REVIEW 1 cited by
Properties and use of CMB power spectrum likelihoods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Properties and use of CMB power spectrum likelihoods
read the original abstract
Fast robust methods for calculating likelihoods from CMB observations on small scales generally rely on approximations based on a set of power spectrum estimators and their covariances. We investigate the optimality of these approximation, how accurate the covariance needs to be, and how to estimate the covariance from simulations. For a simple case with azimuthal symmetry we compare optimality of hybrid pseudo-C_l CMB power spectrum estimators with the exact result, indicating that the loss of information is not negligible, but neither is it enough to have a large effect on standard parameter constraints. We then discuss the number of samples required to estimate the covariance from simulations, with and without a good analytic approximation, and assess the use of shrinkage estimators. Finally we discuss how to combine an approximate high-ell likelihood with a more exact low-ell harmonic-space likelihood as a practical method for accurate likelihood calculation on all scales.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SPT-3G D1: A Measurement of Secondary Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Power
SPT-3G's 2019–2020 spectra at ell=1700–11000 give D_tSZ=4.91±0.37 μK^2 and D_kSZ=1.75±0.86 μK^2 at ell=3000 (free-CIB model) and a 95% limit Δz_re<3.8 on the reionization duration.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.