Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Testing the equivalence principle: why and how?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv gr-qc/9606080 v1 pith:2TZNIAPC submitted 1996-06-27 gr-qc

Thibault Damour This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords equivalenceprinciplerationaletestingtheoreticalchoiceclassescompeting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Part of the theoretical motivation for improving the present level of testing of the equivalence principle is reviewed. The general rationale for optimizing the choice of pairs of materials to be tested is presented. One introduces a simplified rationale based on a trichotomy of competing classes of theoretical models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Regular black hole solutions in $(2 + 1)$-dimensional $f(R,T)$ gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New families of regular black hole solutions are derived in (2+1)-dimensional f(R,T) gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics, generalizing earlier results and showing that energy-momentum is not conserved.

Pith tools