No saturation of the quantum Bogomolnyi bound by two-dimensional supersymmetric solitons
read the original abstract
We reanalyse the question whether the quantum Bogomolnyi bound is saturated in the two-dimensional supersymmetric kink and sine-Gordon models. Our starting point is the usual expression for the one-loop correction to the mass of a soliton in terms of sums over zero-point energies. To regulate these sums, most authors put the system in a box with suitable boundary conditions, and impose an ultraviolet cut-off. We distinguish between an energy cut-off and a mode number cut-off, and show that they lead to different results. We claim that only the mode cut-off yields correct results, and only if one considers exactly the same number of bosonic and fermionic modes in the total sum over bound-state and zero-point energies. To substantiate this claim, we show that in the sine-Gordon model only the mode cut-off yields a result for the quantum soliton mass that is consistent with the exact result for the spectrum as obtained by Dashen et al. from quantising the so-called breather solution. In the supersymmetric case, our conclusion is that contrary to previous claims the quantum Bogomolnyi bound is not saturated in any of the two-dimensional models considered.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Krakow Lectures on Scalar Quantum Solitons
The paper presents Linearized Soliton Perturbation Theory (LSPT) as a new Hamiltonian tool for constructing quantum soliton states and computing their perturbative corrections and scattering.
-
Constructing Quantum Soliton States Despite Zero Modes
Imposing zero total momentum enables perturbative construction of the quantum ground state for solitons despite zero modes from broken translation invariance.
-
Scheme Dependence of the One-Loop Domain Wall Tension
New spectral and perturbation methods for one-loop domain wall tension agree with dimensional regularization when the renormalization scheme is the same.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.