system has no large-scale friction and the authors note that energy condensation will eventually occur. The mean kinetic energy in Fig. 5 appears to fluctuate but the paper does not demonstrate that the chosen window is stationary, e.g., by showing that the fitted exponent is stable under shifting the window, splitting the interval in half, or checking that the low-k energy content has saturated. Since the central exponents are obtained by averaging over this window, the possibility remains that the reported values are time-dependent transients of the inverse cascade rather than steady-state scaling exponents. A quantitative stationarity test should be added.
  4. [App. B2] The apparent horizon is located by solving the nonlinear elliptic equation (B15) with a Newton–Krylov method, but no numerical tests are reported for this solver: no convergence of the Newton iteration, no comparison of the horizon location with an independent method, and no sensitivity of the fractal dimension to the horizon-finding tolerance or to the interpolation procedure. Since D=2.65±0.02 is estimated from z_H, the accuracy of z_H directly affects the central claim. Please report at least a basic validation of the horizon solver (e.g., convergence of H under mesh refinement and residual reduction).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (17)] The definition of Π_C appears to contain a typo: the term −(1/2) f ∂_z B should likely be −(1/2) f ∂_z C, consistent with the structure of (16) and with S_ΠC in App. B3. Please check and correct.
  2. [Fig. 2 and Sec. III.B] The text says 'Serval profiles' (should be 'several'), and the figure would benefit from a legend identifying the fitted ranges and exponents. The k^{-5} range is mentioned in the text but not clearly discussed; a sentence on its origin and lifetime would help.
  3. [App. B1] The phrase '330 or 512 Fourier modes on each spatial xi direction' is ambiguous. Which resolution was used for the decaying runs and which for the driven runs? Please specify the actual grid for each simulation.
  4. [Sec. V] For the madogram estimate, please state the exact range of separations r used in the linear fit, the number of transects and time snapshots used in the average, and whether the x- and y-direction transects are averaged with equal weight. The current Fig. 10 refers only to a shaded range that is said to correspond to Fig. 8.
  5. [Refs.] Reference [50] is cited as a Springer book chapter; please give the full bibliographic details. Also correct 'GMRES' misspelled as 'GRMES' in App. B2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; D and the spectral exponents are independently measured numerical outputs of an unforced Einstein-scalar evolution.

