REVIEW 2 cited by
Phenomenology of Power Corrections in Fragmentation Processes in e^+ e^- Annihilation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We analyse power corrections to longitudinal and transverse fragmentation processes in e^+ e^- annihilation, based on the assumption of ultraviolet dominance of power corrections. Under this assumption, we determine the dependence of power corrections on the scaling variable x from the infrared renormalon asymptotics of leading power coefficient functions. Our results suggest that the longitudinal and transverse gluon fragmentation coefficient functions receive corrections of order 1/(x Q)^2. The power expansion breaks down at x<\Lambda/Q and has to be resummed. This resummation leads to 1/Q corrections to the longitudinal and transverse cross section, which cancel for the total cross section. We provide a simple parametrization of the x dependence of 1/Q^2 corrections to fragmentation processes and investigate perturbative corrections to the longitudinal cross section in higher orders, in view of a determination of the strong coupling.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Anomalous scaling of linear power corrections
For thrust, C-parameter, and energy correlators, the 1/Q hadronization correction is multiplied by R(Q) = (alpha_s(Q)/alpha_s(mu_np))^{C_A S_1/beta_0} with S_1 = 8(1-ln2), an all-order exponential derived under the li...
-
Power corrections in the determination of heavy meson LCDAs: A renormalon-based estimation
Using the renormalon model, the paper estimates that power corrections to the QCD-to-HQET light-cone distribution amplitude matching are around 22% for the D meson and 7% for the B meson in the peak region.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.