Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.ScaleHomogeneityNoGo

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Scale-homogeneity no-go for selectors on a positive-real scale action: any selector that is jointly scale-invariant cannot force a unique value, while the natural forcing selector fails joint scale invariance. Physicists citing uniqueness of the RS cost or fixed point use this to rule out pure scale-homogeneous selection. The module packages the action laws, invariance predicates, contrasting selectors, and a certificate recording the dichotomy.

claimOn a carrier $X$ with a positive-real scaling action $\lambda\cdot x$ obeying the usual action laws, no jointly scale-invariant selector forces a unique value; the forcing selector is not jointly scale-invariant, while the positivity selector is jointly scale-invariant yet does not force a value.

background

Recognition Science forces its cost and fixed point from structural axioms rather than free parameters. A recurring obstruction is pure scale homogeneity: if a selection rule is invariant under simultaneous rescaling of all positive-real data, it cannot pin down a unique numerical value.

This module formalizes a positive-real scaling action on a carrier $X$, with action laws written so instances cannot hide state-dependent rescaling. It defines scale invariance of a single map and joint scale invariance of a selector, then introduces two contrasting selectors: a forcing selector that would pick a unique value, and a positivity selector that only retains the positive cone.

The local setting is foundational (pre-physics): the no-go is combinatorial and algebraic, not dynamical. It sits upstream of uniqueness arguments for the $J$-cost and the self-similar fixed point $\varphi$ in the forcing chain.

proof idea

The module is theorem-bearing, not a pure definition dump. It first records the scale-action structure and the two invariance predicates. It then proves the dichotomy in two directions: (i) any jointly scale-invariant selector fails to force a unique value; (ii) the forcing selector is not jointly scale-invariant. A separate positivity selector is shown to be jointly scale-invariant yet non-forcing, supplying a concrete witness that invariance and forcing pull apart. A certificate structure packages the pair of facts for downstream consumption. Arguments are direct equational and quantifier manipulations on the action laws; no analytic estimates.

why it matters in Recognition Science

The no-go blocks a natural escape from the RS forcing chain: one cannot obtain unique constants (cost shape, $\varphi$, octave period, dimension) by a purely scale-homogeneous selection rule on positive data. Downstream uniqueness results for $J$ (T5) and the self-similar fixed point $\varphi$ (T6) rely on breaking pure scale symmetry, typically via the Recognition Composition Law or normalization conventions. The certificate gives a reusable interface so later modules can cite the dichotomy without replaying the selector algebra. In the broader framework it explains why RS must introduce a non-homogeneous structure (composition law, discrete tick, or defect) rather than scaling alone.

scope and limits

declarations in this module (31)