Pith. sign in
module module high

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.FalsifierRegisterDatasets

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Shared dataset-attachment records for the Recognition Science falsifier register. Each row names an observational handle, a dimensionless sensitivity, an RS target scale, and a flag for whether the data already reach that scale. Downstream likelihood modules import these attachments to upgrade §7 falsifier rows into dataset-specific certificates. The module is pure data structure: no theorems, only typed records and positivity predicates.

claimA dataset attachment is a record $(name, sensitivity, rsTargetScale, units, currentlySensitive)$ for one falsifier-register row. Sensitivity and RS target scale are dimensionless unless $units$ says otherwise. The flag $currentlySensitive$ is true precisely when the named dataset can already probe the $\varphi$-suppressed RS target; otherwise the row is named but not yet decisive.

background

Recognition Science states sharp, often $\varphi$-suppressed targets for strong-field gravity, dark energy $w(z)$, ringdown/echoes, and pulsar-timing stochastic GW backgrounds. The falsifier register (§7) lists those targets against named observational programs. Before a likelihood certificate can be written, each row needs a stable handle: which dataset, what sensitivity, what RS scale, and whether the data already reach that scale.

This module supplies that handle type and the concrete attachments (BMV, Hawking temperature, leading-log entropy, Page curve, echoes, $\Omega_\Lambda$, dark-energy $w$, QNMs, PTA, and related rows). Two small predicates record that sensitivity and target scale are positive. Units default to dimensionless; the field units overrides when a dimensionful convention is required.

The design is deliberately honest about reach: several future rows set currentlySensitive := false, so the register names the experiment without claiming a present-day test of the $\varphi$-ladder prediction.

proof idea

This is a definition module, no proofs. It introduces the DatasetAttachment structure, positivity predicates on sensitivity and RS target scale, and a family of concrete attachment values (one per falsifier-register row). Downstream modules import the records and build likelihood-style certificates on top of them.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Every §7 likelihood upgrade in the Verification layer imports this module. Downstream consumers include Cassini strong-field, GRAVITY S2, EHT M87*, Planck/BAO/SNe dark-energy $w$, $\Omega_\Lambda$, GWTC-3 ringdown/echo/QNM status, EPTA DR2 PTA, and NANOGrav PTA attachments. Those modules are marked structural theorems (0 sorry, 0 RS-internal axiom) that turn bare register rows into dataset-specific certificates.

Without a shared attachment type, each likelihood module would re-encode dataset metadata ad hoc. Centralizing the records keeps the falsifier register uniform: same fields, same honesty about current sensitivity, same path from $\varphi$-suppressed target to observational handle. The module therefore sits under the verification spine rather than under the forcing chain (T0–T8); it does not derive constants, but it makes the empirical claims of RS checkable against named data.

scope and limits

used by (9)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

declarations in this module (37)