full rationale

The paper's central results, E(k) ~ k^{-1.79} and D ≈ 2.65, are outputs of a direct numerical integration of the full nonlinear Einstein-scalar system. The driving parameters (A, k_f, n, Δv) are set in advance and are not fitted to reproduce the claimed exponents. The energy spectrum is computed separately from the boundary fluid velocity via Eq. (39), while the fractal dimension is estimated from the madogram of the apparent-horizon location z_H via Eqs. (47)-(48). Nothing in the paper defines D in terms of the spectral slope or vice versa; the asserted correspondence between D ≈ 2.65 and k^{-1.79} is an empirical result, not an algebraic consequence. Comparisons with Refs. [49] and [50] are external benchmarks rather than self-citations. The only self-citation, Ref. [67] for the Bondi-Sachs gauge, is a technical scheme adopted from prior work by two of the authors and is not load-bearing for the turbulence or fractal-dimension claims. The shared fitting range for the spectrum and the madogram in Sec. V is a scale-range selection within the inertial range, not a construction that forces D from E(k). The gauge-dependence caveat in Sec. VI concerns the physical interpretation of D as a geometric quantity and is a validity limitation, not a circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained: the numerical outputs are measurements, not fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the AdS/CFT dictionary, the Bondi–Sachs gauge choice, the scalar driving model, and the madogram estimator. The paper provides no code/data and only fitting-error bars, so these assumptions are not independently verified. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • Driving amplitude A = 0.02
    Chosen by hand (Sec. IV.A); no scan over forcing amplitude, so the reported exponents and D may depend on this value.
  • Number of driving modes n = 200
    Chosen; finite-mode white noise defines the forcing spectrum.
  • Injection wavenumber k_f = 100 ± 1
    Positioned near minimal numerical resolution to maximize inertial range; consequently scales below k_f are unresolved and a second (deeper) scaling branch cannot be checked (Sec. IV.A, V).
  • Driving update interval Δv = 20 δv
    Chosen to slowly vary the force; affects the compressible/incompressible partition.
  • Averaging window = v=4000–10000
    Time interval used for exponent and D averages; chosen from the apparent plateau in Fig. 5 and could bias results if the cascade is still developing.
  • Fitting range = k∈(10,65) for E, k∈(10,50) for E_i, k∈(10,65) for E_c; madogram range matching Fig. 8
    Inertial range selected after inspecting spectra; different ranges yield different exponents (Fig. 7 shows fluctuations), and only fitting uncertainties are quoted.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality: the numerical Einstein-scalar bulk in AdS4 is dual to a (2+1)-dimensional conformal fluid; fluid-gravity duality holds beyond the derivative expansion.
    The entire interpretation of the bulk solution in terms of boundary turbulence and the boundary stress tensor (A4)-(A13) rests on this. Invoked throughout, esp. Sec. I-II.
  • domain assumption The Bondi–Sachs metric (9) with det h_ij=1 and the chosen gauge conditions (8) can represent the dynamical black hole without coordinate singularities over the evolution.
    Sec. II.B-C; if this gauge cannot cover the trapped region without additional conditions, the evolution and horizon location would be invalid.
  • domain assumption The scalar field has m^2=−2/L^2 with standard holographic dictionary (ϕ1 source, ϕ2 vev), and no interactions; the boundary force term in eq. (33) is the physical driving.
    Sec. II.A and App. A; the claim that the driving is a scalar operator source rather than an artifact depends on this dictionary.
  • domain assumption The apparent horizon can be located by the elliptic equation (B15) and its height z_H(v,x,y) is a single-valued graph over the boundary coordinates.
    Sec. V, App. B2; the fractal dimension estimate uses transects of this graph; if the horizon ceases to be a graph (e.g., overhangs), D is undefined.
  • domain assumption The madogram estimator (47) with scaling γ1(r) ∝ r^{2−D}, applied to 1D transects with D = D_transect+1, gives the fractal dimension of the 2D horizon surface.
    Sec. V [49]; this assumes self-affine, isotropic roughness; the authors note a covariant definition is still needed.
  • ad hoc to paper Spectral discretization with 22 Chebyshev points in z and 330–512 Fourier modes in x,y, with dt=1/100, resolves the physical dynamics in the inertial range k=10–65.
    App. B1; no convergence study is reported, so this is an unverified numerical assumption.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21810 in / 17612 out tokens · 143030 ms · 2026-08-04T09:59:22.231575+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We numerically study two-dimensional turbulence driven by a scalar operator within the framework of the AdS/CFT correspondence, where the external driving source is used to sustain a quasi-steady turbulent state. We propose a simple and efficient evolution scheme within the Bondi-Sachs formalism. Applying this scheme to numerically solve the full nonlinear equations of motion, we obtain a turbulent black hole in asymptotically $\mathrm{AdS}_4$ spacetime. The inverse energy cascade and the corresponding energy spectrum of both decaying and driven dual turbulence are analyzed. The scalar driving leads to a compressible-energy-dominated flow, and the corresponding power law scaling, $E(k)\propto k^{-1.79}$, agrees well with previous simulations of two-dimensional turbulence in weakly coupled compressible fluids in fluid dynamics. This differs from the Kolmogorov $-5/3$ scaling law. Furthermore, we perform a direct numerical estimate of the fractal structure of the turbulent black hole, obtaining a fractal dimension $D\approx 2.65$, which suggests an interesting universality in the fractal dimension.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12198 by Hongbao Zhang, Jia Du, Yu Tian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic foliation of AdS4 spacetime. Initial data are given on the ingoing null hypersurfaces (blue dashed lines) at v0 and radial domain is chosen as hypersurfaces between z = const and the AdS boundary z = 0. The evolution re￾peatedly follows along the vector ∂v (red arrows) from one null hypersurfaces into a next one. a series of works based on it (see, e.g., [48, 68–72]), the affine gauge is chosen. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The vorticity field ω = ∂xuy −∂yux of the boundary fluid at v = 1000, 1400, 2000, 3000. The flow is transformed from an unstable shear flow to a homogenous and isotropic decaying turbulent flow where the inverse cascade is manifestly shown from the first row profiles. The stage at v = 1400 corresponds to the point where the velocity components ux and uy reach approximately the same magnitude of order. The … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean kinetic energy Etotal = 1 2L2 R d 2xρu 2 of the fluid and its ux and uy contributions from v = 0 to v = 10000. It shows that the shear flow transforms into turbulence by two stages: while the total kinetic energy E decreases, nonlinear instability triggers ux grows exponentially until it reaches the same level of uy (at v ≈ 1400) and then both ux and uy decay at a similar rate. fluid, since the observ… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vorticity field ω , velocity field component ux and the energy spectrum E (k) of the driven turbulence at v = 100, 1000, 5000, 10000. The vorticity field (top row) is manifestly homogeneous and isotropic. Vorticies grow from the driving scales kf to the largest scales around k = 10 which agree with the energy spectrum. The large scale structures observed in the velocity component ux (middle row) are simila… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean kinetic energy (40) of the driven turbulence. It is normalized by the value at v = 1 since they vanishes ini￾tially. It rapidly raises from a small value and then fluctuates around a nearly constant value. Shaded area shows the range used in the time average of the scaling powers. kf ⋍ 100 and δk = 1. This driving scale is selected near to the minimal numerical resolution, which enables us to maximize… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fitted scaling power law exponents in the inertial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A representative energy spectrum decomposed into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fractal structure of the apparent horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An averaged madogram for transections of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    First, consider of a family of null hypersurfaces de- scribed byv r, xi = constantand assumev, r≥0

