REVIEW 3 cited by
Boundary Terms, Variational Principles and Higher Derivative Modified Gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Boundary Terms, Variational Principles and Higher Derivative Modified Gravity
read the original abstract
We discuss the criteria that must be satisfied by a well-posed variational principle. We clarify the role of Gibbons-Hawking-York type boundary terms in the actions of higher derivative models of gravity, such as F(R) gravity, and argue that the correct boundary terms are the naive ones obtained though the correspondence with scalar-tensor theory, despite the fact that variations of normal derivatives of the metric must be fixed on the boundary. We show in the case of F(R) gravity that these boundary terms reproduce the correct ADM energy in the hamiltonian formalism, and the correct entropy for black holes in the semi-classical approximation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Ordering-Independent Wheeler-DeWitt Equation for Flat Minisuperspace Models
Path-integral measures determine operator orderings for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in flat minisuperspace models, with all consistent choices yielding identical physical observables via field redefinition Jacobians.
-
Canonical Clock Sectors and Relational Frame Equivalence in Brans--Dicke Theory
Apparent Jordan–Einstein inequivalence after relational deparametrization is a clock-sector mismatch; a frame-adapted canonical chart restores identical reduced Hamiltonians.
-
Gravitational wave constraints on corrections to Bekenstein-Hawking Area Formula in classical F(R) gravity and quantum GR : implications for theory parameters
Assuming an extra 'absolute consistency' rule, gravitational-wave validation of the area theorem forces negative entropy corrections, which restricts F(R) gravity and would rule out two axions or an axion plus a graviton.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.