REVIEW 6 cited by
The Nature of Galaxy Bias and Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We have used a combination of high resolution cosmological N-body simulations and semi-analytic modelling of galaxy formation to investigate the processes that determine the spatial distribution of galaxies in cold dark matter (CDM) models. The galaxy distribution depends sensitively on the efficiency with which galaxies form in halos of different mass. In small mass halos, galaxy formation is inhibited by the reheating of cooled gas by feedback processes, whereas in large mass halos, it is inhibited by the long cooling time of the gas. As a result, the mass-to-light ratio of halos has a deep minimum at the halo mass associated with L* galaxies. This leads to a scale dependent bias in the distribution of galaxies relative to the distribution of mass. On large scales, the bias in the galaxy distribution is related in a simple way to the bias in the distribution of massive halos. On small scales, the correlation function is determined by the interplay between various effects including the spatial exclusion of dark matter halos, the distribution function of the number of galaxies occupying a single dark matter halo and, to a lesser extent, dynamical friction. Remarkably, these processes conspire to produce a correlation function in a flat, Omega_0=0.3, CDM model that is close to a power-law over nearly four orders of magnitude in amplitude. This model agrees well with the correlation function of galaxies measured in the APM survey. On small scales, the model galaxies are less strongly clustered than the dark matter whereas on large scales, they trace the occupied halos. Our clustering predictions are robust to changes in the parameters of the galaxy formation model, provided only those models that match the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function are considered. (abridged)
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Web-Halo Model Peak-Background Split (WHM-PBS): halo bias as a distribution, not a number
Halo bias is derived as an environment-inherited probability distribution whose spread simultaneously produces halo stochasticity, EFT prior bands, and the measured bias–concentration inversion at M ≈ 1.7×10¹³ h⁻¹M☉.
-
Simulation-Based Priors for HI Bias from Halo Occupation Physics
A conditional normalizing flow learned from two simulation suites maps HI halo-occupation parameters to EFT bias parameters, producing correlated non-Gaussian priors that are much tighter than flat priors for 21 cm analyses.
-
Cosmological Constraints from Bias-Robust Wavelet Scattering Statistics for Stage-IV Galaxy Surveys
The paper develops R^wst, a bias-robust wavelet scattering statistic that delivers unbiased constraints on cosmological parameters and improves degeneracy breaking versus the two-point correlation function via simulat...
-
Fast and accurate Gaia-unWISE quasar mock catalogs from LPT and Eulerian bias
Generation of 100 full-sky quasar spectrophotometric mock catalogs using a hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme on Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory lightcone fields, calibrated to DESI data and includin...
-
Modeling Gravitational Wave Bias from 3D Power Spectra of Spectroscopic Surveys
Using mock gravitational wave catalogs built from the SDSS DR7 galaxy survey, the clustering bias of GW sources is most sensitive to host stellar mass, secondarily to star formation rate, and nearly insensitive to met...
-
The Gravitational Wave Bias Parameter from Angular Power Spectra: Bridging Between Galaxies and Binary Black Holes
The gravitational wave bias of mock binary black holes increases with the pivot mass of the assumed host galaxy mass selection, and can exceed the galaxy bias by up to about 30 percent only for steep host probability slopes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.