Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reconstructing baryon oscillations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0909.1802 v1 pith:HVFJEH6S submitted 2009-09-09 astro-ph.CO

Reconstructing baryon oscillations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords reconstructionacousticbaryonbiasedconstrainingformalismmasspeak
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) method for constraining the expansion history is adversely affected by non-linear structure formation, which washes out the correlation function peak created at decoupling. To increase the constraining power of low z BAO experiments, it has been proposed that one use the observed distribution of galaxies to "reconstruct'' the acoustic peak. Recently Padmanabhan, White and Cohn provided an analytic formalism for understanding how reconstruction works within the context of Lagrangian perturbation theory. We extend that formalism to include the case of biased tracers of the mass and, because the quantitative validity of LPT is questionable, we investigate reconstruction in N-body simulations. We find that LPT does a good job of explaining the trends seen in simulations for both the mass and for biased tracers and comment upon the implications this has for reconstruction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars

    astro-ph.CO 2024-04 accept novelty 7.0

    DESI measures BAO scales in six redshift bins with 0.52% combined precision using 5.7 million objects, detecting the signal at up to 9.1 sigma and finding larger scales than Planck LCDM at z<0.8.

  2. Standard Reconstruction Shifts the Optimal Input Scale for CNN-Based Density-Field Reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Applying standard reconstruction before a CNN shifts the optimal input cube for z=10 density reconstruction from ~150-200 h^-1 Mpc to ~38-114 h^-1 Mpc, and a single post-reconstruction CNN beats dual-scale CNN inputs.