Pith. sign in
theorem

lambda_PDG_in_window

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.StandardModel.CKMExact
domain
StandardModel
line
223 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

The 2024 PDG Wolfenstein λ (taken as 0.2265) lies strictly between 0.222 and 0.232. Anyone comparing RS CKM predictions to experiment cites this window check. The proof unfolds the numeric definition and discharges both inequalities by norm_num.

Claim. Let $\lambda_{\mathrm{PDG}} := 0.2265$ be the PDG 2024 Wolfenstein parameter (identified with $|V_{us}|$). Then $0.222 < \lambda_{\mathrm{PDG}} < 0.232$.

background

The module CKMExact derives the Wolfenstein $A$ parameter from $Q_3$ geometry: Gray-code flip counts $(4,2,2)$, generation torsion gaps $\Delta\tau_{12}=11$ and $\Delta\tau_{23}=6$, and a face-flux correction $3/2$, yielding $A_{\mathrm{corrected}}=9/11\approx 0.818$ (PDG $0.826\pm 0.013$). The same $Q_3$ chirality ties into the 44-factor that appears in $\alpha^{-1}$ and $\eta_B$.

Wolfenstein $\lambda$ is the Cabibbo-scale mixing angle, experimentally $|V_{us}|\approx 0.2265$. In this file it is frozen as the real constant $0.2265$. A nearby claim records that the RS value (rooted in $\varphi^{-3}$) differs from this PDG figure by less than 6%, with a small geometric correction still pending.

The present theorem only certifies that the frozen PDG number sits in a fixed open interval used as a comparison window.

proof idea

One-line tactic proof. Unfold the definition $\lambda_{\mathrm{PDG}}=0.2265$, split the conjunction, and run norm_num on each strict inequality $0.222<0.2265$ and $0.2265<0.232$. No lemmas beyond the definition are required.

why it matters

Places the experimental Wolfenstein $\lambda$ inside a concrete numeric band so later RS-vs-PDG comparisons (the $<6%$ gap to the $\varphi^{-3}$ origin, and the $A=9/11$ match) can quote a proved window rather than a raw float. It sits in the CKMExact stack that already closes $A_{\mathrm{corrected}}=9/11$ from $Q_3$ face flux and generation torsion, linking CKM to the same 44-structure that governs $\alpha^{-1}$ and $\eta_B$. No downstream theorems depend on it yet; it is a local sanity gate for the PDG side of the comparison. It does not itself derive $\lambda$ from the forcing chain (T5–T8) or from RCL.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.