Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PrimitiveRecognitionCalculus.PRCNativeCostStructuralLedger

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Structural ledger for the primitive recognition native cost: a cross-equivalence of displays is treated as equality of those displays, and a real character cost jq is recorded with its orbit, closed-form, and sign properties. Cost and gauge-orbit work cites this layer when the J-cost must sit on ratio orbits rather than abstract certificates. The module is definitional bookkeeping plus elementary algebraic identities, not a deep existence proof.

claimA cross-equivalence of displays is identified with equality of the corresponding display values. On that ledger one records a real character cost $j_q$ on ratio orbits, with $j_q(1)=0$, closed form, nonnegativity, and the usual zero/negative sign rules, together with the identification of the character cost with $j_q$.

background

Primitive Recognition Calculus (PRC) builds the native cost before the full forcing chain is invoked. Upstream sits the native-cost minimality certificate module, which supplies the certificate that the cost is minimal among admissible recognition functionals. Here the ledger is structural: displays and their cross-relations are the raw data, and a cross-equivalence is read simply as equality of displays rather than as a separate quotient construction.

The main object introduced is the real character cost $j_q$ (siblings: orbit restriction, cost-from-character identification, and the elementary facts $j_q(1)=0$, closed form, nonnegativity, and sign/zero rules). In Recognition Science this is the same family as the T5 J-cost $J(x)=(x+x^{-1})/2-1$, specialized to the character/ratio-orbit setting used by the native cost. The module therefore sits between abstract minimality and concrete gauge-orbit calculus.

proof idea

Definition module with elementary algebraic lemmas, not a single deep theorem. Cross-display equivalence is packaged as display equality; $j_q$ is defined (or identified) on ratio orbits and tied to the character cost. The remaining declarations are short facts: value at one, closed form, nonnegativity, and the zero/negative cases. Expect direct unfolding, rewriting along the orbit, and standard real inequalities rather than a multi-step forcing argument.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Feeds the cost-side gauge-orbit development: Cost.GaugeOrbitFromRealCharacter imports this ledger so that gauge orbits can be read from a real character whose cost is already native and structurally normalized. Without the cross-display equality convention and the $j_q$ package, orbit arguments would still talk in certificates rather than in display equalities and explicit character costs.

In the broader framework this is bookkeeping under the Recognition Composition Law and T5 J-uniqueness: the same $J$-shape appears as $j_q$ on ratio orbits, ready for gauge and cost modules downstream. It does not itself force $\varphi$, the eight-tick octave, or $D=3$; it only makes the native cost legible to those later steps.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (104)

… and 24 more