Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0212066 v3 pith:57F76HFZ submitted 2002-12-11 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords basis-dependentdetectordetectorsdistributionprotocolquantumratesecurity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 10 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Experimental quantum cryptography with single photons and imperfect devices

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 20-minute BB84 run with a quantum-dot single-photon source yields ≈2.2×10^6 finite-size secure bits under a security proof that explicitly includes beamsplitter, detector-efficiency, dark-count, and multiphoton unce...

  2. Security proofs for practical QKD: variations, techniques, gaps, and limitations

    quant-ph 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical review of decoy-state BB84 security proofs identifies common gaps and shows that no current proof meets the full standard of completeness, modularity, and verifiability.

Pith tools