    Numerical Scheme The Bondi-Sachs metric (9) is constructed by fixing the four gauge conditions (8) as following. First, consider of a family of null hypersurfaces de- scribed byv r, xi = constantand assumev, r≥0. Each parameterv r, xi characterizes the ingoing null rays on its hypersurface. In contrast to the literature where outgoing null rays are chosen...

  2. [2]

    It clearly demonstrates the fluid’s motion consists of many small clockwise (blue) and counterclockwise (red) vortices. And those vortices with the same rotation split and merge and gradually grow into bigger ones, conse- quently reducing the total number of vortices and indi- cating an obvious behavior of two dimensional turbulent inverse cascade. At lat...

    2000

  3. [3]

    WithB, C, ϕ, χknown, solve equations (12) forPi

  4. [4]

    WithB, C, χ, Pknown, solve equations (15) forξi

  5. [5]

    WithB, C, ϕ, χ, ξi known, solve equation (13) for f

  6. [6]

    And those exponents are smaller than−5/3, which is also observed in [38]

    Based on the growth of the total kinetic energy and the energy spectrum (see Figure 5 and Figure 6), a time average of the fitted scaling exponents is taken overv= 4000tov= 10000, yielding an energy spectrum scaling of E(k)∼k −1.79±0.03.(44) As shown in Figure 7, the fitted scaling power fluctuates around a constant level in the range ofk∈(10,65)at late t...

  7. [7]

    WithB, Cknown, integrate to getKfrom the def- inition (20)

  8. [8]

    The scaling law (46) for each component agrees well with the numerical experiments of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes compressible tur- bulence [50] within the rangek < kf

    A time averaged fitting power law fromv= 4000to v= 10000yields Ei ∼k −1.99±0.03, E c ∼k −1.80±0.03.(46) whereE i andE c are fitted in the rangek∈(10,50)and k∈(10,65)respectively. The scaling law (46) for each component agrees well with the numerical experiments of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes compressible tur- bulence [50] within the rangek < kf. In ...

  9. [9]

    Provide fieldsB, C, ϕand boundary valuesf3, ξi 3 at initial time slicev=v 0, and specifyϕ1,∂ vϕ1

  10. [10]

    WithB, C, ϕknown, solve equation (11) forχ

  11. [11]

    WithB, C, f3, ξi 3, ϕ1, ∂vϕ1 known, obtain∂vf3, ∂vξi 3 from equations (A11), (A12) and (A13)

  12. [12]

    With∂ vB, ∂vC, ∂vf3, ∂vξi 3 all known, integrate them to next time slicev=v 0 +δvby fourth order Runge-Kutta method

  13. [13]

    WithB, C, ϕ, χ, ξi, fknown, solve equation(25) for ∂vϕ

  14. [14]

    V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, The Fluid/Gravity Correspondence,http://arxiv. org/abs/1107.5780(2011), arXiv:1107.5780 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    WithB, C, ϕ, χ, ξi, f, Kknown, solve equations (21) for eΠB, eΠC

