REVIEW 2 cited by
Detection of non-Gaussianity in the WMAP 1-year data using spherical wavelets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A non-Gaussian detection in the WMAP 1-year data is reported. The detection has been found in the combined Q-V-W map proposed by the WMAP team (Komatsu et al. 2003) after applying a wavelet technique based on the Spherical Mexican Hat Wavelet (SMHW). The skewness and the kurtosis of the SMHW coefficients are calculated at different scales. A non-Gaussian signal is detected at scales of the SMHW around 4 deg (size in the sky of around 10 deg). The right tail probability of the detection is approx. 0.4%. In addition, a study of Gaussianity is performed in each hemisphere. The northern hemisphere is compatible with Gaussianity, whereas the southern one deviates from Gaussianity with a right tail probability of approx. 0.1%. Systematics, foregrounds and uncertainties in the estimation of the cosmological parameters are carefully studied in order to identify the possible source of non-Gaussianity. The detected deviation from Gaussianity is not found to be caused by systematic effects: 1) each one of the Q, V and W receivers shows the same non-Gaussianity pattern, and 2) several combinations of the different receivers at each frequency band do not show this non-Gaussian pattern. Similarly, galactic foregrounds show a negligible contribution to the non-Gaussian detection: non-Gaussianity is detected in all the WMAP maps and no frequency dependence is observed. Moreover, the expected foreground contribution to the combined WMAP map was added to CMB Gaussian simulations showing a behaviour compatible with the Gaussian model. Influence of uncertainties in the CMB power spectrum estimation are also quantified. Hence, possible intrinsic temperature fluctuations (like secondary anisotropies and primordial features) can not be rejected as the source of this non-Gaussian detection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The CMB Cold Spot under the lens II: Lensing signatures in polarization and cosmic texture footprints
Forecasts indicate Simons Observatory could reach 1.5-2.3 sigma sensitivity to sub-10 arcsecond lensing from a cosmic texture using temperature and polarization channels, with polarization boosting signal-to-noise by ...
-
Fr\'echet Vectors as sensitive tools for blind tests of CMB anomalies
Fréchet Vectors, built from Multipole Vectors, are more sensitive to CMB anisotropies, and Planck 2018 temperature maps show small tensions with a Gaussian and statistically isotropic sky.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.