REVIEW 3 cited by
Accurate time-domain gravitational waveforms for extreme-mass-ratio binaries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The accuracy of time-domain solutions of the inhomogeneous Teukolsky equation is improved significantly. Comparing energy fluxes in gravitational waves with highly accurate frequency-domain results for circular equatorial orbits in Schwarzschild and Kerr, we find agreement to within 1% or better, which we believe can be even further improved. We apply our method to orbits for which frequency-domain calculations have a relative disadvantage, specifically high-eccentricity (elliptical and parabolic) "zoom-whirl" orbits, and find the energy fluxes, waveforms, and characteristic strain in gravitational waves.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Unified remnant models for aligned-spin, precessing, and eccentric binary black hole mergers
New analytic fits, gwModelRemS/P, predict remnant mass, spin, luminosity, and kick for black hole mergers from equal mass to q=1000, with a neural-flow model for precessing kicks.
-
Accurate models for recoil velocity distribution in black hole mergers with comparable to extreme mass-ratios and their astrophysical implications
New analytic, GPR, and normalizing-flow kick models for black-hole mergers trained from q=1 to q≈200, with cluster-retention consequences.
-
Consistency of spin effects between numerical relativity and perturbation theory for inspiraling comparable-mass black hole binaries
Adiabatic point-particle black hole perturbation theory reproduces numerical-relativity spin effects in comparable-mass inspirals to within ~1%, so only small spin-dependent post-adiabatic corrections are needed.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.