  16. [16]

    Transform eΠB and eΠC backtoΠ B andΠ C byequa- tions (19)

  17. [17]

    TransformΠ B andΠ C back to∂ vBand∂ vCby equations (18)

  18. [18]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Ad- vances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics2, 253 (1998)

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Ad- vances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics2, 253 (1998)

    1998

  19. [19]

    M. V. Raamsdonk, Black Hole Dynamics From Atmo- spheric Science, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 106 (2008), arXiv:0802.3224 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    The boundary conditions are all imposed on the confor- mal boundary as listed in (26), (27), (28), (29), (30), (31) and (32)

    Repeat the above process. The boundary conditions are all imposed on the confor- mal boundary as listed in (26), (27), (28), (29), (30), (31) and (32). We use spectral method [73, 94–99], typically using22Chebyshevpolynomialsonradialdirectionzand 330 or 512 Fourier modes on each spatialxi direction. The time evolution is performed with a fixed time-step δ...

  21. [21]

    Theapparenthorizonislocatedatwheretheexpansionof the congruence of outgoing null geodesics vanishes [100]

    Locate the Apparent Horizon We display our equations for deriving location of the apparent horizon and some numerical techniques here. Theapparenthorizonislocatedatwheretheexpansionof the congruence of outgoing null geodesics vanishes [100]. Suppose the null congruence is generated by the normal vector ka =µ∇ aΦ(B13) for some scalarΦ (xµ)andµ(x µ). Demand...

  22. [22]

    Explicit expression forS X We give the explicit expression appeared in equations (11), (12), (13) and (14) as follows, Sχ = 1 4 z h (∂zB)2 cosh2 C+ (∂ zC) 2 + (∂zϕ)2 i ,(B23) Spx =− ∂xχ z + 1 4 eB∂yB(∂zBsinh(2C)−2∂ zC) + 2eB∂yC∂ zBcosh(2C)(B24) +eB∂z∂yBsinh(2C)−2e B∂z∂yC+∂ xB∂zBcosh(2C)−2∂ xC∂ zBsinh(2C) −∂z∂xBcosh(2C) +∂ xB∂zB+ 2∂ xC∂ zC+ 2∂ xϕ∂zϕ−∂ z∂xB...

  23. [23]

    Osborne Reynolds, An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resis- tance in parallel channels, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London174, 935 (1883)

  24. [24]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, The Local Structure of Turbu- lence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers, Doklady Akademiia Nauk SSSR30, 301 (1941)

    1941

  25. [25]

    Obukhov, A.M., On the distribution of energy in the spectrum of turbulent flow, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR32, 22 (1941)

    1941

  26. [26]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, Dissipation of energy in the locally isotropicturbulence,ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyof London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 434, 15 (1941)

    1941

  27. [27]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number, Journal of Fluid Mechanics13, 82 (1962)

    1962

  28. [28]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial Ranges in Two-Dimensional Turbulence, The Physics of Fluids10, 1417 (1967)

    1967

  29. [29]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. D. Landau,Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics No. v. 6 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, England ; New York, 1987)

    1987

  30. [30]

    Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A

    U. Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Boffetta and R

    G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-Dimensional Tur- bulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics44, 427 (2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Policastro, D

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics2002, 043 (2002)

    2002

  33. [33]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, V. E. Hubeny, and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Grav- ity, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 045 (2008)

    2008

  34. [34]

    Baier, P

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, and M. A. Stephanov, Relativistic viscous hydrodynam- ics, conformal invariance, and holography, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 100 (2008), arXiv:0712.2451 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Rangamani, Gravity & Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity26, 224003 (2009), arXiv:0905.4352 [hep- th]

    M. Rangamani, Gravity & Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity26, 224003 (2009), arXiv:0905.4352 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Campoleoni, L

    A. Campoleoni, L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, P. Mar- ios Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, Two-dimensional flu- ids and their holographic duals, Nuclear Physics B946, 114692 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    V. E. Hubeny, The Fluid/Gravity Correspondence: 16 A new perspective on the Membrane Paradigm, Classical and Quantum Gravity28, 114007 (2011), arXiv:1011.4948 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity, International Jour- nal of Theoretical Physics38, 1113 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9711200

    arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    Gubser, I

    S. Gubser, I. Klebanov, and A. Polyakov, Gauge the- ory correlators from non-critical string theory, Physics Letters B428, 105 (1998)

