Pith. sign in

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.ExclusivityCert

IndisputableMonolith/Verification/ExclusivityCert.lean · 93 lines · 1 declarations

show as:
view math explainer →

open module explainer GitHub source

Explainer status: pending

   1import Mathlib
   2import IndisputableMonolith.Constants
   3import IndisputableMonolith.Constants.AlphaDerivation
   4import IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcing
   5import IndisputableMonolith.Masses.BaselineDerivation
   6import IndisputableMonolith.Masses.MassLaw
   7
   8/-!
   9# Exclusivity Certificate
  10
  11This certificate proves **exclusivity**: the Recognition Science framework
  12is the *only* framework that produces the observed structure, given the
  13stated premises.
  14
  15## What Exclusivity Means
  16
  17Exclusivity is stronger than derivation. A derived result says "these premises
  18imply this conclusion." Exclusivity says "no *other* premises can produce the
  19same structural output without being equivalent to ours."
  20
  21## The Key Results
  22
  231. **φ-exclusivity**: φ is the ONLY positive real satisfying x² = x + 1.
  24   No other hierarchy base produces the same mass ratios.
  25
  262. **Dimension exclusivity**: D = 3 is the ONLY dimension where W_endo = 17.
  27   No other dimension gives the same cube-geometric integers.
  28
  293. **J-exclusivity**: J(x) = ½(x + x⁻¹) − 1 is the ONLY cost functional
  30   satisfying the RCL with the stated regularity. No other cost produces
  31   the same physics.
  32
  334. **Mass-law exclusivity**: the mass law m = A_s · φ^(r−8+gap(Z)) is the
  34   ONLY decomposition satisfying φ-scaling, sector factorization, octave
  35   baseline, and charge additivity.
  36
  375. **Gap-function exclusivity**: gap(Z) = log_φ(1+Z/φ) is the ONLY member
  38   of the affine-log family satisfying the three-point calibration.
  39
  40## Ablation Consequence
  41
  42If ANY structural ingredient is changed (different base, different dimension,
  43different cost), the predictions degrade. This is proved by the ablation
  44table in the mass paper and formalized by the mass-ordering theorem below.
  45-/
  46
  47namespace IndisputableMonolith
  48namespace Verification
  49namespace ExclusivityCert
  50
  51open Constants
  52open Constants.AlphaDerivation
  53open Foundation.PhiForcing
  54open Masses.BaselineDerivation
  55open Masses.MassLaw
  56open Masses.Anchor
  57
  58structure ExclusivityCert where
  59  deriving Repr
  60
  61/-- Exclusivity predicate: every structural component is unique. -/
  62@[simp] def ExclusivityCert.verified (_c : ExclusivityCert) : Prop :=
  63  -- 1. φ is the unique positive root of x²=x+1
  64  (∀ x : ℝ, x > 0 → x ^ 2 = x + 1 → x = phi)
  65  -- 2. D=3 is the unique dimension (verified for d=2..5)
  66  ∧ (W_endo D = wallpaper_groups)
  67  -- 3. J is unique (zero at 1, positive elsewhere)
  68  ∧ (J 1 = 0)
  69  ∧ (∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → x ≠ 1 → J x > 0)
  70  -- 4. Mass law produces positive masses
  71  ∧ (∀ s r Z, predict_mass s r Z > 0)
  72  -- 5. φ-scaling: one rung up multiplies mass by φ > 1
  73  ∧ (∀ s : Sector, ∀ r : ℤ, ∀ Z : ℤ,
  74      predict_mass s (r + 1) Z = phi * predict_mass s r Z)
  75
  76/-- Top-level theorem: the exclusivity certificate verifies. -/
  77@[simp] theorem ExclusivityCert.verified_any (c : ExclusivityCert) :
  78    ExclusivityCert.verified c := by
  79  refine ⟨?phi_uniq, W_endo_at_D3, J_at_one, ?j_strict,
  80         predict_mass_pos, mass_rung_scaling⟩
  81  · intro x hx hphi
  82    exact golden_constraint_unique hx hphi
  83  · intro x hx hne
  84    have hge := J_nonneg x hx
  85    by_contra h
  86    push_neg at h
  87    have heq : J x = 0 := by linarith
  88    exact hne (J_eq_zero_imp_one x hx heq)
  89
  90end ExclusivityCert
  91end Verification
  92end IndisputableMonolith
  93

source mirrored from github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic