pith. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0211255 · v1 · submitted 2002-11-12 · 🌌 astro-ph

A Method of Correcting Near-Infrared Spectra for Telluric Absorption

classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords absorptionspectratelluricmethodnear-infraredcorrectingmedium-resolutionobtained
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present a method for correcting near-infrared medium-resolution spectra for telluric absorption. The method makes use of a spectrum of an A0V star, observed near in time and close in airmass to the target object, and a high-resolution model of Vega, to construct a telluric correction spectrum that is free of stellar absorption features. The technique was designed specifically to perform telluric corrections on spectra obtained with SpeX, a 0.8-5.5 micron, medium-resolution cross-dispersed spectrograph at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility, and uses the fact that for medium resolutions there exist spectral regions uncontaminated by atmospheric absorption lines. However, it is also applicable (in a somewhat modified form) to spectra obtained with other near-infrared spectrographs. An IDL-based code that carries out the procedures is available for downloading via the World Wide Web from the IRTF website.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gaia21bja: pre-main sequence star with quasi-periodic bursts

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Gaia21bja is identified as a pre-main sequence star with quasi-periodic bursts, showing spectral features and a 5.5-6 times higher accretion rate during outbursts that place it in the periodic category of outbursting YSOs.

  2. The Accretion Process on Protostars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews techniques for measuring protostellar accretion, analyzes methodological differences and caveats in comparing observations with simulations, and outlines next steps for a fuller picture.