    1998

  40. [40]

    Even beyond the fluid/gravity duality, some turbulent behaviors are also found in gravity

    and so on. Even beyond the fluid/gravity duality, some turbulent behaviors are also found in gravity. For instance, energy cascade in unstable AdS spacetimes [41], parametric resonant turbulent black holes [42] and tur- bulent modes in gravitational waves [43–47]. In the pioneering work of [48], it was realized that two- dimensional turbulent flows can em...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Bizoń and A

    P. Bizoń and A. Rostworowski, Weakly Turbulent In- stability of Anti–de Sitter Spacetime, Physical Review Letters107, 031102 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Lahiri, R. Loganayagam, and S. Minwalla, Large Rotating Ads Black Holes from Fluid Mechanics, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 054 (2008)

    2008

  43. [43]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, and S. R. Wadia, The Incompressible Non-Relativistic Navier-Stokes Equa- tion from Gravity, Journal of High Energy Physics 2009, 059 (2009)

    2009

  44. [44]

    Eling, I

    C. Eling, I. Fouxon, and Y. Oz, The Incompress- ible Navier-Stokes Equations From Black Hole Mem- brane Dynamics, Physics Letters B680, 496 (2009), arXiv:0905.3638 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Eling and Y

    C. Eling and Y. Oz, Relativistic CFT hydrodynamics from the membrane paradigm, Journal of High Energy Physics2010, 69 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Eling, I

    C. Eling, I. Fouxon, and Y. Oz, Gravity and a Ge- ometrization of Turbulence: An Intriguing Corre- spondence,http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2632(2010), arXiv:1004.2632 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Bredberg and A

    I. Bredberg and A. Strominger, Black Holes as Incom- pressible Fluids on the Sphere, Journal of High Energy Physics2012, 43 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    Fractal structure of the apparent horizonz H at v= 10000

    does not derive reasonable results and even is not re- liable in one dimensional curves embedded in Euclidean 10 Figure 9. Fractal structure of the apparent horizonz H at v= 10000. 10-2 10-1 r=L 10-4 .1(r);v=10000 D:2:65 driving Figure 10. An averaged madogram for transections ofz H atv= 10000.The range used to linear fit is shaded which corresponds to th...

  49. [49]

    Bhattacharyya, R

    S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla, S.Nampuri, S.P.Trivedi,andS.R.Wadia,ForcedFluid Dynamics from Gravity, Journal of High Energy Physics 2009, 018 (2009), arXiv:0806.0006 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Carrasco, L

    F. Carrasco, L. Lehner, R. C. Myers, O. Reula, and A. Singh, Turbulent flows for relativistic conformal flu- ids in 2 + 1 dimensions, Physical Review D86, 126006 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    R.-G. Cai, L. Li, Z.-Y. Nie, and Y.-L. Zhang, Holo- graphic Forced Fluid Dynamics in Non-Relativistic Limit, Nuclear Physics B864, 260 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    Ashok, Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity in Ar- bitrary Dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 138 (2014), arXiv:1309.6325 [hep-th]

    T. Ashok, Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity in Ar- bitrary Dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 138 (2014), arXiv:1309.6325 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    S. R. Green, F. Carrasco, and L. Lehner, Holographic Path to the Turbulent Side of Gravity, Physical Review X4, 011001 (2014)

    2014

  54. [54]

    Adams, N

    A. Adams, N. Benjamin, A. Moghaddam, and W. Mu- sial, Dynamical Spacetimes from Numerical Hydro- dynamics,http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2001(2014), arXiv:1411.2001 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    J. R. Westernacher-Schneider, L. Lehner, and Y. Oz, Scaling Relations in Two-Dimensional Relativistic Hy- drodynamic Turbulence, Journal of High Energy Physics2015, 1 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    J. R. Westernacher-Schneider and L. Lehner, Numerical Measurements of Scaling Relations in Two-Dimensional Conformal Fluid Turbulence, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 27 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Rozali, E

    M. Rozali, E. Sabag, and A. Yarom, Holographic Tur- bulence in a Large Number of Dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 65 (2018), arXiv:1707.08973 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Andrade, C

