REVIEW 3 cited by
One-Loop Self-Dual and N=4 Super Yang-Mills
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We conjecture a simple relationship between the one-loop maximally helicity violating gluon amplitudes of ordinary QCD (all helicities identical) and those of N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills (all but two helicities identical). Because the amplitudes in self-dual Yang Mills have been shown to be the same as the maximally helicity violating ones in QCD, this conjecture implies that they are also related to the maximally helicity violating ones of N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills. We have an explicit proof of the relation up to the six-point amplitude; for amplitudes with more external legs, it remains a conjecture. A similar conjecture relates amplitudes in self-dual gravity to maximally helicity violating N=8 supergravity amplitudes.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An adaptive inverse-problem framework for one-loop five-gluon BCJ numerators
The complete 207-dimensional family of one-loop five-gluon BCJ numerator coefficients is reconstructed exactly, and every direction in that family is shown to be invisible to the specified color-ring observable.
-
Color-factor symmetry using perturbiner methods for tree-level amplitudes of Yang-Mills theory coupled to matter
Perturbiner recursion proves color-factor symmetry (hence BCJ relations) for all tree-level YM+matter amplitudes with at least one gluon.
-
Pure connection formalism and Plebanski's second heavenly equation
A pure-connection derivation yields Plebanski's second heavenly equation on flat and constant-curvature backgrounds, packaged in a compact covariant form with a new interpretation of the self-dual Yang-Mills kinematic...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.