Pith Number
pith:MT3Z4VBZ
pith:2024:MT3Z4VBZSMW5P2OW2RIS6B67SB
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Does It Make Sense to Explain a Black Box With Another Black Box?
arxiv:2404.14943 v1 · 2024-04-23 · cs.CL · cs.LG
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{MT3Z4VBZSMW5P2OW2RIS6B67SB}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Cited by
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T08:11:12.337677Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
64f79e5439932dd7e9d6d4512f07df9077c6459af409dfea3b4a6e263e32c8c0
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/MT3Z4VBZSMW5P2OW2RIS6B67SB \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 64f79e5439932dd7e9d6d4512f07df9077c6459af409dfea3b4a6e263e32c8c0
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "3ab144e149caaa81fe3c4180cfab181d7b1e5e359eae6651bc37c267d2127227",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"cs.LG"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2024-04-23T11:40:30Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "732dc37b5028172a41244e0bec2ca6282a7a7651b26716db30d8fe84080fc0f3"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2404.14943",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}