    T. Andrade, C. Pantelidou, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, Driven black holes: From Kolmogorov scaling to turbu- lent wakes,http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.00032(2019), arXiv:1912.00032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  59. [59]

    Waeber and A

    S. Waeber and A. Yarom, Stochastic gravity and turbu- lence, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 185 (2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    Y. Oz, S. Waeber, and A. Yarom, Holographic Turbulence From a Random Gravitational Potential, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 71 (2024), arXiv:2402.08471 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Bhattacharyya, V

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, R. Loganayagam, G. Mandal, S. Minwalla, T. Morita, M. Rangamani, and H. S. Reall, Local Fluid Dynamical Entropy from Grav- ity, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 055 (2008), arXiv:0803.2526 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Fouxon and Y

    I. Fouxon and Y. Oz, Conformal Field Theory as Mi- croscopic Dynamics of Incompressible Euler and Navier- Stokes Equations, Physical Review Letters101, 261602 (2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    Gundlach, T

    C. Gundlach, T. W. Baumgarte, and D. Hilditch, Sim- ulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates: II. Critical collapse of an axisymmetric scalar field, Physi- cal Review D110, 024019 (2024), arXiv:2404.15839 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, and L. Lehner, Turbulent Black Holes, Physical Review Letters114, 081101 (2015)

    2015

  65. [65]

    Galtier and S

    S. Galtier and S. V. Nazarenko, Turbulence of Weak Gravitational Waves in the Early Universe, Physical Re- view Letters119, 221101 (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    Galtier and S

    S. Galtier and S. V. Nazarenko, Direct Evidence of a Dual Cascade in Gravitational Wave Turbulence, Phys- ical Review Letters127, 131101 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Gay and S

    B. Gay and S. Galtier, Asymmetric Dual Cascade in Gravitational Wave Turbulence,https://www.ssrn. com/abstract=5129446(2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    S. Ma, L. Lehner, H. Yang, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Emergent Turbulence in Nonlinear Gravity,http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13294(2025), arXiv:2508.13294 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Krynicki, J

    H. Krynicki, J. Wu, and E. R. Most, Toward a Theory of Gravitational Wave Turbulence,http://arxiv.org/ abs/2509.19769(2025), arXiv:2509.19769 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Adams, P

    A. Adams, P. M. Chesler, and H. Liu, Holographic Tur- bulence, Physical Review Letters112, 151602 (2014)

    2014

  71. [71]

    J. R. Westernacher-Schneider, Fractal Dimension of Turbulent Black Holes, Physical Review D96, 104054 (2017)

    2017

  72. [72]

    A. G. Kritsuk, Energy Transfer and Spectra in Sim- ulations of Two-dimensional Compressible Turbulence (Springer International Publishing, 2019) pp. 61–70, arXiv:1802.08228 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Stability in gauged extended supergravity, Annals of Physics144, 249 (1982). 17

    1982

  74. [74]

    de Haro, K

    S. de Haro, K. Skenderis, and S. N. Solodukhin, Holo- graphic Reconstruction of Spacetime and Renormaliza- tion in the AdS/CFT Correspondence, Communications in Mathematical Physics217, 595 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0002230

    arXiv 2001

  75. [75]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, Thermodynamics of Asymptotically Locally AdS Spacetimes, Journal of High Energy Physics2005, 004 (2005), arXiv:hep- th/0505190

    arXiv 2005

  76. [76]

    Bondi, Gravitational Waves in General Relativity, Nature186, 535 (1960)

    H. Bondi, Gravitational Waves in General Relativity, Nature186, 535 (1960)

    1960

  77. [77]

    Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII

    R. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII. Waves in asymptotically flat space-time, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences270, 103 (1962)

    1962

  78. [78]

    Waves from axi-symmetric isolated system, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    H.Bondi, M.G.JulianVanderBurg,andA.W.Kenneth Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity, VII. Waves from axi-symmetric isolated system, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences269, 21 (1962)

    1962

  79. [79]

    Conserved quantities, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London

    Van der Burg, Gravitational waves in general relativity IX. Conserved quantities, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences294, 112 (1966)

    1966

  80. [80]

    Winicour, Characteristic Evolution and Matching, Living Reviews in Relativity15, 2 (2012)

    J. Winicour, Characteristic Evolution and Matching, Living Reviews in Relativity15, 2 (2012)

    2012

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.