Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Boundary form factors of the sinh-Gordon model with Dirichlet boundary conditions at the self-dual point

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-th/0606269 v2 pith:N6ZM5IZ4 submitted 2006-06-28 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords boundaryformfactorssinh-gordonmodeldirichletfieldsparticular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this manuscript we present a detailed investigation of the form factors of boundary fields of the sinh-Gordon model with a particular type of Dirichlet boundary condition, corresponding to zero value of the sinh-Gordon field at the boundary, at the self-dual point. We follow for this the boundary form factor program recently proposed by Z. Bajnok, L. Palla and G. Takaks in hep-th/0603171, extending the analysis of the boundary sinh-Gordon model initiated there. The main result of the paper is a conjecture for the structure of all n-particle form factors of two particular boundary operators in terms of elementary symmetric polynomials in certain functions of the rapidity variables. In addition, form factors of boundary "descendant" fields have been constructed

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Boundary Quantum Field Theories Perturbed by ${\rm T}\bar{\rm T}$: Towards a Form Factor Program

    hep-th 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper constructs deformed boundary minimal form factors for T anti-T perturbed theories and rewrites the sinh-Gordon Dirichlet minimal form factor in the same block form, but the central solution formula has a sign error.

Pith tools