Is the Zee model neutrino mass matrix ruled out?
read the original abstract
A very economic model of generating small neutrino masses is the Zee model. This model has been studied extensively in the literature with most of the studies concentrated on the simplest version of the model where all diagonal entries in the mass matrix are zero. SNO, and KamLAND data disfavor this simple version, but only when one also combines information from atmospheric and K2K data, can one rule out this model with high confidence level. We show that the simplest version of Zee model is ruled out at $3\sigma$ level. The original Zee model, however, contains more than enough freedom to satisfy constraints from data. We propose a new form of mass matrix by naturalness consideration. This new form of mass matrix predicts that $m_{\nu_3} = 0$, and $\tan^2\theta_{solar}$ increases with $|V_{e3}|$. For the best fit value of $\tan^2\theta_{solar}$, $|V_{e3}|$ is sizeable but below the upper bound.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Zee models with a non-invertible $Z_M$ symmetry
Zee models are classified under non-invertible Z_M symmetries; viable candidates are identified from data consistency, and a Z_7 benchmark yields numerical predictions for neutrino parameters and CLFV rates.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.