REVIEW 1 cited by
A Central Engine for Cosmic Gamma-Ray Burst Sources
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
One of a family previously proposed ``central engines'' for cosmic gamma-ray burst sources (Klu\'zniak & Ruderman 1998) is considered in some detail. A steadily accreting $10^6$ Gauss magnetic white dwarf should ultimately collapse to a strongly differentially rotating, millisecond-rotation-period neutron star for a wide range of steady accretion rates and initial masses if the accreting white dwarf has an evolved O-Ne-Mg composition. A similar neutron star could also result from an initial C-O white dwarf but only for more constrained accretion rates. Because the collapsing white dwarf begins as a $\gamma=4/3$ polytrope, the final neutron star's spin-rate increases strongly with cylindrical radius. A stable wind-up of the neutron star's poloidal magnetic field then produces buoyant magnetic toroids which grow, break loose, rise, and partly penetrate the neutron star surface to form a transient, $B\approx 10^{17}$ G millisecond spin-period pulsar with a powerful pulsar wind (Usov 1992). This pulsar wind emission is then rapidly suppressed by the surface shear motion from the strong stellar differential rotation. This wind-up and transient pulsar formation can occur at other times on different cylinders and/or repeat on the same one, with (re-)wind up and surface penetration time scales hugely longer han the neutron star's millisecond spin period. In this way, differential rotation both opens and closes the doors which allow neutron star spin-energy to be emitted in powerful bursts of pulsar wind. Predictions of this model compare favorably to needed central engine properties of gamma-ray burst sources (total energy, duration, sub-burst fluctuations and time scales, variability among burst events, and baryon loading).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Duration of Gamma-Ray Bursts
GRB duration is shaped by the progenitor, the central engine, the emitter, and geometry, so short versus long duration is not a reliable direct indicator of what exploded or merged.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.